Final version before submission!

_thesis/0_Preface/0.1_Abstract.html

@@ -50,9 +50,15 @@ image:
 <!--  -->
 
 <!-- Main Page Body -->
-<p>Large systems of interacting objects can give rise to a rich array of emergent behaviours. Make those objects quantum and the possibilities only expand. Interacting quantum many-body systems, as such systems are called, include essentially all physical systems. Luckily, we don’t usually need to consider this full quantum many-body description. The world at the human scale is essentially classical (not quantum), while at the microscopic scale of condensed matter physics we can often get by without interactions. Some systems, however, do require the full description. These are known as strongly correlated materials. Some of the most exciting topics in modern condensed matter fall under this umbrella: the spin liquids, the fractional quantum Hall effect, high temperature superconductivity and much more. Unfortunately, strongly correlated materials are notoriously difficult to study, defying many of the established theoretical techniques within the field. Enter <em>exactly solvable models</em>, these are interacting quantum many-body systems with extensively many local symmetries. The symmetries give rise to conserved charges which essentially break the model up into many non-interacting quantum systems which are more amenable to standard theoretical techniques. This thesis will focus on two such exactly solvable models.</p>
+<!--300 word version in comments-->
-<p>The first, the Falicov-Kimball (FK) model is an exactly solvable limit of the famous Hubbard model which describes itinerant fermions interacting with a classical Ising background field. Originally introduced to explain metal-insulator transitions, it has a rich set of ground state and thermodynamic phases. Disorder or interactions can turn metals into insulators and the FK model features both transitions. We will define a generalised FK model in 1D with long-range interactions. This model which shows a similarly rich phase diagram to its higher dimensional cousins. We use an exact Markov Chain Monte Carlo method to map the phase diagram and compute the energy resolved localisation properties of the fermions. This allows us to look at how the move to 1D affects the physics of the model. We show that the model can be understood by comparison to a simpler model of fermions coupled to binary disorder.</p>
+<!-- Large systems of interacting quantum objects can give rise to a rich array of emergent behaviours. However this full description is notoriously difficult to use, defying many of the established theoretical techniques within the field. Luckily, we don't usually need to consider the full quantum many-body description. Strongly correlated materials (SCMs), however, do require the full description.  Enter exactly solvable models, these can model SCMs but are much more amenable to standard theoretical techniques. This thesis focuses on two such exactly solvable models.
-<p>The second, the Kitaev Honeycomb (KH) model, was the first solvable 2D model with a Quantum Spin Liquid (QSL) ground state. QSLs are generally expected to arise from Mott insulators when frustration prevents magnetic ordering all the way to zero temperature. The QSL state defies the traditional Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson paradigm of phases being defined by local order parameters. It is instead a topologically ordered phase. Recent work generalising non-interacting topological insulator phases to amorphous lattices raises the question of whether interacting phases like the QSLs can be similarly generalised. We extend the KH model to random lattices with fixed coordination number three generated by Voronoi partitions of the plane. We show that this model remains solvable and hosts a chiral amorphous QSL ground state. The presence of plaquettes with an odd number of sides leads to a spontaneous breaking of time reversal symmetry. We unearth a rich phase diagram displaying Abelian as well as a non-Abelian QSL phases with a remarkably simple ground state flux pattern. Furthermore, we show that the system undergoes a phase transition to a conducting thermal metal state and discuss possible experimental realisations.</p>
+
+The first, the Falicov-Kimball (FK) model is an exactly solvable limit of the famous Hubbard model which describes itinerant fermions interacting with a classical Ising background field. We will define a generalised FK model in 1D with long-range interactions. This model which shows a rich ground and thermodynamic phase diagram, similar to its higher dimensional cousins. We use an exact Markov Chain Monte Carlo method to map the phase diagram and compute the energy resolved localisation properties of the fermions. This allows us to look at how the move to 1D affects the physics of the model.
+
+The second, the Kitaev Honeycomb (KH) model, was the first solvable 2D model with a Quantum Spin Liquid (QSL) ground state. The QSL state defies the traditional Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson paradigm of local order parameters. It is instead a topologically ordered phase. We extend the KH model to random lattices, with fixed coordination number three, generated by Voronoi partitions of the plane. We show that this model remains solvable and hosts a chiral amorphous QSL ground state with spontaneous breaking of time reversal symmetry, a chiral spin liquid. We unearth a rich phase diagram displaying Abelian as well as a non-Abelian QSL phases. Furthermore, we show that the system undergoes a phase transition to a conducting thermal metal state. -->
+<p>Large systems of interacting objects can give rise to a rich array of emergent behaviours. Make those objects quantum and the possibilities only expand. Interacting quantum many-body systems, as such systems are called, include essentially all physical systems. Luckily, we don’t usually need to consider this full quantum many-body description. The world at the human scale is essentially classical (not quantum), while at the microscopic scale of condensed matter physics we can often get by without interactions. Strongly correlated materials, however, do require the full description. Some of the most exciting topics in modern condensed matter fall under this umbrella: the spin liquids, the fractional quantum Hall effect, high temperature superconductivity and much more. Unfortunately, strongly correlated materials are notoriously difficult to study, defying many of the established theoretical techniques within the field. Enter <em>exactly solvable models</em>, these are interacting quantum many-body systems with extensively many local symmetries. The symmetries give rise to conserved charges. These charges break the model up into many non-interacting quantum systems which are more amenable to standard theoretical techniques. This thesis will focus on two such exactly solvable models.</p>
+<p>The first, the Falicov-Kimball (FK) model is an exactly solvable limit of the famous Hubbard model which describes itinerant fermions interacting with a classical Ising background field. Originally introduced to explain metal-insulator transitions, it has a rich set of ground state and thermodynamic phases. Disorder or interactions can turn metals into insulators and the FK model features both transitions. We will define a generalised FK model in 1D with long-range interactions. This model shows a similarly rich phase diagram to its higher dimensional cousins. We use an exact Markov Chain Monte Carlo method to map the phase diagram and compute the energy resolved localisation properties of the fermions. This allows us to look at how the move to 1D affects the physics of the model. We show that the model can be understood by comparison to a simpler model of fermions coupled to binary disorder.</p>
+<p>The second, the Kitaev Honeycomb (KH) model, was the first solvable 2D model with a Quantum Spin Liquid (QSL) ground state. QSLs are generally expected to arise from Mott insulators, when frustration prevents magnetic ordering all the way to zero temperature. The QSL state defies the traditional Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson paradigm of phases being defined by local order parameters. It is instead a topologically ordered phase. Recent work generalising non-interacting topological insulator phases to amorphous lattices raises the question of whether interacting phases like the QSLs can be similarly generalised. We extend the KH model to random lattices with fixed coordination number three generated by Voronoi partitions of the plane. We show that this model remains solvable and hosts a chiral amorphous QSL ground state. The presence of plaquettes with an odd number of sides leads to a spontaneous breaking of time reversal symmetry. We unearth a rich phase diagram displaying Abelian as well as a non-Abelian QSL phases with a remarkably simple ground state flux pattern. Furthermore, we show that the system undergoes a phase transition to a conducting thermal metal state and discuss possible experimental realisations.</p>
 
 
 </main>

_thesis/0_Preface/0.2_Declarations.html

@@ -71,7 +71,8 @@ image:
 </section>
 <section id="copyright-declaration" class="level3">
 <h3>Copyright Declaration</h3>
-<p>The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Unless otherwise indicated, its contents are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC). Under this licence, you may copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. You may also create and distribute modified versions of the work. This is on the condition that: you credit the author and do not use it, or any derivative works, for a commercial purpose. When reusing or sharing this work, ensure you make the licence terms clear to others by naming the licence and linking to the licence text. Where a work has been adapted, you should indicate that the work has been changed and describe those changes. Please seek permission from the copyright holder for uses of this work that are not included in this licence or permitted under UK Copyright Law. \ https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7143205</p>
+<p>The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Unless otherwise indicated, its contents are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC). Under this licence, you may copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. You may also create and distribute modified versions of the work. This is on the condition that: you credit the author and do not use it, or any derivative works, for a commercial purpose. When reusing or sharing this work, ensure you make the licence terms clear to others by naming the licence and linking to the licence text. Where a work has been adapted, you should indicate that the work has been changed and describe those changes. Please seek permission from the copyright holder for uses of this work that are not included in this licence or permitted under UK Copyright Law.</p>
+<p>https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7143205</p>
 </section>
 
 

_thesis/0_Preface/0.3_Aknowledgements.html

@@ -50,35 +50,12 @@ image:
 <!--  -->
 
 <!-- Main Page Body -->
-<p>Acknowledgements here.</p>
+<p>I would like to thank my supervisor, Professor Johannes Knolle and co-supervisor Professor Derek Lee for guidance and support during this long process. Thanks also to Professors Kim Christensen and Dr Arnaud Czaja for pastoral support. To Angus MacKinnon and Matthew Foulkes for helpful discussions on physics. To all the administrative staff at Imperial, particularly Carolyn, Juraci, Ievgeniia and Loli, for their patience and support. To everyone at the Imperial Mental Health Service. To all the students in CMTH at Imperial and in the CMT group at TUM. Particularly to Gino, Josef and Krishnan for proofreading.</p>
-<!-- I would like to thank my supervisor, Professor Johannes Knolle and co-supervisor Professor Derek Lee for guidance and support during this long process. Thanks also to Professors Kim Christensen, Angus MacKinnon and Matthew Foulkes for helpful discussions.
+<p>To all the Research Computing and Data Science team at Imperial, Katerina, Jeremy, John, Liam and everyone else, you were a pleasure to work with.</p>
-
+<p>To Laura and Nina, for being there since the very beginning.</p>
-Dan Hdidouan for being an example of how to weather the stress of a PhD with grace and kindness.
+<p>To Dan Hdidouan for being an example of how to weather the stress of a PhD with grace and kindness. To Petchara, Hannah, Heloi and the rest of the Environmental Society. To Brian for your endless energy on our many calls while we were postgraduate reps. To Dan Simpson and Sophie Nadel, my favourite poetic collaborators.</p>
-
+<p>To all the gang from Munich, Mike, Claudi, Tobi, Toni, Thomas, Trang, Mine, Jianni, Anne and many others, you’re welcome at mine any time. To Julie and Kim, a piece of my heart will always be in the woods (and the container) with you both. To all my friends from London, particularly Shreya, Pushkar, Tom and Monty. To Lou, for keeping me sane during the great lockdown of spring ’20. To the staff of the Camberwell Public Library, where the first seeds of this thesis were written. To Tammi and Mr Jeffries, if it wasn’t for teachers like you, I doubt any of us would be here.</p>
-Arnaud for help and guidance...
+<p>To my family and to Anna, you already know how much I appreciate you.</p>
-
-Carolyn, Juraci, Ievgeniia and Loli for their patience and support.
-
-Nina del Ser 
-
-Brian Tam for his endless energy on our many many calls while we served as joint Postgraduate reps for the department.
-
-All the students in CMTH, Halvard, Tom, Chris, Krishnan, David, Tonny, Emanuele ... and particularly to  Thank you to the CMT group at TUM in Munich, Alex and Rohit.
-
-Gino, Peru and Willian for their collaboration on the Amorphous Kitaev model.
-
-Mr Jeffries who encouraged me to pursue physics
-
-All the gang from Munich, Toni, Mine, Mike, Claudi.
-
-Dan Simpson, the poet in residence at Imperial and one of my favourite collaborators during my time at Imperial.
-
-Lou Khalfaoui for keeping me sane during the lockdown of March 2022. Sophie Nadel, Julie Ketcher and Kim ??? for their graphic design expertise and patience.
-
-
-All the I-Stemm team, Katerina, Jeremey, John, ....
-
-And finally, I'd like the thank the staff of the Camberwell Public Library where the majority of this thesis was written.  -->
 
 
 </main>

_thesis/1_Introduction/1_Intro.html

@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ image:
 </figure>
 <p>To give an example closer to the topic at hand, our understanding of thermodynamics began with bulk properties like heat, energy, pressure and temperature <span class="citation" data-cites="saslowHistoryThermodynamicsMissing2020"> [<a href="#ref-saslowHistoryThermodynamicsMissing2020" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>]</span>. It was only later that we gained an understanding of how these properties emerge from microscopic interactions between very large numbers of particles <span class="citation" data-cites="flammHistoryOutlookStatistical1998"> [<a href="#ref-flammHistoryOutlookStatistical1998" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>.</p>
 <p>At its heart, condensed matter is the study of the behaviours that can emerge from large numbers of interacting quantum objects at low energy. When these three properties are present together (a large number of objects, those objects being quantum and the presence interactions between the objects), we call it an interacting quantum many body system. From these three ingredients, nature builds all manner of weird and wonderful materials.</p>
-<p>Historically, we first made headway by ignoring interactions and quantum properties and looking at purely many-body systems. The ideal gas law and the Drude classical electron gas <span class="citation" data-cites="ashcroftSolidStatePhysics1976"> [<a href="#ref-ashcroftSolidStatePhysics1976" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>]</span> are good examples. Including interactions leads to the Ising model <span class="citation" data-cites="isingBeitragZurTheorie1925"> [<a href="#ref-isingBeitragZurTheorie1925" role="doc-biblioref">8</a>]</span>, the Landau theory <span class="citation" data-cites="landau2013fluid"> [<a href="#ref-landau2013fluid" role="doc-biblioref">9</a>]</span> and the classical theory of phase transitions <span class="citation" data-cites="jaegerEhrenfestClassificationPhase1998"> [<a href="#ref-jaegerEhrenfestClassificationPhase1998" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>]</span>. In contrast, condensed matter theory got its start in quantum many-body theory where the only electron-electron interaction considered is the Pauli exclusion principle. Bloch’s theorem <span class="citation" data-cites="blochÜberQuantenmechanikElektronen1929"> [<a href="#ref-blochÜberQuantenmechanikElektronen1929" role="doc-biblioref">11</a>]</span>, the core result of band theory, predicted the properties of non-interacting electrons in crystal lattices. It predicted, in particular, that band insulators arise when the electrons bands are filled, leaving the fermi level in a bandgap <span class="citation" data-cites="ashcroftSolidStatePhysics1976"> [<a href="#ref-ashcroftSolidStatePhysics1976" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>]</span>. In the same vein, advances were made in understanding the quantum origins of magnetism, including ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism <span class="citation" data-cites="MagnetismCondensedMatter"> [<a href="#ref-MagnetismCondensedMatter" role="doc-biblioref">12</a>]</span>.</p>
+<p>Historically, we first made headway by ignoring interactions and quantum properties and looking at purely many-body systems. The ideal gas law and the Drude classical electron gas <span class="citation" data-cites="ashcroftSolidStatePhysics1976"> [<a href="#ref-ashcroftSolidStatePhysics1976" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>]</span> are good examples. Including interactions leads to the Ising model <span class="citation" data-cites="isingBeitragZurTheorie1925"> [<a href="#ref-isingBeitragZurTheorie1925" role="doc-biblioref">8</a>]</span>, the Landau theory <span class="citation" data-cites="landauTheoryPhaseTransitions1937"> [<a href="#ref-landauTheoryPhaseTransitions1937" role="doc-biblioref">9</a>]</span> and the classical theory of phase transitions <span class="citation" data-cites="jaegerEhrenfestClassificationPhase1998"> [<a href="#ref-jaegerEhrenfestClassificationPhase1998" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>]</span>. In contrast, condensed matter theory got its start in quantum many-body theory where the only electron-electron interaction considered is the Pauli exclusion principle. Bloch’s theorem <span class="citation" data-cites="blochÜberQuantenmechanikElektronen1929"> [<a href="#ref-blochÜberQuantenmechanikElektronen1929" role="doc-biblioref">11</a>]</span>, the core result of band theory, predicted the properties of non-interacting electrons in crystal lattices. It predicted, in particular, that band insulators arise when the electrons bands are filled, leaving the fermi level in a bandgap <span class="citation" data-cites="ashcroftSolidStatePhysics1976"> [<a href="#ref-ashcroftSolidStatePhysics1976" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>]</span>. In the same vein, advances were made in understanding the quantum origins of magnetism, including ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism <span class="citation" data-cites="MagnetismCondensedMatter"> [<a href="#ref-MagnetismCondensedMatter" role="doc-biblioref">12</a>]</span>.</p>
 <p>The development of Landau-Fermi liquid theory explained why band theory works so well even where an analysis of the relevant energies suggests that it should not <span class="citation" data-cites="wenQuantumFieldTheory2007"> [<a href="#ref-wenQuantumFieldTheory2007" role="doc-biblioref">13</a>]</span>. Landau Fermi Liquid theory demonstrates that, in many cases where electron-electron interactions are significant, the system can still be described in terms of generalised non-interacting quasiparticles. This happens when the properties of the quasiparticles in the interacting system can be smoothly connected to the free fermions of the non-interacting system.</p>
 <p>However, there are systems where even Landau-Fermi liquid theory fails. An effective theoretical description of these systems must include electron-electron correlations. They are thus called strongly correlated materials <span class="citation" data-cites="morosanStronglyCorrelatedMaterials2012"> [<a href="#ref-morosanStronglyCorrelatedMaterials2012" role="doc-biblioref">14</a>]</span>. The canonical examples are superconductivity <span class="citation" data-cites="MicroscopicTheorySuperconductivity"> [<a href="#ref-MicroscopicTheorySuperconductivity" role="doc-biblioref">15</a>]</span>, the fractional quantum hall effect <span class="citation" data-cites="feldmanFractionalChargeFractional2021"> [<a href="#ref-feldmanFractionalChargeFractional2021" role="doc-biblioref">16</a>]</span> and the Mott insulators <span class="citation" data-cites="mottBasisElectronTheory1949 fisherMottInsulatorsSpin1999"> [<a href="#ref-mottBasisElectronTheory1949" role="doc-biblioref">17</a>,<a href="#ref-fisherMottInsulatorsSpin1999" role="doc-biblioref">18</a>]</span>. We’ll start by looking at the latter but shall see that there are many links between the three topics.</p>
 </section>
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ image:
 <img src="/assets/thesis/intro_chapter/fk_schematic.svg" id="fig-fk_schematic" data-short-caption="Falicov-Kimball Model Diagram" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 3: The Falicov-Kimball model can be viewed as a model of classical spins S_i coupled to spinless fermions \hat{c}_i where the fermions are mobile with hopping t and the fermions are coupled to the spins by an Ising type interaction with strength U." />
 <figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 3: The Falicov-Kimball model can be viewed as a model of classical spins <span class="math inline">\(S_i\)</span> coupled to spinless fermions <span class="math inline">\(\hat{c}_i\)</span> where the fermions are mobile with hopping <span class="math inline">\(t\)</span> and the fermions are coupled to the spins by an Ising type interaction with strength <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span>.</figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>The Falicov-Kimball (FK) model was originally introduced to describe the metal-insulator transition in f-electron system <span class="citation" data-cites="hubbardj.ElectronCorrelationsNarrow1963 falicovSimpleModelSemiconductorMetal1969"> [<a href="#ref-hubbardj.ElectronCorrelationsNarrow1963" role="doc-biblioref">25</a>,<a href="#ref-falicovSimpleModelSemiconductorMetal1969" role="doc-biblioref">39</a>]</span>. The FK model is the limit of the Hubbard model as the mass of one of the spins states of the electron is taken to infinity. This gives a model with two fermion species, one itinerant and one entirely immobile. The number operators for the immobile fermions are therefore conserved quantities and can be be treated like classical degrees of freedom. For our purposes, it will be useful to replace the immobile fermions with a classical Ising background field <span class="math inline">\(S_i = \pm1\)</span>.</p>
+<p>The Falicov-Kimball (FK) model was originally introduced to describe the metal-insulator transition in f-electron system <span class="citation" data-cites="hubbardj.ElectronCorrelationsNarrow1963 falicovSimpleModelSemiconductorMetal1969"> [<a href="#ref-hubbardj.ElectronCorrelationsNarrow1963" role="doc-biblioref">25</a>,<a href="#ref-falicovSimpleModelSemiconductorMetal1969" role="doc-biblioref">39</a>]</span>. The FK model is the limit of the Hubbard model as the mass of one of the spins states of the electron is taken to infinity. This gives a model with two fermion species, one itinerant and one entirely immobile. The number operators for the immobile fermions are therefore conserved quantities and can be treated like classical degrees of freedom. For our purposes, it will be useful to replace the immobile fermions with a classical Ising background field <span class="math inline">\(S_i = \pm1\)</span>.</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
 H_{\mathrm{FK}} = &amp; -\;t \sum_{\langle i,j \rangle} c^\dagger_{i}c_{j} + \;U \sum_{i} S_i\;(c^\dagger_{i}c_{i} - \tfrac{1}{2}). \\
 \end{aligned}\]</span></p>
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ H_{\mathrm{FK}} = &amp; -\;t \sum_{\langle i,j \rangle} c^\dagger_{i}c_{j} + \;U
 </section>
 <section id="quantum-spin-liquids" class="level1">
 <h1>Quantum Spin Liquids</h1>
-<p>Turning to the other key topic of this thesis, we have already discussed the AFM ordering of local moments in the Mott insulating state. Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson theory characterises phases of matter as inextricably linked to the emergence of long-range order via a spontaneously broken symmetry. Within this paradigm, we would not expect any interesting phases of matter not associated with AFM or other long-range order. However, Anderson first proposed in 1973 <span class="citation" data-cites="andersonResonatingValenceBonds1973"> [<a href="#ref-andersonResonatingValenceBonds1973" role="doc-biblioref">49</a>]</span> that, if long-range order is suppressed by some mechanism, it might lead to a liquid-like state even at zero temperature: a QSL.</p>
+<p>Turning to the other key topic of this thesis, we have already discussed the AFM ordering of local moments in the Mott insulating state. Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson theory characterises phases of matter as inextricably linked to the emergence of long-range order via a spontaneously broken symmetry. Within this paradigm, we would not expect any interesting phases of matter not associated with AFM or other long-range order. However, Anderson first proposed in 1973 <span class="citation" data-cites="Anderson1973"> [<a href="#ref-Anderson1973" role="doc-biblioref">49</a>]</span> that, if long-range order is suppressed by some mechanism, it might lead to a liquid-like state even at zero temperature: a QSL.</p>
 <p>This QSL state would exist at zero or very low temperatures. Therefore, we would expect quantum effects to be very strong, which will have far reaching consequences. It was the discovery of a different phase, however, that really kickstarted interest in the topic. The fractional quantum Hall state, discovered in the 1980s <span class="citation" data-cites="laughlinAnomalousQuantumHall1983"> [<a href="#ref-laughlinAnomalousQuantumHall1983" role="doc-biblioref">50</a>]</span> is an explicit example of an interacting electron system that falls outside of the Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson paradigm<a href="#fn1" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref1" role="doc-noteref"><sup>1</sup></a>. It shares many phenomenological properties with the QSL state. They both exhibit fractionalised excitations, braiding statistics and non-trivial topological properties <span class="citation" data-cites="broholmQuantumSpinLiquids2020"> [<a href="#ref-broholmQuantumSpinLiquids2020" role="doc-biblioref">55</a>]</span>. The many-body ground state of such systems acts as a complex and highly entangled vacuum. This vacuum can support quasiparticle excitations with properties unbound from that of the Dirac fermions of the standard model.</p>
 <p>How do we actually make a QSL? Frustration is one mechanism that we can use to suppress magnetic order in spin models <span class="citation" data-cites="TrebstPhysRep2022"> [<a href="#ref-TrebstPhysRep2022" role="doc-biblioref">56</a>]</span>. Frustration can be geometric. Triangular lattices, for instance, cannot support AFM order. It can also come about as a result of spin-orbit coupling or other physics. There are also other routes to QSLs besides frustrated spin systems that we will not discuss here <span class="citation" data-cites="balentsNodalLiquidTheory1998 balentsDualOrderParameter1999 linExactSymmetryWeaklyinteracting1998"> [<a href="#ref-balentsNodalLiquidTheory1998" role="doc-biblioref">57</a>–<a href="#ref-linExactSymmetryWeaklyinteracting1998" role="doc-biblioref">59</a>]</span>.</p>
 <!-- Experimentally, Mott insulating systems without magnetic order have been proposed as QSL systems\ [@law1TTaS2QuantumSpin2017; @ribakGaplessExcitationsGround2017].  -->
@@ -141,10 +141,10 @@ H_{\mathrm{FK}} = &amp; -\;t \sum_{\langle i,j \rangle} c^\dagger_{i}c_{j} + \;U
 <p>At this point, we can sketch out a phase diagram like that of fig. <a href="#fig:kitaev-material-phase-diagram">4</a>. When both electron-electron interactions <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span> and spin-orbit couplings <span class="math inline">\(\lambda\)</span> are small relative to the bandwidth <span class="math inline">\(t\)</span>, we recover standard band theory of band insulators and metals. In the upper left, we have the simple Mott insulating state as described by the Hubbard model. In the lower right, strong spin-orbit coupling gives rise to topological insulators characterised by symmetry protected edge modes and non-zero Chern number. Kitaev materials occur in the region where strong electron-electron interaction and spin-orbit coupling interact. See <span class="citation" data-cites="witczak-krempaCorrelatedQuantumPhenomena2014"> [<a href="#ref-witczak-krempaCorrelatedQuantumPhenomena2014" role="doc-biblioref">66</a>]</span> for a more expansive version of this diagram.</p>
 <p>The KH model <span class="citation" data-cites="kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006"> [<a href="#ref-kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006" role="doc-biblioref">67</a>]</span> was one of the first exactly solvable spin models with a QSL ground state. It is defined on the 2D honeycomb lattice and provides an exactly solvable model that can be reduced to a free fermion problem via a mapping to Majorana fermions. This yields an extensive number of static <span class="math inline">\(\mathbb Z_2\)</span> fluxes tied to an emergent gauge field. The model is remarkable not only for its QSL ground state, but also for its fractionalised excitations with non-trivial braiding statistics. It has a rich phase diagram hosting gapless, Abelian and non-Abelian phases <span class="citation" data-cites="knolleDynamicsFractionalizationQuantum2015"> [<a href="#ref-knolleDynamicsFractionalizationQuantum2015" role="doc-biblioref">68</a>]</span> and a finite temperature phase transition to a thermal metal state <span class="citation" data-cites="selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019"> [<a href="#ref-selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019" role="doc-biblioref">69</a>]</span>. It has been proposed that its non-Abelian excitations could be used to support robust topological quantum computing <span class="citation" data-cites="kitaev_fault-tolerant_2003 freedmanTopologicalQuantumComputation2003 nayakNonAbelianAnyonsTopological2008"> [<a href="#ref-kitaev_fault-tolerant_2003" role="doc-biblioref">70</a>–<a href="#ref-nayakNonAbelianAnyonsTopological2008" role="doc-biblioref">72</a>]</span>.</p>
 <p>The KH and FK models have quite a bit of conceptual overlap. They can both be seen as models of spinless fermions coupled to a classical Ising background field. This is what makes them exactly solvable. At finite temperatures, fluctuations in their background fields provide an effective disorder potential for the fermionic sector, so both models can be studied at finite temperature with Markov chain Monte Carlo methods <span class="citation" data-cites="antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016 selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019"> [<a href="#ref-selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019" role="doc-biblioref">69</a>,<a href="#ref-antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016" role="doc-biblioref">73</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>As Kitaev points out in his original paper, the KH model remains solvable on any trivalent <span class="math inline">\(z=3\)</span> graph which can be three-edge-coloured. Indeed many generalisations of the model exist <span class="citation" data-cites="Baskaran2007 Baskaran2008 Nussinov2009 OBrienPRB2016 hermanns2015weyl"> [<a href="#ref-Baskaran2007" role="doc-biblioref">74</a>–<a href="#ref-hermanns2015weyl" role="doc-biblioref">78</a>]</span>. Notably, the Yao-Kivelson model <span class="citation" data-cites="yaoExactChiralSpin2007"> [<a href="#ref-yaoExactChiralSpin2007" role="doc-biblioref">79</a>]</span> introduces triangular plaquettes to the honeycomb lattice leading to spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking. These extensions all retain translation symmetry. This is likely because edge-colouring, finding the ground state and understanding the QSL properties are much harder without it <span class="citation" data-cites="eschmann2019thermodynamics Peri2020"> [<a href="#ref-eschmann2019thermodynamics" role="doc-biblioref">80</a>,<a href="#ref-Peri2020" role="doc-biblioref">81</a>]</span>. Undeterred, this gap lead us to wonder what might happen if we remove translation symmetry from the Kitaev model. This would be a model of a trivalent, highly bond anisotropic but otherwise amorphous material.</p>
+<p>As Kitaev points out in his original paper, the KH model remains solvable on any trivalent <span class="math inline">\(z=3\)</span> graph which can be three-edge-coloured. Indeed, many generalisations of the model exist <span class="citation" data-cites="Baskaran2007 Baskaran2008 Nussinov2009 OBrienPRB2016 hermanns2015weyl"> [<a href="#ref-Baskaran2007" role="doc-biblioref">74</a>–<a href="#ref-hermanns2015weyl" role="doc-biblioref">78</a>]</span>. Notably, the Yao-Kivelson model <span class="citation" data-cites="yaoExactChiralSpin2007"> [<a href="#ref-yaoExactChiralSpin2007" role="doc-biblioref">79</a>]</span> introduces triangular plaquettes to the honeycomb lattice leading to spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking. These extensions all retain translation symmetry. This is likely because edge-colouring, finding the ground state and understanding the QSL properties are much harder without it <span class="citation" data-cites="eschmann2019thermodynamics Peri2020"> [<a href="#ref-eschmann2019thermodynamics" role="doc-biblioref">80</a>,<a href="#ref-Peri2020" role="doc-biblioref">81</a>]</span>. Undeterred, this gap led us to wonder what might happen if we remove translation symmetry from the Kitaev model. This would be a model of a trivalent, highly bond anisotropic but otherwise amorphous material.</p>
 <p>Amorphous materials do not have long-range lattice regularities but may have short-range regularities in the lattice structure, such as fixed coordination number <span class="math inline">\(z\)</span> as in some covalent compounds. The best examples are amorphous Silicon and Germanium with <span class="math inline">\(z=4\)</span> which are used to make thin-film solar cells <span class="citation" data-cites="Weaire1971 betteridge1973possible"> [<a href="#ref-Weaire1971" role="doc-biblioref">82</a>,<a href="#ref-betteridge1973possible" role="doc-biblioref">83</a>]</span>. Recently, it has been shown that topological insulating (TI) phases can exist in amorphous systems. Amorphous TIs are characterised by similar protected edge states to their translation invariant cousins and generalised topological bulk invariants <span class="citation" data-cites="mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018 agarwala2019topological marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpeModels2020 costa2019toward agarwala2020higher spring2021amorphous corbae2019evidence"> [<a href="#ref-mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018" role="doc-biblioref">84</a>–<a href="#ref-corbae2019evidence" role="doc-biblioref">90</a>]</span>. However, research on amorphous electronic systems has mostly focused on non-interacting systems with a few exceptions, for example, to account for the observation of superconductivity <span class="citation" data-cites="buckel1954einfluss mcmillan1981electron meisel1981eliashberg bergmann1976amorphous mannaNoncrystallineTopologicalSuperconductors2022"> [<a href="#ref-buckel1954einfluss" role="doc-biblioref">91</a>–<a href="#ref-mannaNoncrystallineTopologicalSuperconductors2022" role="doc-biblioref">95</a>]</span> in amorphous materials or very recently to understand the effect of strong electron repulsion in TIs <span class="citation" data-cites="kim2022fractionalization"> [<a href="#ref-kim2022fractionalization" role="doc-biblioref">96</a>]</span>.</p>
 <p>Amorphous <em>magnetic</em> systems have been investigated since the 1960s, mostly through the adaptation of theoretical tools developed for disordered systems <span class="citation" data-cites="aharony1975critical Petrakovski1981 kaneyoshi1992introduction Kaneyoshi2018"> [<a href="#ref-aharony1975critical" role="doc-biblioref">97</a>–<a href="#ref-Kaneyoshi2018" role="doc-biblioref">100</a>]</span> and with numerical methods <span class="citation" data-cites="fahnle1984monte plascak2000ising"> [<a href="#ref-fahnle1984monte" role="doc-biblioref">101</a>,<a href="#ref-plascak2000ising" role="doc-biblioref">102</a>]</span>. Research on classical Heisenberg and Ising models accounts for the observed behaviour of ferromagnetism, disordered antiferromagnetism and widely observed spin glass behaviour <span class="citation" data-cites="coey1978amorphous"> [<a href="#ref-coey1978amorphous" role="doc-biblioref">103</a>]</span>. However, the role of spin-anisotropic interactions and quantum effects in amorphous magnets has not been addressed.</p>
-<p>In <a href="../4_Amorphous_Kitaev_Model/4.1_AMK_Model.html">chapter 4</a>, I will address the question of whether frustrated magnetic interactions on amorphous lattices can give rise to genuine quantum phases, i.e. to long-range entangled QSL <span class="citation" data-cites="Anderson1973 Knolle2019 Savary2016 Lacroix2011"> [<a href="#ref-Anderson1973" role="doc-biblioref">104</a>–<a href="#ref-Lacroix2011" role="doc-biblioref">107</a>]</span>. We will find that the answer is yes. I will introduce the amorphous Kitaev model, a generalisation of the KH model to random lattices with fixed coordination number three. I will show that this model is a solvable, amorphous, chiral spin liquid. As with the Yao-Kivelson model <span class="citation" data-cites="yaoExactChiralSpin2007"> [<a href="#ref-yaoExactChiralSpin2007" role="doc-biblioref">79</a>]</span>, the amorphous Kitaev model retains its exact solubility but the presence of plaquettes with an odd number of sides leads to a spontaneous breaking of time reversal symmetry. I will confirm prior observations that the form of the ground state is relatively simple <span class="citation" data-cites="OBrienPRB2016 eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020"> [<a href="#ref-OBrienPRB2016" role="doc-biblioref">77</a>,<a href="#ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" role="doc-biblioref">108</a>]</span> and unearth a rich phase diagram displaying Abelian as well as a non-Abelian chiral spin liquid phases. Furthermore, I will show that the system undergoes a finite-temperature phase transition to a thermal metal state and discuss possible experimental realisations.</p>
+<p>In <a href="../4_Amorphous_Kitaev_Model/4.1_AMK_Model.html">chapter 4</a>, I will address the question of whether frustrated magnetic interactions on amorphous lattices can give rise to genuine quantum phases, i.e. to long-range entangled QSL <span class="citation" data-cites="Anderson1973 Knolle2019 Savary2016 Lacroix2011"> [<a href="#ref-Anderson1973" role="doc-biblioref">49</a>,<a href="#ref-Knolle2019" role="doc-biblioref">104</a>–<a href="#ref-Lacroix2011" role="doc-biblioref">106</a>]</span>. We will find that the answer is yes. I will introduce the amorphous Kitaev model, a generalisation of the KH model to random lattices with fixed coordination number three. I will show that this model is a solvable, amorphous, chiral spin liquid. As with the Yao-Kivelson model <span class="citation" data-cites="yaoExactChiralSpin2007"> [<a href="#ref-yaoExactChiralSpin2007" role="doc-biblioref">79</a>]</span>, the amorphous Kitaev model retains its exact solubility but the presence of plaquettes with an odd number of sides leads to a spontaneous breaking of time reversal symmetry. I will confirm prior observations that the form of the ground state is relatively simple <span class="citation" data-cites="OBrienPRB2016 eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020"> [<a href="#ref-OBrienPRB2016" role="doc-biblioref">77</a>,<a href="#ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" role="doc-biblioref">107</a>]</span> and unearth a rich phase diagram displaying Abelian as well as a non-Abelian chiral spin liquid phases. Furthermore, I will show that the system undergoes a finite-temperature phase transition to a thermal metal state and discuss possible experimental realisations.</p>
 <p>The next chapter, <a href="../2_Background/2.1_FK_Model.html">Chapter 2</a>, will introduce some necessary background to the FK model, the KH model, and disorder and localisation.</p>
 <p>Next Chapter: <a href="../2_Background/2.1_FK_Model.html">2 Background</a></p>
 </section>
@@ -175,8 +175,8 @@ H_{\mathrm{FK}} = &amp; -\;t \sum_{\langle i,j \rangle} c^\dagger_{i}c_{j} + \;U
 <div id="ref-isingBeitragZurTheorie1925" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[8] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">E. Ising, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02980577">Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus</a></em>, Z. Physik <strong>31</strong>, 253 (1925).</div>
 </div>
-<div id="ref-landau2013fluid" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div id="ref-landauTheoryPhaseTransitions1937" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[9] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, <em>Fluid Mechanics: Landau and Lifshitz: Course of Theoretical Physics, Volume 6</em>, Vol. 6 (Elsevier, 2013).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[9] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">L. D. Landau, <em><a href="https://cds.cern.ch/record/480039">On the Theory of Phase Transitions. I.</a></em>, Phys. Z. Sowjet. <strong>11</strong>, 19 (1937).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-jaegerEhrenfestClassificationPhase1998" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[10] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">G. Jaeger, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s004070050021">The Ehrenfest Classification of Phase Transitions: Introduction and Evolution</a></em>, Arch Hist Exact Sc. <strong>53</strong>, 51 (1998).</div>
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ H_{\mathrm{FK}} = &amp; -\;t \sum_{\langle i,j \rangle} c^\dagger_{i}c_{j} + \;U
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[25] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">Hubbard, J., <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1963.0204">Electron Correlations in Narrow Energy Bands</a></em>, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences <strong>276</strong>, 238 (1963).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-hubbardElectronCorrelationsNarrow1964" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[26] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Hubbard and B. H. Flowers, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1964.0190">Electron Correlations in Narrow Energy Bands III. An Improved Solution</a></em>, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences <strong>281</strong>, 401 (1964).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[26] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Hubbard, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1964.0190">Electron Correlations in Narrow Energy Bands III. An Improved Solution</a></em>, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences <strong>281</strong>, 401 (1964).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-mottMetalInsulatorTransitions1990" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[27] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">N. Mott, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/b12795">Metal-Insulator Transitions</a></em> (CRC Press, London, 1990).</div>
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ H_{\mathrm{FK}} = &amp; -\;t \sum_{\langle i,j \rangle} c^\dagger_{i}c_{j} + \;U
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[28] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">K. T. Law and P. A. Lee, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706769114">1t-TaS2 as a Quantum Spin Liquid</a></em>, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences <strong>114</strong>, 6996 (2017).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-ribakGaplessExcitationsGround2017" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[29] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Ribak, I. Silber, C. Baines, K. Chashka, Z. Salman, Y. Dagan, and A. Kanigel, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.195131">Gapless Excitations in the Ground State of $1t\text{\ensuremath{-}}{\Mathrm{TaS}}_{2}$</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>96</strong>, 195131 (2017).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[29] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Ribak, I. Silber, C. Baines, K. Chashka, Z. Salman, Y. Dagan, and A. Kanigel, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.195131">Gapless Excitations in the Ground State of 1t-TaS2</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>96</strong>, 195131 (2017).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-slaterMagneticEffectsHartreeFock1951" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[30] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. C. Slater, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.82.538">Magnetic Effects and the Hartree-Fock Equation</a></em>, Phys. Rev. <strong>82</strong>, 538 (1951).</div>
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ H_{\mathrm{FK}} = &amp; -\;t \sum_{\langle i,j \rangle} c^\dagger_{i}c_{j} + \;U
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[38] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Mazurenko, C. S. Chiu, G. Ji, M. F. Parsons, M. Kanász-Nagy, R. Schmidt, F. Grusdt, E. Demler, D. Greif, and M. Greiner, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22362">A Cold-Atom Fermi–Hubbard Antiferromagnet</a></em>, Nature <strong>545</strong>, 462 (2017).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-falicovSimpleModelSemiconductorMetal1969" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[39] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">L. M. Falicov and J. C. Kimball, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.22.997">Simple Model for Semiconductor-Metal Transitions: Sm${\mathrm{B}}_{6}$ and Transition-Metal Oxides</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>22</strong>, 997 (1969).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[39] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">L. M. Falicov and J. C. Kimball, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.22.997">Simple Model for Semiconductor-Metal Transitions: SmB6 and Transition-Metal Oxides</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>22</strong>, 997 (1969).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-belitzAndersonMottTransition1994" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[40] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">D. Belitz and T. R. Kirkpatrick, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.66.261">The Anderson-Mott Transition</a></em>, Rev. Mod. Phys. <strong>66</strong>, 261 (1994).</div>
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ H_{\mathrm{FK}} = &amp; -\;t \sum_{\langle i,j \rangle} c^\dagger_{i}c_{j} + \;U
 <div id="ref-herrmannNonequilibriumDynamicalCluster2016" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[48] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. J. Herrmann, N. Tsuji, M. Eckstein, and P. Werner, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.245114">Nonequilibrium Dynamical Cluster Approximation Study of the Falicov-Kimball Model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>94</strong>, 245114 (2016).</div>
 </div>
-<div id="ref-andersonResonatingValenceBonds1973" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div id="ref-Anderson1973" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[49] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. W. Anderson, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5408(73)90167-0">Resonating Valence Bonds: A New Kind of Insulator?</a></em>, Materials Research Bulletin <strong>8</strong>, 153 (1973).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-laughlinAnomalousQuantumHall1983" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
@@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ H_{\mathrm{FK}} = &amp; -\;t \sum_{\langle i,j \rangle} c^\dagger_{i}c_{j} + \;U
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[63] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. Hermanns, I. Kimchi, and J. Knolle, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-033117-053934">Physics of the Kitaev Model: Fractionalization, Dynamic Correlations, and Material Connections</a></em>, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics <strong>9</strong>, 17 (2018).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Winter2017" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[64] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. M. Winter, A. A. Tsirlin, M. Daghofer, J. van den Brink, Y. Singh, P. Gegenwart, and R. Valentí, <em>Models and Materials for Generalized Kitaev Magnetism</em>, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter <strong>29</strong>, 493002 (2017).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[64] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. M. Winter, A. A. Tsirlin, M. Daghofer, J. van den Brink, Y. Singh, P. Gegenwart, and R. Valentí, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/aa8cf5">Models and Materials for Generalized Kitaev Magnetism</a></em>, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter <strong>29</strong>, 493002 (2017).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Takagi2019" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[65] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">H. Takagi, T. Takayama, G. Jackeli, G. Khaliullin, and S. E. Nagler, <em>Concept and Realization of Kitaev Quantum Spin Liquids</em>, Nature Reviews Physics <strong>1</strong>, 264 (2019).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[65] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">H. Takagi, T. Takayama, G. Jackeli, G. Khaliullin, and S. E. Nagler, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-019-0038-2">Concept and Realization of Kitaev Quantum Spin Liquids</a></em>, Nat Rev Phys <strong>1</strong>, 4 (2019).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-witczak-krempaCorrelatedQuantumPhenomena2014" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[66] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">W. Witczak-Krempa, G. Chen, Y. B. Kim, and L. Balents, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-020911-125138">Correlated Quantum Phenomena in the Strong Spin-Orbit Regime</a></em>, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics <strong>5</strong>, 57 (2014).</div>
@@ -383,13 +383,13 @@ H_{\mathrm{FK}} = &amp; -\;t \sum_{\langle i,j \rangle} c^\dagger_{i}c_{j} + \;U
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[77] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">K. O’Brien, M. Hermanns, and S. Trebst, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.085101">Classification of Gapless Z₂ Spin Liquids in Three-Dimensional Kitaev Models</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>93</strong>, 085101 (2016).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-hermanns2015weyl" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[78] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. Hermanns, K. O’Brien, and S. Trebst, <em>Weyl Spin Liquids</em>, Physical Review Letters <strong>114</strong>, 157202 (2015).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[78] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. Hermanns, K. O’Brien, and S. Trebst, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.157202">Weyl Spin Liquids</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>114</strong>, 157202 (2015).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-yaoExactChiralSpin2007" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[79] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">H. Yao and S. A. Kivelson, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.247203">An Exact Chiral Spin Liquid with Non-Abelian Anyons</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>99</strong>, 247203 (2007).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-eschmann2019thermodynamics" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[80] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Eschmann, P. A. Mishchenko, T. A. Bojesen, Y. Kato, M. Hermanns, Y. Motome, and S. Trebst, <em>Thermodynamics of a Gauge-Frustrated Kitaev Spin Liquid</em>, Physical Review Research <strong>1</strong>, 032011(R) (2019).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[80] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Eschmann, P. A. Mishchenko, T. A. Bojesen, Y. Kato, M. Hermanns, Y. Motome, and S. Trebst, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.032011">Thermodynamics of a Gauge-Frustrated Kitaev Spin Liquid</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Research <strong>1</strong>, 032011 (2019).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Peri2020" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[81] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">V. Peri, S. Ok, S. S. Tsirkin, T. Neupert, G. Baskaran, M. Greiter, R. Moessner, and R. Thomale, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.041114">Non-Abelian Chiral Spin Liquid on a Simple Non-Archimedean Lattice</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>101</strong>, 041114 (2020).</div>
@@ -398,82 +398,79 @@ H_{\mathrm{FK}} = &amp; -\;t \sum_{\langle i,j \rangle} c^\dagger_{i}c_{j} + \;U
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[82] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">D. Weaire and M. F. Thorpe, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.4.2508">Electronic Properties of an Amorphous Solid. I. A Simple Tight-Binding Theory</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>4</strong>, 2508 (1971).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-betteridge1973possible" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[83] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">G. Betteridge, <em>A Possible Model of Amorphous Silicon and Germanium</em>, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics <strong>6</strong>, L427 (1973).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[83] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">G. P. Betteridge, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/6/23/001">A Possible Model of Amorphous Silicon and Germanium</a></em>, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. <strong>6</strong>, L427 (1973).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[84] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">N. P. Mitchell, L. M. Nash, D. Hexner, A. M. Turner, and W. T. M. Irvine, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-017-0024-5">Amorphous topological insulators constructed from random point sets</a></em>, Nature Phys <strong>14</strong>, 380 (2018).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-agarwala2019topological" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[85] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Agarwala, <em>Topological Insulators in Amorphous Systems</em>, in <em>Excursions in Ill-Condensed Quantum Matter</em> (Springer, 2019), pp. 61–79.</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[85] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Agarwala, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21511-8_3">Topological Insulators in Amorphous Systems</a></em>, in <em>Excursions in Ill-Condensed Quantum Matter: From Amorphous Topological Insulators to Fractional Spins</em>, edited by A. Agarwala (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019), pp. 61–79.</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpeModels2020" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[86] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">Q. Marsal, D. Varjas, and A. G. Grushin, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2007384117">Topological Weaire-Thorpe Models of Amorphous Matter</a></em>, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. <strong>117</strong>, 30260 (2020).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-costa2019toward" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[87] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. Costa, G. R. Schleder, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, C. Lewenkopf, and A. Fazzio, <em>Toward Realistic Amorphous Topological Insulators</em>, Nano Letters <strong>19</strong>, 8941 (2019).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[87] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. Costa, G. R. Schleder, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, C. Lewenkopf, and A. Fazzio, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03881">Toward Realistic Amorphous Topological Insulators</a></em>, Nano Lett. <strong>19</strong>, 8941 (2019).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-agarwala2020higher" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[88] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Agarwala, V. Juričić, and B. Roy, <em>Higher-Order Topological Insulators in Amorphous Solids</em>, Physical Review Research <strong>2</strong>, 012067 (2020).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[88] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Agarwala, V. Juričić, and B. Roy, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.012067">Higher-Order Topological Insulators in Amorphous Solids</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Research <strong>2</strong>, 012067 (2020).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-spring2021amorphous" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[89] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">H. Spring, A. Akhmerov, and D. Varjas, <em>Amorphous Topological Phases Protected by Continuous Rotation Symmetry</em>, SciPost Physics <strong>11</strong>, 022 (2021).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[89] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">H. Spring, A. Akhmerov, and D. Varjas, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.11.2.022">Amorphous Topological Phases Protected by Continuous Rotation Symmetry</a></em>, SciPost Physics <strong>11</strong>, 022 (2021).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-corbae2019evidence" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[90] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. Corbae et al., <em>Evidence for Topological Surface States in Amorphous Bi _ {2} Se _ {3}</em>, arXiv Preprint arXiv:1910.13412 (2019).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[90] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. Corbae et al., <em>Evidence for Topological Surface States in Amorphous Bi₂Se₃</em>, arXiv Preprint arXiv:1910.13412 (2019).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-buckel1954einfluss" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[91] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">W. Buckel and R. Hilsch, <em>Einfluß Der Kondensation Bei Tiefen Temperaturen Auf Den Elektrischen Widerstand Und Die Supraleitung Für Verschiedene Metalle</em>, Zeitschrift Für Physik <strong>138</strong>, 109 (1954).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[91] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">W. Buckel and R. Hilsch, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01337903">Einfluß der Kondensation bei tiefen Temperaturen auf den elektrischen Widerstand und die Supraleitung für verschiedene Metalle</a></em>, Z. Physik <strong>138</strong>, 109 (1954).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-mcmillan1981electron" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[92] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">W. McMillan and J. Mochel, <em>Electron Tunneling Experiments on Amorphous Ge 1- x Au x</em>, Physical Review Letters <strong>46</strong>, 556 (1981).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[92] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">W. McMillan and J. Mochel, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.46.556">Electron Tunneling Experiments on Amorphous Ge_{1- x} Au_x</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>46</strong>, 556 (1981).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-meisel1981eliashberg" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[93] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">L. V. Meisel and P. J. Cote, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.23.5834">Eliashberg Function in Amorphous Metals</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>23</strong>, 5834 (1981).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-bergmann1976amorphous" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[94] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">G. Bergmann, <em>Amorphous Metals and Their Superconductivity</em>, Physics Reports <strong>27</strong>, 159 (1976).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[94] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">G. Bergmann, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(76)90040-5">Amorphous Metals and Their Superconductivity</a></em>, Physics Reports <strong>27</strong>, 159 (1976).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-mannaNoncrystallineTopologicalSuperconductors2022" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[95] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. Manna, S. K. Das, and B. Roy, <em><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.02203">Noncrystalline Topological Superconductors</a></em>, arXiv:2207.02203.</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[95] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. Manna, S. K. Das, and B. Roy, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.02203">Noncrystalline Topological Superconductors</a></em>, arXiv:2207.02203.</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-kim2022fractionalization" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[96] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. Kim, A. Agarwala, and D. Chowdhury, <em>Fractionalization and Topology in Amorphous Electronic Solids</em>, arXiv Preprint arXiv:2205.11523 (2022).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-aharony1975critical" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[97] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Aharony, <em>Critical Behavior of Amorphous Magnets</em>, Physical Review B <strong>12</strong>, 1038 (1975).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[97] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Aharony, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.12.1038">Critical Behavior of Amorphous Magnets</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>12</strong>, 1038 (1975).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Petrakovski1981" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[98] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">G. A. Petrakovskii, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1070/pu1981v024n06abeh004850">Amorphous Magnetic Materials</a></em>, Soviet Physics Uspekhi <strong>24</strong>, 511 (1981).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-kaneyoshi1992introduction" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[99] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Kaneyoshi, <em>Introduction to Amorphous Magnets</em> (World Scientific Publishing Company, 1992).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[99] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Kaneyoshi, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/1710">Introduction to Amorphous Magnets</a></em> (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 1992).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Kaneyoshi2018" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[100] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Kaneyoshi, editor, <em>Amorphous Magnetism</em> (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2018).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[100] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Kaneyoshi, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351069618">Amorphous Magnetism</a></em> (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2017).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-fahnle1984monte" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[101] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. Fähnle, <em>Monte Carlo Study of Phase Transitions in Bond-and Site-Disordered Ising and Classical Heisenberg Ferromagnets</em>, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials <strong>45</strong>, 279 (1984).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[101] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. Fähnle, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(84)90019-2">Monte Carlo Study of Phase Transitions in Bond- and Site-Disordered Ising and Classical Heisenberg Ferromagnets</a></em>, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials <strong>45</strong>, 279 (1984).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-plascak2000ising" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[102] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Plascak, L. E. Zamora, and G. P. Alcazar, <em>Ising Model for Disordered Ferromagnetic Fe- Al Alloys</em>, Physical Review B <strong>61</strong>, 3188 (2000).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[102] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. A. Plascak, L. E. Zamora, and G. A. Pérez Alcazar, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.61.3188">Ising Model for Disordered Ferromagnetic Fe-Al Alloys</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>61</strong>, 3188 (2000).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-coey1978amorphous" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[103] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Coey, <em>Amorphous Magnetic Order</em>, Journal of Applied Physics <strong>49</strong>, 1646 (1978).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[103] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. M. D. Coey, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.324880">Amorphous Magnetic Order</a></em>, Journal of Applied Physics <strong>49</strong>, 1646 (1978).</div>
-</div>
-<div id="ref-Anderson1973" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[104] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. W. Anderson, <em>Resonating Valence Bonds: A New Kind of Insulator?</em>, Mater. Res. Bull. <strong>8</strong>, 153 (1973).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Knolle2019" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[105] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Knolle and R. Moessner, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013401">A Field Guide to Spin Liquids</a></em>, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics <strong>10</strong>, 451 (2019).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[104] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Knolle and R. Moessner, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013401">A Field Guide to Spin Liquids</a></em>, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics <strong>10</strong>, 451 (2019).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Savary2016" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[106] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">L. Savary and L. Balents, <em>Quantum Spin Liquids: A Review</em>, Reports on Progress in Physics <strong>80</strong>, 016502 (2017).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[105] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">L. Savary and L. Balents, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/80/1/016502">Quantum Spin Liquids: A Review</a></em>, Rep. Prog. Phys. <strong>80</strong>, 016502 (2016).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Lacroix2011" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[107] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Lacroix, P. Mendels, and F. Mila, editors, <em>Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism</em>, Vol. 164 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2011).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[106] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Lacroix, P. Mendels, and F. Mila, editors, <em>Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism</em>, Vol. 164 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2011).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[108] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Eschmann, P. A. Mishchenko, K. O’Brien, T. A. Bojesen, Y. Kato, M. Hermanns, Y. Motome, and S. Trebst, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.075125">Thermodynamic Classification of Three-Dimensional Kitaev Spin Liquids</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>102</strong>, 075125 (2020).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[107] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Eschmann, P. A. Mishchenko, K. O’Brien, T. A. Bojesen, Y. Kato, M. Hermanns, Y. Motome, and S. Trebst, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.075125">Thermodynamic Classification of Three-Dimensional Kitaev Spin Liquids</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>102</strong>, 075125 (2020).</div>
 </div>
 </div>
 </section>

_thesis/2_Background/2.1_FK_Model.html

@@ -82,64 +82,59 @@ image:
 <h1>The Falicov Kimball Model</h1>
 <section id="the-model" class="level2">
 <h2>The Model</h2>
-<p>The Falicov-Kimball (FK) model is one of the simplest models of the correlated electron problem. It captures the essence of the interaction between itinerant and localised electrons. It was originally introduced to explain the metal-insulator transition in f-electron systems but in its long history it has been interpreted variously as a model of electrons and ions, binary alloys or of crystal formation <span class="citation" data-cites="hubbardj.ElectronCorrelationsNarrow1963 falicovSimpleModelSemiconductorMetal1969 gruberFalicovKimballModelReview1996 gruberFalicovKimballModel2006"> [<a href="#ref-hubbardj.ElectronCorrelationsNarrow1963" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>–<a href="#ref-gruberFalicovKimballModel2006" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>]</span>. In terms of immobile fermions <span class="math inline">\(d_i\)</span> and light fermions <span class="math inline">\(c_i\)</span> and with chemical potential fixed at half-filling, the model reads</p>
+<figure>
+<img src="/assets/thesis/background_chapter/simple_DOS.svg" id="fig-simple_DOS" data-short-caption="Cubic Lattice dispersion with disorder" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 1: The dispersion (upper row) and density of states (lower row) obtained from a cubic lattice model H = \sum_{i} V_i c^\dagger_{i}c_{i} - t \sum_{\langle i,j\rangle} c^\dagger_{i}c_{j} in 1D. (a) With no external potential. (b) With a static charge density wave background V_i = (-1)^i (c) A static charge density wave background with 2% binary disorder. The top row shows the analytic dispersion in orange compared with the integral of the DOS in dotted black." />
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1: The dispersion (upper row) and density of states (lower row) obtained from a cubic lattice model <span class="math inline">\(H = \sum_{i} V_i c^\dagger_{i}c_{i} - t \sum_{\langle i,j\rangle} c^\dagger_{i}c_{j}\)</span> in 1D. (a) With no external potential. (b) With a static charge density wave background <span class="math inline">\(V_i = (-1)^i\)</span> (c) A static charge density wave background with 2% binary disorder. The top row shows the analytic dispersion in orange compared with the integral of the DOS in dotted black.</figcaption>
+</figure>
+<p>The Falicov-Kimball (FK) model is one of the simplest models of the correlated electron problem. It captures the essence of the interaction between itinerant and localised electrons. It was originally introduced to explain the metal-insulator transition in f-electron systems. However, in its long history, the FK model has been interpreted variously as a model of electrons and ions, binary alloys or crystal formation <span class="citation" data-cites="hubbardj.ElectronCorrelationsNarrow1963 falicovSimpleModelSemiconductorMetal1969 gruberFalicovKimballModelReview1996 gruberFalicovKimballModel2006"> [<a href="#ref-hubbardj.ElectronCorrelationsNarrow1963" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>–<a href="#ref-gruberFalicovKimballModel2006" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>]</span>. In terms of immobile fermions <span class="math inline">\(d_i\)</span> and light fermions <span class="math inline">\(c_i\)</span> and with chemical potential fixed at half-filling, the model reads</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
 H_{\mathrm{FK}} = &amp; \;U \sum_{i} (d^\dagger_{i}d_{i} - \tfrac{1}{2})\;(c^\dagger_{i}c_{i} - \tfrac{1}{2}) -\;t \sum_{\langle i,j\rangle} c^\dagger_{i}c_{j}.\\
 \end{aligned}\]</span></p>
-<p>Here we will only discuss the hypercubic lattices, i.e the chain, the square lattice, the cubic lattice and so on. The connection to the Hubbard model is that we have relabelled the up and down spin electron states and removed the hopping term for one spin state, the equivalent of taking the limit of infinite mass ratio <span class="citation" data-cites="devriesSimplifiedHubbardModel1993"> [<a href="#ref-devriesSimplifiedHubbardModel1993" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>]</span>.</p>
+<p>Here we will only discuss the hypercubic lattices, i.e the chain, the square lattice, the cubic lattice and so on. The connection to the Hubbard model is that we have relabelled the up and down spin electron states and removed the hopping term for one spin state. This is equivalent to taking the limit of infinite mass ratio <span class="citation" data-cites="devriesSimplifiedHubbardModel1993"> [<a href="#ref-devriesSimplifiedHubbardModel1993" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>Like other exactly solvable models <span class="citation" data-cites="smithDisorderFreeLocalization2017"> [<a href="#ref-smithDisorderFreeLocalization2017" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>, the FK model possesses extensively many conserved degrees of freedom <span class="math inline">\([d^\dagger_{i}d_{i}, H] = 0\)</span>. Similarly, the Kitaev model contains an extensive number of conserved fluxes. So in both models, the Hilbert space breaks up into a set of sectors in which these operators take a definite value. Crucially, this reduces the interaction terms in the model from being quartic in fermion operators to quadratic. This is what makes the two models exactly solvable, in contrast to the Hubbard model. For the FK model the interaction term <span class="math inline">\((d^\dagger_{i}d_{i} - \tfrac{1}{2})\;(c^\dagger_{i}c_{i} - \tfrac{1}{2})\)</span> becomes quadratic when <span class="math inline">\(d^\dagger_{i}d_{i}\)</span> is replaced with on of its eigenvalues <span class="math inline">\(\{0,1\}\)</span>. The same thing happens in the Kitaev model, though after first applying a clever transformation which we will discuss later.</p>
+<p>Like other exactly solvable models <span class="citation" data-cites="smithDisorderFreeLocalization2017"> [<a href="#ref-smithDisorderFreeLocalization2017" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>, the FK model possesses extensively many conserved degrees of freedom <span class="math inline">\([d^\dagger_{i}d_{i}, H] = 0\)</span>. Similarly, the Kitaev model contains an extensive number of conserved fluxes. So in both models, the Hilbert space breaks up into a set of sectors in which these operators take a definite value. Crucially, this reduces the interaction terms in the model from being quartic in fermion operators to quadratic. This is what makes the two models exactly solvable, in contrast to the Hubbard model. For the FK model the interaction term <span class="math inline">\((d^\dagger_{i}d_{i} - \tfrac{1}{2})\;(c^\dagger_{i}c_{i} - \tfrac{1}{2})\)</span> becomes quadratic when <span class="math inline">\(d^\dagger_{i}d_{i}\)</span> is replaced with one of its eigenvalues <span class="math inline">\(\{0,1\}\)</span>. The same thing happens in the Kitaev model, though after first applying a clever transformation which we will discuss later.</p>
-<p>Due to Pauli exclusion, maximum filling occurs when each lattice site is fully occupied, <span class="math inline">\(\langle n_c + n_d \rangle = 2\)</span>. Here we will focus on the half filled case <span class="math inline">\(\langle n_c + n_d \rangle = 1\)</span>. The ground state phenomenology as the model is doped away from the half-filled state can be rich <span class="citation" data-cites="jedrzejewskiFalicovKimballModels2001 gruberGroundStatesSpinless1990"> [<a href="#ref-jedrzejewskiFalicovKimballModels2001" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>,<a href="#ref-gruberGroundStatesSpinless1990" role="doc-biblioref">8</a>]</span> but the half-filled point has symmetries that make it particularly interesting. From this point on we will only consider the half-filled point.</p>
+<p>Due to Pauli exclusion, maximum filling occurs when each lattice site is fully occupied, <span class="math inline">\(\langle n_c + n_d \rangle = 2\)</span>. Here we will focus on the half filled case <span class="math inline">\(\langle n_c + n_d \rangle = 1\)</span>. The ground state phenomenology as the model is doped away from the half-filled state can be rich <span class="citation" data-cites="jedrzejewskiFalicovKimballModels2001 gruberGroundStatesSpinless1990"> [<a href="#ref-jedrzejewskiFalicovKimballModels2001" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>,<a href="#ref-gruberGroundStatesSpinless1990" role="doc-biblioref">8</a>]</span> but the half-filled point has symmetries that make it particularly interesting. From this point on, we will only consider the half-filled point.</p>
-<p>At half-filling and on bipartite lattices, the FK the model is particle-hole symmetric. That is, the Hamiltonian anticommutes with the particle hole operator <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{P}H\mathcal{P}^{-1} = -H\)</span>. As a consequence, the energy spectrum is symmetric about <span class="math inline">\(E = 0\)</span>, which is the Fermi energy. The particle hole operator corresponds to the substitution <span class="math inline">\(c^\dagger_i \rightarrow \epsilon_i c_i, d^\dagger_i \rightarrow d_i\)</span> where <span class="math inline">\(\epsilon_i = +1\)</span> for the A sublattice and <span class="math inline">\(-1\)</span> for the B sublattice <span class="citation" data-cites="gruberFalicovKimballModel2005"> [<a href="#ref-gruberFalicovKimballModel2005" role="doc-biblioref">9</a>]</span>. The absence of a hopping term for the heavy electrons means they do not need the factor of <span class="math inline">\(\epsilon_i\)</span> but they would need it in the corresponding Hubbard model. See appendix <a href="../6_Appendices/A.1_Particle_Hole_Symmetry.html#particle-hole-symmetry">A.1</a> for a full derivation of the particle-hole symmetry.</p>
+<p>At half-filling and on bipartite lattices, the FK model is particle-hole symmetric. That is, the Hamiltonian anticommutes with the particle hole operator <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{P}H\mathcal{P}^{-1} = -H\)</span>. As a consequence, the energy spectrum is symmetric about <span class="math inline">\(E = 0\)</span>, which is the Fermi energy. The particle hole operator corresponds to the substitution <span class="math inline">\(c^\dagger_i \rightarrow \epsilon_i c_i, d^\dagger_i \rightarrow d_i\)</span> where <span class="math inline">\(\epsilon_i = +1\)</span> for the A sublattice and <span class="math inline">\(-1\)</span> for the B sublattice <span class="citation" data-cites="gruberFalicovKimballModel2006"> [<a href="#ref-gruberFalicovKimballModel2006" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>]</span>. The absence of a hopping term for the heavy electrons means they do not need the factor of <span class="math inline">\(\epsilon_i\)</span> but they would need it in the corresponding Hubbard model. See appendix <a href="../6_Appendices/A.1_Particle_Hole_Symmetry.html#particle-hole-symmetry">A.1</a> for a full derivation of the particle-hole symmetry.</p>
-<figure>
+<p>We will later add a long-range interaction between the localised electrons. At that point we will replace the immobile fermions with a classical Ising field <span class="math inline">\(S_i = 1 - 2d^\dagger_id_i = \pm1\)</span> which I will refer to as the spins.</p>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/background_chapter/simple_DOS.svg" id="fig-simple_DOS" data-short-caption="Cubic Lattice dispersion with disorder" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 1: The dispersion (upper row) and density of states (lower row) obtained from a cubic lattice model H = \sum_{i} V_i c^\dagger_{i}c_{i} - t \sum_{\langle i,j\rangle} c^\dagger_{i}c_{j} in 1D. (a) With no external potential. (b) With a static charge density wave background V_i = (-1)^i (c) A static charge density wave background with 2% binary disorder. The top rows shows the analytic dispersion in orange compared with the integral of the DOS in dotted black." />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1: The dispersion (upper row) and density of states (lower row) obtained from a cubic lattice model <span class="math inline">\(H = \sum_{i} V_i c^\dagger_{i}c_{i} - t \sum_{\langle i,j\rangle} c^\dagger_{i}c_{j}\)</span> in 1D. (a) With no external potential. (b) With a static charge density wave background <span class="math inline">\(V_i = (-1)^i\)</span> (c) A static charge density wave background with 2% binary disorder. The top rows shows the analytic dispersion in orange compared with the integral of the DOS in dotted black.</figcaption>
-</figure>
-<p>We will later add a long-range interaction between the localised electrons at which point we will replace the immobile fermions with a classical Ising field <span class="math inline">\(S_i = 1 - 2d^\dagger_id_i = \pm1\)</span> which I will refer to as the spins.</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
 H_{\mathrm{FK}} = &amp; \;U \sum_{i} S_i\;(c^\dagger_{i}c_{i} - \tfrac{1}{2}) -\;t \sum_{\langle i,j\rangle} c^\dagger_{i}c_{j}.\\
 \end{aligned}\]</span></p>
-<p>The FK model can be solved exactly with dynamic mean field theory in the infinite dimensional limit <span class="citation" data-cites="antipovCriticalExponentsStrongly2014 ribicNonlocalCorrelationsSpectral2016 freericksExactDynamicalMeanfield2003 herrmannNonequilibriumDynamicalCluster2016"> [<a href="#ref-antipovCriticalExponentsStrongly2014" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>–<a href="#ref-herrmannNonequilibriumDynamicalCluster2016" role="doc-biblioref">13</a>]</span> but has radically different behaviour in lower dimensional systems.</p>
+<p>The FK model can be solved exactly with dynamic mean field theory in the infinite dimensional limit <span class="citation" data-cites="antipovCriticalExponentsStrongly2014 ribicNonlocalCorrelationsSpectral2016 freericksExactDynamicalMeanfield2003 herrmannNonequilibriumDynamicalCluster2016"> [<a href="#ref-antipovCriticalExponentsStrongly2014" role="doc-biblioref">9</a>–<a href="#ref-herrmannNonequilibriumDynamicalCluster2016" role="doc-biblioref">12</a>]</span>. In lower dimensional systems it has radically different behaviour, as we shall see.</p>
 </section>
 <section id="phase-diagrams" class="level2">
 <h2>Phase Diagrams</h2>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/background_chapter/fk_phase_diagram.svg" id="fig-fk_phase_diagram" data-short-caption="Falicov-Kimball Temperatue-Interaction Phase Diagrams" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 2: Schematic Phase diagram of the Falicov-Kimball model in dimensions greater than two. At low temperature the classical fermions (spins) settle into an ordered charge density wave state (antiferromagnetic state). The schematic diagram for the Hubbard model is the same. Reproduced from  [10,14]" />
+<img src="/assets/thesis/background_chapter/fk_phase_diagram.svg" id="fig-fk_phase_diagram" data-short-caption="Falicov-Kimball Temperature-Interaction Phase Diagrams" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 2: Schematic Phase diagram of the Falicov-Kimball model in dimensions greater than two. At low temperature the classical fermions (spins) settle into an ordered charge density wave state (antiferromagnetic state). The schematic diagram for the Hubbard model is the same. Reproduced from  [9,13]." />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 2: Schematic Phase diagram of the Falicov-Kimball model in dimensions greater than two. At low temperature the classical fermions (spins) settle into an ordered charge density wave state (antiferromagnetic state). The schematic diagram for the Hubbard model is the same. Reproduced from <span class="citation" data-cites="antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016 antipovCriticalExponentsStrongly2014"> [<a href="#ref-antipovCriticalExponentsStrongly2014" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>,<a href="#ref-antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016" role="doc-biblioref">14</a>]</span></figcaption>
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 2: Schematic Phase diagram of the Falicov-Kimball model in dimensions greater than two. At low temperature the classical fermions (spins) settle into an ordered charge density wave state (antiferromagnetic state). The schematic diagram for the Hubbard model is the same. Reproduced from <span class="citation" data-cites="antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016 antipovCriticalExponentsStrongly2014"> [<a href="#ref-antipovCriticalExponentsStrongly2014" role="doc-biblioref">9</a>,<a href="#ref-antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016" role="doc-biblioref">13</a>]</span>.</figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>In dimensions greater than one, the FK model exhibits a phase transition at some <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span> dependent critical temperature <span class="math inline">\(T_c(U)\)</span> to a low temperature ordered phase <span class="citation" data-cites="maskaThermodynamicsTwodimensionalFalicovKimball2006"> [<a href="#ref-maskaThermodynamicsTwodimensionalFalicovKimball2006" role="doc-biblioref">15</a>]</span>. In terms of the heavy electrons this corresponds to them occupying only one of the two sublattices A and B, known as a Charge Density Wave (CDW) phase. In terms of spins this is an antiferromagnetic phase.</p>
+<p>In dimensions greater than one, the FK model exhibits a phase transition at some <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span> dependent critical temperature <span class="math inline">\(T_c(U)\)</span> to a low temperature ordered phase <span class="citation" data-cites="maskaThermodynamicsTwodimensionalFalicovKimball2006"> [<a href="#ref-maskaThermodynamicsTwodimensionalFalicovKimball2006" role="doc-biblioref">14</a>]</span>. In terms of the heavy electrons this corresponds to them occupying only one of the two sublattices A and B, known as a Charge Density Wave (CDW) phase. In terms of spins, this is an antiferromagnetic phase.</p>
-<p>In the disordered region above <span class="math inline">\(T_c(U)\)</span> there are two insulating phases. For weak interactions <span class="math inline">\(U &lt;&lt; t\)</span>, thermal fluctuations in the spins act as an effective disorder potential for the fermions, causing them to localise and giving rise to an Anderson insulating (AI) phase <span class="citation" data-cites="andersonAbsenceDiffusionCertain1958"> [<a href="#ref-andersonAbsenceDiffusionCertain1958" role="doc-biblioref">16</a>]</span> which we will discuss more in section <a href="../2_Background/2.4_Disorder.html#bg-disorder-and-localisation">2.3</a>. For strong interactions <span class="math inline">\(U &gt;&gt; t\)</span>, the spins are not ordered but nevertheless their interaction with the electrons opens a gap, leading to a Mott insulator analogous to that of the Hubbard model <span class="citation" data-cites="brandtThermodynamicsCorrelationFunctions1989"> [<a href="#ref-brandtThermodynamicsCorrelationFunctions1989" role="doc-biblioref">17</a>]</span>. The presence of an interaction driven phase like the Mott insulator in an exactly solvable model is part of what makes the FK model such an interesting system.</p>
+<p>In the disordered region above <span class="math inline">\(T_c(U)\)</span>, there are two insulating phases. For weak interactions <span class="math inline">\(U &lt;&lt; t\)</span>, thermal fluctuations in the spins act as an effective disorder potential for the fermions. This causes them to localise, giving rise to an Anderson insulating (AI) phase <span class="citation" data-cites="andersonAbsenceDiffusionCertain1958"> [<a href="#ref-andersonAbsenceDiffusionCertain1958" role="doc-biblioref">15</a>]</span> which we will discuss more in section <a href="../2_Background/2.4_Disorder.html#bg-disorder-and-localisation">2.3</a>. For strong interactions <span class="math inline">\(U &gt;&gt; t\)</span>, the spins are not ordered. Nevertheless, their interaction with the electrons opens a gap, leading to a Mott insulator analogous to that of the Hubbard model <span class="citation" data-cites="brandtThermodynamicsCorrelationFunctions1989"> [<a href="#ref-brandtThermodynamicsCorrelationFunctions1989" role="doc-biblioref">16</a>]</span>. The presence of an interaction driven phase like the Mott insulator in an exactly solvable model is part of what makes the FK model such an interesting system.</p>
-<p>By contrast, in the 1D FK model there is no Finite-Temperature Phase Transition (FTPT) to an ordered CDW phase <span class="citation" data-cites="liebAbsenceMottTransition1968"> [<a href="#ref-liebAbsenceMottTransition1968" role="doc-biblioref">18</a>]</span>. Indeed dimensionality is crucial for the physics of both localisation and FTPTs. In 1D, disorder generally dominates: even the weakest disorder exponentially localises <em>all</em> single particle eigenstates. In the 1D FK model this means the whole spectrum is localised at all finite temperatures <span class="citation" data-cites="goldshteinPurePointSpectrum1977 abrahamsScalingTheoryLocalization1979 kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993"> [<a href="#ref-goldshteinPurePointSpectrum1977" role="doc-biblioref">19</a>–<a href="#ref-kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993" role="doc-biblioref">21</a>]</span>. Though at low temperatures the localisation length may be so large that the states appear extended in finite sized systems <span class="citation" data-cites="antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016"> [<a href="#ref-antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016" role="doc-biblioref">14</a>]</span>. Only longer-range correlations of the disorder potential can potentially induce localisation-delocalisation transitions in 1D <span class="citation" data-cites="aubryAnalyticityBreakingAnderson1980 dassarmaLocalizationMobilityEdges1990 dunlapAbsenceLocalizationRandomdimer1990"> [<a href="#ref-aubryAnalyticityBreakingAnderson1980" role="doc-biblioref">22</a>–<a href="#ref-dunlapAbsenceLocalizationRandomdimer1990" role="doc-biblioref">24</a>]</span></p>
+<p>By contrast, in the 1D FK model there is no Finite-Temperature Phase Transition (FTPT) to an ordered CDW phase <span class="citation" data-cites="liebAbsenceMottTransition1968"> [<a href="#ref-liebAbsenceMottTransition1968" role="doc-biblioref">17</a>]</span>. Indeed, dimensionality is crucial for the physics of both localisation and FTPTs. In 1D, disorder generally dominates: even the weakest disorder exponentially localises <em>all</em> single particle eigenstates. In the 1D FK model, this means that the whole spectrum is localised at all finite temperatures <span class="citation" data-cites="goldshteinPurePointSpectrum1977 abrahamsScalingTheoryLocalization1979 kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993"> [<a href="#ref-goldshteinPurePointSpectrum1977" role="doc-biblioref">18</a>–<a href="#ref-kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993" role="doc-biblioref">20</a>]</span>. Although at low temperatures, the localisation length may be so large that the states appear extended in finite sized systems <span class="citation" data-cites="antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016"> [<a href="#ref-antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016" role="doc-biblioref">13</a>]</span>. Only longer-range correlations of the disorder potential can potentially induce localisation-delocalisation transitions in 1D <span class="citation" data-cites="aubryAnalyticityBreakingAnderson1980 dassarmaLocalizationMobilityEdges1990 dunlapAbsenceLocalizationRandomdimer1990"> [<a href="#ref-aubryAnalyticityBreakingAnderson1980" role="doc-biblioref">21</a>–<a href="#ref-dunlapAbsenceLocalizationRandomdimer1990" role="doc-biblioref">23</a>]</span></p>
-<p>The absence of finite temperature ordered phases in 1D systems is a general feature. It can be understood as a consequence of the fact that domain walls are energetically cheap in 1D. Thermodynamically, short-range interactions just cannot overcome the entropy of thermal defects in 1D. However, the addition of longer range interactions can overcome this <span class="citation" data-cites="peierlsIsingModelFerromagnetism1936 kennedyItinerantElectronModel1986"> [<a href="#ref-peierlsIsingModelFerromagnetism1936" role="doc-biblioref">25</a>,<a href="#ref-kennedyItinerantElectronModel1986" role="doc-biblioref">26</a>]</span>.</p>
+<p>The absence of finite temperature ordered phases in 1D systems is a general feature. It can be understood as a consequence of the fact that domain walls are energetically cheap in 1D. Thermodynamically, short-range interactions just cannot overcome the entropy of thermal defects in 1D. However, the addition of longer range interactions can overcome this <span class="citation" data-cites="peierlsIsingModelFerromagnetism1936 kennedyItinerantElectronModel1986"> [<a href="#ref-peierlsIsingModelFerromagnetism1936" role="doc-biblioref">24</a>,<a href="#ref-kennedyItinerantElectronModel1986" role="doc-biblioref">25</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>However, the absence of an FTPT in the short ranged FK chain is far from obvious because the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida (RKKY) interaction mediated by the fermions <span class="citation" data-cites="kasuyaTheoryMetallicFerro1956 rudermanIndirectExchangeCoupling1954 vanvleckNoteInteractionsSpins1962 yosidaMagneticPropertiesCuMn1957"> [<a href="#ref-kasuyaTheoryMetallicFerro1956" role="doc-biblioref">27</a>–<a href="#ref-yosidaMagneticPropertiesCuMn1957" role="doc-biblioref">30</a>]</span> decays as <span class="math inline">\(r^{-1}\)</span> in 1D <span class="citation" data-cites="rusinCalculationRKKYRange2017"> [<a href="#ref-rusinCalculationRKKYRange2017" role="doc-biblioref">31</a>]</span>. This could in principle induce the necessary long-range interactions for the classical Ising background to order at low temperatures <span class="citation" data-cites="thoulessLongRangeOrderOneDimensional1969 peierlsIsingModelFerromagnetism1936"> [<a href="#ref-peierlsIsingModelFerromagnetism1936" role="doc-biblioref">25</a>,<a href="#ref-thoulessLongRangeOrderOneDimensional1969" role="doc-biblioref">32</a>]</span>. However, Kennedy and Lieb established rigorously that at half-filling a CDW phase only exists at <span class="math inline">\(T = 0\)</span> for the 1D FK model <span class="citation" data-cites="kennedyItinerantElectronModel1986"> [<a href="#ref-kennedyItinerantElectronModel1986" role="doc-biblioref">26</a>]</span>.</p>
+<p>The absence of an FTPT in the short ranged FK chain is far from obvious because the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida (RKKY) interaction mediated by the fermions <span class="citation" data-cites="kasuyaTheoryMetallicFerro1956 rudermanIndirectExchangeCoupling1954 vanvleckNoteInteractionsSpins1962 yosidaMagneticPropertiesCuMn1957"> [<a href="#ref-kasuyaTheoryMetallicFerro1956" role="doc-biblioref">26</a>–<a href="#ref-yosidaMagneticPropertiesCuMn1957" role="doc-biblioref">29</a>]</span> decays as <span class="math inline">\(r^{-1}\)</span> in 1D <span class="citation" data-cites="rusinCalculationRKKYRange2017"> [<a href="#ref-rusinCalculationRKKYRange2017" role="doc-biblioref">30</a>]</span>. This could, in principle, induce the necessary long-range interactions for the classical Ising background to order at low temperatures <span class="citation" data-cites="thoulessLongRangeOrderOneDimensional1969 peierlsIsingModelFerromagnetism1936"> [<a href="#ref-peierlsIsingModelFerromagnetism1936" role="doc-biblioref">24</a>,<a href="#ref-thoulessLongRangeOrderOneDimensional1969" role="doc-biblioref">31</a>]</span>. However, Kennedy and Lieb established rigorously that, at half-filling, a CDW phase only exists at <span class="math inline">\(T = 0\)</span> for the 1D FK model <span class="citation" data-cites="kennedyItinerantElectronModel1986"> [<a href="#ref-kennedyItinerantElectronModel1986" role="doc-biblioref">25</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>The 1D FK model has been studied numerically, perturbatively in interaction strength <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span> and in the continuum limit <span class="citation" data-cites="bursillOneDimensionalContinuum1994"> [<a href="#ref-bursillOneDimensionalContinuum1994" role="doc-biblioref">33</a>]</span>. The main results are that for attractive <span class="math inline">\(U &gt; U_c\)</span> the system forms electron spin bound state ‘atoms’ which repel on another <span class="citation" data-cites="gruberGroundStateEnergyLowTemperature1993"> [<a href="#ref-gruberGroundStateEnergyLowTemperature1993" role="doc-biblioref">34</a>]</span> and that the ground state phase diagram has a has a fractal structure as a function of electron filling, a devil’s staircase <span class="citation" data-cites="freericksTwostateOnedimensionalSpinless1990 michelettiCompleteDevilStaircase1997"> [<a href="#ref-freericksTwostateOnedimensionalSpinless1990" role="doc-biblioref">35</a>,<a href="#ref-michelettiCompleteDevilStaircase1997" role="doc-biblioref">36</a>]</span>.</p>
+<p>The 1D FK model has been studied numerically, perturbatively in interaction strength <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span> and in the continuum limit <span class="citation" data-cites="bursillOneDimensionalContinuum1994"> [<a href="#ref-bursillOneDimensionalContinuum1994" role="doc-biblioref">32</a>]</span>. The main results are that for attractive <span class="math inline">\(U &gt; U_c\)</span> the system forms electron spin bound state ‘atoms’ which repel one another <span class="citation" data-cites="gruberGroundStateEnergyLowTemperature1993"> [<a href="#ref-gruberGroundStateEnergyLowTemperature1993" role="doc-biblioref">33</a>]</span> and that the ground state phase diagram has a fractal structure as a function of electron filling, a devil’s staircase <span class="citation" data-cites="freericksTwostateOnedimensionalSpinless1990 michelettiCompleteDevilStaircase1997"> [<a href="#ref-freericksTwostateOnedimensionalSpinless1990" role="doc-biblioref">34</a>,<a href="#ref-michelettiCompleteDevilStaircase1997" role="doc-biblioref">35</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>Based on this primacy of dimensionality, we will go digging into the 1D case. In chapter <a href="../3_Long_Range_Falicov_Kimball/3.1_LRFK_Model.html">3</a> we will construct a generalised one-dimensional FK model with long-range interactions which induces the otherwise forbidden CDW phase at non-zero temperature. To do this we will draw on theory of the Long-Range Ising (LRI) model which is the subject of the next section.</p>
+<p>Based on this primacy of dimensionality, we will go digging into the 1D case. In chapter <a href="../3_Long_Range_Falicov_Kimball/3.1_LRFK_Model.html">3</a>, we will construct a generalised 1D FK model with long-range interactions, which induces the otherwise forbidden CDW phase at non-zero temperature. To do this, we will draw on theory of the Long-Range Ising (LRI) model which is the subject of the next section.</p>
 </section>
 <section id="long-ranged-ising-model" class="level2">
 <h2>Long-Ranged Ising model</h2>
-<p>The suppression of phase transitions is a common phenomena in 1D systems and the Ising model serves as the canonical illustration of this. In terms of classical spins <span class="math inline">\(S_i = \pm 1\)</span> the standard Ising model reads</p>
+<p>The suppression of phase transitions is a common phenomenon in 1D systems and the Ising model serves as the canonical illustration of this. In terms of classical spins <span class="math inline">\(S_i = \pm 1\)</span> the standard Ising model reads</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[H_{\mathrm{I}} = \sum_{\langle ij \rangle} S_i S_j\]</span></p>
-<p>Like the FK model, the Ising model shows an FTPT to an ordered state only in 2D and above. This can be understood via Peierls’ argument <span class="citation" data-cites="peierlsIsingModelFerromagnetism1936 kennedyItinerantElectronModel1986"> [<a href="#ref-peierlsIsingModelFerromagnetism1936" role="doc-biblioref">25</a>,<a href="#ref-kennedyItinerantElectronModel1986" role="doc-biblioref">26</a>]</span> to be a consequence of the low energy penalty for domain walls in 1D systems.</p>
+<p>Like the FK model, the Ising model shows an FTPT to an ordered state only in 2D and above. This can be understood via Peierls’ argument <span class="citation" data-cites="peierlsIsingModelFerromagnetism1936 kennedyItinerantElectronModel1986"> [<a href="#ref-peierlsIsingModelFerromagnetism1936" role="doc-biblioref">24</a>,<a href="#ref-kennedyItinerantElectronModel1986" role="doc-biblioref">25</a>]</span> to be a consequence of the low energy penalty for domain walls in 1D systems.</p>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/intro_chapter/ising_model_domain_wall.svg" id="fig-ising_model_domain_wall" data-short-caption="Domain walls in the long-range Ising Model" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 3: Domain walls in the 1D Ising model cost finite energy because they affect only one interaction while in the Long-Range Ising (LRI) model it depends on how the interactions decay with distance." />
+<img src="/assets/thesis/intro_chapter/ising_model_domain_wall.svg" id="fig-ising_model_domain_wall" data-short-caption="Domain walls in the long-range Ising Model" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 3: Domain walls in the 1D Ising model cost finite energy because they affect only one interaction. In the Long-Range Ising (LRI) model it depends on how the interactions decay with distance." />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 3: Domain walls in the 1D Ising model cost finite energy because they affect only one interaction while in the Long-Range Ising (LRI) model it depends on how the interactions decay with distance.</figcaption>
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 3: Domain walls in the 1D Ising model cost finite energy because they affect only one interaction. In the Long-Range Ising (LRI) model it depends on how the interactions decay with distance.</figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>Following Peierls’ argument, consider the difference in free energy <span class="math inline">\(\Delta F = \Delta E - T\Delta S\)</span> between an ordered state and a state with single domain wall as in fig. <a href="#fig:ising_model_domain_wall">3</a>. If this value is negative it implies that the ordered state is unstable with respect to domain wall defects, and they will thus proliferate, destroying the ordered phase. If we consider the scaling of the two terms with system size <span class="math inline">\(L\)</span> we see that short range interactions produce a constant energy penalty <span class="math inline">\(\Delta E\)</span> for a domain wall. In contrast, the number of such single domain wall states scales linearly with system size so the entropy is <span class="math inline">\(\propto \ln L\)</span>. Thus the entropic contribution dominates (eventually) in the thermodynamic limit and no finite temperature order is possible. In 2D and above, the energy penalty of a large domain wall scales like <span class="math inline">\(L^{d-1}\)</span> which is why they can support ordered phases. This argument does not quite apply to the FK model because of the aforementioned RKKY interaction. Instead this argument will give us insight into how to recover an ordered phase in the 1D FK model.</p>
+<p>Following Peierls’ argument, consider the difference in free energy <span class="math inline">\(\Delta F = \Delta E - T\Delta S\)</span> between an ordered state and a state with single domain wall as in fig. <a href="#fig:ising_model_domain_wall">3</a>. If this value is negative, it implies that the ordered state is unstable with respect to domain wall defects, and they will thus proliferate, destroying the ordered phase. If we consider the scaling of the two terms with system size <span class="math inline">\(L\)</span>, we see that short range interactions produce a constant energy penalty <span class="math inline">\(\Delta E\)</span> for a domain wall. In contrast, the number of such single domain wall states scales linearly with system size so the entropy is <span class="math inline">\(\propto \ln L\)</span>. Thus, the entropic contribution dominates (eventually) in the thermodynamic limit and no finite temperature order is possible. In 2D and above, the energy penalty of a large domain wall scales like <span class="math inline">\(L^{d-1}\)</span> which is why they can support ordered phases. This argument does not quite apply to the FK model because of the aforementioned RKKY interaction. Instead, this argument will give us insight into how to recover an ordered phase in the 1D FK model.</p>
-<p>In contrast the LRI model <span class="math inline">\(H_{\mathrm{LRI}}\)</span> can have an FTPT in 1D.</p>
-<p><span class="math display">\[H_{\mathrm{LRI}} = \sum_{ij} J(|i-j|) S_i S_j = J \sum_{i\neq j} |i - j|^{-\alpha} S_i S_j\]</span></p>
-<p>Renormalisation group analyses show that the LRI model has an ordered phase in 1D for <span class="math inline">\(1 &lt; \alpha &lt; 2\)</span>  <span class="citation" data-cites="dysonExistencePhasetransitionOnedimensional1969"> [<a href="#ref-dysonExistencePhasetransitionOnedimensional1969" role="doc-biblioref">37</a>]</span>. Peierls’ argument can be extended <span class="citation" data-cites="thoulessLongRangeOrderOneDimensional1969"> [<a href="#ref-thoulessLongRangeOrderOneDimensional1969" role="doc-biblioref">32</a>]</span> to long-range interactions to provide intuition for why this is the case. Again considering the energy difference between the ordered state <span class="math inline">\(|\ldots\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\ldots\rangle\)</span> and a domain wall state <span class="math inline">\(|\ldots\uparrow\uparrow\downarrow\downarrow\ldots\rangle\)</span>. In the case of the LRI model, careful counting shows that this energy penalty is <span id="eq:bg-dw-penalty"><span class="math display">\[\Delta E \propto \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n J(n)\qquad{(1)}\]</span></span></p>
-<p>because each interaction between spins separated across the domain by a bond length <span class="math inline">\(n\)</span> can be drawn between <span class="math inline">\(n\)</span> equivalent pairs of sites. The behaviour then depends crucially on how eq. <a href="#eq:bg-dw-penalty">1</a> scales with system size. Ruelle proved rigorously for a very general class of 1D systems that if <span class="math inline">\(\Delta E\)</span> or its many-body generalisation converges to a constant in the thermodynamic limit then the free energy is analytic <span class="citation" data-cites="ruelleStatisticalMechanicsOnedimensional1968"> [<a href="#ref-ruelleStatisticalMechanicsOnedimensional1968" role="doc-biblioref">38</a>]</span>. This rules out a finite order phase transition, though not one of the Kosterlitz-Thouless type. Dyson also proves this though with a slightly different condition on <span class="math inline">\(J(n)\)</span> <span class="citation" data-cites="dysonExistencePhasetransitionOnedimensional1969"> [<a href="#ref-dysonExistencePhasetransitionOnedimensional1969" role="doc-biblioref">37</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>With a power law form for <span class="math inline">\(J(n)\)</span>, there are a few cases to consider:</p>
-<p>For <span class="math inline">\(\alpha = 0\)</span> i.e infinite range interactions, the Ising model is exactly solvable and mean field theory is exact <span class="citation" data-cites="lipkinValidityManybodyApproximation1965"> [<a href="#ref-lipkinValidityManybodyApproximation1965" role="doc-biblioref">39</a>]</span>. This limit is the same as the infinite dimensional limit.</p>
-<p>For <span class="math inline">\(\alpha \leq 1\)</span> we have very slowly decaying interactions. <span class="math inline">\(\Delta E\)</span> does not converge as a function of system size so the Hamiltonian is non-extensive, a topic not without some considerable controversy <span class="citation" data-cites="grossNonextensiveHamiltonianSystems2002 lutskoQuestioningValidityNonextensive2011 wangCommentNonextensiveHamiltonian2003"> [<a href="#ref-grossNonextensiveHamiltonianSystems2002" role="doc-biblioref">40</a>–<a href="#ref-wangCommentNonextensiveHamiltonian2003" role="doc-biblioref">42</a>]</span> that we will not consider further here.</p>
-<p>For <span class="math inline">\(1 &lt; \alpha &lt; 2\)</span>, we get a phase transition to an ordered state at a finite temperature, this is what we want!</p>
-<p>For <span class="math inline">\(\alpha = 2\)</span>, the energy of domain walls diverges logarithmically, and this turns out to be a Kostelitz-Thouless transition <span class="citation" data-cites="thoulessLongRangeOrderOneDimensional1969"> [<a href="#ref-thoulessLongRangeOrderOneDimensional1969" role="doc-biblioref">32</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>Finally, for <span class="math inline">\(2 &lt; \alpha\)</span> we have very quickly decaying interactions and domain walls again have a finite energy penalty, hence Peirels’ argument holds and there is no phase transition.</p>
-<p>One final complexity is that for <span class="math inline">\(\tfrac{3}{2} &lt; \alpha &lt; 2\)</span> renormalisation group methods show that the critical point has non-universal critical exponents that depend on <span class="math inline">\(\alpha\)</span>  <span class="citation" data-cites="fisherCriticalExponentsLongRange1972"> [<a href="#ref-fisherCriticalExponentsLongRange1972" role="doc-biblioref">43</a>]</span>. To avoid this potential confounding factors we will park ourselves at <span class="math inline">\(\alpha = 1.25\)</span> when we apply these ideas to the FK model.</p>
-<p>Were we to extend this to arbitrary dimension <span class="math inline">\(d\)</span> we would find that thermodynamics properties generally both <span class="math inline">\(d\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(\alpha\)</span>, long-range interactions can modify the ‘effective dimension’ of thermodynamic systems <span class="citation" data-cites="angeliniRelationsShortrangeLongrange2014"> [<a href="#ref-angeliniRelationsShortrangeLongrange2014" role="doc-biblioref">44</a>]</span>.</p>
 <figure>
 <img src="/assets/thesis/background_chapter/alpha_diagram.svg" id="fig-alpha_diagram" data-short-caption="Long-Range Ising Model Behaviour" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 4: The thermodynamic behaviour of the long-range Ising model H_{\mathrm{LRI}} = J \sum_{i\neq j} |i - j|^{-\alpha} S_i S_j as the exponent of the interaction \alpha is varied. In my simulations I stick to a value of \alpha = \tfrac{5}{4} the complexity of non-universal critical exponents." />
 <figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 4: The thermodynamic behaviour of the long-range Ising model <span class="math inline">\(H_{\mathrm{LRI}} = J \sum_{i\neq j} |i - j|^{-\alpha} S_i S_j\)</span> as the exponent of the interaction <span class="math inline">\(\alpha\)</span> is varied. In my simulations I stick to a value of <span class="math inline">\(\alpha = \tfrac{5}{4}\)</span> the complexity of non-universal critical exponents.</figcaption>
 </figure>
+<p>In contrast, the LRI model <span class="math inline">\(H_{\mathrm{LRI}}\)</span> can have an FTPT in 1D.</p>
+<p><span class="math display">\[H_{\mathrm{LRI}} = \sum_{ij} J(|i-j|) S_i S_j = J \sum_{i\neq j} |i - j|^{-\alpha} S_i S_j\]</span></p>
+<p>Renormalisation group analyses show that the LRI model has an ordered phase in 1D for <span class="math inline">\(1 &lt; \alpha &lt; 2\)</span>  <span class="citation" data-cites="dysonExistencePhasetransitionOnedimensional1969"> [<a href="#ref-dysonExistencePhasetransitionOnedimensional1969" role="doc-biblioref">36</a>]</span>. Peierls’ argument can be extended <span class="citation" data-cites="thoulessLongRangeOrderOneDimensional1969"> [<a href="#ref-thoulessLongRangeOrderOneDimensional1969" role="doc-biblioref">31</a>]</span> to long-range interactions to provide intuition for why this is the case. Let’s consider again the energy difference between the ordered state <span class="math inline">\(|\ldots\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\ldots\rangle\)</span> and a domain wall state <span class="math inline">\(|\ldots\uparrow\uparrow\downarrow\downarrow\ldots\rangle\)</span>. In the case of the LRI model, careful counting shows that this energy penalty is <span id="eq:bg-dw-penalty"><span class="math display">\[\Delta E \propto \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n J(n)\qquad{(1)}\]</span></span></p>
+<p>because each interaction between spins separated across the domain by a bond length <span class="math inline">\(n\)</span> can be drawn between <span class="math inline">\(n\)</span> equivalent pairs of sites. The behaviour then depends crucially on how eq. <a href="#eq:bg-dw-penalty">1</a> scales with system size. Ruelle proved rigorously for a very general class of 1D systems that if <span class="math inline">\(\Delta E\)</span> or its many-body generalisation converges to a constant in the thermodynamic limit then the free energy is analytic <span class="citation" data-cites="ruelleStatisticalMechanicsOnedimensional1968"> [<a href="#ref-ruelleStatisticalMechanicsOnedimensional1968" role="doc-biblioref">37</a>]</span>. This rules out a finite order phase transition, though not one of the Kosterlitz-Thouless type. Dyson also proved this, though with a slightly different condition on <span class="math inline">\(J(n)\)</span> <span class="citation" data-cites="dysonExistencePhasetransitionOnedimensional1969"> [<a href="#ref-dysonExistencePhasetransitionOnedimensional1969" role="doc-biblioref">36</a>]</span>.</p>
+<p>With a power law form for <span class="math inline">\(J(n)\)</span>, there are a few cases to consider: For <span class="math inline">\(\alpha = 0\)</span> i.e infinite range interactions, the Ising model is exactly solvable and mean field theory is exact <span class="citation" data-cites="lipkinValidityManybodyApproximation1965"> [<a href="#ref-lipkinValidityManybodyApproximation1965" role="doc-biblioref">38</a>]</span>. This limit is the same as the infinite dimensional limit. For <span class="math inline">\(\alpha \leq 1\)</span> we have very slowly decaying interactions. <span class="math inline">\(\Delta E\)</span> does not converge as a function of system size so the Hamiltonian is non-extensive, a topic not without some considerable controversy <span class="citation" data-cites="grossNonextensiveHamiltonianSystems2002 lutskoQuestioningValidityNonextensive2011 wangCommentNonextensiveHamiltonian2003"> [<a href="#ref-grossNonextensiveHamiltonianSystems2002" role="doc-biblioref">39</a>–<a href="#ref-wangCommentNonextensiveHamiltonian2003" role="doc-biblioref">41</a>]</span> that I will not consider further here. For <span class="math inline">\(1 &lt; \alpha &lt; 2\)</span>, we get a phase transition to an ordered state at a finite temperature. This is what we want! At the special point <span class="math inline">\(\alpha = 2\)</span>, the energy of domain walls diverges logarithmically. This turns out to be a Kostelitz-Thouless transition <span class="citation" data-cites="thoulessLongRangeOrderOneDimensional1969"> [<a href="#ref-thoulessLongRangeOrderOneDimensional1969" role="doc-biblioref">31</a>]</span>. Finally, for <span class="math inline">\(\alpha &gt; 2\)</span> we have very quickly decaying interactions and domain walls again have a finite energy penalty. Hence, Peirels’ argument holds and there is no phase transition.</p>
+<p>One final complexity is that for <span class="math inline">\(\tfrac{3}{2} &lt; \alpha &lt; 2\)</span> renormalisation group methods show that the critical point has non-universal critical exponents that depend on <span class="math inline">\(\alpha\)</span>  <span class="citation" data-cites="fisherCriticalExponentsLongRange1972"> [<a href="#ref-fisherCriticalExponentsLongRange1972" role="doc-biblioref">42</a>]</span>. To avoid this potential confounding factor we will park ourselves at <span class="math inline">\(\alpha = 1.25\)</span> when we apply these ideas to the FK model.</p>
+<p>Were we to extend this to arbitrary dimension <span class="math inline">\(d\)</span>, we would find that thermodynamics properties, generally both <span class="math inline">\(d\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(\alpha\)</span>, long-range interactions can modify the ‘effective dimension’ of thermodynamic systems <span class="citation" data-cites="angeliniRelationsShortrangeLongrange2014"> [<a href="#ref-angeliniRelationsShortrangeLongrange2014" role="doc-biblioref">43</a>]</span>.</p>
 <p>Next Section: <a href="../2_Background/2.2_HKM_Model.html">The Kitaev Honeycomb Model</a></p>
 </section>
 </section>
@@ -150,13 +145,13 @@ H_{\mathrm{FK}} = &amp; \;U \sum_{i} S_i\;(c^\dagger_{i}c_{i} - \tfrac{1}{2}) -\
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[1] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">Hubbard, J., <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1963.0204">Electron Correlations in Narrow Energy Bands</a></em>, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences <strong>276</strong>, 238 (1963).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-falicovSimpleModelSemiconductorMetal1969" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[2] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">L. M. Falicov and J. C. Kimball, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.22.997">Simple Model for Semiconductor-Metal Transitions: Sm${\mathrm{B}}_{6}$ and Transition-Metal Oxides</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>22</strong>, 997 (1969).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[2] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">L. M. Falicov and J. C. Kimball, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.22.997">Simple Model for Semiconductor-Metal Transitions: SmB6 and Transition-Metal Oxides</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>22</strong>, 997 (1969).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-gruberFalicovKimballModelReview1996" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[3] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Gruber and N. Macris, <em>The Falicov-Kimball Model: A Review of Exact Results and Extensions</em>, Helvetica Physica Acta <strong>69</strong>, (1996).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[3] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Gruber and N. Macris, <em><a href="https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Falicov-Kimball-model%3A-a-review-of-exact-and-Gruber-Macris/f369e56a528205992a34abc9b3dc9770390608c9">The Falicov-Kimball Model: A Review of Exact Results and Extensions</a></em>, Helvetica Physica Acta <strong>69</strong>, (1996).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-gruberFalicovKimballModel2006" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[4] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Gruber and D. Ueltschi, <em>The Falicov-Kimball model</em>, in <em>Encyclopedia of mathematical physics. 1, 1,</em> (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[4] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Gruber and D. Ueltschi, <em><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0502041">The Falicov-Kimball model</a></em>, in <em>Encyclopedia of mathematical physics. 1, 1,</em> (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-devriesSimplifiedHubbardModel1993" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[5] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. de Vries, K. Michielsen, and H. De Raedt, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01308754">The Simplified Hubbard Model in One and Two Dimensions</a></em>, Z. Physik B - Condensed Matter <strong>92</strong>, 353 (1993).</div>
@@ -170,113 +165,110 @@ H_{\mathrm{FK}} = &amp; \;U \sum_{i} S_i\;(c^\dagger_{i}c_{i} - \tfrac{1}{2}) -\
 <div id="ref-gruberGroundStatesSpinless1990" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[8] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Gruber, J. Iwanski, J. Jedrzejewski, and P. Lemberger, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.2198">Ground States of the Spinless Falicov-Kimball Model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>41</strong>, 2198 (1990).</div>
 </div>
-<div id="ref-gruberFalicovKimballModel2005" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[9] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Gruber and D. Ueltschi, <em><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0502041">The Falicov-Kimball Model</a></em>, arXiv:math-Ph/0502041 (2005).</div>
-</div>
 <div id="ref-antipovCriticalExponentsStrongly2014" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[10] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. E. Antipov, E. Gull, and S. Kirchner, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.226401">Critical Exponents of Strongly Correlated Fermion Systems from Diagrammatic Multiscale Methods</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>112</strong>, 226401 (2014).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[9] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. E. Antipov, E. Gull, and S. Kirchner, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.226401">Critical Exponents of Strongly Correlated Fermion Systems from Diagrammatic Multiscale Methods</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>112</strong>, 226401 (2014).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-ribicNonlocalCorrelationsSpectral2016" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[11] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Ribic, G. Rohringer, and K. Held, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.195105">Nonlocal Correlations and Spectral Properties of the Falicov-Kimball Model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>93</strong>, 195105 (2016).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[10] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Ribic, G. Rohringer, and K. Held, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.195105">Nonlocal Correlations and Spectral Properties of the Falicov-Kimball Model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>93</strong>, 195105 (2016).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-freericksExactDynamicalMeanfield2003" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[12] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. K. Freericks and V. Zlatić, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.1333">Exact Dynamical Mean-Field Theory of the Falicov-Kimball Model</a></em>, Rev. Mod. Phys. <strong>75</strong>, 1333 (2003).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[11] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. K. Freericks and V. Zlatić, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.1333">Exact Dynamical Mean-Field Theory of the Falicov-Kimball Model</a></em>, Rev. Mod. Phys. <strong>75</strong>, 1333 (2003).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-herrmannNonequilibriumDynamicalCluster2016" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[13] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. J. Herrmann, N. Tsuji, M. Eckstein, and P. Werner, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.245114">Nonequilibrium Dynamical Cluster Approximation Study of the Falicov-Kimball Model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>94</strong>, 245114 (2016).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[12] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. J. Herrmann, N. Tsuji, M. Eckstein, and P. Werner, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.245114">Nonequilibrium Dynamical Cluster Approximation Study of the Falicov-Kimball Model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>94</strong>, 245114 (2016).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[14] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. E. Antipov, Y. Javanmard, P. Ribeiro, and S. Kirchner, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.146601">Interaction-Tuned Anderson Versus Mott Localization</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>117</strong>, 146601 (2016).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[13] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. E. Antipov, Y. Javanmard, P. Ribeiro, and S. Kirchner, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.146601">Interaction-Tuned Anderson Versus Mott Localization</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>117</strong>, 146601 (2016).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-maskaThermodynamicsTwodimensionalFalicovKimball2006" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[15] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. M. Maśka and K. Czajka, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.035109">Thermodynamics of the Two-Dimensional Falicov-Kimball Model: A Classical Monte Carlo Study</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>74</strong>, 035109 (2006).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[14] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. M. Maśka and K. Czajka, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.035109">Thermodynamics of the Two-Dimensional Falicov-Kimball Model: A Classical Monte Carlo Study</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>74</strong>, 035109 (2006).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-andersonAbsenceDiffusionCertain1958" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[16] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. W. Anderson, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.109.1492">Absence of Diffusion in Certain Random Lattices</a></em>, Phys. Rev. <strong>109</strong>, 1492 (1958).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[15] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. W. Anderson, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.109.1492">Absence of Diffusion in Certain Random Lattices</a></em>, Phys. Rev. <strong>109</strong>, 1492 (1958).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-brandtThermodynamicsCorrelationFunctions1989" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[17] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">U. Brandt and C. Mielsch, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321824">Thermodynamics and Correlation Functions of the Falicov-Kimball Model in Large Dimensions</a></em>, Z. Physik B - Condensed Matter <strong>75</strong>, 365 (1989).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[16] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">U. Brandt and C. Mielsch, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321824">Thermodynamics and Correlation Functions of the Falicov-Kimball Model in Large Dimensions</a></em>, Z. Physik B - Condensed Matter <strong>75</strong>, 365 (1989).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-liebAbsenceMottTransition1968" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[18] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">E. H. Lieb and F. Y. Wu, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.20.1445">Absence of Mott Transition in an Exact Solution of the Short-Range, One-Band Model in One Dimension</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>20</strong>, 1445 (1968).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[17] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">E. H. Lieb and F. Y. Wu, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.20.1445">Absence of Mott Transition in an Exact Solution of the Short-Range, One-Band Model in One Dimension</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>20</strong>, 1445 (1968).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-goldshteinPurePointSpectrum1977" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[19] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">I. Ya. Gol’dshtein, S. A. Molchanov, and L. A. Pastur, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01135526">A Pure Point Spectrum of the Stochastic One-Dimensional Schrödinger Operator</a></em>, Funct Anal Its Appl <strong>11</strong>, 1 (1977).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[18] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">I. Ya. Gol’dshtein, S. A. Molchanov, and L. A. Pastur, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01135526">A Pure Point Spectrum of the Stochastic One-Dimensional Schrödinger Operator</a></em>, Funct Anal Its Appl <strong>11</strong>, 1 (1977).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-abrahamsScalingTheoryLocalization1979" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[20] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">E. Abrahams, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello, and T. V. Ramakrishnan, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.673">Scaling Theory of Localization: Absence of Quantum Diffusion in Two Dimensions</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>42</strong>, 673 (1979).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[19] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">E. Abrahams, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello, and T. V. Ramakrishnan, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.673">Scaling Theory of Localization: Absence of Quantum Diffusion in Two Dimensions</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>42</strong>, 673 (1979).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[21] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">B. Kramer and A. MacKinnon, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/56/12/001">Localization: Theory and Experiment</a></em>, Rep. Prog. Phys. <strong>56</strong>, 1469 (1993).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[20] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">B. Kramer and A. MacKinnon, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/56/12/001">Localization: Theory and Experiment</a></em>, Rep. Prog. Phys. <strong>56</strong>, 1469 (1993).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-aubryAnalyticityBreakingAnderson1980" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[22] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. Aubry and G. André, <em>Analyticity Breaking and Anderson Localization in Incommensurate Lattices</em>, Proceedings, VIII International Colloquium on Group-Theoretical Methods in Physics <strong>3</strong>, 18 (1980).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[21] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. Aubry and G. André, <em>Analyticity Breaking and Anderson Localization in Incommensurate Lattices</em>, Proceedings, VIII International Colloquium on Group-Theoretical Methods in Physics <strong>3</strong>, 18 (1980).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-dassarmaLocalizationMobilityEdges1990" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[23] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. Das Sarma, S. He, and X. C. Xie, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.5544">Localization, Mobility Edges, and Metal-Insulator Transition in a Class of One-Dimensional Slowly Varying Deterministic Potentials</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>41</strong>, 5544 (1990).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[22] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. Das Sarma, S. He, and X. C. Xie, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.5544">Localization, Mobility Edges, and Metal-Insulator Transition in a Class of One-Dimensional Slowly Varying Deterministic Potentials</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>41</strong>, 5544 (1990).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-dunlapAbsenceLocalizationRandomdimer1990" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[24] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">D. H. Dunlap, H.-L. Wu, and P. W. Phillips, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.88">Absence of Localization in a Random-Dimer Model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>65</strong>, 88 (1990).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[23] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">D. H. Dunlap, H.-L. Wu, and P. W. Phillips, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.88">Absence of Localization in a Random-Dimer Model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>65</strong>, 88 (1990).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-peierlsIsingModelFerromagnetism1936" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[25] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">R. Peierls, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100019174">On Ising’s Model of Ferromagnetism</a></em>, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society <strong>32</strong>, 477 (1936).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[24] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">R. Peierls, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100019174">On Ising’s Model of Ferromagnetism</a></em>, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society <strong>32</strong>, 477 (1936).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-kennedyItinerantElectronModel1986" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[26] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Kennedy and E. H. Lieb, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371(86)90188-3">An Itinerant Electron Model with Crystalline or Magnetic Long Range Order</a></em>, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications <strong>138</strong>, 320 (1986).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[25] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Kennedy and E. H. Lieb, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371(86)90188-3">An Itinerant Electron Model with Crystalline or Magnetic Long Range Order</a></em>, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications <strong>138</strong>, 320 (1986).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-kasuyaTheoryMetallicFerro1956" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[27] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Kasuya, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.16.45">A Theory of Metallic Ferro- and Antiferromagnetism on Zener’s Model</a></em>, Prog Theor Phys <strong>16</strong>, 45 (1956).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[26] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Kasuya, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.16.45">A Theory of Metallic Ferro- and Antiferromagnetism on Zener’s Model</a></em>, Prog Theor Phys <strong>16</strong>, 45 (1956).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-rudermanIndirectExchangeCoupling1954" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[28] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. A. Ruderman and C. Kittel, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.96.99">Indirect Exchange Coupling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Conduction Electrons</a></em>, Phys. Rev. <strong>96</strong>, 99 (1954).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[27] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. A. Ruderman and C. Kittel, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.96.99">Indirect Exchange Coupling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Conduction Electrons</a></em>, Phys. Rev. <strong>96</strong>, 99 (1954).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-vanvleckNoteInteractionsSpins1962" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[29] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. H. Van Vleck, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.34.681">Note on the Interactions Between the Spins of Magnetic Ions or Nuclei in Metals</a></em>, Rev. Mod. Phys. <strong>34</strong>, 681 (1962).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[28] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. H. Van Vleck, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.34.681">Note on the Interactions Between the Spins of Magnetic Ions or Nuclei in Metals</a></em>, Rev. Mod. Phys. <strong>34</strong>, 681 (1962).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-yosidaMagneticPropertiesCuMn1957" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[30] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">K. Yosida, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.106.893">Magnetic Properties of Cu-Mn Alloys</a></em>, Phys. Rev. <strong>106</strong>, 893 (1957).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[29] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">K. Yosida, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.106.893">Magnetic Properties of Cu-Mn Alloys</a></em>, Phys. Rev. <strong>106</strong>, 893 (1957).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-rusinCalculationRKKYRange2017" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[31] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. M. Rusin and W. Zawadzki, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.06.007">On Calculation of RKKY Range Function in One Dimension</a></em>, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials <strong>441</strong>, 387 (2017).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[30] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. M. Rusin and W. Zawadzki, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.06.007">On Calculation of RKKY Range Function in One Dimension</a></em>, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials <strong>441</strong>, 387 (2017).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-thoulessLongRangeOrderOneDimensional1969" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[32] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">D. J. Thouless, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.187.732">Long-Range Order in One-Dimensional Ising Systems</a></em>, Phys. Rev. <strong>187</strong>, 732 (1969).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[31] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">D. J. Thouless, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.187.732">Long-Range Order in One-Dimensional Ising Systems</a></em>, Phys. Rev. <strong>187</strong>, 732 (1969).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-bursillOneDimensionalContinuum1994" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[33] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">R. J. Bursill, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371(94)90322-0">One Dimensional Continuum Falicov-Kimball Model in the Strongly Correlated Limit</a></em>, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications <strong>206</strong>, 521 (1994).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[32] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">R. J. Bursill, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371(94)90322-0">One Dimensional Continuum Falicov-Kimball Model in the Strongly Correlated Limit</a></em>, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications <strong>206</strong>, 521 (1994).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-gruberGroundStateEnergyLowTemperature1993" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[34] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Gruber, J. L. Lebowitz, and N. Macris, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/21/4/002">Ground-State Energy and Low-Temperature Behavior of the One-Dimensional Falicov-Kimball Model</a></em>, EPL <strong>21</strong>, 389 (1993).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[33] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Gruber, J. L. Lebowitz, and N. Macris, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/21/4/002">Ground-State Energy and Low-Temperature Behavior of the One-Dimensional Falicov-Kimball Model</a></em>, EPL <strong>21</strong>, 389 (1993).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-freericksTwostateOnedimensionalSpinless1990" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[35] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. K. Freericks and L. M. Falicov, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.2163">Two-State One-Dimensional Spinless Fermi Gas</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>41</strong>, 2163 (1990).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[34] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. K. Freericks and L. M. Falicov, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.2163">Two-State One-Dimensional Spinless Fermi Gas</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>41</strong>, 2163 (1990).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-michelettiCompleteDevilStaircase1997" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[36] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Micheletti, A. B. Harris, and J. M. Yeomans, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/30/21/002">A Complete Devil’s Staircase in the Falicov-Kimball Model</a></em>, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. <strong>30</strong>, L711 (1997).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[35] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Micheletti, A. B. Harris, and J. M. Yeomans, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/30/21/002">A Complete Devil’s Staircase in the Falicov-Kimball Model</a></em>, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. <strong>30</strong>, L711 (1997).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-dysonExistencePhasetransitionOnedimensional1969" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[37] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">F. J. Dyson, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645907">Existence of a Phase-Transition in a One-Dimensional Ising Ferromagnet</a></em>, Commun.Math. Phys. <strong>12</strong>, 91 (1969).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[36] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">F. J. Dyson, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645907">Existence of a Phase-Transition in a One-Dimensional Ising Ferromagnet</a></em>, Commun.Math. Phys. <strong>12</strong>, 91 (1969).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-ruelleStatisticalMechanicsOnedimensional1968" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[38] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">D. Ruelle, <em><a href="https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0234697">Statistical Mechanics of a One-Dimensional Lattice Gas</a></em>, Comm. Math. Phys. <strong>9</strong>, 267 (1968).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[37] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">D. Ruelle, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01654281">Statistical Mechanics of a One-Dimensional Lattice Gas</a></em>, Commun.Math. Phys. <strong>9</strong>, 267 (1968).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-lipkinValidityManybodyApproximation1965" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[39] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">H. J. Lipkin, N. Meshkov, and A. J. Glick, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(65)90862-X">Validity of Many-Body Approximation Methods for a Solvable Model. (I). Exact Solutions and Perturbation Theory</a></em>, Nuclear Physics <strong>62</strong>, 188 (1965).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[38] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">H. J. Lipkin, N. Meshkov, and A. J. Glick, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(65)90862-X">Validity of Many-Body Approximation Methods for a Solvable Model. (I). Exact Solutions and Perturbation Theory</a></em>, Nuclear Physics <strong>62</strong>, 188 (1965).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-grossNonextensiveHamiltonianSystems2002" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[40] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">D. H. E. Gross, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(01)00646-X">Non-Extensive Hamiltonian Systems Follow Boltzmann’s Principle Not Tsallis Statistics. -- Phase Transitions, Second Law of Thermodynamics</a></em>, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications <strong>305</strong>, 99 (2002).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[39] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">D. H. E. Gross, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(01)00646-X">Non-Extensive Hamiltonian Systems Follow Boltzmann’s Principle Not Tsallis Statistics. -- Phase Transitions, Second Law of Thermodynamics</a></em>, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications <strong>305</strong>, 99 (2002).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-lutskoQuestioningValidityNonextensive2011" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[41] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. F. Lutsko and J. P. Boon, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/95/20006">Questioning the Validity of Non-Extensive Thermodynamics for Classical Hamiltonian Systems</a></em>, EPL <strong>95</strong>, 20006 (2011).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[40] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. F. Lutsko and J. P. Boon, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/95/20006">Questioning the Validity of Non-Extensive Thermodynamics for Classical Hamiltonian Systems</a></em>, EPL <strong>95</strong>, 20006 (2011).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-wangCommentNonextensiveHamiltonian2003" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[42] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">Q. A. Wang, <em><a href="https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00009462">Comment on <span>“Nonextensive Hamiltonian Systems Follow Boltzmann’s Principle Not Tsallis Statistics-Phase Transition, Second Law of Thermodynamics”</span> by Gross</a></em>, (2003).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[41] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">Q. A. Wang, <em><a href="https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00009462">Comment on <span>“Nonextensive Hamiltonian Systems Follow Boltzmann’s Principle Not Tsallis Statistics-Phase Transition, Second Law of Thermodynamics”</span> by Gross</a></em>, (2003).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-fisherCriticalExponentsLongRange1972" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[43] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. E. Fisher, S. Ma, and B. G. Nickel, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.29.917">Critical Exponents for Long-Range Interactions</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>29</strong>, 917 (1972).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[42] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. E. Fisher, S. Ma, and B. G. Nickel, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.29.917">Critical Exponents for Long-Range Interactions</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>29</strong>, 917 (1972).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-angeliniRelationsShortrangeLongrange2014" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[44] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. C. Angelini, G. Parisi, and F. Ricci-Tersenghi, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.062120">Relations Between Short-Range and Long-Range Ising Models</a></em>, Phys. Rev. E <strong>89</strong>, 062120 (2014).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[43] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. C. Angelini, G. Parisi, and F. Ricci-Tersenghi, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.062120">Relations Between Short-Range and Long-Range Ising Models</a></em>, Phys. Rev. E <strong>89</strong>, 062120 (2014).</div>
 </div>
 </div>
 </section>

_thesis/2_Background/2.2_HKM_Model.html

@@ -84,49 +84,49 @@ image:
 <section id="bg-hkm-model" class="level1">
 <h1>The Kitaev Honeycomb Model</h1>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/intro/honeycomb_zoom/intro_figure_by_hand.svg" id="fig-intro_figure_by_hand" data-short-caption="The Kitaev Honeycomb Model" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 1: (a) The Kitaev honeycomb model is defined on a honeycomb lattice. The special feature of the honeycomb lattice that makes the model solvable is that each vertex is joined by exactly three bonds, i.e. the lattice is trivalent. One of three labels is assigned to each bond (x,y,z) here represented by colour. (b). After transforming to the Majorana representation we get an emergent gauge degree of freedom u_{jk} = \pm 1 that lives on each bond, the bond variables. These are antisymmetric, u_{jk} = -u_{kj}, so we represent them graphically with arrows on each bond that point in the direction that u_{jk} = +1 (c). The Majorana transformation can be visualised as breaking each spin into four Majoranas b_i^x,\;b_i^y,\;b_i^z,\;c_i. The x, y and z Majoranas then pair along the bonds forming conserved \mathbb{Z}_2 bond operators u_{jk} = \langle i b_i^\alpha b_j^\alpha \rangle. The remaining c_i operators form an effective quadratic Hamiltonian H = \frac{i}{4} \sum_{\langle i,j\rangle_\alpha} 2J^{\alpha} u_{ij} \hat{c}_i \hat{c}_j." />
+<img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/intro/honeycomb_zoom/intro_figure_by_hand.svg" id="fig-intro_figure_by_hand" data-short-caption="The Kitaev Honeycomb Model" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 1: (a) The Kitaev honeycomb model is defined on a honeycomb lattice. The special feature of the honeycomb lattice that makes the model solvable is that each vertex is joined by exactly three bonds, i.e. the lattice is trivalent. One of three labels is assigned to each bond \{x,\;y,\;z\} here represented by colour. (b) After transforming to the Majorana representation we get an emergent gauge degree of freedom u_{jk} = \pm 1 that lives on each bond, the bond variables. These are antisymmetric, u_{jk} = -u_{kj}, so we represent them graphically with arrows on each bond that point in the direction that u_{jk} = +1. (c) The Majorana transformation can be visualised as breaking each spin into four Majoranas b_i^x,\;b_i^y,\;b_i^z,\;c_i. The x, y and z Majoranas then pair along the bonds forming conserved \mathbb{Z}_2 bond operators u_{jk} = \langle i b_i^\alpha b_j^\alpha \rangle. The remaining c_i operators form an effective quadratic Hamiltonian H = \frac{i}{4} \sum_{\langle i,j\rangle_\alpha} 2J^{\alpha} u_{ij} \hat{c}_i \hat{c}_j." />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1: <strong>(a)</strong> The Kitaev honeycomb model is defined on a honeycomb lattice. The special feature of the honeycomb lattice that makes the model solvable is that each vertex is joined by exactly three bonds, i.e. the lattice is trivalent. One of three labels is assigned to each bond (x,y,z) here represented by colour. <strong>(b)</strong>. After transforming to the Majorana representation we get an emergent gauge degree of freedom <span class="math inline">\(u_{jk} = \pm 1\)</span> that lives on each bond, the bond variables. These are antisymmetric, <span class="math inline">\(u_{jk} = -u_{kj}\)</span>, so we represent them graphically with arrows on each bond that point in the direction that <span class="math inline">\(u_{jk} = +1\)</span> <strong>(c)</strong>. The Majorana transformation can be visualised as breaking each spin into four Majoranas <span class="math inline">\(b_i^x,\;b_i^y,\;b_i^z,\;c_i\)</span>. The x, y and z Majoranas then pair along the bonds forming conserved <span class="math inline">\(\mathbb{Z}_2\)</span> bond operators <span class="math inline">\(u_{jk} = \langle i b_i^\alpha b_j^\alpha \rangle\)</span>. The remaining <span class="math inline">\(c_i\)</span> operators form an effective quadratic Hamiltonian <span class="math inline">\(H = \frac{i}{4} \sum_{\langle i,j\rangle_\alpha} 2J^{\alpha} u_{ij} \hat{c}_i \hat{c}_j\)</span>.</figcaption>
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1: <strong>(a)</strong> The Kitaev honeycomb model is defined on a honeycomb lattice. The special feature of the honeycomb lattice that makes the model solvable is that each vertex is joined by exactly three bonds, i.e. the lattice is trivalent. One of three labels is assigned to each bond <span class="math inline">\(\{x,\;y,\;z\}\)</span> here represented by colour. <strong>(b)</strong> After transforming to the Majorana representation we get an emergent gauge degree of freedom <span class="math inline">\(u_{jk} = \pm 1\)</span> that lives on each bond, the bond variables. These are antisymmetric, <span class="math inline">\(u_{jk} = -u_{kj}\)</span>, so we represent them graphically with arrows on each bond that point in the direction that <span class="math inline">\(u_{jk} = +1\)</span>. <strong>(c)</strong> The Majorana transformation can be visualised as breaking each spin into four Majoranas <span class="math inline">\(b_i^x,\;b_i^y,\;b_i^z,\;c_i\)</span>. The x, y and z Majoranas then pair along the bonds forming conserved <span class="math inline">\(\mathbb{Z}_2\)</span> bond operators <span class="math inline">\(u_{jk} = \langle i b_i^\alpha b_j^\alpha \rangle\)</span>. The remaining <span class="math inline">\(c_i\)</span> operators form an effective quadratic Hamiltonian <span class="math inline">\(H = \frac{i}{4} \sum_{\langle i,j\rangle_\alpha} 2J^{\alpha} u_{ij} \hat{c}_i \hat{c}_j\)</span>.</figcaption>
 </figure>
 <section id="the-spin-hamiltonian" class="level2">
 <h2>The Spin Hamiltonian</h2>
 <p>The Kitaev Honeycomb (KH) model is an exactly solvable model of interacting spin<span class="math inline">\(-1/2\)</span> spins on the vertices of a honeycomb lattice. Each bond in the lattice is assigned a label <span class="math inline">\(\alpha \in \{ x, y, z\}\)</span> and couples two spins along the <span class="math inline">\(\alpha\)</span> axis. See fig. <a href="#fig:intro_figure_by_hand">1</a> for a diagram of the setup.</p>
 <p>This gives us the Hamiltonian <span id="eq:bg-kh-model"><span class="math display">\[ H =  - \sum_{\langle j,k\rangle_\alpha} J^{\alpha}\sigma_j^{\alpha}\sigma_k^{\alpha}, \qquad{(1)}\]</span></span> where <span class="math inline">\(\sigma^\alpha_j\)</span> is the <span class="math inline">\(\alpha\)</span> component of a Pauli matrix acting on site <span class="math inline">\(j\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(\langle j,k\rangle_\alpha\)</span> is a pair of nearest-neighbour indices connected by an <span class="math inline">\(\alpha\)</span>-bond with exchange coupling <span class="math inline">\(J^\alpha\)</span>. Kitaev introduced this model in his seminal 2006 paper <span class="citation" data-cites="kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006"> [<a href="#ref-kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>The KH can arise as the result of strong spin-orbit couplings in, for example, the transition metal based compounds <span class="citation" data-cites="Jackeli2009 HerrmannsAnRev2018 Winter2017 TrebstPhysRep2022 Takagi2019"> [<a href="#ref-Jackeli2009" role="doc-biblioref">2</a>–<a href="#ref-Takagi2019" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>. The model is highly frustrated: each spin would like to align along a different direction with each of its three neighbours but this cannot be achieved even classically <span class="citation" data-cites="chandraClassicalHeisenbergSpins2010 selaOrderbydisorderSpinorbitalLiquids2014"> [<a href="#ref-chandraClassicalHeisenbergSpins2010" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>,<a href="#ref-selaOrderbydisorderSpinorbitalLiquids2014" role="doc-biblioref">8</a>]</span>. This frustration leads the model to have a Quantum Sping Liquid (QSL) ground state, a complex many-body state with a high degree of entanglement but no long-range magnetic order even at zero temperature. While the possibility of a QSL ground state was suggested much earlier <span class="citation" data-cites="andersonResonatingValenceBonds1973"> [<a href="#ref-andersonResonatingValenceBonds1973" role="doc-biblioref">9</a>]</span>, the KH model was the first exactly solvable models of the QSL state. The KH model has a rich ground state phase diagram with gapless and gapped phases, the latter supporting fractionalised quasiparticles with both Abelian and non-Abelian quasiparticle excitations. Anyons have been the subject of much attention because, among other reasons, they can be braided through spacetime to achieve noise tolerant quantum computations <span class="citation" data-cites="freedmanTopologicalQuantumComputation2003"> [<a href="#ref-freedmanTopologicalQuantumComputation2003" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>]</span>. At finite temperature the KH model undergoes a phase transition to a thermal metal state <span class="citation" data-cites="selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019"> [<a href="#ref-selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019" role="doc-biblioref">11</a>]</span>. The KH model can be solved exactly via a mapping to Majorana fermions. This mapping yields an extensive number of static <span class="math inline">\(\mathbb Z_2\)</span> fluxes tied to an emergent gauge field with the remaining fermions are governed by a free fermion hamiltonian.</p>
+<p>The KH can arise as the result of strong spin-orbit couplings in, for example, the transition metal based compounds <span class="citation" data-cites="Jackeli2009 HerrmannsAnRev2018 Winter2017 TrebstPhysRep2022 Takagi2019"> [<a href="#ref-Jackeli2009" role="doc-biblioref">2</a>–<a href="#ref-Takagi2019" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>. The model is highly frustrated: each spin would like to align along a different direction with each of its three neighbours but this cannot be achieved even classically <span class="citation" data-cites="chandraClassicalHeisenbergSpins2010 selaOrderbydisorderSpinorbitalLiquids2014"> [<a href="#ref-chandraClassicalHeisenbergSpins2010" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>,<a href="#ref-selaOrderbydisorderSpinorbitalLiquids2014" role="doc-biblioref">8</a>]</span>. This frustration leads the model to have a Quantum Sping Liquid (QSL) ground state, a complex many-body state with a high degree of entanglement but no long-range magnetic order even at zero temperature. While the possibility of a QSL ground state was suggested much earlier <span class="citation" data-cites="Anderson1973"> [<a href="#ref-Anderson1973" role="doc-biblioref">9</a>]</span>, the KH model was the first exactly solvable models of the QSL state. The KH model has a rich ground state phase diagram with gapless and gapped phases, the latter supporting fractionalised quasiparticles with both Abelian and non-Abelian quasiparticle excitations. Anyons have been the subject of much attention because, among other reasons, they can be braided through spacetime to achieve noise tolerant quantum computations <span class="citation" data-cites="freedmanTopologicalQuantumComputation2003"> [<a href="#ref-freedmanTopologicalQuantumComputation2003" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>]</span>. At finite temperature the KH model undergoes a phase transition to a thermal metal state <span class="citation" data-cites="selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019"> [<a href="#ref-selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019" role="doc-biblioref">11</a>]</span>. The KH model can be solved exactly via a mapping to Majorana fermions. This mapping yields an extensive number of static <span class="math inline">\(\mathbb Z_2\)</span> fluxes tied to an emergent gauge field with the remaining fermions are governed by a free fermion hamiltonian.</p>
-<p>This section will go over the standard model in detail, first discussing <a href="../2_Background/2.2_HKM_Model.html#the-spin-model">the spin model</a>, then detailing the transformation to a <a href="../2_Background/2.2_HKM_Model.html#the-majorana-model">Majorana hamiltonian</a> that allows a full solution while enlarging the Hamiltonian. We will discuss the properties of the <a href="../2_Background/2.2_HKM_Model.html#an-emergent-gauge-field">emergent gauge fields</a> and the projector. The <a href="../2_Background/2.2_HKM_Model.html#sec:anyons">next section</a> will discuss anyons, topology and the Chern number, using the Kitaev model as an explicit example of these topics. Finally will then discuss the ground state found via Lieb’s theorem as well as work on generalisations of the ground state to other lattices. Finally we will look at the <a href="../2_Background/2.2_HKM_Model.html#ground-state-phases">phase diagram</a>.</p>
+<p>This section will go over the standard model in detail, first discussing <a href="../2_Background/2.2_HKM_Model.html#the-spin-model">the spin model</a>, then detailing the transformation to a <a href="../2_Background/2.2_HKM_Model.html#the-majorana-model">Majorana hamiltonian</a> that allows a full solution while enlarging the Hamiltonian. I will discuss the properties of the <a href="../2_Background/2.2_HKM_Model.html#an-emergent-gauge-field">emergent gauge fields</a> and the projector. The <a href="../2_Background/2.2_HKM_Model.html#sec:anyons">next section</a> will discuss anyons, topology and the Chern number, using the KH model as an explicit example.I will then discuss the ground state found via Lieb’s theorem as well as work on generalisations of the ground state to other lattices. Finally I will present the <a href="../2_Background/2.2_HKM_Model.html#ground-state-phases">phase diagram</a>.</p>
 </section>
 <section id="the-spin-model" class="level2">
 <h2>The Spin Model</h2>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/visual_kitaev_1.svg" id="fig-visual_kitaev_1" data-short-caption="A Visual Intro to the Kitaev Model" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 2: A visual introduction to the Kitaev honeycomb model." />
+<img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/visual_kitaev_1.svg" id="fig-visual_kitaev_1" data-short-caption="A Visual Intro to the Kitaev Model" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 2: A visual introduction to the Kitaev Honeycomb (KH) model. In the spin representation, bond operators k_{ij} = \sigma^\alpha_i \sigma^\alpha_j can be represented by arrows from site i to site j, from these we can form the Hamiltonian and conserved plaquette and loop operators. Note that the bond operators are defined differently in the Majorana representation but the definitions coincide for closed loops of bonds." />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 2: A visual introduction to the Kitaev honeycomb model.</figcaption>
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 2: A visual introduction to the Kitaev Honeycomb (KH) model. In the spin representation, bond operators <span class="math inline">\(k_{ij} = \sigma^\alpha_i \sigma^\alpha_j\)</span> can be represented by arrows from site <span class="math inline">\(i\)</span> to site <span class="math inline">\(j\)</span>, from these we can form the Hamiltonian and conserved plaquette and loop operators. Note that the bond operators are defined differently in the Majorana representation but the definitions coincide for closed loops of bonds.</figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>As discussed in the introduction, spin hamiltonians like that of the KH model arise in electronic systems as the result the balance of multiple effects <span class="citation" data-cites="TrebstPhysRep2022"> [<a href="#ref-TrebstPhysRep2022" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>]</span>. For instance, in certain transition metal systems with <span class="math inline">\(d^5\)</span> valence electrons, crystal field and spin-orbit couplings conspire to shift and split the <span class="math inline">\(d\)</span> orbitals into moments with spin <span class="math inline">\(j = 1/2\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(j = 3/2\)</span>. Of these, the bandwidth <span class="math inline">\(t\)</span> of the <span class="math inline">\(j= 1/2\)</span> band is small, meaning that even relatively meagre electron correlations (such those induced by the <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span> term in the Hubbard model) can lead to the opening of a Mott gap. From there we have a <span class="math inline">\(j = 1/2\)</span> Mott insulator whose effective spin-spin interactions are again shaped by the lattice geometry and spin-orbit coupling leading some materials to have strong bond-directional Ising-type interactions <span class="citation" data-cites="jackeliMottInsulatorsStrong2009 khaliullinOrbitalOrderFluctuations2005"> [<a href="#ref-jackeliMottInsulatorsStrong2009" role="doc-biblioref">12</a>,<a href="#ref-khaliullinOrbitalOrderFluctuations2005" role="doc-biblioref">13</a>]</span>. In the KH model the bond directionality refers to the fact that the coupling axis <span class="math inline">\(\alpha\)</span> in terms like <span class="math inline">\(\sigma_j^{\alpha}\sigma_k^{\alpha}\)</span> is strongly bond dependent.</p>
+<p>As discussed in the introduction, spin hamiltonians like that of the KH model arise in electronic systems as the result the balance of multiple effects <span class="citation" data-cites="TrebstPhysRep2022"> [<a href="#ref-TrebstPhysRep2022" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>]</span>. For instance, in certain transition metal systems with <span class="math inline">\(d^5\)</span> valence electrons, crystal field and spin-orbit couplings conspire to shift and split the <span class="math inline">\(d\)</span> orbitals into moments with spin <span class="math inline">\(j = 1/2\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(j = 3/2\)</span>. Of these, the bandwidth <span class="math inline">\(t\)</span> of the <span class="math inline">\(j= 1/2\)</span> band is small, meaning that even relatively meagre electron correlations (such as those induced by the <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span> term in the Hubbard model) can lead to the opening of a Mott gap. From there we have a <span class="math inline">\(j = 1/2\)</span> Mott insulator whose effective spin-spin interactions are again shaped by the lattice geometry and spin-orbit coupling leading some materials to have strong bond-directional Ising-type interactions <span class="citation" data-cites="jackeliMottInsulatorsStrong2009 khaliullinOrbitalOrderFluctuations2005"> [<a href="#ref-jackeliMottInsulatorsStrong2009" role="doc-biblioref">12</a>,<a href="#ref-khaliullinOrbitalOrderFluctuations2005" role="doc-biblioref">13</a>]</span>. In the KH model the bond directionality refers to the fact that the coupling axis <span class="math inline">\(\alpha\)</span> in terms like <span class="math inline">\(\sigma_j^{\alpha}\sigma_k^{\alpha}\)</span> is strongly bond dependent.</p>
-<p>In the spin hamiltonian eq. <a href="#eq:bg-kh-model">1</a> we can already tease out a set of conserved fluxes that will be key to the model’s solution. These fluxes are the expectations of Wilson loop operators</p>
+<p>In the spin hamiltonian eq. <a href="#eq:bg-kh-model">1</a>, we can already tease out a set of conserved fluxes that will be key to the model’s solution. These fluxes are the expectations of Wilson loop operators</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[\hat{W}_p = \prod_{\langle i,j\rangle_\alpha\; \in\; p} \sigma_i^{\alpha}\sigma_j^{\alpha},\]</span></p>
-<p>the products of bonds winding around a closed path <span class="math inline">\(p\)</span> on the lattice. These operators commute with the Hamiltonian and so have no time dynamics. The winding direction does not matter so long as it is fixed. By convention we will always use clockwise. Each closed path on the lattice is associated with a flux. The number of conserved quantities grows linearly with system size and is thus extensive, this is a common property for exactly solvable systems and can be compared to the heavy electrons present in the Falicov-Kimball model. The square of two loop operators is one so any contractible loop can be expressed as a product of loops around plaquettes of the lattice, as in fig. <a href="#fig:stokes_theorem">3</a>. For the honeycomb lattice the plaquettes are the hexagons. The expectations of <span class="math inline">\(\hat{W}_p\)</span> through each plaquette, the fluxes, are therefore enough to describe the whole flux sector. We will focus on these fluxes, denoting them by <span class="math inline">\(\phi_i\)</span>. Once we have made the mapping to the Majorana Hamiltonian I will explain how these fluxes can be connected to an emergent <span class="math inline">\(B\)</span> field which makes their interpretation as fluxes clear.</p>
+<p>the products of bonds winding around a closed path <span class="math inline">\(p\)</span> on the lattice. These operators commute with the Hamiltonian and so have no time dynamics. The winding direction does not matter so long as it is fixed. By convention we will always use clockwise. Each closed path on the lattice is associated with a flux. The number of conserved quantities grows linearly with system size and is thus extensive. This is a common property for exactly solvable systems and can be compared to the heavy electrons present in the Falicov-Kimball model. The square of two loop operators is one so any contractible loop can be expressed as a product of loops around plaquettes of the lattice, as in fig. <a href="#fig:stokes_theorem">3</a>. For the honeycomb lattice, the plaquettes are the hexagons. The expectations of <span class="math inline">\(\hat{W}_p\)</span> through each plaquette, the fluxes, are therefore enough to describe the whole flux sector. We will focus on these fluxes, denoting them by <span class="math inline">\(\phi_i\)</span>. Once we have made the mapping to the Majorana Hamiltonian, I will explain how these fluxes can be connected to an emergent <span class="math inline">\(B\)</span> field which makes their interpretation as fluxes clear.</p>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/stokes_theorem/stokes_theorem.svg" id="fig-stokes_theorem" data-short-caption="We can construct arbitrary loops from plaquette fluxes." style="width:71.0%" alt="Figure 3: In the Kitaev honeycomb model, Wilson loop operators \hat{W}_p = \prod_{\langle i,j\rangle_\alpha\; \in\; p} \sigma_i^{\alpha}\sigma_j^{\alpha} can be composed via multiplication to produce arbitrary contractible loops. As a consequence we need only to keep track of the value of the flux through each plaquette \phi_i. This relationship between the u_{ij} around a region and fluxes with one is evocative of Stokes’ theorem from classical electromagnetism. In fact it turns out to be the exponential of it as we shall make explicit later." />
+<img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/stokes_theorem/stokes_theorem.svg" id="fig-stokes_theorem" data-short-caption="We can construct arbitrary loops from plaquette fluxes." style="width:71.0%" alt="Figure 3: In the KH model, Wilson loop operators \hat{W}_p = \prod_{\langle i,j\rangle_\alpha\; \in\; p} \sigma_i^{\alpha}\sigma_j^{\alpha} can be composed via multiplication to produce arbitrary contractible loops. As a consequence, we need only to keep track of the value of the flux through each plaquette \phi_i. This relationship between the u_{ij} around a region and the fluxes inside it is evocative of Stokes’ theorem from classical electromagnetism. Indeed, it turns out to be closely related as we shall see later." />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 3: In the Kitaev honeycomb model, Wilson loop operators <span class="math inline">\(\hat{W}_p = \prod_{\langle i,j\rangle_\alpha\; \in\; p} \sigma_i^{\alpha}\sigma_j^{\alpha}\)</span> can be composed via multiplication to produce arbitrary contractible loops. As a consequence we need only to keep track of the value of the flux through each plaquette <span class="math inline">\(\phi_i\)</span>. This relationship between the <span class="math inline">\(u_{ij}\)</span> around a region and fluxes with one is evocative of Stokes’ theorem from classical electromagnetism. In fact it turns out to be the exponential of it as we shall make explicit later.</figcaption>
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 3: In the KH model, Wilson loop operators <span class="math inline">\(\hat{W}_p = \prod_{\langle i,j\rangle_\alpha\; \in\; p} \sigma_i^{\alpha}\sigma_j^{\alpha}\)</span> can be composed via multiplication to produce arbitrary contractible loops. As a consequence, we need only to keep track of the value of the flux through each plaquette <span class="math inline">\(\phi_i\)</span>. This relationship between the <span class="math inline">\(u_{ij}\)</span> around a region and the fluxes inside it is evocative of Stokes’ theorem from classical electromagnetism. Indeed, it turns out to be closely related as we shall see later.</figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>It is worth noting in passing that the effective Hamiltonian for many Kitaev materials incorporates a contribution from an isotropic Heisenberg term <span class="math inline">\(\sum_{i,j} \vec{\sigma}_i\cdot\vec{\sigma}_j\)</span>, this is referred to as the Heisenberg-Kitaev model <span class="citation" data-cites="Chaloupka2010"> [<a href="#ref-Chaloupka2010" role="doc-biblioref">14</a>]</span>. Materials for which the Kitaev term dominates are generally known as Kitaev Materials. See <span class="citation" data-cites="TrebstPhysRep2022"> [<a href="#ref-TrebstPhysRep2022" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>]</span> for a full discussion of Kitaev Materials.</p>
+<p>It is worth noting in passing that the effective Hamiltonian for many Kitaev materials incorporates a contribution from an isotropic Heisenberg term <span class="math inline">\(\sum_{i,j} \vec{\sigma}_i\cdot\vec{\sigma}_j\)</span>. This is referred to as the Heisenberg-Kitaev model <span class="citation" data-cites="Chaloupka2010"> [<a href="#ref-Chaloupka2010" role="doc-biblioref">14</a>]</span>. Materials for which the Kitaev term dominates are generally known as Kitaev Materials. See <span class="citation" data-cites="TrebstPhysRep2022"> [<a href="#ref-TrebstPhysRep2022" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>]</span> for a full discussion of Kitaev Materials.</p>
-<p>As with the Falicov-Kimball model, the KH model has a extensive number of conserved quantities, the fluxes. So again we will work in the simultaneous eigenbasis of the fluxes and the Hamiltonian so that we can treat the fluxes like a classical degree of freedom. This is part of what makes the model tractable. We will find that the ground state of the model corresponds to some particular choice of fluxes. We will refer to local excitations away from the flux ground state as <em>vortices</em>. In order to fully solve the model however, we must first move to a Majorana picture.</p>
+<p>As with the Falicov-Kimball model, the KH model has an extensive number of conserved quantities, the fluxes. So again we will work in the simultaneous eigenbasis of the fluxes and the Hamiltonian so that we can treat the fluxes like a classical degree of freedom. This is part of what makes the model tractable. We will find that the ground state of the model corresponds to some particular choice of fluxes. We will refer to local excitations away from the flux ground state as <em>vortices</em>. In order to fully solve the model however, we must first move to a Majorana representation.</p>
 </section>
 <section id="the-majorana-model" class="level2">
 <h2>The Majorana Model</h2>
-<p>Majorana fermions are something like ‘half of a complex fermion’ and are their own antiparticle. From a set of <span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> fermionic creation <span class="math inline">\(f_i^\dagger\)</span> and anhilation <span class="math inline">\(f_i\)</span> operators we can construct <span class="math inline">\(2N\)</span> Majorana operators <span class="math inline">\(c_m\)</span>. We can do this construction in multiple ways subject to only mild constraints required to keep the overall commutations relations correct <span class="citation" data-cites="kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006"> [<a href="#ref-kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>. Majorana operators square to one but otherwise have standard fermionic anti-commutation relations.</p>
+<p>Majorana fermions are something like ‘half of a complex fermion’ and are their own antiparticle. From a set of <span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> fermionic creation <span class="math inline">\(f_i^\dagger\)</span> and anhilation <span class="math inline">\(f_i\)</span> operators, we can construct <span class="math inline">\(2N\)</span> Majorana operators <span class="math inline">\(c_m\)</span>. We can do this construction in multiple ways subject to only mild constraints required to keep the overall commutations relations correct <span class="citation" data-cites="kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006"> [<a href="#ref-kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>. Majorana operators square to one, but otherwise have standard fermionic anti-commutation relations.</p>
-<p><span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> spins can be mapped to <span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> fermions with the well known Jordan-Wigner transformation and indeed this approach can be used to solve the Kitaev model <span class="citation" data-cites="chenExactResultsKitaev2008"> [<a href="#ref-chenExactResultsKitaev2008" role="doc-biblioref">15</a>]</span>. Here I will introduce the method Kitaev used in the original paper as this forms the basis for the results that will be presented in this thesis. Rather than mapping to <span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> fermions, Kitaev maps to <span class="math inline">\(4N\)</span> Majoranas, effectively <span class="math inline">\(2N\)</span> fermions. In contrast to the Jordan-Wigner approach which makes fermions out of strings of spin operators in order to correctly produce fermionic commutation relations, the Kitaev transformation maps each spin locally to four Majoranas. The downside is that this enlarges the Hilbert space from <span class="math inline">\(2^N\)</span> to <span class="math inline">\(4^N\)</span>. We will have to employ a projector <span class="math inline">\(\hat{P}\)</span> to come back down to the physical Hilbert space later. As everything is local, I will drop the site indices <span class="math inline">\(ijk\)</span> in expressions that refer to only a single site.</p>
+<p><span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> spins can be mapped to <span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> fermions with the well-known Jordan-Wigner transformation and indeed this approach can be used to solve the Kitaev model <span class="citation" data-cites="chenExactResultsKitaev2008"> [<a href="#ref-chenExactResultsKitaev2008" role="doc-biblioref">15</a>]</span>. Here I will introduce the method Kitaev used in the original paper as this forms the basis for the results that will be presented in this thesis. Rather than mapping to <span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> fermions, Kitaev maps to <span class="math inline">\(4N\)</span> Majoranas, effectively <span class="math inline">\(2N\)</span> fermions. In contrast to the Jordan-Wigner transformation which makes fermions out of strings of spin operators in order to correctly produce fermionic commutation relations, the Kitaev transformation maps each spin locally to four Majoranas. The downside is that this enlarges the Hilbert space from <span class="math inline">\(2^N\)</span> to <span class="math inline">\(4^N\)</span>. We will have to employ a projector <span class="math inline">\(\hat{P}\)</span> to come back down to the physical Hilbert space later. As everything is local, I will drop the site indices <span class="math inline">\(ijk\)</span> in expressions that refer to only a single site.</p>
 <p>The mapping is defined in terms of four Majoranas per site <span class="math inline">\(b_i^x,\;b_i^y,\;b_i^z,\;c_i\)</span> such that</p>
 <p><span id="eq:bg-kh-mapping"><span class="math display">\[\tilde{\sigma}^x = i b^x c,\; \tilde{\sigma}^y = i b^y c,\; \tilde{\sigma}^z = i b^z c\qquad{(2)}\]</span></span></p>
-<p>The tildes on the spin operators <span class="math inline">\(\tilde{\sigma_i^\alpha}\)</span> emphasis that they live in this new extended Hilbert space and are only equivalent to the original spin operators after applying a projector <span class="math inline">\(\hat{P}\)</span>. The form of the projection operator can be understood in a few ways. From a group-theoretic perspective, before projection, the operators <span class="math inline">\(\{\tilde{\sigma}^x, \tilde{\sigma}^y, \tilde{\sigma}^z\}\)</span> form a representation of the gamma group <span class="math inline">\(G_{3,0}\)</span>. The gamma groups <span class="math inline">\(G_{p,q}\)</span> have <span class="math inline">\(p\)</span> generators that square to the identity and <span class="math inline">\(q\)</span> that square (roughly) to <span class="math inline">\(-1\)</span>. The generators otherwise obey standard anticommutation relations. The well known gamma matrices <span class="math inline">\(\{\gamma^0, \gamma^1, \gamma^2, \gamma^3\}\)</span> represent <span class="math inline">\(G_{1,3}\)</span> the quaternions <span class="math inline">\(G_{0,3}\)</span> and the Pauli matrices <span class="math inline">\(G_{3,0}\)</span>.</p>
+<p>The tildes on the spin operators <span class="math inline">\(\tilde{\sigma_i^\alpha}\)</span> emphasise that they live in this new extended Hilbert space and are only equivalent to the original spin operators after applying a projector <span class="math inline">\(\hat{P}\)</span>. The form of the projection operator can be understood in a few ways. From a group-theoretic perspective, before projection, the operators <span class="math inline">\(\{\tilde{\sigma}^x, \tilde{\sigma}^y, \tilde{\sigma}^z\}\)</span> form a representation of the gamma group <span class="math inline">\(G_{3,0}\)</span>. The gamma groups <span class="math inline">\(G_{p,q}\)</span> have <span class="math inline">\(p\)</span> generators that square to the identity and <span class="math inline">\(q\)</span> that square (roughly) to <span class="math inline">\(-1\)</span>. The generators otherwise obey standard anticommutation relations. The well known gamma matrices <span class="math inline">\(\{\gamma^0, \gamma^1, \gamma^2, \gamma^3\}\)</span> represent <span class="math inline">\(G_{1,3}\)</span> the quaternions <span class="math inline">\(G_{0,3}\)</span> and the Pauli matrices <span class="math inline">\(G_{3,0}\)</span>.</p>
-<p>The Pauli matrices, however, have the additional property that the <em>chiral element</em> <span class="math inline">\(\sigma^x \sigma^y \sigma^z = \pmi\)</span> is not fully determined by the group properties of <span class="math inline">\(G_{3,0}\)</span> but it is equal to <span class="math inline">\(i\)</span> in the Pauli matrices. Therefore to fully reproduce the algebra of the Pauli matrices we must project into the subspace where <span class="math inline">\(\tilde{\sigma}^x \tilde{\sigma}^y \tilde{\sigma}^z = +i\)</span>. The chiral element of the gamma matrices for instance <span class="math inline">\(\gamma_5 = i\gamma^0 \gamma^1 \gamma^2 \gamma^3\)</span> is of central importance in quantum field theory. See <span class="citation" data-cites="petitjeanChiralityDiracSpinors2020"> [<a href="#ref-petitjeanChiralityDiracSpinors2020" role="doc-biblioref">16</a>]</span> for more discussion of this group theoretic view.</p>
+<p>The Pauli matrices, however, have the additional property that the <em>chiral element</em> <span class="math inline">\(\sigma^x \sigma^y \sigma^z = \pmi\)</span> is not fully determined by the group properties of <span class="math inline">\(G_{3,0}\)</span>, but it is equal to <span class="math inline">\(i\)</span> in the Pauli matrices. Therefore, to fully reproduce the algebra of the Pauli matrices, we must project into the subspace where <span class="math inline">\(\tilde{\sigma}^x \tilde{\sigma}^y \tilde{\sigma}^z = +i\)</span>. The chiral element of the gamma matrices for instance <span class="math inline">\(\gamma_5 = i\gamma^0 \gamma^1 \gamma^2 \gamma^3\)</span> is of central importance in quantum field theory. See <span class="citation" data-cites="petitjeanChiralityDiracSpinors2020"> [<a href="#ref-petitjeanChiralityDiracSpinors2020" role="doc-biblioref">16</a>]</span> for more discussion of this group theoretic view.</p>
-<p>So the projector must project onto the subspace where <span class="math inline">\(\tilde \sigma^x \tilde \sigma^y \tilde \sigma^z = i\)</span>. If we work this through we find that in general <span class="math inline">\(\tilde \sigma^x \tilde \sigma^y \tilde\sigma^z = iD\)</span> where <span class="math inline">\(D = b^x b^y b^z c\)</span> must be the identity for every site. In other words, we can only work with <em>physical states</em> <span class="math inline">\(|\phi\rangle\)</span> that satisfy <span class="math inline">\(D_i|\phi\rangle = |\phi\rangle\)</span> for all sites <span class="math inline">\(i\)</span>. From this we construct an on-site projector <span class="math inline">\(P_i = \frac{1 + D_i}{2}\)</span> and the overall projector is simply <span class="math inline">\(P = \prod_i P_i\)</span>.</p>
+<p>So the projector must project onto the subspace where <span class="math inline">\(\tilde \sigma^x \tilde \sigma^y \tilde \sigma^z = i\)</span>. If we work this through, we find that in general <span class="math inline">\(\tilde \sigma^x \tilde \sigma^y \tilde\sigma^z = iD\)</span> where <span class="math inline">\(D = b^x b^y b^z c\)</span> must be the identity for every site. In other words, we can only work with <em>physical states</em> <span class="math inline">\(|\phi\rangle\)</span> that satisfy <span class="math inline">\(D_i|\phi\rangle = |\phi\rangle\)</span> for all sites <span class="math inline">\(i\)</span>. From this we construct an on-site projector <span class="math inline">\(P_i = \frac{1 + D_i}{2}\)</span> and the overall projector is simply <span class="math inline">\(P = \prod_i P_i\)</span>.</p>
 <p>Another way to see what this is doing physically is to explicitly construct the two intermediate fermionic operators <span class="math inline">\(f\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(g\)</span> that give rise to these four Majoranas. Denoting a fermion state by <span class="math inline">\(|n_f, n_g\rangle\)</span> the Hilbert space is the set <span class="math inline">\(\{|00\rangle,|01\rangle,|10\rangle,|11\rangle\}\)</span>. We can map these to Majoranas with, for example, this definition</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
 b^x = (f + f^\dagger),\;\;&amp; b^y = -i(f - f^\dagger),\\
 b^z = (g + g^\dagger),\;\;&amp; c = -i(g - g^\dagger),
 \end{aligned}\]</span></p>
-<p>Working through the algebra we see that the operator <span class="math inline">\(D = b^x b^y b^z c\)</span> is equal to the fermion parity <span class="math inline">\(D = -(2n_f - 1)(2n_g - 1) = \pm1\)</span> where <span class="math inline">\(n_f,\; n_g\)</span> are the number operators. So setting <span class="math inline">\(D = 1\)</span> everywhere is equivalent to restricting to the <span class="math inline">\(\{|01\rangle,|10\rangle\}\)</span> though we could equally well have used the other one.</p>
+<p>Working through the algebra, we see that the operator <span class="math inline">\(D = b^x b^y b^z c\)</span> is equal to the fermion parity <span class="math inline">\(D = -(2n_f - 1)(2n_g - 1) = \pm1\)</span> where <span class="math inline">\(n_f,\; n_g\)</span> are the number operators. So setting <span class="math inline">\(D = 1\)</span> everywhere is equivalent to restricting to the <span class="math inline">\(\{|01\rangle,|10\rangle\}\)</span> though we could equally well have used <span class="math inline">\(D = -1\)</span>.</p>
-<p>Expanding the product <span class="math inline">\(\prod_i P_i\)</span> out, we find that the projector corresponds to a symmetrisation over <span class="math inline">\(\{u_{ij}\}\)</span> states within a flux sector and and overall fermion parity <span class="math inline">\(\prod_i D_i\)</span>, see <span class="citation" data-cites="pedrocchiPhysicalSolutionsKitaev2011"> [<a href="#ref-pedrocchiPhysicalSolutionsKitaev2011" role="doc-biblioref">17</a>]</span> or <a href="../6_Appendices/A.5_The_Projector.html#app-the-projector">appendix A.5</a> for the full derivation. The significance of this is that an arbitrary many-body state can be made to have non-zero overlap with the physical subspace via the addition or removal of just a single fermion. This implies that in the thermodynamic limit the projection step is not generally necessary to extract physical results</p>
+<p>Expanding the product <span class="math inline">\(\prod_i P_i\)</span> out, we find that the projector corresponds to a symmetrisation over <span class="math inline">\(\{u_{ij}\}\)</span> states within a flux sector and overall fermion parity <span class="math inline">\(\prod_i D_i\)</span>, see <span class="citation" data-cites="pedrocchiPhysicalSolutionsKitaev2011"> [<a href="#ref-pedrocchiPhysicalSolutionsKitaev2011" role="doc-biblioref">17</a>]</span> or <a href="../6_Appendices/A.5_The_Projector.html#app-the-projector">appendix A.6</a> for the full derivation. The significance of this is that an arbitrary many-body state can be made to have non-zero overlap with the physical subspace via the addition or removal of just a single fermion. This implies that, in the thermodynamic limit, the projection step is not generally necessary to extract physical results</p>
 <p>We can now rewrite the spin hamiltonian in Majorana form with the caveat that they are only strictly equivalent after projection. The Ising interactions <span class="math inline">\(\sigma_j^{\alpha}\sigma_k^{\alpha}\)</span> decouple into the form <span class="math inline">\(-i (i b^\alpha_i b^\alpha_j) c_i c_j\)</span>. We factor out the <em>bond operators</em> <span class="math inline">\(\hat{u}_{ij} = i b^\alpha_i b^\alpha_j\)</span> which are Hermitian and, remarkably, commute with the Hamiltonian and each other.</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
 \tilde{H} &amp;=  - \sum_{\langle i,j\rangle_\alpha} J^{\alpha}\tilde{\sigma}_i^{\alpha}\tilde{\sigma}_j^{\alpha}\\
@@ -157,19 +157,21 @@ H &amp;=  i \sum_{\langle i,j\rangle_\alpha} J^{\alpha} u_{ij} \hat{c}_i \hat{c}
 <p>We have transformed the spin Hamiltonian into a Majorana hamiltonian <span class="math inline">\(H = i \sum_{\langle i,j\rangle_\alpha} J^{\alpha} u_{ij} \hat{c}_i \hat{c}_j\)</span> describing the dynamics of a classical field <span class="math inline">\(u_{ij}\)</span> and Majoranas <span class="math inline">\(c_i\)</span>. It is natural to ask how the classical field <span class="math inline">\(u_{ij}\)</span> relates to the fluxes of the original spin model. We can evaluate the fluxes <span class="math inline">\(\phi_i\)</span> in terms of the bond operators</p>
 <p><span id="eq:flux-majorana"><span class="math display">\[\phi_i = \prod_{\langle j,k\rangle \in \mathcal{P}_i} i u_{jk}.\qquad{(4)}\]</span></span></p>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/intro/gauge_symmetries/gauge_symmetries.svg" id="fig-gauge_symmetries" data-short-caption="Gauge Symmetries" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 4: A honeycomb lattice with edges in grey, along with its dual, the triangle lattice in red. The vertices of the dual lattice are the faces of the original lattice and, hence, are the locations of the vortices. (Left) The action of the gauge operator D_j at a vertex is to flip the value of the three u_{jk} variables (black lines) surrounding site j. The corresponding edges of the dual lattice (red lines) form a closed triangle. (Middle) Composing multiple adjacent D_j operators produces a large closed dual loop or multiple disconnected dual loops. Dual loops are not directed like Wilson loops. (Right) A non-contractable loop which cannot be produced by composing D_j operators. All three operators can be thought of as the action of a vortex-vortex pair that is created, one of them is transported around the loop, and then the two annihilate again. Note that every plaquette has an even number of u_{ij}s flipped on its edge. Therefore, all retain the same flux \phi_i." />
+<img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/intro/gauge_symmetries/gauge_symmetries.svg" id="fig-gauge_symmetries" data-short-caption="Gauge Symmetries" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 4: A honeycomb lattice with edges in grey, along with its dual, the triangle lattice in red. The vertices of the dual lattice are the faces of the original lattice and, hence, are the locations of the vortices. (Left) The action of the gauge operator D_j at a vertex is to flip the value of the three u_{jk} variables (black lines) surrounding site j. The corresponding edges of the dual lattice (red lines) form a closed triangle. (Middle) Composing multiple adjacent D_j operators produces a large, closed dual loop or multiple disconnected dual loops. Dual loops are not directed like Wilson loops. (Right) A non-contractable loop which cannot be produced by composing D_j operators. All three operators can be thought of as the action of a vortex-vortex pair that is created, one of them is transported around the loop, and then the two annihilate again. Note that every plaquette has an even number of u_{ij}s flipped on its edge. Therefore, all retain the same flux \phi_i." />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 4: A honeycomb lattice with edges in grey, along with its dual, the triangle lattice in red. The vertices of the dual lattice are the faces of the original lattice and, hence, are the locations of the vortices. (Left) The action of the gauge operator <span class="math inline">\(D_j\)</span> at a vertex is to flip the value of the three <span class="math inline">\(u_{jk}\)</span> variables (black lines) surrounding site <span class="math inline">\(j\)</span>. The corresponding edges of the dual lattice (red lines) form a closed triangle. (Middle) Composing multiple adjacent <span class="math inline">\(D_j\)</span> operators produces a large closed dual loop or multiple disconnected dual loops. Dual loops are not directed like Wilson loops. (Right) A non-contractable loop which cannot be produced by composing <span class="math inline">\(D_j\)</span> operators. All three operators can be thought of as the action of a vortex-vortex pair that is created, one of them is transported around the loop, and then the two annihilate again. Note that every plaquette has an even number of <span class="math inline">\(u_{ij}\)</span>s flipped on its edge. Therefore, all retain the same flux <span class="math inline">\(\phi_i\)</span>.</figcaption>
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 4: A honeycomb lattice with edges in grey, along with its dual, the triangle lattice in red. The vertices of the dual lattice are the faces of the original lattice and, hence, are the locations of the vortices. (Left) The action of the gauge operator <span class="math inline">\(D_j\)</span> at a vertex is to flip the value of the three <span class="math inline">\(u_{jk}\)</span> variables (black lines) surrounding site <span class="math inline">\(j\)</span>. The corresponding edges of the dual lattice (red lines) form a closed triangle. (Middle) Composing multiple adjacent <span class="math inline">\(D_j\)</span> operators produces a large, closed dual loop or multiple disconnected dual loops. Dual loops are not directed like Wilson loops. (Right) A non-contractable loop which cannot be produced by composing <span class="math inline">\(D_j\)</span> operators. All three operators can be thought of as the action of a vortex-vortex pair that is created, one of them is transported around the loop, and then the two annihilate again. Note that every plaquette has an even number of <span class="math inline">\(u_{ij}\)</span>s flipped on its edge. Therefore, all retain the same flux <span class="math inline">\(\phi_i\)</span>.</figcaption>
 </figure>
 <p>In addition, the bond operators form a highly degenerate description of the system. The operators <span class="math inline">\(D_i = b^x_i b^y_i b^z_i c_i\)</span> commute with <span class="math inline">\(H\)</span> forming a set of local symmetries. The action of <span class="math inline">\(D_i\)</span> on a state is to flip the values of the three <span class="math inline">\(u_{ij}\)</span> bonds that connect to site <span class="math inline">\(i\)</span>. This changes the bond configuration <span class="math inline">\(\{u_{ij}\}\)</span> but leaves the flux configuration <span class="math inline">\(\{\phi_i\}\)</span> unchanged. Physically, we interpret <span class="math inline">\(u_{ij}\)</span> as a gauge field with a high degree of degeneracy and <span class="math inline">\(\{D_i\}\)</span> as the set of gauge symmetries. The Majorana bond operators <span class="math inline">\(u_{ij}\)</span> are an emergent, classical, <span class="math inline">\(\mathbb{Z}_2\)</span> gauge field! The flux configuration <span class="math inline">\(\{\phi_i\}\)</span> is what encodes physical information about the system without all the gauge degeneracy.</p>
-<p>The ground state of the KH model is the flux configuration where all fluxes are one <span class="math inline">\(\{\phi_i = +1\; \forall \; i\}\)</span>. This can be proven via Lieb’s theorem <span class="citation" data-cites="lieb_flux_1994"> [<a href="#ref-lieb_flux_1994" role="doc-biblioref">19</a>]</span> which gives the lowest energy magnetic flux configuration for a system of electrons hopping in a magnetic field. Kitaev remarks in his original paper that he was not initially aware of the relevance of Lieb’s 1994 result. This is not surprising because at first glance the two models seem quite different but the connection is quite instructive for understanding the KH and its generalisations.</p>
+<p>The ground state of the KH model is the flux configuration where all fluxes are one <span class="math inline">\(\{\phi_i = +1\; \forall \; i\}\)</span>. This can be proven via Lieb’s theorem <span class="citation" data-cites="lieb_flux_1994"> [<a href="#ref-lieb_flux_1994" role="doc-biblioref">19</a>]</span> which gives the lowest energy magnetic flux configuration for a system of electrons hopping in a magnetic field. Kitaev remarks in his original paper that he was not initially aware of the relevance of Lieb’s 1994 result. This is not surprising because at first glance the two models seem quite different. Yet the connection is quite instructive for understanding the KH and its generalisations.</p>
-<p>Lieb discusses a model of mobile electrons</p>
+<p>Lieb discussed a model of mobile electrons</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[H = \sum_{ij} t_{ij} c^\dagger_i c_j\]</span></p>
-<p>where the hopping terms <span class="math inline">\(t_{ij} = |t_{ij}|\exp(i\theta_{ij})\)</span> incorporate Aharanhov-Bohm (AB) phases <span class="citation" data-cites="aharonovSignificanceElectromagneticPotentials1959"> [<a href="#ref-aharonovSignificanceElectromagneticPotentials1959" role="doc-biblioref">20</a>]</span> <span class="math inline">\(\theta_{ij}\)</span>. The AB phases model the effect of a slowly varying magnetic field on the electrons through the integral of the magnetic vector potential <span class="math inline">\(\theta_{ij} = \int_i^j \vec{A} \cdot d\vec{l}\)</span>, a Peierls substitution <span class="citation" data-cites="peierlsZurTheorieDiamagnetismus1933"> [<a href="#ref-peierlsZurTheorieDiamagnetismus1933" role="doc-biblioref">21</a>]</span>. If we map the Majorana form of the Kitaev model to Lieb’s model we see that our <span class="math inline">\(t_{ij} = i J^\alpha u_{ij}\)</span>. The <span class="math inline">\(i u_{ij} = \pm i\)</span> correspond to AB phases <span class="math inline">\(\theta_{ij} = \pi/2\)</span> or <span class="math inline">\(3\pi/2\)</span> along each bond.</p>
+<p>where the hopping terms <span class="math inline">\(t_{ij} = |t_{ij}|\exp(i\theta_{ij})\)</span> incorporate Aharanhov-Bohm (AB) phases <span class="citation" data-cites="aharonovSignificanceElectromagneticPotentials1959"> [<a href="#ref-aharonovSignificanceElectromagneticPotentials1959" role="doc-biblioref">20</a>]</span> <span class="math inline">\(\theta_{ij}\)</span>. The AB phases model the effect of a slowly varying magnetic field on the electrons through the integral of the magnetic vector potential</p>
+<p><span class="math display">\[\theta_{ij} = \int_i^j \vec{A} \cdot d\vec{l},\]</span></p>
+<p>a Peierls substitution <span class="citation" data-cites="peierlsZurTheorieDiamagnetismus1933"> [<a href="#ref-peierlsZurTheorieDiamagnetismus1933" role="doc-biblioref">21</a>]</span>. If we map the Majorana form of the Kitaev model to Lieb’s model, we see that our <span class="math inline">\(t_{ij} = i J^\alpha u_{ij}\)</span>. The <span class="math inline">\(i u_{ij} = \pm i\)</span> correspond to AB phases <span class="math inline">\(\theta_{ij} = \pi/2\)</span> or <span class="math inline">\(3\pi/2\)</span> along each bond.</p>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/intro/regular_plaquettes/regular_plaquettes.svg" id="fig-regular_plaquettes" data-short-caption="Plaquettes in the Kitaev Model" style="width:86.0%" alt="Figure 5: Lieb’s theorem gives the ground state flux configuration for even sided plaquettes in systems with at least one translationally invariant direction  [19]. These labels correspond to the Kitaev fluxes \phi_i rather than the magnetic fluxes Q_i of Lieb’s original paper (\phi_i = \exp{iQ_i}). Other work has extended Lieb’s theorem numerically to arbitrary plaquettes,  [22–25]. The additional twofold degeneracy of the \pm i, \mp i terms is a consequence of the odd sided plaquettes breaking chiral symmetry. Chiral symmetry is spontaneously broken in the ground state  [23]." />
+<img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/intro/regular_plaquettes/regular_plaquettes.svg" id="fig-regular_plaquettes" data-short-caption="Plaquettes in the Kitaev Model" style="width:86.0%" alt="Figure 5: Lieb’s theorem gives the ground state flux configuration for even sided plaquettes in systems with at least one translationally invariant direction  [19]. These labels correspond to the Kitaev fluxes \phi_i rather than the magnetic fluxes Q_i of Lieb’s original paper (\phi_i = \exp{iQ_i}). Other work has extended Lieb’s theorem numerically to arbitrary plaquettes  [22–25]. The additional twofold degeneracy of the \pm i, \mp i terms is a consequence of the odd sided plaquettes breaking chiral symmetry. Chiral symmetry is spontaneously broken in the ground state  [23]." />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 5: Lieb’s theorem gives the ground state flux configuration for even sided plaquettes in systems with at least one translationally invariant direction <span class="citation" data-cites="lieb_flux_1994"> [<a href="#ref-lieb_flux_1994" role="doc-biblioref">19</a>]</span>. These labels correspond to the Kitaev fluxes <span class="math inline">\(\phi_i\)</span> rather than the magnetic fluxes <span class="math inline">\(Q_i\)</span> of Lieb’s original paper (<span class="math inline">\(\phi_i = \exp{iQ_i}\)</span>). Other work has extended Lieb’s theorem numerically to arbitrary plaquettes, <span class="citation" data-cites="eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020 Yao2009 eschmann2019thermodynamics Peri2020"> [<a href="#ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" role="doc-biblioref">22</a>–<a href="#ref-Peri2020" role="doc-biblioref">25</a>]</span>. The additional twofold degeneracy of the <span class="math inline">\(\pm i, \mp i\)</span> terms is a consequence of the odd sided plaquettes breaking chiral symmetry. Chiral symmetry is spontaneously broken in the ground state <span class="citation" data-cites="Yao2009"> [<a href="#ref-Yao2009" role="doc-biblioref">23</a>]</span>.</figcaption>
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 5: Lieb’s theorem gives the ground state flux configuration for even sided plaquettes in systems with at least one translationally invariant direction <span class="citation" data-cites="lieb_flux_1994"> [<a href="#ref-lieb_flux_1994" role="doc-biblioref">19</a>]</span>. These labels correspond to the Kitaev fluxes <span class="math inline">\(\phi_i\)</span> rather than the magnetic fluxes <span class="math inline">\(Q_i\)</span> of Lieb’s original paper (<span class="math inline">\(\phi_i = \exp{iQ_i}\)</span>). Other work has extended Lieb’s theorem numerically to arbitrary plaquettes <span class="citation" data-cites="eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020 Yao2009 eschmann2019thermodynamics Peri2020"> [<a href="#ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" role="doc-biblioref">22</a>–<a href="#ref-Peri2020" role="doc-biblioref">25</a>]</span>. The additional twofold degeneracy of the <span class="math inline">\(\pm i, \mp i\)</span> terms is a consequence of the odd sided plaquettes breaking chiral symmetry. Chiral symmetry is spontaneously broken in the ground state <span class="citation" data-cites="Yao2009"> [<a href="#ref-Yao2009" role="doc-biblioref">23</a>]</span>.</figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>Stokes’ theorem tells us that the magnetic flux <span class="math inline">\(Q_m\)</span> through a surface <span class="math inline">\(S\)</span> is related to the line integral of <span class="math inline">\(\vec{A}\)</span> along the boundary of the surface <span class="math inline">\(\partial S\)</span> which in the discrete case reduces to the sum of the AB phases along the path. We can thus rewrite eq. <a href="#eq:flux-majorana">4</a> as</p>
+<p>Stokes’ theorem tells us that the magnetic flux <span class="math inline">\(Q_m\)</span> through a surface <span class="math inline">\(S\)</span> is related to the line integral of <span class="math inline">\(\vec{A}\)</span> along the boundary of the surface <span class="math inline">\(\partial S\)</span>, which in the discrete case reduces to the sum of the AB phases along the path. We can thus rewrite eq. <a href="#eq:flux-majorana">4</a> as</p>
 <p><span id="eq:flux-magnetic"><span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
 \phi_i &amp;= \prod_{\mathcal{P}_i} i u_{jk}\\
        &amp;= \prod_{\mathcal{P}_i} \exp{(i\theta_{jk}})\\
@@ -177,21 +179,23 @@ H &amp;=  i \sum_{\langle i,j\rangle_\alpha} J^{\alpha} u_{ij} \hat{c}_i \hat{c}
        &amp;= \exp \left( i \oint_{\mathcal{P}_i} \vec{A} \cdot d\vec{l} \right)\\
        &amp;= \exp \left( i Q_i \right)
 \end{aligned}\qquad{(5)}\]</span></span></p>
-<p>Thus we can interpret the fluxes <span class="math inline">\(\phi_i\)</span> as the exponential of magnetic fluxes <span class="math inline">\(Q_m\)</span> of some fictitious gauge field <span class="math inline">\(\vec{A}\)</span> and the bond operators as <span class="math inline">\(i u_{ij} = \exp i \int_i^j \vec{A} \cdot d\vec{l}\)</span>. In this analogy to classical electromagnetism, the sets <span class="math inline">\(\{u_{ij}\}\)</span> that correspond to the same <span class="math inline">\(\{\phi_i\}\)</span> are all gauge equivalent as we have already seen via other means. The fact that fluxes can be written as products of bond operators and composed is a consequence of eq. <a href="#eq:flux-magnetic">5</a>. If the lattice contains odd plaquettes, as in the Yao-Kivelson model <span class="citation" data-cites="yaoExactChiralSpin2007"> [<a href="#ref-yaoExactChiralSpin2007" role="doc-biblioref">26</a>]</span>, the complex fluxes that appear are a sign that chiral symmetry has been broken.</p>
+<p>Thus, we can interpret the fluxes <span class="math inline">\(\phi_i\)</span> as the exponential of magnetic fluxes <span class="math inline">\(Q_m\)</span> of some fictitious gauge field <span class="math inline">\(\vec{A}\)</span> and the bond operators as <span class="math inline">\(i u_{ij} = \exp i \int_i^j \vec{A} \cdot d\vec{l}\)</span>. In this analogy to classical electromagnetism, the sets <span class="math inline">\(\{u_{ij}\}\)</span> that correspond to the same <span class="math inline">\(\{\phi_i\}\)</span> are all gauge equivalent as we have already seen via other means. The fact that fluxes can be written as products of bond operators and composed is a consequence of eq. <a href="#eq:flux-magnetic">5</a>. If the lattice contains odd plaquettes, as in the Yao-Kivelson model <span class="citation" data-cites="yaoExactChiralSpin2007"> [<a href="#ref-yaoExactChiralSpin2007" role="doc-biblioref">26</a>]</span>, the complex fluxes that appear are a sign that chiral symmetry has been broken.</p>
 <p>In full, Lieb’s theorem states that the ground state has magnetic flux <span class="math inline">\(Q_i = \sum_{\mathcal{P}_i}\theta_{ij} = \pi \; (\mathrm{mod} \;2\pi)\)</span> for plaquettes with <span class="math inline">\(0 \; (\mathrm{mod}\;4)\)</span> sides and <span class="math inline">\(0 \; (\mathrm{mod}\;2\pi)\)</span> for plaquettes with <span class="math inline">\(2 \; (\mathrm{mod}\;4)\)</span> sides. In terms of our fluxes, this means <span class="math inline">\(\phi = -1\)</span> for squares, <span class="math inline">\(\phi = 1\)</span> for hexagons and so on.</p>
-<p>While Lieb’s theorem is restricted to bipartite lattices with translational symmetry, other works have shown numerically that it tends to hold for more general lattices too <span class="citation" data-cites="eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020 Yao2009 eschmann2019thermodynamics Peri2020"> [<a href="#ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" role="doc-biblioref">22</a>–<a href="#ref-Peri2020" role="doc-biblioref">25</a>]</span>. From this we find that the generalisation to odd sided plaquettes is similar but with an additional chiral symmetry, so <span class="math inline">\(\phi = \pm i\)</span> for plaquettes with <span class="math inline">\(1 \; (\mathrm{mod}\;4)\)</span> sides and <span class="math inline">\(\mp i\)</span> for those with <span class="math inline">\(3 \; (\mathrm{mod}\;4)\)</span> sides. Overall we can write <span class="math inline">\(\phi = -(\pm i)^{n_{\mathrm{sides}}}\)</span>. Later I will present numerical evidence that this rule continues to hold for general amorphous lattices.</p>
+<p>While Lieb’s theorem is restricted to bipartite lattices with translational symmetry, other works have shown numerically that it tends to hold for more general lattices too <span class="citation" data-cites="eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020 Yao2009 eschmann2019thermodynamics Peri2020"> [<a href="#ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" role="doc-biblioref">22</a>–<a href="#ref-Peri2020" role="doc-biblioref">25</a>]</span>. From this we find that the generalisation to odd sided plaquettes is similar but with an additional chiral symmetry. <span class="math inline">\(\phi = \pm i\)</span> for plaquettes with <span class="math inline">\(1 \; (\mathrm{mod}\;4)\)</span> sides and <span class="math inline">\(\mp i\)</span> for those with <span class="math inline">\(3 \; (\mathrm{mod}\;4)\)</span> sides. Overall we can write</p>
+<p><span id="eq:liebs-theorem"><span class="math display">\[\phi = -(\pm i)^{n_{\mathrm{sides}}}.\qquad{(6)}\]</span></span></p>
+<p>Later I will present numerical evidence that this rule continues to hold for general amorphous lattices.</p>
 <p>Understanding <span class="math inline">\(u_{ij}\)</span> as a gauge field provides another way to understand the action of the projector. The local projector <span class="math inline">\(P_i = \frac{1 + D_i}{2}\)</span> applied to a state constructs a superposition of the original state and the gauge equivalent state linked to it by flipping the three <span class="math inline">\(u_{ij}\)</span> around site <span class="math inline">\(i\)</span>. The overall projector <span class="math inline">\(P = \prod_i P_i\)</span> can thus be understood as a symmetrisation over all gauge equivalent states, removing the gauge degeneracy introduced by the mapping from spins to Majoranas.</p>
 <!-- <figure>
 <img src="../../figure_code/amk_chapter/intro/flood_fill/flood_fill.gif" style="max-width:700px;" title="Gauge Operators">
 <figcaption>
-A honeycomb lattice (in black) along with its dual (in red). (Left) The product of sets of $D_j$ operators (Bold Vertices) can be used to construct arbitrary contractible loops that flip $u_{ij}$  values. If we take the product of _every_ $D_j$ the boundary contracts to a point and disappears. This is a visual proof that $\prod_i D_i \propto \mathbb{1}$. This observation forms a key part of constructing an explicit expression for the projector, see [appendix A.5](#app-the-projector). (Right) In black and red the edges and dual edges that must be flipped to add vortices at the sites highlighted in orange. Flipping all the _plaquettes_ in the system is __not__ equivalent to the identity. Not that the edges that must be flipped can always be chosen from a spanning tree since loops can always be removed by a gauge transformation.
+A honeycomb lattice (in black) along with its dual (in red). (Left) The product of sets of $D_j$ operators (Bold Vertices) can be used to construct arbitrary contractible loops that flip $u_{ij}$  values. If we take the product of _every_ $D_j$ the boundary contracts to a point and disappears. This is a visual proof that $\prod_i D_i \propto \mathbb{1}$. This observation forms a key part of constructing an explicit expression for the projector, see [appendix A.6](#app-the-projector). (Right) In black and red the edges and dual edges that must be flipped to add vortices at the sites highlighted in orange. Flipping all the _plaquettes_ in the system is __not__ equivalent to the identity. Not that the edges that must be flipped can always be chosen from a spanning tree since loops can always be removed by a gauge transformation.
 </figcaption>
 </figure> -->
 <figure>
 <img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/topological_fluxes.png" id="fig-topological_fluxes" data-short-caption="Topological Fluxes" style="width:57.0%" alt="Figure 6: Wilson loops that wind the major or minor diameters of the torus measure flux winding through the hole of the doughnut/torus (red) or through the filling (green). If they made doughnuts which had both had a jam filling and a hole, this analogy would be a lot easier to make  [27]." />
 <figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 6: Wilson loops that wind the major or minor diameters of the torus measure flux winding through the hole of the doughnut/torus (red) or through the filling (green). If they made doughnuts which had both had a jam filling and a hole, this analogy would be a lot easier to make <span class="citation" data-cites="parkerWhyDoesThis"> [<a href="#ref-parkerWhyDoesThis" role="doc-biblioref">27</a>]</span>.</figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>A final but important point to mention is that the local fluxes <span class="math inline">\(\phi_i\)</span> are not quite all there is. We’ve seen that products of <span class="math inline">\(\phi_i\)</span> can be used to construct the flux associated with arbitrary contractible loops. On the plane contractible loops are all there is. However, on the torus we can construct two global fluxes <span class="math inline">\(\Phi_x\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(\Phi_y\)</span> which correspond to paths tracing the major and minor axes. The four sectors spanned by the <span class="math inline">\(\pm1\)</span> values of these fluxes are gapped away from one another but only by virtual tunnelling processes so the gap decays exponentially with system size <span class="citation" data-cites="kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006"> [<a href="#ref-kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>. Physically <span class="math inline">\(\Phi_x\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(\Phi_y\)</span> could be thought of as measuring the flux that threads through the hole of the doughnut. In general, surfaces with genus <span class="math inline">\(g\)</span> have <span class="math inline">\(g\)</span> ‘handles’ and <span class="math inline">\(2g\)</span> of these global fluxes. At first glance it may seem this would not have much relevance to physical realisations of the Kitaev model that will likely have a planar geometry with open boundary conditions. However these fluxes are closely linked to topology and the existence of anyonic quasiparticle excitations in the model, which we will discuss next.</p>
+<p>A final but important point to mention is that the local fluxes <span class="math inline">\(\phi_i\)</span> are not quite all there is. We’ve seen that products of <span class="math inline">\(\phi_i\)</span> can be used to construct the flux associated with arbitrary contractible loops. On the plane contractible loops are all there is. However, on the torus we can construct two global fluxes <span class="math inline">\(\Phi_x\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(\Phi_y\)</span> which correspond to paths tracing the major and minor axes. The four sectors spanned by the <span class="math inline">\(\pm1\)</span> values of these fluxes are gapped away from one another, but only by virtual tunnelling processes so the gap decays exponentially with system size <span class="citation" data-cites="kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006"> [<a href="#ref-kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>. Physically <span class="math inline">\(\Phi_x\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(\Phi_y\)</span> could be thought of as measuring the flux that threads through the hole of the doughnut. In general, surfaces with genus <span class="math inline">\(g\)</span> have <span class="math inline">\(g\)</span> ‘handles’ and <span class="math inline">\(2g\)</span> of these global fluxes. At first glance, it may seem that these fluxes would not have much relevance to physical realisations of the Kitaev model which are likely to have a planar geometry. However these fluxes are closely linked to topology and the existence of anyonic quasiparticle excitations in the model, which we will discuss next.</p>
 </section>
 <section id="sec:anyons" class="level2">
 <h2>Anyons, Topology and the Chern number</h2>
@@ -199,10 +203,10 @@ A honeycomb lattice (in black) along with its dual (in red). (Left) The product
 <img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/braiding.png" id="fig-braiding" data-short-caption="Braiding in Two Dimensions" style="width:71.0%" alt="Figure 7: Worldlines of particles in 2D can become tangled or braided with one another." />
 <figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 7: Worldlines of particles in 2D can become tangled or <em>braided</em> with one another.</figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>To discuss different ground state phases of the KH model we must first review the topic of anyons and topology. The standard argument for the existence of Fermions and Bosons goes like this: the quantum state of a system must pick up a factor of <span class="math inline">\(\pm1\)</span> if two identical particles are swapped. Only <span class="math inline">\(\pm1\)</span> are allowed since swapping twice must correspond to the identity. This argument works in 3D for states without topological degeneracy, which seems to be true of the real world, but condensed matter systems are subject to no such constraints.</p>
+<p>To discuss different ground state phases of the KH model, we must first review the topic of anyons and topology. The standard argument for the existence of Fermions and Bosons goes like this: the quantum state of a system must pick up a factor of <span class="math inline">\(\pm1\)</span> if two identical particles are swapped. Only <span class="math inline">\(\pm1\)</span> are allowed since swapping twice must correspond to the identity. This argument works in 3D for states without topological degeneracy, which seems to be true of the real world, but condensed matter systems are subject to no such constraints.</p>
 <p>In gapped condensed matter systems, all equal time correlators decay exponentially with distance <span class="citation" data-cites="hastingsLiebSchultzMattisHigherDimensions2004"> [<a href="#ref-hastingsLiebSchultzMattisHigherDimensions2004" role="doc-biblioref">28</a>]</span>. Put another way, gapped systems support quasiparticles with a definite location in space and finite extent. As such it is meaningful to consider what would happen to the overall quantum state if we were to adiabatically carry out a series of swaps as described above. This is known as braiding. Recently, braiding in topological systems has attracted interest because of proposals to use ground state degeneracy to implement both passively fault tolerant and actively stabilised quantum computations <span class="citation" data-cites="kitaev_fault-tolerant_2003 poulinStabilizerFormalismOperator2005 hastingsDynamicallyGeneratedLogical2021"> [<a href="#ref-kitaev_fault-tolerant_2003" role="doc-biblioref">29</a>–<a href="#ref-hastingsDynamicallyGeneratedLogical2021" role="doc-biblioref">31</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>First we realise that in 2D, swapping identical particles twice is not topologically equivalent to the identity, see fig. <a href="#fig:braiding">7</a>. Instead it corresponds to encircling one particle around the other. This means we can in general pick up any complex phase <span class="math inline">\(e^{i\theta}\)</span> upon exchange, hence the name <strong>any</strong>-ons. These are known as Abelian anyons because complex multiplication commutes and hence the group of braiding operations forms an Abelian group.</p>
+<p>First we realise that, in 2D, swapping identical particles twice is not topologically equivalent to the identity, see fig. <a href="#fig:braiding">7</a>. Instead it corresponds to encircling one particle around the other. This means we can in general pick up any complex phase <span class="math inline">\(e^{i\theta}\)</span> upon exchange, hence the name <em>any</em>-ons. Those that pick up a complex phase are known as Abelian anyons because complex multiplication commutes and hence the group of braiding operations on them forms an Abelian group.</p>
-<p>The KH model has a topologically degenerate ground state with sectors labelled by the values of the topological fluxes <span class="math inline">\((\Phi_x\)</span>, <span class="math inline">\(\Phi_y)\)</span>. Consider the operation in which a quasiparticle pair is created from the ground state, transported around one of the non-contractible loops and then annihilated together, call them <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{T}_{x}\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{T}_{y}\)</span>. These operations move the system around within the ground state manifold and they need not commute. This leads to non-Abelian anyons. As Kitaev points out, these operations are not specific to the torus: the operation <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{T}_{x}\mathcal{T}_{y}\mathcal{T}_{x}^{-1}\mathcal{T}_{y}^{-1}\)</span> corresponds to an operation in which none of the particles crosses the torus, rather one simply winds around the other, hence these effects are relevant even for the planar case.</p>
+<p>The KH model has a topologically degenerate ground state with sectors labelled by the values of the topological fluxes <span class="math inline">\((\Phi_x\)</span>, <span class="math inline">\(\Phi_y)\)</span>. Consider the operation in which a quasiparticle pair is created from the ground state, transported around one of the non-contractible loops, and then annihilated together, call them <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{T}_{x}\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{T}_{y}\)</span>. These operations move the system around within the ground state manifold and they need not commute. This leads to non-Abelian anyons. As Kitaev pointed out, these operations are not specific to the torus: the operation <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{T}_{x}\mathcal{T}_{y}\mathcal{T}_{x}^{-1}\mathcal{T}_{y}^{-1}\)</span> corresponds to an operation in which none of the particles crosses the torus, rather one simply winds around the other. Hence, these effects are relevant even for the planar case!</p>
 <!-- <figure>
 <img src="../../figure_code/amk_chapter/intro/types_of_dual_loops_animated/types_of_dual_loops_animated.gif" style="max-width:700px;" title="Dual Loops and Vortex Pairs">
 <figcaption>
@@ -211,21 +215,20 @@ A honeycomb lattice (in black) along with its dual (in red). (Left) The product
 This all works the same way for the amorphous lattice but the diagram is a lot messier so I've stuck with the honeycomb here. 
 </figcaption>
 </figure> -->
-<p>In condensed matter systems, the existence of anyonic excitations automatically implies the system has topological ground state degeneracy on the torus <span class="citation" data-cites="einarssonFractionalStatisticsTorus1990"> [<a href="#ref-einarssonFractionalStatisticsTorus1990" role="doc-biblioref">32</a>]</span> and indeed anyons and topology are intimately linked <span class="citation" data-cites="oshikawaTopologicalDegeneracyNonAbelian2007 Chung_Topological_quantum2010 yaoAlgebraicSpinLiquid2009"> [<a href="#ref-oshikawaTopologicalDegeneracyNonAbelian2007" role="doc-biblioref">33</a>–<a href="#ref-yaoAlgebraicSpinLiquid2009" role="doc-biblioref">35</a>]</span>. The Chern number <span class="math inline">\(\nu\)</span>, a concept originally used to describe complex vector bundles in algebraic topology <span class="citation" data-cites="chernCharacteristicClassesHermitian1946"> [<a href="#ref-chernCharacteristicClassesHermitian1946" role="doc-biblioref">36</a>]</span>, has found use in physics as a powerful diagnostic tool for topological systems. Kitaev showed that there is a full classification of anyonic statistics in terms of <span class="math inline">\(\nu\;(\mathrm{mod}\;16)\)</span> but relevant to us is that vortices in the KH model are Abelian when the Chern number is even and non-Abelian when the Chern number is odd. Non-Abelian statistics of the vortices in the KH model arise due to unpaired Majorana modes that are bound to them.</p>
+<p>In condensed matter systems, the existence of anyonic excitations automatically implies that the system has topological ground state degeneracy on the torus <span class="citation" data-cites="einarssonFractionalStatisticsTorus1990"> [<a href="#ref-einarssonFractionalStatisticsTorus1990" role="doc-biblioref">32</a>]</span> and indeed anyons and topology are intimately linked <span class="citation" data-cites="oshikawaTopologicalDegeneracyNonAbelian2007 Chung_Topological_quantum2010 yaoAlgebraicSpinLiquid2009"> [<a href="#ref-oshikawaTopologicalDegeneracyNonAbelian2007" role="doc-biblioref">33</a>–<a href="#ref-yaoAlgebraicSpinLiquid2009" role="doc-biblioref">35</a>]</span>. The Chern number <span class="math inline">\(\nu\)</span>, was a concept originally used to describe complex vector bundles in algebraic topology <span class="citation" data-cites="chernCharacteristicClassesHermitian1946"> [<a href="#ref-chernCharacteristicClassesHermitian1946" role="doc-biblioref">36</a>]</span>. It has now found use in physics as a powerful diagnostic tool for topological systems. Kitaev showed that there is a full classification of anyonic statistics in terms of <span class="math inline">\(\nu\;(\mathrm{mod}\;16)\)</span>, but relevant to us is that vortices in the KH model are Abelian when the Chern number is even and non-Abelian when the Chern number is odd. Non-Abelian statistics of the vortices in the KH model arise due to unpaired Majorana modes that are bound to them.</p>
 </section>
 <section id="ground-state-phases" class="level2">
 <h2>Ground State Phases</h2>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/background_chapter/KH_phase_diagram.svg" id="fig-KH_phase_diagram" data-short-caption="Kitaev Honeycomb Model Phase Diagram" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 8: Setting the energy scale of the KH model with the constraint that J_x + J_y + J_z = 1 yields a triangular phase diagram where each of the corners represents J_\alpha = 1. For each corner \alpha the region |J_\alpha &gt; |J_\beta| + |J_\gamma| supports a gapped non-Abelian phase equivalent to that of the Toric code  [29,37]. The point around equal coupling J_x = J_y = J_z, the B phase, is gapless. The B phase is known a Majorana metal and on the honeycomb lattice it has a Dirac cone dispersion similar to that of graphene." />
+<img src="/assets/thesis/background_chapter/KH_phase_diagram.svg" id="fig-KH_phase_diagram" data-short-caption="Kitaev Honeycomb Model Phase Diagram" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 8: Setting the energy scale of the KH model with the constraint that J_x + J_y + J_z = 1 yields a triangular phase diagram where each of the corners represents J_\alpha = 1. For each corner \alpha the region |J_\alpha &gt; |J_\beta| + |J_\gamma| supports a gapped non-Abelian phase equivalent to that of the Toric code  [29,37]. The point around equal coupling J_x = J_y = J_z, the B phase, is gapless. The B phase is known as a Majorana metal and on the honeycomb lattice it has a Dirac cone dispersion similar to that of graphene." />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 8: Setting the energy scale of the KH model with the constraint that <span class="math inline">\(J_x + J_y + J_z = 1\)</span> yields a triangular phase diagram where each of the corners represents <span class="math inline">\(J_\alpha = 1\)</span>. For each corner <span class="math inline">\(\alpha\)</span> the region <span class="math inline">\(|J_\alpha &gt; |J_\beta| + |J_\gamma|\)</span> supports a gapped non-Abelian phase equivalent to that of the Toric code <span class="citation" data-cites="kitaev1997quantum kitaev_fault-tolerant_2003"> [<a href="#ref-kitaev_fault-tolerant_2003" role="doc-biblioref">29</a>,<a href="#ref-kitaev1997quantum" role="doc-biblioref">37</a>]</span>. The point around equal coupling <span class="math inline">\(J_x = J_y = J_z\)</span>, the B phase, is gapless. The B phase is known a Majorana metal and on the honeycomb lattice it has a Dirac cone dispersion similar to that of graphene.</figcaption>
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 8: Setting the energy scale of the KH model with the constraint that <span class="math inline">\(J_x + J_y + J_z = 1\)</span> yields a triangular phase diagram where each of the corners represents <span class="math inline">\(J_\alpha = 1\)</span>. For each corner <span class="math inline">\(\alpha\)</span> the region <span class="math inline">\(|J_\alpha &gt; |J_\beta| + |J_\gamma|\)</span> supports a gapped non-Abelian phase equivalent to that of the Toric code <span class="citation" data-cites="kitaev1997quantum kitaev_fault-tolerant_2003"> [<a href="#ref-kitaev_fault-tolerant_2003" role="doc-biblioref">29</a>,<a href="#ref-kitaev1997quantum" role="doc-biblioref">37</a>]</span>. The point around equal coupling <span class="math inline">\(J_x = J_y = J_z\)</span>, the B phase, is gapless. The B phase is known as a Majorana metal and on the honeycomb lattice it has a Dirac cone dispersion similar to that of graphene.</figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>Setting the overall energy scale with the constraint <span class="math inline">\(J_x + J_y + J_z = 1\)</span> yields a triangular phase diagram. In each of the corners one of the spin-coupling directions dominates, <span class="math inline">\(|J_\alpha &gt; |J_\beta| + |J_\gamma|\)</span>, yielding three equivalent <span class="math inline">\(A_\alpha\)</span> phases while the central triangle around <span class="math inline">\(J_x = J_y = J_z\)</span> is called the B phase. Both phases support two kinds of quasiparticles, fermions and <span class="math inline">\(\mathbb{Z}_2\)</span>-vortices. In the A phases, the vortices have bosonic statistics with respect to themselves but act like fermions with respect to the fermions, hence they are Abelian anyons, This phase has the same anyonic structure as the Toric code <span class="citation" data-cites="kitaev_fault-tolerant_2003"> [<a href="#ref-kitaev_fault-tolerant_2003" role="doc-biblioref">29</a>]</span>. The B phase can be described as a semi-metal of the Majorana fermions <span class="citation" data-cites="TrebstPhysRep2022"> [<a href="#ref-TrebstPhysRep2022" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>]</span>. Since the B phase is gapless, the quasiparticles aren’t localised and so don’t have braiding statistics.</p>
+<p>Setting the overall energy scale with the constraint <span class="math inline">\(J_x + J_y + J_z = 1\)</span> yields a triangular phase diagram. In each of the corners one of the spin-coupling directions dominates, <span class="math inline">\(|J_\alpha &gt; |J_\beta| + |J_\gamma|\)</span>, yielding three equivalent <span class="math inline">\(A_\alpha\)</span> phases while the central triangle around <span class="math inline">\(J_x = J_y = J_z\)</span> is called the B phase. Both phases support two kinds of quasiparticles, fermions and <span class="math inline">\(\mathbb{Z}_2\)</span>-vortices. In the A phases, the vortices have bosonic statistics with respect to themselves but act like fermions with respect to the fermions, hence they are Abelian anyons. This phase has the same anyonic structure as the Toric code <span class="citation" data-cites="kitaev_fault-tolerant_2003"> [<a href="#ref-kitaev_fault-tolerant_2003" role="doc-biblioref">29</a>]</span>. The B phase can be described as a semi-metal of the Majorana fermions <span class="citation" data-cites="TrebstPhysRep2022"> [<a href="#ref-TrebstPhysRep2022" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>]</span>. Since the B phase is gapless, the quasiparticles aren’t localised and so don’t have braiding statistics.</p>
-<p>An external magnetic can be used to break chiral symmetry. The lowest order term that breaks chiral symmetry but retains the solvability of the model is the three spin term <span class="math display">\[
+<p>An external magnetic can be used to break chiral symmetry. The lowest order term which breaks chiral symmetry but retains the solvability of the model is the three spin term <span class="math display">\[
 \sum_{(i,j,k)} \sigma_i^{\alpha} \sigma_j^{\beta} \sigma_k^{\gamma}
-\]</span> where the sum <span class="math inline">\((i,j,k)\)</span> runs over consecutive indices around plaquettes. The addition of this to the spin model leads to two bond terms in the corresponding Majorana model. The effect of breaking chiral symmetry is to open a gap in the B phase. The vortices of the gapped B phase are non-Abelian anyons. This phase has the same anyonic exchange statistics as <span class="math inline">\(p_x + ip_y\)</span> superconductor <span class="citation" data-cites="readPairedStatesFermions2000"> [<a href="#ref-readPairedStatesFermions2000" role="doc-biblioref">38</a>]</span>, the Moore-Read state for the <span class="math inline">\(\nu = 5/2\)</span> fractional quantum Hall state <span class="citation" data-cites="mooreNonabelionsFractionalQuantum1991"> [<a href="#ref-mooreNonabelionsFractionalQuantum1991" role="doc-biblioref">39</a>]</span> and many other systems <span class="citation" data-cites="aliceaNonAbelianStatisticsTopological2011 fuSuperconductingProximityEffect2008 lutchynMajoranaFermionsTopological2010 oregHelicalLiquidsMajorana2010 sauGenericNewPlatform2010"> [<a href="#ref-aliceaNonAbelianStatisticsTopological2011" role="doc-biblioref">40</a>–<a href="#ref-sauGenericNewPlatform2010" role="doc-biblioref">44</a>]</span>. Collectively these systems have attracted interest as possible physical realisations for braiding based quantum computers.</p>
+\]</span> where the sum <span class="math inline">\((i,j,k)\)</span> runs over consecutive indices around plaquettes. The addition of this to the spin model leads to two bond terms in the corresponding Majorana model. The effect of breaking chiral symmetry is to open a gap in the B phase. The vortices of the gapped B phase are non-Abelian anyons. This phase has the same anyonic exchange statistics as <span class="math inline">\(p_x + ip_y\)</span> superconductor <span class="citation" data-cites="readPairedStatesFermions2000"> [<a href="#ref-readPairedStatesFermions2000" role="doc-biblioref">38</a>]</span>, the Moore-Read state for the <span class="math inline">\(\nu = 5/2\)</span> fractional quantum Hall state <span class="citation" data-cites="mooreNonabelionsFractionalQuantum1991"> [<a href="#ref-mooreNonabelionsFractionalQuantum1991" role="doc-biblioref">39</a>]</span> and many other systems <span class="citation" data-cites="aliceaNonAbelianStatisticsTopological2011 fuSuperconductingProximityEffect2008 lutchynMajoranaFermionsTopological2010 oregHelicalLiquidsMajorana2010 sauGenericNewPlatform2010"> [<a href="#ref-aliceaNonAbelianStatisticsTopological2011" role="doc-biblioref">40</a>–<a href="#ref-sauGenericNewPlatform2010" role="doc-biblioref">44</a>]</span>. Collectively these systems have attracted interest as possible physical realisations for quantum computers whose operations are based on braiding operations.</p>
 <p>At finite temperatures, recent work has shown that the KH model undergoes a transition to a thermal metal phase. Vortex disorder causes the fermion gap to fill up and the DOS has a characteristic logarithmic divergence at zero energy which can be understood from random matrix theory <span class="citation" data-cites="selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019"> [<a href="#ref-selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019" role="doc-biblioref">11</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>To surmise, the KH model is remarkable because it combines three key properties. First, the form of the Hamiltonian can plausibly be realised by a real material. Candidate materials, such as <span class="math inline">\(\alpha\mathrm{-RuCl}_3\)</span>, are known to have sufficiently strong spin-orbit coupling and the correct lattice structure to behave according to the KH model with small corrections <span class="citation" data-cites="banerjeeProximateKitaevQuantum2016 TrebstPhysRep2022"> [<a href="#ref-TrebstPhysRep2022" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>,<a href="#ref-banerjeeProximateKitaevQuantum2016" role="doc-biblioref">45</a>]</span>. Second, its ground state is the canonical example of the long sought after QSL state, its dynamical spin-spin correlation functions are zero beyond nearest neighbour separation <span class="citation" data-cites="baskaranExactResultsSpin2007"> [<a href="#ref-baskaranExactResultsSpin2007" role="doc-biblioref">46</a>]</span>. Its excitations are anyons, particles that can only exist in 2D that break the normal fermion/boson dichotomy.</p>
+<p>To surmise, the KH model is remarkable because it combines three key properties. First, the form of the Hamiltonian can plausibly be realised by a real material. Candidate materials, such as <span class="math inline">\(\alpha\mathrm{-RuCl}_3\)</span>, are known to have sufficiently strong spin-orbit coupling and the correct lattice structure to behave according to the KH model with small corrections <span class="citation" data-cites="banerjeeProximateKitaevQuantum2016 TrebstPhysRep2022"> [<a href="#ref-TrebstPhysRep2022" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>,<a href="#ref-banerjeeProximateKitaevQuantum2016" role="doc-biblioref">45</a>]</span>. Second, its ground state is the canonical example of the long sought after QSL state, its dynamical spin-spin correlation functions are zero beyond nearest neighbour separation <span class="citation" data-cites="baskaranExactResultsSpin2007"> [<a href="#ref-baskaranExactResultsSpin2007" role="doc-biblioref">46</a>]</span>. Its excitations are anyons, particles that can only exist in 2D that break the normal fermion/boson dichotomy. Third, and perhaps most importantly, this model is a rare many-body interacting quantum system that can be treated analytically. It is exactly solvable. We can explicitly write down its many-body ground states in terms of single particle states <span class="citation" data-cites="kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006"> [<a href="#ref-kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>. The solubility of the KH model, like the FK model, comes about because the model has extensively many conserved degrees of freedom. These conserved quantities can be factored out as classical degrees of freedom, leaving behind a non-interacting quantum model that is easy to solve.</p>
-<p>Third, and perhaps most importantly, this model is a rare many-body interacting quantum system that can be treated analytically. It is exactly solvable. We can explicitly write down its many-body ground states in terms of single particle states <span class="citation" data-cites="kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006"> [<a href="#ref-kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>. The solubility of the KH model, like the Falicov-Kimball model of chapter 1, comes about because the model has extensively many conserved degrees of freedom. These conserved quantities can be factored out as classical degrees of freedom, leaving behind a non-interacting quantum model that is easy to solve.</p>
 <p>Next Section: <a href="../2_Background/2.4_Disorder.html">Disorder and Localisation</a></p>
 </section>
 </section>
@@ -242,13 +245,13 @@ This all works the same way for the amorphous lattice but the diagram is a lot m
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[3] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. Hermanns, I. Kimchi, and J. Knolle, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-033117-053934">Physics of the Kitaev Model: Fractionalization, Dynamic Correlations, and Material Connections</a></em>, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics <strong>9</strong>, 17 (2018).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Winter2017" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[4] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. M. Winter, A. A. Tsirlin, M. Daghofer, J. van den Brink, Y. Singh, P. Gegenwart, and R. Valentí, <em>Models and Materials for Generalized Kitaev Magnetism</em>, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter <strong>29</strong>, 493002 (2017).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[4] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. M. Winter, A. A. Tsirlin, M. Daghofer, J. van den Brink, Y. Singh, P. Gegenwart, and R. Valentí, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/aa8cf5">Models and Materials for Generalized Kitaev Magnetism</a></em>, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter <strong>29</strong>, 493002 (2017).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-TrebstPhysRep2022" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[5] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. Trebst and C. Hickey, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2021.11.003">Kitaev Materials</a></em>, Physics Reports <strong>950</strong>, 1 (2022).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Takagi2019" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[6] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">H. Takagi, T. Takayama, G. Jackeli, G. Khaliullin, and S. E. Nagler, <em>Concept and Realization of Kitaev Quantum Spin Liquids</em>, Nature Reviews Physics <strong>1</strong>, 264 (2019).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[6] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">H. Takagi, T. Takayama, G. Jackeli, G. Khaliullin, and S. E. Nagler, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-019-0038-2">Concept and Realization of Kitaev Quantum Spin Liquids</a></em>, Nat Rev Phys <strong>1</strong>, 4 (2019).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-chandraClassicalHeisenbergSpins2010" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[7] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. Chandra, K. Ramola, and D. Dhar, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.031113">Classical Heisenberg Spins on a Hexagonal Lattice with Kitaev Couplings</a></em>, Phys. Rev. E <strong>82</strong>, 031113 (2010).</div>
@@ -256,7 +259,7 @@ This all works the same way for the amorphous lattice but the diagram is a lot m
 <div id="ref-selaOrderbydisorderSpinorbitalLiquids2014" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[8] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">E. Sela, H.-C. Jiang, M. H. Gerlach, and S. Trebst, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.035113">Order-by-Disorder and Spin-Orbital Liquids in a Distorted Heisenberg-Kitaev Model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>90</strong>, 035113 (2014).</div>
 </div>
-<div id="ref-andersonResonatingValenceBonds1973" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div id="ref-Anderson1973" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[9] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. W. Anderson, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5408(73)90167-0">Resonating Valence Bonds: A New Kind of Insulator?</a></em>, Materials Research Bulletin <strong>8</strong>, 153 (1973).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-freedmanTopologicalQuantumComputation2003" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
@@ -272,7 +275,7 @@ This all works the same way for the amorphous lattice but the diagram is a lot m
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[13] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">G. Khaliullin, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1143/PTPS.160.155">Orbital Order and Fluctuations in Mott Insulators</a></em>, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement <strong>160</strong>, 155 (2005).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Chaloupka2010" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[14] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli, and G. Khaliullin, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.027204">Kitaev-Heisenberg Model on a Honeycomb Lattice: Possible Exotic Phases in Iridium Oxides ${A}_{2}{\mathrm{IrO}}_{3}$</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>105</strong>, 027204 (2010).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[14] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli, and G. Khaliullin, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.027204">Kitaev-Heisenberg Model on a Honeycomb Lattice: Possible Exotic Phases in Iridium Oxides A₂IrO₃</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>105</strong>, 027204 (2010).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-chenExactResultsKitaev2008" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[15] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">H.-D. Chen and Z. Nussinov, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/41/7/075001">Exact Results of the Kitaev Model on a Hexagonal Lattice: Spin States, String and Brane Correlators, and Anyonic Excitations</a></em>, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. <strong>41</strong>, 075001 (2008).</div>
@@ -284,7 +287,7 @@ This all works the same way for the amorphous lattice but the diagram is a lot m
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[17] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">F. L. Pedrocchi, S. Chesi, and D. Loss, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.165414">Physical solutions of the Kitaev honeycomb model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>84</strong>, 165414 (2011).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-BlaizotRipka1986" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[18] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J.-P. Blaizot and G. Ripka, <em>Quantum Theory of Finite Systems</em> (The MIT Press, 1986).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[18] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Blaizot, G. Ripka, J. W. Negele, H. Orland, and G. E. Brown, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2811565">Quantum Theory of Finite Systems and Quantum Many‐Particle Systems</a></em>, Physics Today <strong>41</strong>, 106 (1988).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-lieb_flux_1994" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[19] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">E. H. Lieb, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.2158">Flux Phase of the Half-Filled Band</a></em>, Physical Review Letters <strong>73</strong>, 2158 (1994).</div>
@@ -302,7 +305,7 @@ This all works the same way for the amorphous lattice but the diagram is a lot m
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[23] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">H. Yao, S.-C. Zhang, and S. A. Kivelson, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.217202">Algebraic Spin Liquid in an Exactly Solvable Spin Model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>102</strong>, 217202 (2009).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-eschmann2019thermodynamics" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[24] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Eschmann, P. A. Mishchenko, T. A. Bojesen, Y. Kato, M. Hermanns, Y. Motome, and S. Trebst, <em>Thermodynamics of a Gauge-Frustrated Kitaev Spin Liquid</em>, Physical Review Research <strong>1</strong>, 032011(R) (2019).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[24] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Eschmann, P. A. Mishchenko, T. A. Bojesen, Y. Kato, M. Hermanns, Y. Motome, and S. Trebst, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.032011">Thermodynamics of a Gauge-Frustrated Kitaev Spin Liquid</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Research <strong>1</strong>, 032011 (2019).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Peri2020" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[25] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">V. Peri, S. Ok, S. S. Tsirkin, T. Neupert, G. Baskaran, M. Greiter, R. Moessner, and R. Thomale, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.041114">Non-Abelian Chiral Spin Liquid on a Simple Non-Archimedean Lattice</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>101</strong>, 041114 (2020).</div>

_thesis/2_Background/2.4_Disorder.html

@@ -79,38 +79,37 @@ image:
 </div>
 <section id="bg-disorder-and-localisation" class="level1">
 <h1>Disorder and Localisation</h1>
-<p>Disorder is a fact of life for the condensed matter physicist. No sample will ever be completely free of contamination or of structural defects. The classical Drude theory of electron conductivity envisages electrons as scattering off impurities. In this model one would expect the electrical conductivity to be proportional to the mean free path <span class="citation" data-cites="lagendijkFiftyYearsAnderson2009"> [<a href="#ref-lagendijkFiftyYearsAnderson2009" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>, decreasing smoothly as the number of defects increases. However, Anderson in 1958 <span class="citation" data-cites="andersonAbsenceDiffusionCertain1958"> [<a href="#ref-andersonAbsenceDiffusionCertain1958" role="doc-biblioref">2</a>]</span> showed that in a simple model, there is some critical level of disorder at which <strong>all</strong> single particle eigenstates localise.</p>
+<p>Disorder is a fact of life for the condensed matter physicist. No sample will ever be completely free of contamination or of structural defects. The classical Drude theory of electron conductivity envisages electrons as scattering off impurities. In this model, one would expect the electrical conductivity to be proportional to the mean free path <span class="citation" data-cites="lagendijkFiftyYearsAnderson2009"> [<a href="#ref-lagendijkFiftyYearsAnderson2009" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>, decreasing smoothly as the number of defects increases. However, Anderson in 1958 <span class="citation" data-cites="andersonAbsenceDiffusionCertain1958"> [<a href="#ref-andersonAbsenceDiffusionCertain1958" role="doc-biblioref">2</a>]</span> showed that in a simple model, there is some critical level of disorder at which <em>all</em> single particle eigenstates localise.</p>
 <p>What would later be known as Anderson localisation is characterised by exponentially localised eigenfunctions <span class="math inline">\(\psi(x) \sim e^{-x/\lambda}\)</span> which cannot contribute to transport processes. The localisation length <span class="math inline">\(\lambda\)</span> is the typical scale of localised states and can be extracted with transmission matrix methods <span class="citation" data-cites="pendrySymmetryTransportWaves1994"> [<a href="#ref-pendrySymmetryTransportWaves1994" role="doc-biblioref">3</a>]</span>. Anderson localisation provided a different kind of insulator to that of the band insulator.</p>
 <p>The Anderson model is about the simplest model of disorder one could imagine <span id="eq:bg-anderson-model"><span class="math display">\[
 H = -t\sum_{\langle jk \rangle} c^\dagger_j c_k + \sum_j V_j c_j^\dagger c_j.
 \qquad{(1)}\]</span></span></p>
-<p>It is one of non-interacting fermions subject to a disorder potential <span class="math inline">\(V_j\)</span> drawn uniformly from the interval <span class="math inline">\([-W,W]\)</span>. The discovery of localisation in quantum systems was surprising at the time given the seeming ubiquity of extended Bloch states. Within the Anderson model, all the states localise at the same disorder strength <span class="math inline">\(W\)</span>. Later Mott showed that in other contexts extended Bloch states and localised states can coexist at the same disorder strength but at different energies. The transition in energy between localised and extended states is known as a mobility edge <span class="citation" data-cites="mottMetalInsulatorTransitions1978"> [<a href="#ref-mottMetalInsulatorTransitions1978" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>]</span>.</p>
+<p>It is one of non-interacting fermions subject to a disorder potential <span class="math inline">\(V_j\)</span> drawn uniformly from the interval <span class="math inline">\([-W,W]\)</span>. The discovery of localisation in quantum systems was surprising at the time given the seeming ubiquity of extended Bloch states. Within the Anderson model, all the states localise at the same disorder strength <span class="math inline">\(W\)</span>. Later, Mott showed that in other contexts extended Bloch states and localised states can coexist at the same disorder strength but at different energies. The transition in energy between localised and extended states is known as a mobility edge <span class="citation" data-cites="mottMetalInsulatorTransitions1978"> [<a href="#ref-mottMetalInsulatorTransitions1978" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>]</span>.</p>
 <p>Localisation phenomena are strongly dimension dependent. In 3D the scaling theory of localisation <span class="citation" data-cites="edwardsNumericalStudiesLocalization1972 kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993"> [<a href="#ref-edwardsNumericalStudiesLocalization1972" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>,<a href="#ref-kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span> shows that Anderson localisation is a critical phenomenon with critical exponents both for how the conductivity vanishes with energy when approaching the mobility edge and for how the localisation length increases below it. By contrast, in 1D disorder generally dominates. Even the weakest disorder exponentially localises <em>all</em> single particle eigenstates in the 1D Anderson model. Only long-range spatial correlations of the disorder potential can induce delocalisation <span class="citation" data-cites="aubryAnalyticityBreakingAnderson1980 dassarmaLocalizationMobilityEdges1990 dunlapAbsenceLocalizationRandomdimer1990 izrailevLocalizationMobilityEdge1999 croyAndersonLocalization1D2011 izrailevAnomalousLocalizationLowDimensional2012"> [<a href="#ref-aubryAnalyticityBreakingAnderson1980" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>–<a href="#ref-izrailevAnomalousLocalizationLowDimensional2012" role="doc-biblioref">12</a>]</span>.</p>
 <p>Later localisation was found in disordered interacting many-body systems:</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[
 H = -t\sum_{\langle jk \rangle} c^\dagger_j c_k + \sum_j V_j c_j^\dagger c_j + U\sum_{jk} n_j n_k
 \]</span> Here, in contrast to the Anderson model, localisation phenomena are robust to weak perturbations of the Hamiltonian. This is called many-body localisation <span class="citation" data-cites="imbrieManyBodyLocalizationQuantum2016 gogolinEquilibrationThermalisationEmergence2016"> [<a href="#ref-imbrieManyBodyLocalizationQuantum2016" role="doc-biblioref">13</a>,<a href="#ref-gogolinEquilibrationThermalisationEmergence2016" role="doc-biblioref">14</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>Both many-body localisation and Anderson localisation depend crucially on the presence of <em>quenched</em> disorder. Quenched disorder takes the form a static background field drawn from an arbitrary probability distribution to which the model is coupled. Disorder may also be introduced into the initial state of the system rather than the Hamiltonian. This has led to ongoing interest in the possibility of disorder-free localisation where the disorder is instead <em>annealed</em>. In this scenario the disorder necessary to generate localisation is generated entirely from the thermal fluctuations of the model.</p>
+<p>Both many-body localisation and Anderson localisation depend crucially on the presence of <em>quenched</em> disorder. Quenched disorder takes the form a static background field drawn from an arbitrary probability distribution to which the model is coupled. Disorder may also be introduced into the initial state of the system rather than the Hamiltonian. This has led to ongoing interest in the possibility of disorder-free localisation where the disorder is instead <em>annealed</em>. In this scenario, the disorder necessary to generate localisation is generated entirely from the thermal fluctuations of the model.</p>
 <p>The concept of disorder-free localisation was first proposed in the context of Helium mixtures <span class="citation" data-cites="kagan1984localization"> [<a href="#ref-kagan1984localization" role="doc-biblioref">15</a>]</span> and then extended to heavy-light mixtures in which multiple species with large mass ratios interact. The idea is that the heavier particles act as an effective disorder potential for the lighter ones, inducing localisation. Two such models <span class="citation" data-cites="yaoQuasiManyBodyLocalizationTranslationInvariant2016 schiulazDynamicsManybodyLocalized2015"> [<a href="#ref-yaoQuasiManyBodyLocalizationTranslationInvariant2016" role="doc-biblioref">16</a>,<a href="#ref-schiulazDynamicsManybodyLocalized2015" role="doc-biblioref">17</a>]</span> instead find that the models thermalise exponentially slowly in system size, which Ref. <span class="citation" data-cites="yaoQuasiManyBodyLocalizationTranslationInvariant2016"> [<a href="#ref-yaoQuasiManyBodyLocalizationTranslationInvariant2016" role="doc-biblioref">16</a>]</span> dubs Quasi-MBL.</p>
-<p>True disorder-free localisation does occur in exactly solvable models with extensively many conserved quantities <span class="citation" data-cites="smithDisorderFreeLocalization2017"> [<a href="#ref-smithDisorderFreeLocalization2017" role="doc-biblioref">18</a>]</span>. As conserved quantities have no time dynamics this can be thought of as taking the separation of timescales to the infinite limit. The localisation phenomena present in the Falicov-Kimball model are instead the result of annealed disorder. A strong separation of timescales means that the heavy species is approximated as immobile with respect to the lighter itinerant species. At finite temperature the heavy species acts as a disorder potential for the lighter one. However, in contrast to quenched disorder, the probability distribution of annealed disorder is entirely determined by the thermodynamics of the Hamiltonian. In the 2D FK model this leads to multiple phases where localisation effects are relevant. At low temperatures the heavy species orders to a symmetry broken CDW phase, leading to a traditional band gap insulator. At higher temperatures however thermal disorder causes the light species to localise. At weak coupling, the localisation length can be very large, so finite sized systems may still conduct, an effect known as weak localisation <span class="citation" data-cites="antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016"> [<a href="#ref-antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016" role="doc-biblioref">19</a>]</span>.</p>
+<p>True disorder-free localisation does occur in exactly solvable models with extensively many conserved quantities <span class="citation" data-cites="smithDisorderFreeLocalization2017"> [<a href="#ref-smithDisorderFreeLocalization2017" role="doc-biblioref">18</a>]</span>. As conserved quantities have no time dynamics, this can be thought of as taking the separation of timescales to the infinite limit. The localisation phenomena present in the Falicov-Kimball model are instead the result of annealed disorder. A strong separation of timescales means that the heavy species is approximated as immobile with respect to the lighter itinerant species. At finite temperature the heavy species acts as a disorder potential for the lighter one. However, in contrast to quenched disorder, the probability distribution of annealed disorder is entirely determined by the thermodynamics of the Hamiltonian. In the 2D FK model this leads to multiple phases where localisation effects are relevant. At low temperatures, the heavy species orders to a symmetry broken CDW phase, leading to a traditional band gap insulator. At higher temperatures, however, thermal disorder causes the light species to localise. At weak coupling, the localisation length can be very large, so finite sized systems may still conduct, an effect known as weak localisation <span class="citation" data-cites="antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016"> [<a href="#ref-antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016" role="doc-biblioref">19</a>]</span>.</p>
 <p>In Chapter 3 we will consider a generalised FK model in 1D and study how the disorder generated near a 1D thermodynamic phase transition interacts with localisation physics.</p>
 <section id="topological-disorder" class="level2">
 <h2>Topological Disorder</h2>
-<p>So far we have considered disorder as a static or dynamic field coupled to a model defined on a translation invariant lattice. Another kind of disordered system that worthy of study are amorphous systems. Amorphous systems have disordered bond connectivity, so called <em>topological disorder</em>. As discussed in the introduction these include amorphous semiconductors such as amorphous Germanium and Silicon  <span class="citation" data-cites="Yonezawa1983 zallen2008physics Weaire1971 betteridge1973possible"> [<a href="#ref-Yonezawa1983" role="doc-biblioref">20</a>–<a href="#ref-betteridge1973possible" role="doc-biblioref">23</a>]</span>. While materials do not have long-range lattice structure they can enforce local constraints such as the approximate coordination number <span class="math inline">\(z = 4\)</span> of silicon.</p>
+<p>So far we have considered disorder as a static or dynamic field coupled to a model defined on a translation invariant lattice. Another kind of disordered system that is worthy of study are amorphous systems. Amorphous systems have disordered bond connectivity, so called <em>topological disorder</em>. As discussed in the introduction these include amorphous semiconductors such as amorphous Germanium and Silicon  <span class="citation" data-cites="Yonezawa1983 zallen2008physics Weaire1971 betteridge1973possible"> [<a href="#ref-Yonezawa1983" role="doc-biblioref">20</a>–<a href="#ref-betteridge1973possible" role="doc-biblioref">23</a>]</span>. While materials do not have long-range lattice structure they can enforce local constraints such as the approximate coordination number <span class="math inline">\(z = 4\)</span> of silicon.</p>
-<p>Topological disorder can be qualitatively different from other disordered systems. Disordered graphs are constrained by fixed coordination number and the Euler equation. A standard method for generating such graphs with coordination number <span class="math inline">\(d+1\)</span> is Voronoi tessellation <span class="citation" data-cites="mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018 marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpeModels2020"> [<a href="#ref-mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018" role="doc-biblioref">24</a>,<a href="#ref-marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpeModels2020" role="doc-biblioref">25</a>]</span>. The Harris <span class="citation" data-cites="harrisEffectRandomDefects1974"> [<a href="#ref-harrisEffectRandomDefects1974" role="doc-biblioref">26</a>]</span> and the Imry-Mar <span class="citation" data-cites="imryRandomFieldInstabilityOrdered1975"> [<a href="#ref-imryRandomFieldInstabilityOrdered1975" role="doc-biblioref">27</a>]</span> criteria are key results on the effect of disorder on thermodynamic phase transitions. The Harris criterion signals when disorder will affect the universality of a thermodynamic critical point while the Imry-Ma criterion simply forbids the formation of long-range ordered states in <span class="math inline">\(d \leq 2\)</span> dimensions in the presence of disorder. Both these criteria are modified for the case of topological disorder. This is because the Euler equation and vertex degree constraints lead to strong anti-correlations which mean that topological disorder is effectively weaker than standard disorder in 2D <span class="citation" data-cites="barghathiPhaseTransitionsRandom2014 schrauthViolationHarrisBarghathiVojtaCriterion2018"> [<a href="#ref-barghathiPhaseTransitionsRandom2014" role="doc-biblioref">28</a>,<a href="#ref-schrauthViolationHarrisBarghathiVojtaCriterion2018" role="doc-biblioref">29</a>]</span>. This does not apply to 3D Voronoi lattices where the Euler equation contains an extra volume term and so is effectively a weaker constraint.</p>
+<p>Topological disorder can be qualitatively different from other disordered systems. Disordered graphs are constrained by fixed coordination number and the Euler equation. A standard method for generating such graphs with coordination number <span class="math inline">\(d+1\)</span> is Voronoi tessellation <span class="citation" data-cites="mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018 marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpeModels2020"> [<a href="#ref-mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018" role="doc-biblioref">24</a>,<a href="#ref-marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpeModels2020" role="doc-biblioref">25</a>]</span>. The Harris <span class="citation" data-cites="harrisEffectRandomDefects1974"> [<a href="#ref-harrisEffectRandomDefects1974" role="doc-biblioref">26</a>]</span> and the Imry-Mar <span class="citation" data-cites="imryRandomFieldInstabilityOrdered1975"> [<a href="#ref-imryRandomFieldInstabilityOrdered1975" role="doc-biblioref">27</a>]</span> criteria are key results on the effect of disorder on thermodynamic phase transitions. The Harris criterion signals when disorder will affect the universality of a thermodynamic critical point while the Imry-Ma criterion simply forbids the formation of long-range ordered states in <span class="math inline">\(d \leq 2\)</span> dimensions in the presence of disorder. Both these criteria are modified for the case of topological disorder. This is because the Euler equation and vertex degree constraints lead to strong anti-correlations which mean that topological disorder is effectively weaker than standard disorder in 2D <span class="citation" data-cites="barghathiPhaseTransitionsRandom2014 schrauthViolationHarrisBarghathiVojtaCriterion2018"> [<a href="#ref-barghathiPhaseTransitionsRandom2014" role="doc-biblioref">28</a>,<a href="#ref-schrauthViolationHarrisBarghathiVojtaCriterion2018" role="doc-biblioref">29</a>]</span>. This does not apply to 3D Voronoi lattices where the Euler equation contains an extra volume term and so is effectively a weaker constraint. It is worth exploring how QSLs and disorder interact. The KH model has been studied subject to both flux <span class="citation" data-cites="Nasu_Thermal_2015"> [<a href="#ref-Nasu_Thermal_2015" role="doc-biblioref">30</a>]</span> and bond <span class="citation" data-cites="knolle_dynamics_2016"> [<a href="#ref-knolle_dynamics_2016" role="doc-biblioref">31</a>]</span> disorder. In some instances it seems that disorder can even promote the formation of a QSL ground state <span class="citation" data-cites="wenDisorderedRouteCoulomb2017"> [<a href="#ref-wenDisorderedRouteCoulomb2017" role="doc-biblioref">32</a>]</span>. It has also been shown that the KH model exhibits disorder-free localisation after a quantum quench <span class="citation" data-cites="zhuSubdiffusiveDynamicsCritical2021"> [<a href="#ref-zhuSubdiffusiveDynamicsCritical2021" role="doc-biblioref">33</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>Lastly it is worth exploring how QSLs and disorder interact. The KH model has been studied subject to both flux <span class="citation" data-cites="Nasu_Thermal_2015"> [<a href="#ref-Nasu_Thermal_2015" role="doc-biblioref">30</a>]</span> and bond <span class="citation" data-cites="knolle_dynamics_2016"> [<a href="#ref-knolle_dynamics_2016" role="doc-biblioref">31</a>]</span> disorder. In some instances it seems that disorder can even promote the formation of a QSL ground state <span class="citation" data-cites="wenDisorderedRouteCoulomb2017"> [<a href="#ref-wenDisorderedRouteCoulomb2017" role="doc-biblioref">32</a>]</span>. It has also been shown that the KH model exhibits disorder-free localisation after a quantum quench <span class="citation" data-cites="zhuSubdiffusiveDynamicsCritical2021"> [<a href="#ref-zhuSubdiffusiveDynamicsCritical2021" role="doc-biblioref">33</a>]</span>.</p>
 <p>In chapter 4 we will put the Kitaev model onto 2D Voronoi lattices and show that much of the rich character of the model is preserved despite the lack of long-range order.</p>
 </section>
 <section id="diagnosing-localisation-in-practice" class="level2">
 <h2>Diagnosing Localisation in practice</h2>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/background_chapter/localisation_radius_vs_length.svg" id="fig-localisation_radius_vs_length" data-short-caption="Localisation length vs diameter" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 1: A localised state \psi in an potential well that has formed from random fluctuations in the disorder potential V(x). The localisation length \lambda governs how quickly the state decays away from the well while the diameter R of the state is controlled by the size of the well. Reproduced from  [6]." />
+<img src="/assets/thesis/background_chapter/localisation_radius_vs_length.svg" id="fig-localisation_radius_vs_length" data-short-caption="Localisation length vs diameter" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 1: A localised state \psi in a potential well that has formed from random fluctuations in the disorder potential V(x). The localisation length \lambda governs how quickly the state decays away from the well while the diameter R of the state is controlled by the size of the well. Reproduced from  [6]." />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1: A localised state <span class="math inline">\(\psi\)</span> in an potential well that has formed from random fluctuations in the disorder potential <span class="math inline">\(V(x)\)</span>. The localisation length <span class="math inline">\(\lambda\)</span> governs how quickly the state decays away from the well while the diameter <span class="math inline">\(R\)</span> of the state is controlled by the size of the well. Reproduced from <span class="citation" data-cites="kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993"> [<a href="#ref-kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>.</figcaption>
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1: A localised state <span class="math inline">\(\psi\)</span> in a potential well that has formed from random fluctuations in the disorder potential <span class="math inline">\(V(x)\)</span>. The localisation length <span class="math inline">\(\lambda\)</span> governs how quickly the state decays away from the well while the diameter <span class="math inline">\(R\)</span> of the state is controlled by the size of the well. Reproduced from <span class="citation" data-cites="kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993"> [<a href="#ref-kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>.</figcaption>
 </figure>
 <p>Looking at practical tools for diagnosing localisation, there are a few standard methods <span class="citation" data-cites="kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993"> [<a href="#ref-kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>The most direct method would be to fit a function of the form <span class="math inline">\(\psi(x) = f(x) e^{-|x-x_0|/\lambda}\)</span> to each single particle wavefunction to extract the localisation length <span class="math inline">\(\lambda\)</span>. This method is little used in practice since it requires storing and processing full wavefunctions which quickly becomes expensive for large systems.</p>
+<p>The most direct method would be to fit a function of the form <span class="math inline">\(\psi(x) = f(x) e^{-|x-x_0|/\lambda}\)</span> to each single particle wavefunction to extract the localisation length <span class="math inline">\(\lambda\)</span>. This method is little used in practice since it requires storing and processing full wavefunctions which quickly becomes computationally expensive for large systems.</p>
 <p>For low dimensional systems with quenched disorder, transfer matrix methods can be used to directly extract the localisation length. These work by turning the time independent Schrödinger equation <span class="math inline">\(\hat{H}|\psi\rangle = E|\psi\rangle\)</span> into a matrix equation linking the amplitude of <span class="math inline">\(\psi\)</span> on each <span class="math inline">\(d-1\)</span> dimensional slice of the system to the next and looking at average properties of this transmission matrix. This method is less useful for systems like the FK model where the disorder as a whole must be sampled from the thermodynamic ensemble.</p>
-<p>A more versatile method is based on the inverse participation ratio (IPR). The IPR is defined for a normalised wave function <span class="math inline">\(\psi_i = \psi(x_i), \sum_i |\psi_i|^2 = 1\)</span> as its fourth moment <span class="citation" data-cites="kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993"> [<a href="#ref-kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>:</p>
+<p>A more versatile method is based on the Inverse Participation Ratio (IPR). The IPR is defined for a normalised wave function <span class="math inline">\(\psi_i = \psi(x_i), \sum_i |\psi_i|^2 = 1\)</span> as its fourth moment <span class="citation" data-cites="kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993"> [<a href="#ref-kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>:</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[
 P^{-1} = \sum_i |\psi_i|^4
 \]</span></p>
@@ -119,16 +118,16 @@ P^{-1} = \sum_i |\psi_i|^4
 <p><span class="math display">\[
 P(L)^{-1} \sim L^{-d*}
 \]</span></p>
-<p>Such intermediate states tend to appear as critical phenomena near mobility edges <span class="citation" data-cites="eversAndersonTransitions2008"> [<a href="#ref-eversAndersonTransitions2008" role="doc-biblioref">34</a>]</span>. For finite size systems, these relations only hold once the system size <span class="math inline">\(L\)</span> is much greater than the localisation length. When the localisation length is comparable to the system size the states still contribute to transport, this is the aforementioned weak localisation effect <span class="citation" data-cites="altshulerMagnetoresistanceHallEffect1980 dattaElectronicTransportMesoscopic1995"> [<a href="#ref-altshulerMagnetoresistanceHallEffect1980" role="doc-biblioref">35</a>,<a href="#ref-dattaElectronicTransportMesoscopic1995" role="doc-biblioref">36</a>]</span>.</p>
+<p>Such intermediate states tend to appear as critical phenomena near mobility edges <span class="citation" data-cites="eversAndersonTransitions2008"> [<a href="#ref-eversAndersonTransitions2008" role="doc-biblioref">34</a>]</span>. For finite size systems, these relations only hold once the system size <span class="math inline">\(L\)</span> is much greater than the localisation length. When the localisation length is comparable to the system size, the states still contribute to transport, this is the aforementioned weak localisation effect <span class="citation" data-cites="altshulerMagnetoresistanceHallEffect1980 dattaElectronicTransportMesoscopic1995"> [<a href="#ref-altshulerMagnetoresistanceHallEffect1980" role="doc-biblioref">35</a>,<a href="#ref-dattaElectronicTransportMesoscopic1995" role="doc-biblioref">36</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>In both chapters to follow I will use an energy resolved IPR <span class="math display">\[
+<p>In the following two chapters I will use an energy resolved IPR <span class="math display">\[
 \begin{aligned}
 DOS(\omega) &amp;= \sum_n \delta(\omega - \epsilon_n)\\
 IPR(\omega) &amp;= DOS(\omega)^{-1} \sum_{n,i} \delta(\omega - \epsilon_n) |\psi_{n,i}|^4
 \end{aligned}
-\]</span> Where <span class="math inline">\(\psi_{n,i}\)</span> is the wavefunction corresponding to the energy <span class="math inline">\(\epsilon_n\)</span> at the ith site. In practice I bin the energies and IPRs into a fine energy grid and use the mean within each bin.</p>
+\]</span> where <span class="math inline">\(\psi_{n,i}\)</span> is the wavefunction corresponding to the energy <span class="math inline">\(\epsilon_n\)</span> at the ith site. In practice I bin the IPRs into finely spaced bins in energy space and use the mean IPR within each bin.</p>
 <section id="chapter-summary" class="level3">
 <h3>Chapter Summary</h3>
-<p>In this chapter we have covered the Falicov-Kimball model, the Kitaev Honeycomb model and the theory of disorder and localisation. We saw that the FK model is one of immobile species (spins) interacting with an itinerant quantum species (electrons). While the KH model is specified in terms of spins on a honeycomb lattice interacting via a highly anisotropic Ising coupling, it can be transformed into one of Majorana fermions interacting with a classical gauge field that supports immobile flux excitations. In each case it is the immobile species that makes each model exactly solvable. Both models have rich ground state and thermodynamic phase diagrams. The last part of this chapter dealt with disorder and how it almost inevitably leads to localisation. Both the FK and KH models are effectively disordered at finite temperatures by their immobile species. In the next chapter we will look at a version of the FK model in 1D augmented with long-range interactions in order to retain its ordered phase. The model is translation invariant but we will see that it exhibits disorder-free localisation. After that we will look at the KH model defined on an amorphous lattice with vertex degree <span class="math inline">\(z=3\)</span>.</p>
+<p>In this chapter we have covered the Falicov-Kimball model, the Kitaev Honeycomb model and the theory of disorder and localisation. We saw that the FK model is one of immobile species (spins) interacting with an itinerant quantum species (electrons). While the KH model is specified in terms of spins on a honeycomb lattice interacting via a highly anisotropic Ising coupling, it can be transformed into one of Majorana fermions interacting with a classical gauge field that supports immobile flux excitations. In each case, it is the immobile species that make the model exactly solvable. Both models have rich ground states and thermodynamic phase diagrams. The last part of this chapter dealt with disorder and how it almost inevitably leads to localisation. Both the FK and KH models are effectively disordered at finite temperatures by their immobile species. In the next chapter we will look at a version of the FK model in 1D augmented with long-range interactions in order to retain its ordered phase. The model is translation invariant but we will see that it exhibits disorder-free localisation. After that we will look at the KH model defined on an amorphous lattice with vertex degree <span class="math inline">\(z=3\)</span>.</p>
 <p>Next Chapter: <a href="../3_Long_Range_Falicov_Kimball/3.1_LRFK_Model.html">3 The Long Range Falicov-Kimball Model</a></p>
 </section>
 </section>
@@ -179,7 +178,7 @@ IPR(\omega) &amp;= DOS(\omega)^{-1} \sum_{n,i} \delta(\omega - \epsilon_n) |\psi
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[14] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Gogolin and J. Eisert, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/5/056001">Equilibration, Thermalisation, and the Emergence of Statistical Mechanics in Closed Quantum Systems</a></em>, Rep. Prog. Phys. <strong>79</strong>, 056001 (2016).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-kagan1984localization" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[15] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">Y. Kagan and L. Maksimov, <em>Localization in a System of Interacting Particles Diffusing in a Regular Crystal</em>, Zhurnal Eksperimental’noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki <strong>87</strong>, 348 (1984).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[15] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">Y. Kagan and L. Maksimov, <em><a href="http://www.jetp.ras.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e_060_01_0201.pdf">Localization in a System of Interacting Particles Diffusing in a Regular Crystal</a></em>, Zhurnal Eksperimental’noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki <strong>87</strong>, 348 (1984).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-yaoQuasiManyBodyLocalizationTranslationInvariant2016" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[16] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">N.  Y. Yao, C.  R. Laumann, J.  I. Cirac, M.  D. Lukin, and J.  E. Moore, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.240601">Quasi-Many-Body Localization in Translation-Invariant Systems</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>117</strong>, 240601 (2016).</div>
@@ -194,7 +193,7 @@ IPR(\omega) &amp;= DOS(\omega)^{-1} \sum_{n,i} \delta(\omega - \epsilon_n) |\psi
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[19] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. E. Antipov, Y. Javanmard, P. Ribeiro, and S. Kirchner, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.146601">Interaction-Tuned Anderson Versus Mott Localization</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>117</strong>, 146601 (2016).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Yonezawa1983" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[20] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">F. Yonezawa and T. Ninomiya, editors, <em>Topological Disorder in Condensed Matter</em>, Vol. 46 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1983).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[20] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">F. Yonezawa and T. Ninomiya, editors, <em><a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-82104-2">Topological Disorder in Condensed Matter</a></em>, Vol. 46 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1983).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-zallen2008physics" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[21] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">R. Zallen, <em>The Physics of Amorphous Solids</em> (John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2008).</div>
@@ -203,7 +202,7 @@ IPR(\omega) &amp;= DOS(\omega)^{-1} \sum_{n,i} \delta(\omega - \epsilon_n) |\psi
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[22] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">D. Weaire and M. F. Thorpe, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.4.2508">Electronic Properties of an Amorphous Solid. I. A Simple Tight-Binding Theory</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>4</strong>, 2508 (1971).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-betteridge1973possible" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[23] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">G. Betteridge, <em>A Possible Model of Amorphous Silicon and Germanium</em>, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics <strong>6</strong>, L427 (1973).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[23] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">G. P. Betteridge, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/6/23/001">A Possible Model of Amorphous Silicon and Germanium</a></em>, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. <strong>6</strong>, L427 (1973).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[24] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">N. P. Mitchell, L. M. Nash, D. Hexner, A. M. Turner, and W. T. M. Irvine, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-017-0024-5">Amorphous topological insulators constructed from random point sets</a></em>, Nature Phys <strong>14</strong>, 380 (2018).</div>
@@ -227,10 +226,10 @@ IPR(\omega) &amp;= DOS(\omega)^{-1} \sum_{n,i} \delta(\omega - \epsilon_n) |\psi
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[30] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Nasu, M. Udagawa, and Y. Motome, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.115122">Thermal Fractionalization of Quantum Spins in a Kitaev Model: Temperature-Linear Specific Heat and Coherent Transport of Majorana Fermions</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>92</strong>, 115122 (2015).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-knolle_dynamics_2016" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[31] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Knolle, Dynamics of a Quantum Spin Liquid, Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, 2016.</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[31] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Knolle, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23953-8">Dynamics of a Quantum Spin Liquid</a></em> (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-wenDisorderedRouteCoulomb2017" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[32] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J.-J. Wen et al., <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.107206">Disordered Route to the Coulomb Quantum Spin Liquid: Random Transverse Fields on Spin Ice in ${\Mathrm{Pr}}_{2}{\mathrm{Zr}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}$</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>118</strong>, 107206 (2017).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[32] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J.-J. Wen et al., <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.107206">Disordered Route to the Coulomb Quantum Spin Liquid: Random Transverse Fields on Spin Ice in Pr₂Zr₂O₇</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>118</strong>, 107206 (2017).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-zhuSubdiffusiveDynamicsCritical2021" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[33] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">G.-Y. Zhu and M. Heyl, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L032069">Subdiffusive Dynamics and Critical Quantum Correlations in a Disorder-Free Localized Kitaev Honeycomb Model Out of Equilibrium</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Research <strong>3</strong>, L032069 (2021).</div>

_thesis/3_Long_Range_Falicov_Kimball/3.1_LRFK_Model.html

@@ -84,13 +84,13 @@ image:
 </section>
 <section id="lrfk-chapter-summary" class="level3">
 <h3>Chapter Summary</h3>
-<p>The paper is organised as follows. First, I will introduce the Long-Range Falicov-Kimball (LRFK) model and motivate its definition. Second, I will present the <a href="../3_Long_Range_Falicov_Kimball/3.2_LRFK_Methods.html#sec:lrfk-methods">methods</a> used to solve it numerically, including Markov chain Monte Carlo and finite size scaling. I will then present and interpret the <a href="../3_Long_Range_Falicov_Kimball/3.3_LRFK_Results.html#sec:lrfk-results">results</a> obtained.</p>
+<p>This chapter is organised as follows. First, I will introduce the Long-Range Falicov-Kimball (LRFK) model and motivate its definition. Second, I will present the <a href="../3_Long_Range_Falicov_Kimball/3.2_LRFK_Methods.html#sec:lrfk-methods">methods</a> used to solve it numerically, including Markov chain Monte Carlo and finite size scaling. I will then present and interpret the <a href="../3_Long_Range_Falicov_Kimball/3.3_LRFK_Results.html#sec:lrfk-results">results</a> obtained.</p>
 </section>
 </section>
 <section id="sec:lrfk-model" class="level1">
 <h1>The Model</h1>
 <p>Dimensionality is crucial for the physics of both localisation and phase transitions. We have already seen that the 1D standard Falicov-Kimball (FK) model cannot support an ordered phase at finite temperatures and therefore has no Finite-Temperature Phase Transition (FTPT).</p>
-<p>On bipartite lattices in dimensions 2 and above the FK model exhibits a finite temperature phase transition to an ordered Charge Density Wave (CDW) phase <span class="citation" data-cites="maskaThermodynamicsTwodimensionalFalicovKimball2006"> [<a href="#ref-maskaThermodynamicsTwodimensionalFalicovKimball2006" role="doc-biblioref">3</a>]</span>. In this phase, the spins order anti-ferromagnetically, breaking the <span class="math inline">\(\mathbb{Z}_2\)</span> symmetry. In 1D, however, Peierls’s argument <span class="citation" data-cites="peierlsIsingModelFerromagnetism1936 kennedyItinerantElectronModel1986"> [<a href="#ref-peierlsIsingModelFerromagnetism1936" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>,<a href="#ref-kennedyItinerantElectronModel1986" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>]</span> states that domain walls only introduce a constant energy penalty into the free energy while bringing a entropic contribution logarithmic in system size. Hence the 1D model does not have a finite temperature phase transition. However 1D systems are much easier to study numerically and admit simpler realisations experimentally. We therefore introduce a long-range coupling between the ions in order to stabilise a CDW phase in 1D.</p>
+<p>On bipartite lattices in dimensions two and above, the FK model exhibits a finite temperature phase transition to an ordered Charge Density Wave (CDW) phase <span class="citation" data-cites="maskaThermodynamicsTwodimensionalFalicovKimball2006"> [<a href="#ref-maskaThermodynamicsTwodimensionalFalicovKimball2006" role="doc-biblioref">3</a>]</span>. In this phase, the spins order anti-ferromagnetically, breaking the <span class="math inline">\(\mathbb{Z}_2\)</span> symmetry. In 1D, however, Peierls’s argument <span class="citation" data-cites="peierlsIsingModelFerromagnetism1936 kennedyItinerantElectronModel1986"> [<a href="#ref-peierlsIsingModelFerromagnetism1936" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>,<a href="#ref-kennedyItinerantElectronModel1986" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>]</span> states that domain walls only introduce a constant energy penalty into the free energy while bringing an entropic contribution logarithmic in system size. Hence, the 1D model does not have a finite temperature phase transition. However, 1D systems are much easier to study numerically and admit simpler realisations experimentally. We therefore introduce a long-range coupling between the ions in order to stabilise a CDW phase in 1D.</p>
 <figure>
 <img src="/assets/thesis/intro_chapter/lrfk_schematic.svg" id="fig-lrfk_schematic" data-short-caption="Falicov-Kimball Model Diagram" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 1: The Long-Range Falicov-Kimball (LRFK) Model is a model of classical spins S_i coupled to spinless fermions \hat{c}_i where the fermions are mobile with hopping t and the fermions are coupled to the spins by an Ising type interaction with strength U. The difference from the standard FK model is the presence of a long-range interaction between the spins J_{ij}S_i S_j." />
 <figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1: The Long-Range Falicov-Kimball (LRFK) Model is a model of classical spins <span class="math inline">\(S_i\)</span> coupled to spinless fermions <span class="math inline">\(\hat{c}_i\)</span> where the fermions are mobile with hopping <span class="math inline">\(t\)</span> and the fermions are coupled to the spins by an Ising type interaction with strength <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span>. The difference from the standard FK model is the presence of a long-range interaction between the spins <span class="math inline">\(J_{ij}S_i S_j\)</span>.</figcaption>
@@ -98,14 +98,14 @@ image:
 <p>We interpret the FK model as a model of spinless fermions, <span class="math inline">\(c^\dagger_{i}\)</span>, hopping on a 1D lattice against a classical Ising spin background, <span class="math inline">\(S_i \in {\pm \frac{1}{2}}\)</span>. The fermions couple to the spins via an onsite interaction with strength <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span> which we supplement by a long-range interaction, <span class="math display">\[
 J_{ij} = 4\kappa J\; (-1)^{|i-j|} |i-j|^{-\alpha},
 \]</span></p>
-<p>between the spins. The additional coupling is very similar to that of the long-range Ising (LRI) model, it stabilises the Antiferromagnetic (AFM) order of the Ising spins which promotes the finite temperature CDW phase of the fermionic sector.</p>
+<p>between the spins. The additional coupling is very similar to that of the long-range Ising (LRI) model. It stabilises the Antiferromagnetic (AFM) order of the Ising spins which promotes the finite temperature CDW phase of the fermionic sector.</p>
 <p>The hopping strength of the electrons, <span class="math inline">\(t = 1\)</span>, sets the overall energy scale and we concentrate throughout on the particle-hole symmetric point at zero chemical potential and half filling <span class="citation" data-cites="gruberFalicovKimballModelReview1996"> [<a href="#ref-gruberFalicovKimballModelReview1996" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>.</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
 H_{\mathrm{FK}} = &amp; \;U \sum_{i} S_i\;(c^\dagger_{i}c_{i} - \tfrac{1}{2}) -\;t \sum_{i} (c^\dagger_{i}c_{i+1} + \textit{h.c.)}\\
 &amp;  + \sum_{i, j}^{N} J_{ij}  S_i S_j
 \label{eq:HFK}\end{aligned}\]</span></p>
-<p>Without proper normalisation, the long-range coupling would render the critical temperature strongly system size dependent for small system sizes. Within a mean field approximation the critical temperature scales with the effective coupling to all the neighbours of each site, which for a system with <span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> sites is <span class="math inline">\(\sum_{i=1}^{N} i^{-\alpha}\)</span>. Hence, the normalisation <span class="math inline">\(\kappa^{-1} = \sum_{i=1}^{N} i^{-\alpha}\)</span>, renders the critical temperature independent of system size in the mean field approximation. This greatly improves the finite size behaviour of the model.</p>
+<p>Without proper normalisation, the long-range coupling would render the critical temperature strongly system size dependent for small system sizes. Within a mean field approximation, the critical temperature scales with the effective coupling to all the neighbours of each site, which for a system with <span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> sites is <span class="math inline">\(\sum_{i=1}^{N} i^{-\alpha}\)</span>. Hence, the normalisation <span class="math inline">\(\kappa^{-1} = \sum_{i=1}^{N} i^{-\alpha}\)</span>, renders the critical temperature independent of system size in the mean field approximation. This greatly improves the finite size behaviour of the model.</p>
-<p>Taking the limit <span class="math inline">\(U = 0\)</span> decouples the spins from the fermions, which gives a spin sector governed by a classical long-range Ising model. Note, the transformation of the spins <span class="math inline">\(S_i \to (-1)^{i} S_i\)</span> maps the AFM model to the FM one. As discussed in the background section, Peierls’ classic argument can be extended to long-range couplings to show that, for the 1D LRI model, a power law decay of <span class="math inline">\(\alpha &lt; 2\)</span> is required for a FTPT as the energy of defect domain then scales with the system size and can overcome the entropic contribution. A renormalisation group analysis supports this finding and shows that the critical exponents are only universal for <span class="math inline">\(\alpha \leq 3/2\)</span> <span class="citation" data-cites="ruelleStatisticalMechanicsOnedimensional1968 thoulessLongRangeOrderOneDimensional1969 angeliniRelationsShortrangeLongrange2014"> [<a href="#ref-ruelleStatisticalMechanicsOnedimensional1968" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>–<a href="#ref-angeliniRelationsShortrangeLongrange2014" role="doc-biblioref">9</a>]</span>. In the following, we choose <span class="math inline">\(\alpha = 5/4\)</span> to avoid the additional complexity of non-universal critical points.</p>
+<p>Taking the limit <span class="math inline">\(U = 0\)</span> decouples the spins from the fermions, which gives a spin sector governed by a classical long-range Ising model. Note, the transformation of the spins <span class="math inline">\(S_i \to (-1)^{i} S_i\)</span> maps the AFM model to the FM one. As discussed in the background section, Peierls’ classic argument can be extended to long-range couplings to show that, for the 1D LRI model, a power law decay of <span class="math inline">\(\alpha &lt; 2\)</span> is required for a FTPT. This is because the energy of defect domain scales with the system size when the interactions are long-range and can overcome the entropic contribution. A renormalisation group analysis supports this finding and shows that the critical exponents are only universal for <span class="math inline">\(\alpha \leq 3/2\)</span> <span class="citation" data-cites="ruelleStatisticalMechanicsOnedimensional1968 thoulessLongRangeOrderOneDimensional1969 angeliniRelationsShortrangeLongrange2014"> [<a href="#ref-ruelleStatisticalMechanicsOnedimensional1968" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>–<a href="#ref-angeliniRelationsShortrangeLongrange2014" role="doc-biblioref">9</a>]</span>. In the following, we choose <span class="math inline">\(\alpha = 5/4\)</span> to avoid the additional complexity of non-universal critical points.</p>
 <p>Next Section: <a href="../3_Long_Range_Falicov_Kimball/3.2_LRFK_Methods.html">Methods</a></p>
 </section>
 <section id="bibliography" class="level1 unnumbered">
@@ -127,10 +127,10 @@ H_{\mathrm{FK}} = &amp; \;U \sum_{i} S_i\;(c^\dagger_{i}c_{i} - \tfrac{1}{2}) -\
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[5] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Kennedy and E. H. Lieb, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371(86)90188-3">An Itinerant Electron Model with Crystalline or Magnetic Long Range Order</a></em>, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications <strong>138</strong>, 320 (1986).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-gruberFalicovKimballModelReview1996" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[6] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Gruber and N. Macris, <em>The Falicov-Kimball Model: A Review of Exact Results and Extensions</em>, Helvetica Physica Acta <strong>69</strong>, (1996).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[6] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Gruber and N. Macris, <em><a href="https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Falicov-Kimball-model%3A-a-review-of-exact-and-Gruber-Macris/f369e56a528205992a34abc9b3dc9770390608c9">The Falicov-Kimball Model: A Review of Exact Results and Extensions</a></em>, Helvetica Physica Acta <strong>69</strong>, (1996).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-ruelleStatisticalMechanicsOnedimensional1968" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[7] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">D. Ruelle, <em><a href="https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0234697">Statistical Mechanics of a One-Dimensional Lattice Gas</a></em>, Comm. Math. Phys. <strong>9</strong>, 267 (1968).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[7] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">D. Ruelle, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01654281">Statistical Mechanics of a One-Dimensional Lattice Gas</a></em>, Commun.Math. Phys. <strong>9</strong>, 267 (1968).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-thoulessLongRangeOrderOneDimensional1969" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[8] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">D. J. Thouless, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.187.732">Long-Range Order in One-Dimensional Ising Systems</a></em>, Phys. Rev. <strong>187</strong>, 732 (1969).</div>

_thesis/3_Long_Range_Falicov_Kimball/3.2_LRFK_Methods.html

@@ -75,14 +75,14 @@ image:
 </div>
 <section id="sec:lrfk-methods" class="level1">
 <h1>Methods</h1>
-<p>To evaluate thermodynamic averages I perform classical Markov Chain Monte Carlo random walks over the space of spin configurations of the LRFK model, at each step diagonalising the effective electronic Hamiltonian <span class="citation" data-cites="maskaThermodynamicsTwodimensionalFalicovKimball2006"> [<a href="#ref-maskaThermodynamicsTwodimensionalFalicovKimball2006" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>. Using a Binder-cumulant method <span class="citation" data-cites="binderFiniteSizeScaling1981 musialMonteCarloSimulations2002"> [<a href="#ref-binderFiniteSizeScaling1981" role="doc-biblioref">2</a>,<a href="#ref-musialMonteCarloSimulations2002" role="doc-biblioref">3</a>]</span>, I demonstrate the model has a finite temperature phase transition when the interaction is sufficiently long-ranged. In this section I will discuss the thermodynamics of the model and how they are amenable to an exact Markov Chain Monte Carlo method.</p>
+<p>To evaluate thermodynamic averages, I perform classical Markov Chain Monte Carlo random walks over the space of spin configurations of the LRFK model, at each step diagonalising the effective electronic Hamiltonian <span class="citation" data-cites="maskaThermodynamicsTwodimensionalFalicovKimball2006"> [<a href="#ref-maskaThermodynamicsTwodimensionalFalicovKimball2006" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>. Using a Binder-cumulant method <span class="citation" data-cites="binderFiniteSizeScaling1981 musialMonteCarloSimulations2002"> [<a href="#ref-binderFiniteSizeScaling1981" role="doc-biblioref">2</a>,<a href="#ref-musialMonteCarloSimulations2002" role="doc-biblioref">3</a>]</span>, I demonstrate that the model has a finite temperature phase transition when the interaction is sufficiently long-ranged. In this section I will discuss the thermodynamics of the model and how they are amenable to an exact Markov Chain Monte Carlo method.</p>
 <section id="thermodynamics-of-the-lrfk-model" class="level2">
 <h2>Thermodynamics of the LRFK Model</h2>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/fk_chapter/lsr/pdf_figs/raw_steps_single_flip.svg" id="fig-raw_steps_single_flip" data-short-caption="Comparison of different proposal distributions" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 1: Two Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) walks starting from the CDW state for a system with N = 100 sites and 10,000 MCMC steps but at a temperature close to but above the ordered state (left column) and much higher than it (right column). In this simulation only a single spin can be flipped per step according to the Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm. The staggered magnetisation m = N^{-1} \sum_i (-1)^i \; S_i order parameter is plotted below. At both temperatures the thermal average of m is zero, while the initial state has m = 1. The higher temperature allows the MCMC to converge more quickly and to fluctuate about the mean with a shorter autocorrelation time. t = 1, \alpha = 1.25, T = {2.5,5}, J = U = 5" />
+<img src="/assets/thesis/fk_chapter/raw_steps_single_flip.svg" id="fig-raw_steps_single_flip" data-short-caption="Comparison of different proposal distributions" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 1: Two Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) walks starting from the CDW state for a system with N = 100 sites and 10,000 MCMC steps but at a temperature close to but above the ordered state (left column) and much higher than it (right column). In this simulation, only a single spin can be flipped per step according to the Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm. The staggered magnetisation m = N^{-1} \sum_i (-1)^i \; S_i order parameter is plotted below. At both temperatures the thermal average of m is zero, while the initial state has m = 1. The higher temperature allows the MCMC to converge more quickly and to fluctuate about the mean with a shorter autocorrelation time. t = 1, \alpha = 1.25, T = {2.5,5}, J = U = 5" />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1: Two Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) walks starting from the CDW state for a system with <span class="math inline">\(N = 100\)</span> sites and 10,000 MCMC steps but at a temperature close to but above the ordered state (left column) and much higher than it (right column). In this simulation only a single spin can be flipped per step according to the Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm. The staggered magnetisation <span class="math inline">\(m = N^{-1} \sum_i (-1)^i \; S_i\)</span> order parameter is plotted below. At both temperatures the thermal average of m is zero, while the initial state has m = 1. The higher temperature allows the MCMC to converge more quickly and to fluctuate about the mean with a shorter autocorrelation time. <span class="math inline">\(t = 1, \alpha = 1.25, T = {2.5,5}, J = U = 5\)</span></figcaption>
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1: Two Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) walks starting from the CDW state for a system with <span class="math inline">\(N = 100\)</span> sites and 10,000 MCMC steps but at a temperature close to but above the ordered state (left column) and much higher than it (right column). In this simulation, only a single spin can be flipped per step according to the Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm. The staggered magnetisation <span class="math inline">\(m = N^{-1} \sum_i (-1)^i \; S_i\)</span> order parameter is plotted below. At both temperatures the thermal average of m is zero, while the initial state has m = 1. The higher temperature allows the MCMC to converge more quickly and to fluctuate about the mean with a shorter autocorrelation time. <span class="math inline">\(t = 1, \alpha = 1.25, T = {2.5,5}, J = U = 5\)</span></figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>The classical Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method which we discuss in the following allows us to solve our LRFK model efficiently, yielding unbiased estimates of thermal expectation values.</p>
+<p>A classical Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method allows us to solve our LRFK model efficiently, yielding unbiased estimates of thermal expectation values.</p>
 <p>Since the spin configurations are classical, the LRFK Hamiltonian can be split into a classical spin part <span class="math inline">\(H_s\)</span> and an operator valued part <span class="math inline">\(H_c\)</span>.</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
 H_s&amp; = - \frac{U}{2}S_i + \sum_{i, j}^{N} J_{ij} S_i S_j \\
@@ -108,21 +108,21 @@ H_c&amp; = \sum_i U S_i c^\dagger_{i}c_{i} -t(c^\dagger_{i}c_{i+1} + c^\dagger_{
 \end{aligned}\]</span></p>
 <p>Where <span class="math inline">\(\nu\)</span> runs over the eigenstates of <span class="math inline">\(H_c\)</span> for a particular spin configuration and <span class="math inline">\(n_F(\epsilon) = \left(e^{-\beta\epsilon} + 1\right)^{-1}\)</span> is the Fermi function.</p>
 <p>The choice of the transition function for MCMC is under-determined as one only needs to satisfy a set of balance conditions for which there are many solutions <span class="citation" data-cites="kellyReversibilityStochasticNetworks1981"> [<a href="#ref-kellyReversibilityStochasticNetworks1981" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>]</span>. Here, we incorporate a modification to the standard Metropolis-Hastings algorithm <span class="citation" data-cites="hastingsMonteCarloSampling1970"> [<a href="#ref-hastingsMonteCarloSampling1970" role="doc-biblioref">8</a>]</span> gleaned from Krauth <span class="citation" data-cites="krauthIntroductionMonteCarlo1998"> [<a href="#ref-krauthIntroductionMonteCarlo1998" role="doc-biblioref">9</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>The standard algorithm decomposes the transition probability into <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{T}(a \to b) = p(a \to b)\mathcal{A}(a \to b)\)</span>. Here, <span class="math inline">\(p\)</span> is the proposal distribution that we can directly sample from while <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{A}\)</span> is the acceptance probability. The standard Metropolis-Hastings choice is</p>
+<p>The standard algorithm decomposes the transition probability into <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{T}(a \to b) = p(a \to b)\mathcal{A}(a \to b)\)</span>. Here, <span class="math inline">\(p\)</span> is the proposal distribution, that we can directly sample from, while <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{A}\)</span> is the acceptance probability. The standard Metropolis-Hastings choice is</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[\mathcal{A}(a \to b) = \min\left(1, \frac{p(b\to a)}{p(a\to b)} e^{-\beta \Delta E}\right)\;,\]</span></p>
-<p>with <span class="math inline">\(\Delta E = E_b - E_a\)</span>. The walk then proceeds by sampling a state <span class="math inline">\(b\)</span> from <span class="math inline">\(p\)</span> and moving to <span class="math inline">\(b\)</span> with probability <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{A}(a \to b)\)</span>. The latter operation is typically implemented by performing a transition if a uniform random sample from the unit interval is less than <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{A}(a \to b)\)</span> and otherwise repeating the current state as the next step in the random walk. The proposal distribution is often symmetric so does not appear in <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{A}\)</span>. Here, we flip a small number of sites in <span class="math inline">\(b\)</span> at random to generate proposals, which is a symmetric proposal.</p>
+<p>with <span class="math inline">\(\Delta E = E_b - E_a\)</span>. The walk then proceeds by sampling a state <span class="math inline">\(b\)</span> from <span class="math inline">\(p\)</span> and moving to <span class="math inline">\(b\)</span> with probability <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{A}(a \to b)\)</span>. The latter operation is typically implemented by performing a transition if a uniform random sample from the unit interval is less than <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{A}(a \to b)\)</span> and otherwise repeating the current state as the next step in the random walk. The proposal distribution is often symmetric, so it does not appear in <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{A}\)</span>. Here, we flip a small number of sites in <span class="math inline">\(b\)</span> at random to generate proposals, which is a symmetric proposal.</p>
-<p>In our computations <span class="citation" data-cites="hodsonMCMCFKModel2021"> [<a href="#ref-hodsonMCMCFKModel2021" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>]</span> the modification to this algorithm that we employ is based on the observation that the free energy of the FK system is composed of a classical part which is much quicker to compute than the quantum part. Hence, we can obtain a computational speed up by first considering the value of the classical energy difference <span class="math inline">\(\Delta H_s\)</span> and rejecting the transition if the former is too high. We only compute the quantum energy difference <span class="math inline">\(\Delta F_c\)</span> if the transition is accepted. We then perform a second rejection sampling step based upon it. This corresponds to two nested comparisons with the majority of the work only occurring if the first test passes. This modified scheme has the acceptance function <span class="math display">\[\mathcal{A}(a \to b) = \min\left(1, e^{-\beta \Delta H_s}\right)\min\left(1, e^{-\beta \Delta F_c}\right)\;.\]</span></p>
+<p>In our computations <span class="citation" data-cites="hodsonMCMCFKModel2021"> [<a href="#ref-hodsonMCMCFKModel2021" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>]</span>, we employ a modification to this algorithm based on the observation that the free energy of the FK system is composed of a classical part which is much quicker to compute than the quantum part. Hence, we can obtain a computational speed up by first considering the value of the classical energy difference <span class="math inline">\(\Delta H_s\)</span> and rejecting the transition if the former is too high. We only compute the quantum energy difference <span class="math inline">\(\Delta F_c\)</span> if the transition is accepted. We then perform a second rejection sampling step based upon it. This corresponds to two nested comparisons with the majority of the work only occurring if the first test passes. This modified scheme has the acceptance function <span class="math display">\[\mathcal{A}(a \to b) = \min\left(1, e^{-\beta \Delta H_s}\right)\min\left(1, e^{-\beta \Delta F_c}\right)\;.\]</span></p>
 <p>For the model parameters used, we find that with our new scheme the matrix diagonalisation is skipped around 30% of the time at <span class="math inline">\(T = 2.5\)</span> and up to 80% at <span class="math inline">\(T = 1.5\)</span>. We observe that for <span class="math inline">\(N = 50\)</span>, the matrix diagonalisation, if it occurs, occupies around 60% of the total computation time for a single step. This rises to 90% at N = 300 and further increases for larger N. We therefore get the greatest speedup for large system sizes at low temperature where many prospective transitions are rejected at the classical stage and the matrix computation takes up the greatest fraction of the total computation time. The upshot is that we find a speedup of up to a factor of 10 at the cost of very little extra algorithmic complexity.</p>
-<p>Our two-step method should be distinguished from the more common method for speeding up MCMC which is to add asymmetry to the proposal distribution to make it as similar as possible to <span class="math inline">\(\min\left(1, e^{-\beta \Delta E}\right)\)</span>. This reduces the number of rejected states, which brings the algorithm closer in efficiency to a direct sampling method. However it comes at the expense of requiring a way to directly sample from this complex distribution, a problem which MCMC was employed to solve in the first place. For example, recent work trains restricted Boltzmann machines (RBMs) to generate samples for the proposal distribution of the FK model <span class="citation" data-cites="huangAcceleratedMonteCarlo2017"> [<a href="#ref-huangAcceleratedMonteCarlo2017" role="doc-biblioref">11</a>]</span>. The RBMs are chosen as a parametrisation of the proposal distribution that can be efficiently sampled from while offering sufficient flexibility that they can be adjusted to match the target distribution. Our proposed method is considerably simpler and does not require training while still reaping some of the benefits of reduced computation.</p>
+<p>Our two-step method should be distinguished from the more common method for speeding up MCMC, which is to add asymmetry to the proposal distribution to make it as similar as possible to <span class="math inline">\(\min\left(1, e^{-\beta \Delta E}\right)\)</span>. This reduces the number of rejected states, which brings the algorithm closer in efficiency to a direct sampling method. However, it comes at the expense of requiring a way to directly sample from this complex distribution. This is a problem which MCMC was employed to solve in the first place. For example, recent work trains restricted Boltzmann machines (RBMs) to generate samples for the proposal distribution of the FK model <span class="citation" data-cites="huangAcceleratedMonteCarlo2017"> [<a href="#ref-huangAcceleratedMonteCarlo2017" role="doc-biblioref">11</a>]</span>. The RBMs are chosen as a parametrisation of the proposal distribution that can be efficiently sampled from, while offering sufficient flexibility that they can be adjusted to match the target distribution. Our proposed method is considerably simpler and does not require training while still reaping some of the benefits of reduced computation.</p>
 </section>
 <section id="scaling" class="level2">
 <h2>Scaling</h2>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/fk_chapter/binder_cumulants/binder_cumulants.svg" id="fig-binder_cumulants" data-short-caption="Binder Cumulants" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 2: (Left) The order parameters, \langle m^2 \rangle(solid) and 1 - f (dashed) describing the onset of the charge density wave phase of the long-range 1D Falicov model at low temperature with staggered magnetisation m = N^{-1} \sum_i (-1)^i S_i and fermionic order parameter f = 2 N^{-1}|\sum_i (-1)^i \; \langle c^\dagger_{i}c_{i}| \rangle . (Right) The crossing of the Binder cumulant, B = \langle m^4 \rangle / \langle m^2 \rangle^2, with system size provides a diagnostic that the phase transition is not a finite size effect, it is used to estimate the critical lines shown in the phase diagram later. All plots use system sizes N = [10,20,30,50,70,110,160,250] and lines are coloured from N = 10 in dark blue to N = 250 in yellow. The parameter values U = 5,\;J = 5,\;\alpha = 1.25 except where explicitly mentioned." />
+<img src="/assets/thesis/fk_chapter/binder_cumulants/binder_cumulants.svg" id="fig-binder_cumulants" data-short-caption="Binder Cumulants" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 2: (Left) The order parameters, \langle m^2 \rangle(solid) and 1 - f (dashed) describing the onset of the charge density wave phase of the LRFK model at low temperature with staggered magnetisation m = N^{-1} \sum_i (-1)^i S_i and fermionic order parameter f = 2 N^{-1}|\sum_i (-1)^i \; \langle c^\dagger_{i}c_{i}| \rangle . (Right) The crossing of the Binder cumulant, B = \langle m^4 \rangle / \langle m^2 \rangle^2, with system size provides a diagnostic that the phase transition is not a finite size effect, it is used to estimate the critical lines shown in the phase diagram later. All plots use system sizes N = [10,20,30,50,70,110,160,250] and lines are coloured from N = 10 in dark blue to N = 250 in yellow. The parameter values U = 5,\;J = 5,\;\alpha = 1.25 except where explicitly mentioned." />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 2: (Left) The order parameters, <span class="math inline">\(\langle m^2 \rangle\)</span>(solid) and <span class="math inline">\(1 - f\)</span> (dashed) describing the onset of the charge density wave phase of the long-range 1D Falicov model at low temperature with staggered magnetisation <span class="math inline">\(m = N^{-1} \sum_i (-1)^i S_i\)</span> and fermionic order parameter <span class="math inline">\(f = 2 N^{-1}|\sum_i (-1)^i \; \langle c^\dagger_{i}c_{i}| \rangle\)</span> . (Right) The crossing of the Binder cumulant, <span class="math inline">\(B = \langle m^4 \rangle / \langle m^2 \rangle^2\)</span>, with system size provides a diagnostic that the phase transition is not a finite size effect, it is used to estimate the critical lines shown in the phase diagram later. All plots use system sizes <span class="math inline">\(N = [10,20,30,50,70,110,160,250]\)</span> and lines are coloured from <span class="math inline">\(N = 10\)</span> in dark blue to <span class="math inline">\(N = 250\)</span> in yellow. The parameter values <span class="math inline">\(U = 5,\;J = 5,\;\alpha = 1.25\)</span> except where explicitly mentioned.</figcaption>
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 2: (Left) The order parameters, <span class="math inline">\(\langle m^2 \rangle\)</span>(solid) and <span class="math inline">\(1 - f\)</span> (dashed) describing the onset of the charge density wave phase of the LRFK model at low temperature with staggered magnetisation <span class="math inline">\(m = N^{-1} \sum_i (-1)^i S_i\)</span> and fermionic order parameter <span class="math inline">\(f = 2 N^{-1}|\sum_i (-1)^i \; \langle c^\dagger_{i}c_{i}| \rangle\)</span> . (Right) The crossing of the Binder cumulant, <span class="math inline">\(B = \langle m^4 \rangle / \langle m^2 \rangle^2\)</span>, with system size provides a diagnostic that the phase transition is not a finite size effect, it is used to estimate the critical lines shown in the phase diagram later. All plots use system sizes <span class="math inline">\(N = [10,20,30,50,70,110,160,250]\)</span> and lines are coloured from <span class="math inline">\(N = 10\)</span> in dark blue to <span class="math inline">\(N = 250\)</span> in yellow. The parameter values <span class="math inline">\(U = 5,\;J = 5,\;\alpha = 1.25\)</span> except where explicitly mentioned.</figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>To improve the scaling of finite size effects, we make the replacement <span class="math inline">\(|i - j|^{-\alpha} \rightarrow |f(i - j)|^{-\alpha}\)</span>, in both <span class="math inline">\(J_{ij}\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(\kappa\)</span>, where <span class="math inline">\(f(x) = \frac{N}{\pi}\sin \frac{\pi x}{N}\)</span>. <span class="math inline">\(f\)</span> is smooth across the circular boundary and its effect effect diminished for larger systems <span class="citation" data-cites="fukuiOrderNClusterMonte2009"> [<a href="#ref-fukuiOrderNClusterMonte2009" role="doc-biblioref">12</a>]</span>. We only consider even system sizes given that odd system sizes are not commensurate with a CDW state.</p>
+<p>To improve the scaling of finite size effects, we make the replacement <span class="math inline">\(|i - j|^{-\alpha} \rightarrow |f(i - j)|^{-\alpha}\)</span>, in both <span class="math inline">\(J_{ij}\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(\kappa\)</span>, where <span class="math inline">\(f(x) = \frac{N}{\pi}\sin \frac{\pi x}{N}\)</span>. <span class="math inline">\(f\)</span> is smooth across the circular boundary and its effect diminished for larger systems <span class="citation" data-cites="fukuiOrderNClusterMonte2009"> [<a href="#ref-fukuiOrderNClusterMonte2009" role="doc-biblioref">12</a>]</span>. We only consider even system sizes given that odd system sizes are not commensurate with a CDW state.</p>
-<p>To identify critical points we use the the Binder cumulant <span class="math inline">\(U_B\)</span> defined by</p>
+<p>To identify critical points, I use the Binder cumulant <span class="math inline">\(U_B\)</span> defined by</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[
 U_B = 1 - \frac{\langle\mu_4\rangle}{3\langle\mu_2\rangle^2}
 \]</span></p>

_thesis/3_Long_Range_Falicov_Kimball/3.3_LRFK_Results.html

@@ -75,73 +75,73 @@ image:
 </div>
 <section id="sec:lrfk-results" class="level1">
 <h1>Results</h1>
-<p>Looking at the results of our MCMC simulations, we find a rich phase diagram with a CDW FTPT and interaction-tuned Anderson versus Mott localised phases similar to the 2D FK model <span class="citation" data-cites="antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016"> [<a href="#ref-antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>. We explore the localisation properties of the fermionic sector and find that the localisation lengths vary dramatically across the phases and for different energies. Although moderate system sizes indicate the coexistence of localised and delocalised states within the CDW phase, we find quantitatively similar behaviour in a model of uncorrelated binary disorder on a CDW background. For large system sizes, i.e. for our 1D disorder model we can treat linear sizes of several thousand sites, we find that all states are eventually localised with a localisation length which diverges towards zero temperature.</p>
+<p>Looking at the results of our MCMC simulations, we find a rich phase diagram with a CDW FTPT and interaction-tuned Anderson versus Mott localised phases similar to the 2D FK model <span class="citation" data-cites="antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016"> [<a href="#ref-antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>. We explore the localisation properties of the fermionic sector and find that the localisation lengths vary dramatically across the phases and for different energies. The results at moderate system sizes indicate the coexistence of localised and delocalised states within the CDW phase. We then introduce a model of uncorrelated binary disorder on a CDW background. This disorder model gives quantitatively similar behaviour to the LRFK model but we are able to simulate it on much larger systems. For these larger system sizes, we find that all states are eventually localised with a localisation length which diverges towards zero temperature indicating that the results at moderate system size suggestive of coexistence were due to weak localisation effects.</p>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/fk_chapter/phase_diagram/phase_diagram.svg" id="fig-phase-diagram-lrfk" data-short-caption="Long-Range Falicov Kimball Model Phase Diagram" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 1: Phase diagrams of the 1D long-range Falicov-Kimball model. (Left) The TJ plane at U = 5: the CDW ordered phase is separated from a disordered Mott insulating phase by a critical temperature T_c, linear in J. (Right) The TU plane at J = 5: the disordered phase is split into two: at large/small U there’s a Mott insulator/Anderson phase characterised by the presence/absence of a gap at E=0 in the single particle energy spectrum. U_c is independent of temperature. At U = 0 the fermions are decoupled from the spins forming a simple Fermi gas." />
+<img src="/assets/thesis/fk_chapter/phase_diagram/phase_diagram.svg" id="fig-phase-diagram-lrfk" data-short-caption="Long-Range Falicov Kimball Model Phase Diagram" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 1: Phase diagrams of the 1D long-range Falicov-Kimball model. (Left) The TJ plane at U = 5: the CDW ordered phase is separated from a disordered Mott insulating phase by a critical temperature T_c, linear in J. (Right) On the TU plane at J = 5, the disordered phase is split into two. At large U there is a Mott insulator phase characterised by the presence of a gap at E=0 in the single particle energy spectrum. At small U there is an Anderson phase characterised by the absence of a gap. U_c is independent of temperature indicating that the FTPT is primarily driven by the long-range coupling term in J. At U = 0 the fermions are decoupled from the spins forming a simple Fermi gas." />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1: Phase diagrams of the 1D long-range Falicov-Kimball model. (Left) The TJ plane at <span class="math inline">\(U = 5\)</span>: the CDW ordered phase is separated from a disordered Mott insulating phase by a critical temperature <span class="math inline">\(T_c\)</span>, linear in J. (Right) The TU plane at <span class="math inline">\(J = 5\)</span>: the disordered phase is split into two: at large/small U there’s a Mott insulator/Anderson phase characterised by the presence/absence of a gap at <span class="math inline">\(E=0\)</span> in the single particle energy spectrum. <span class="math inline">\(U_c\)</span> is independent of temperature. At <span class="math inline">\(U = 0\)</span> the fermions are decoupled from the spins forming a simple Fermi gas.</figcaption>
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1: Phase diagrams of the 1D long-range Falicov-Kimball model. (Left) The TJ plane at <span class="math inline">\(U = 5\)</span>: the CDW ordered phase is separated from a disordered Mott insulating phase by a critical temperature <span class="math inline">\(T_c\)</span>, linear in J. (Right) On the TU plane at <span class="math inline">\(J = 5\)</span>, the disordered phase is split into two. At large U there is a Mott insulator phase characterised by the presence of a gap at <span class="math inline">\(E=0\)</span> in the single particle energy spectrum. At small U there is an Anderson phase characterised by the absence of a gap. <span class="math inline">\(U_c\)</span> is independent of temperature indicating that the FTPT is primarily driven by the long-range coupling term in <span class="math inline">\(J\)</span>. At <span class="math inline">\(U = 0\)</span> the fermions are decoupled from the spins forming a simple Fermi gas.</figcaption>
 </figure>
 <section id="lrfk-results-phase-diagram" class="level2">
 <h2>Phase Diagram</h2>
-<p>Using the MCMC methods described in the previous section I will now discuss the results of extensive MCMC simulations of the model, starting with the phase diagram in the fermion spin coupling <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span>, the strength of the long-range spin-spin coupling <span class="math inline">\(J\)</span> and the temperature <span class="math inline">\(T\)</span>.</p>
+<p>Using the MCMC methods described in the previous section, I will now discuss the results of extensive MCMC simulations of the model, starting with the phase diagram in the fermion spin coupling <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span>, the strength of the long-range spin-spin coupling <span class="math inline">\(J\)</span>, and the temperature <span class="math inline">\(T\)</span>.</p>
 <p>Fig. <a href="#fig:phase-diagram-lrfk">1</a> shows the phase diagram for constant <span class="math inline">\(U=5\)</span> and constant <span class="math inline">\(J=5\)</span>, respectively. The transition temperatures were determined from the crossings of the Binder cumulants <span class="math inline">\(B_4 = \langle m^4 \rangle /\langle m^2 \rangle^2\)</span> <span class="citation" data-cites="binderFiniteSizeScaling1981"> [<a href="#ref-binderFiniteSizeScaling1981" role="doc-biblioref">2</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>The CDW transition temperature is largely independent from the strength of the interaction <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span>. This demonstrates that the phase transition is driven by the long-range term <span class="math inline">\(J\)</span> with little effect from the coupling to the fermions <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span>. The physics of the spin sector in the LRFK model mimics that of the LRI model and is not significantly altered by the presence of the fermions. In 2D the transition to the CDW phase is mediated by an RKYY-like interaction <span class="citation" data-cites="rusinCalculationRKKYRange2017"> [<a href="#ref-rusinCalculationRKKYRange2017" role="doc-biblioref">3</a>]</span> but this is insufficient to stabilise long-range order in 1D. That the critical temperature <span class="math inline">\(T_c\)</span> does not depend on <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span> in our model further confirms this.</p>
+<p>The CDW transition temperature is largely independent from the strength of the interaction <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span>. This demonstrates that the phase transition is driven by the long-range term <span class="math inline">\(J\)</span> with little effect from the coupling to the fermions <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span>. The physics of the spin sector in the LRFK model mimics that of the LRI model and is not significantly altered by the presence of the fermions. In 2D the transition to the CDW phase is mediated by an RKYY-like interaction <span class="citation" data-cites="rusinCalculationRKKYRange2017"> [<a href="#ref-rusinCalculationRKKYRange2017" role="doc-biblioref">3</a>]</span>. However, this is insufficient to stabilise long-range order in 1D. That the critical temperature <span class="math inline">\(T_c\)</span> does not depend on <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span> in our model further confirms this.</p>
-<p>The main order parameters for this model is the staggered magnetisation <span class="math inline">\(m = N^{-1} \sum_i (-1)^i S_i\)</span> that signals the onset of a CDW phase at low temperature. However, my main interest concerns the additional structure of the fermionic sector in the high temperature phase. Following Ref. <span class="citation" data-cites="antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016"> [<a href="#ref-antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>, we can distinguish between the Mott and Anderson insulating phases. The Mott insulator is characterised by a gapped DOS in the absence of a CDW, instead the gap is driven entirely by interaction effect. Thus, the opening of a gap for large <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span> is distinct from the gap-opening induced by the translational symmetry breaking in the CDW state below <span class="math inline">\(T_c\)</span>. The Anderson phase is gapless but, as we explain below, shows localised fermionic eigenstates hence it also has insulating character.</p>
+<p>The main order parameter for this model is the staggered magnetisation <span class="math inline">\(m = N^{-1} \sum_i (-1)^i S_i\)</span> that signals the onset of a CDW phase at low temperature. However, my main interest concerns the additional structure of the fermionic sector in the high temperature phase. Following Ref. <span class="citation" data-cites="antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016"> [<a href="#ref-antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>, we can distinguish between the Mott and Anderson insulating phases. The Mott insulator is characterised by a gapped DOS in the absence of a CDW, instead the gap is driven entirely by interaction effect. Thus, the opening of a gap for large <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span> is distinct from the gap-opening induced by the translational symmetry breaking in the CDW state below <span class="math inline">\(T_c\)</span>. The Anderson phase is gapless but, as we explain below, shows localised fermionic eigenstates. It therefore has an insulating character.</p>
+<figure>
+<img src="/assets/thesis/fk_chapter/DOS/DOS.svg" id="fig-DOS" data-short-caption="Energy resolved DOS($\omega$) in the difference phases." style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 2: Energy resolved DOS(\omega) against system size N in all three phases. The Charge Density Wave (CDW) phase is shown in both the high and low U regime for completeness. The top left panel shows the Anderson phase at U = 2 and high T = 2.5, this phase is gapless, but does not conduct due to Anderson localisation. In the lower left pane at U = 2 and low T = 1.5, CDW order sets in, allowing the single particle eigenstates to become extended but opening a gap in their band structure. In the upper right panel at U = 5 and high T = 2.5, the states are localised by disorder and an interaction driven gap opens. This is a Mott insulator. Finally the CDW phase at U = 5 and T = 1.5 is qualitatively similar to the lower left panel except that the gap scales with U. For all the plots J = 5,\;\alpha = 1.25." />
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 2: Energy resolved DOS(<span class="math inline">\(\omega\)</span>) against system size <span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> in all three phases. The Charge Density Wave (CDW) phase is shown in both the high and low <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span> regime for completeness. The top left panel shows the Anderson phase at <span class="math inline">\(U = 2\)</span> and high <span class="math inline">\(T = 2.5\)</span>, this phase is gapless, but does not conduct due to Anderson localisation. In the lower left pane at <span class="math inline">\(U = 2\)</span> and low <span class="math inline">\(T = 1.5\)</span>, CDW order sets in, allowing the single particle eigenstates to become extended but opening a gap in their band structure. In the upper right panel at <span class="math inline">\(U = 5\)</span> and high <span class="math inline">\(T = 2.5\)</span>, the states are localised by disorder and an interaction driven gap opens. This is a Mott insulator. Finally the CDW phase at <span class="math inline">\(U = 5\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(T = 1.5\)</span> is qualitatively similar to the lower left panel except that the gap scales with <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span>. For all the plots <span class="math inline">\(J = 5,\;\alpha = 1.25\)</span>.</figcaption>
+</figure>
 </section>
 <section id="localisation-properties" class="level2">
 <h2>Localisation Properties</h2>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/fk_chapter/DOS/DOS.svg" id="fig-DOS" data-short-caption="Energy resolved DOS($\omega$) in the difference phases." style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 2: Energy resolved DOS(\omega) against system size N in all three phases. The charge density wave phase is shown in both the high and low U regime for completeness. The top left panel shows the Anderson phase at U = 2 and high T = 2.5, this phase is gapless but does not conduct due to Anderson localisation. In the lower left pane at U = 2 and low T = 1.5, charge density wave order sets in, allowing the single particle eigenstates to become extended but opening a gap in their band structure. In the upper right panel at U = 5 and high T = 2.5 the states are localised by disorder and an interaction driven gap opens, a Mott insulator. Finally the charge density wave phase at U = 5 and T = 1.5 is qualitatively similar to the lower left panel except that the gap scales with U. For all the plots J = 5,\;\alpha = 1.25." />
+<img src="/assets/thesis/fk_chapter/DOS/IPR_scaling.svg" id="fig-IPR_scaling" data-short-caption="Scaling of IPR($\omega$) against system size $N$." style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 3: The IPR(\omega) scaling with N at fixed energy for each phase and for points both in the gap (\omega_0) and in a band (\omega_1). The slope of the line yields the scaling exponent \tau defined by \mathrm{IPR} \propto N^{-\tau}). \tau close to zero implies that the states at that energy are localised while \tau = -d corresponds to extended states where d is the system dimension. All but the bands of the charge density wave phase are approximately localised with \tau is very close to zero. The bands in the charge density wave phase are localised with long localisation lengths at finite temperatures that extend to infinity as the temperature approaches zero. For all the plots J = 5,\;\alpha = 1.25. The measured \tau_0,\tau_1 for each figure are: (a) (0.06\pm0.01, 0.02\pm0.01 (b) 0.04\pm0.02, 0.00\pm0.01 (c) 0.05\pm0.03, 0.30\pm0.03 (d) 0.06\pm0.04, 0.15\pm0.05 We show later that the apparent slight scaling of the IPR with system size in the localised cases can be explained by finite size effects due to the changing defect density with system size rather than due to delocalisation of the states." />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 2: Energy resolved DOS(<span class="math inline">\(\omega\)</span>) against system size <span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> in all three phases. The charge density wave phase is shown in both the high and low <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span> regime for completeness. The top left panel shows the Anderson phase at <span class="math inline">\(U = 2\)</span> and high <span class="math inline">\(T = 2.5\)</span>, this phase is gapless but does not conduct due to Anderson localisation. In the lower left pane at <span class="math inline">\(U = 2\)</span> and low <span class="math inline">\(T = 1.5\)</span>, charge density wave order sets in, allowing the single particle eigenstates to become extended but opening a gap in their band structure. In the upper right panel at <span class="math inline">\(U = 5\)</span> and high <span class="math inline">\(T = 2.5\)</span> the states are localised by disorder and an interaction driven gap opens, a Mott insulator. Finally the charge density wave phase at <span class="math inline">\(U = 5\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(T = 1.5\)</span> is qualitatively similar to the lower left panel except that the gap scales with <span class="math inline">\(U\)</span>. For all the plots <span class="math inline">\(J = 5,\;\alpha = 1.25\)</span>.</figcaption>
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 3: The IPR(<span class="math inline">\(\omega\)</span>) scaling with <span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> at fixed energy for each phase and for points both in the gap (<span class="math inline">\(\omega_0\)</span>) and in a band (<span class="math inline">\(\omega_1\)</span>). The slope of the line yields the scaling exponent <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> defined by <span class="math inline">\(\mathrm{IPR} \propto N^{-\tau}\)</span>). <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> close to zero implies that the states at that energy are localised while <span class="math inline">\(\tau = -d\)</span> corresponds to extended states where <span class="math inline">\(d\)</span> is the system dimension. All but the bands of the charge density wave phase are approximately localised with <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> is very close to zero. The bands in the charge density wave phase are localised with long localisation lengths at finite temperatures that extend to infinity as the temperature approaches zero. For all the plots <span class="math inline">\(J = 5,\;\alpha = 1.25\)</span>. The measured <span class="math inline">\(\tau_0,\tau_1\)</span> for each figure are: (a) <span class="math inline">\((0.06\pm0.01, 0.02\pm0.01\)</span> (b) <span class="math inline">\(0.04\pm0.02, 0.00\pm0.01\)</span> (c) <span class="math inline">\(0.05\pm0.03, 0.30\pm0.03\)</span> (d) <span class="math inline">\(0.06\pm0.04, 0.15\pm0.05\)</span> We show later that the apparent slight scaling of the IPR with system size in the localised cases can be explained by finite size effects due to the changing defect density with system size rather than due to delocalisation of the states.</figcaption>
+</figure>
+<p>The MCMC formulation suggests viewing the spin configurations as a form of annealed binary disorder whose probability distribution is given by the Boltzmann weight <span class="math inline">\(e^{-\beta H_S[\vec{S}] - \beta F_c[\vec{S}]}\)</span>. This makes apparent the link to the study of disordered systems and Anderson localisation. These systems are typically studied by defining the probability distribution for the quenched disorder potential externally. Here, by contrast, we have a translation invariant system with disorder as a natural consequence of the Ising background field conserved by the dynamics.</p>
+<figure>
+<img src="/assets/thesis/fk_chapter/gap_opening/gap_opening_U5.svg" id="fig-gap_opening_U5" data-short-caption="The transition from CDW to the Mott phase" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 4: The DOS (a) and scaling exponent \tau (b) as a function of energy for the CDW to gapped Mott phase transition at U=5. Regions where the DOS is close to zero are shown in white. The scaling exponent \tau is obtained from fits to IPR(N) = A N^{-\lambda} for a range of system sizes. J = 5,\;\alpha = 1.25" />
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 4: The DOS (a) and scaling exponent <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> (b) as a function of energy for the CDW to gapped Mott phase transition at <span class="math inline">\(U=5\)</span>. Regions where the DOS is close to zero are shown in white. The scaling exponent <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> is obtained from fits to <span class="math inline">\(IPR(N) = A N^{-\lambda}\)</span> for a range of system sizes. <span class="math inline">\(J = 5,\;\alpha = 1.25\)</span></figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>The MCMC formulation suggests viewing the spin configurations as a form of annealed binary disorder whose probability distribution is given by the Boltzmann weight <span class="math inline">\(e^{-\beta H_S[\vec{S}] - \beta F_c[\vec{S}]}\)</span>. This makes apparent the link to the study of disordered systems and Anderson localisation. While these systems are typically studied by defining the probability distribution for the quenched disorder potential externally, here we have a translation invariant system with disorder as a natural consequence of the Ising background field conserved under the dynamics.</p>
 <p>In the limits of zero and infinite temperature, our model becomes a simple tight-binding model for the fermions. At zero temperature, the spin background is in one of the two translation invariant AFM ground states with two gapped fermionic CDW bands at energies</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[E_{\pm} = \pm\sqrt{\frac{1}{4}U^2 + 2t^2(1 + \cos ka)^2}\;.\]</span></p>
-<p>At infinite temperature, all the spin configurations become equally likely and the fermionic model reduces to one of binary uncorrelated disorder in which all eigenstates are Anderson localised <span class="citation" data-cites="abrahamsScalingTheoryLocalization1979"> [<a href="#ref-abrahamsScalingTheoryLocalization1979" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>]</span>. An Anderson localised state centered around <span class="math inline">\(r_0\)</span> has magnitude that drops exponentially over some localisation length <span class="math inline">\(\xi\)</span> i.e <span class="math inline">\(|\psi(r)|^2 \sim \exp{-|r - r_0|/\xi}\)</span>. Calculating <span class="math inline">\(\xi\)</span> directly is numerically demanding. Therefore, we determine if a given state is localised via the energy-resolved IPR and the DOS defined as</p>
+<p>At infinite temperature, all the spin configurations become equally likely and the fermionic model reduces to one of binary uncorrelated disorder in which all eigenstates are Anderson localised <span class="citation" data-cites="abrahamsScalingTheoryLocalization1979"> [<a href="#ref-abrahamsScalingTheoryLocalization1979" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>]</span>. An Anderson localised state, centred around <span class="math inline">\(r_0\)</span>, has magnitude that drops exponentially over some localisation length <span class="math inline">\(\xi\)</span> i.e <span class="math inline">\(|\psi(r)|^2 \sim \exp{-|r - r_0|/\xi}\)</span>. Calculating <span class="math inline">\(\xi\)</span> directly is numerically demanding. Therefore, we determine if a given state is localised via the energy-resolved IPR and the DOS defined as</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
 \mathrm{DOS}(\vec{S}, \omega)&amp; = N^{-1} \sum_{i} \delta(\epsilon_i - \omega)\\
 \mathrm{IPR}(\vec{S}, \omega)&amp; = \; N^{-1} \mathrm{DOS}(\vec{S}, \omega)^{-1} \sum_{i,j} \delta(\epsilon_i - \omega)\;\psi^{4}_{i,j}\end{aligned}\]</span></p>
 <p>where <span class="math inline">\(\epsilon_i\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(\psi_{i,j}\)</span> are the <span class="math inline">\(i\)</span>th energy level and <span class="math inline">\(j\)</span>th element of the corresponding eigenfunction, both dependent on the background spin configuration <span class="math inline">\(\vec{S}\)</span>.</p>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/fk_chapter/DOS/IPR_scaling.svg" id="fig-IPR_scaling" data-short-caption="Scaling of IPR($\omega$) against system size $N$." style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 3: The IPR(\omega) scaling with N at fixed energy for each phase and for points both in the gap (\omega_0) and in a band (\omega_1). The slope of the line yields the scaling exponent \tau defined by \mathrm{IPR} \propto N^{-\tau}). \tau close to zero implies that the states at that energy are localised while \tau = -d corresponds to extended states where d is the system dimension. All but the bands of the charge density wave phase are approximately localised with \tau is very close to zero. The bands in the charge density wave phase are localised with long localisation lengths at finite temperatures that extend to infinity as the temperature approaches zero. For all the plots J = 5,\;\alpha = 1.25. The measured \tau_0,\tau_1 for each figure are: (a) (0.06\pm0.01, 0.02\pm0.01 (b) 0.04\pm0.02, 0.00\pm0.01 (c) 0.05\pm0.03, 0.30\pm0.03 (d) 0.06\pm0.04, 0.15\pm0.05 We show later that the apparent slight scaling of the IPR with system size in the localised cases can be explained by finite size effects due to the changing defect density with system size rather than due to delocalisation of the states." />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 3: The IPR(<span class="math inline">\(\omega\)</span>) scaling with <span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> at fixed energy for each phase and for points both in the gap (<span class="math inline">\(\omega_0\)</span>) and in a band (<span class="math inline">\(\omega_1\)</span>). The slope of the line yields the scaling exponent <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> defined by <span class="math inline">\(\mathrm{IPR} \propto N^{-\tau}\)</span>). <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> close to zero implies that the states at that energy are localised while <span class="math inline">\(\tau = -d\)</span> corresponds to extended states where <span class="math inline">\(d\)</span> is the system dimension. All but the bands of the charge density wave phase are approximately localised with <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> is very close to zero. The bands in the charge density wave phase are localised with long localisation lengths at finite temperatures that extend to infinity as the temperature approaches zero. For all the plots <span class="math inline">\(J = 5,\;\alpha = 1.25\)</span>. The measured <span class="math inline">\(\tau_0,\tau_1\)</span> for each figure are: (a) <span class="math inline">\((0.06\pm0.01, 0.02\pm0.01\)</span> (b) <span class="math inline">\(0.04\pm0.02, 0.00\pm0.01\)</span> (c) <span class="math inline">\(0.05\pm0.03, 0.30\pm0.03\)</span> (d) <span class="math inline">\(0.06\pm0.04, 0.15\pm0.05\)</span> We show later that the apparent slight scaling of the IPR with system size in the localised cases can be explained by finite size effects due to the changing defect density with system size rather than due to delocalisation of the states.</figcaption>
-</figure>
-<p>The scaling of the IPR with system size <span class="math inline">\(\mathrm{IPR} \propto N^{-\tau}\)</span> depends on the localisation properties of states at that energy. For delocalised states, e.g. Bloch waves, <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> is the physical dimension. For fully localised states <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> goes to zero in the thermodynamic limit. However, for special types of disorder such as binary disorder, the localisation lengths can be large comparable to the system size at hand, which can make it difficult to extract the correct scaling. An additional complication arises from the fact that the scaling exponent may display intermediate behaviours for correlated disorder and in the vicinity of a localisation-delocalisation transition <span class="citation" data-cites="kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993 eversAndersonTransitions2008"> [<a href="#ref-kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>,<a href="#ref-eversAndersonTransitions2008" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>. The thermal defects of the CDW phase lead to a binary disorder potential with a finite correlation length, which in principle could result in delocalised eigenstates.</p>
-<p>The key question for our system is then: How is the <span class="math inline">\(T=0\)</span> CDW phase with fully delocalised fermionic states connected to the fully localised phase at high temperatures?</p>
-<p>For a representative set of parameters covering all three phases fig. <a href="#fig:DOS">2</a> shows the density of states as function of energy while fig. <a href="#fig:IPR_scaling">3</a> shows <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span>, the scaling exponent of the IPR with system size, The DOS is symmetric about <span class="math inline">\(0\)</span> because of the particle hole symmetry of the model. At high temperatures, all of the eigenstates are localised in both the Mott and Anderson phases (with <span class="math inline">\(\tau \leq 0.07\)</span> for our system sizes). We also checked that the states are localised by direct inspection. Note that there are in-gap states for instance at <span class="math inline">\(\omega_0\)</span>, below the upper band which are localised and smoothly connected across the phase transition.</p>
-<figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/fk_chapter/gap_opening/gap_opening_U5.svg" id="fig-gap_opening_U5" data-short-caption="The transition from CDW to the Mott phase" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 4: The DOS (a) and scaling exponent \tau (b) as a function of energy for the CDW to gapped Mott phase transition at U=5. Regions where the DOS is close to zero are shown in white. The scaling exponent \tau is obtained from fits to IPR(N) = A N^{-\lambda} for a range of system sizes. J = 5,\;\alpha = 1.25" />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 4: The DOS (a) and scaling exponent <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> (b) as a function of energy for the CDW to gapped Mott phase transition at <span class="math inline">\(U=5\)</span>. Regions where the DOS is close to zero are shown in white. The scaling exponent <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> is obtained from fits to <span class="math inline">\(IPR(N) = A N^{-\lambda}\)</span> for a range of system sizes. <span class="math inline">\(J = 5,\;\alpha = 1.25\)</span></figcaption>
-</figure>
-<p>In the CDW phases at <span class="math inline">\(U=2\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(U=5\)</span>, we find for the states within the gapped CDW bands, e.g. at <span class="math inline">\(\omega_1\)</span>, scaling exponents <span class="math inline">\(\tau = 0.30\pm0.03\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(\tau = 0.15\pm0.05\)</span>, respectively. This surprising finding suggests that the CDW bands are partially delocalised with multi-fractal behaviour of the wavefunctions <span class="citation" data-cites="eversAndersonTransitions2008"> [<a href="#ref-eversAndersonTransitions2008" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>. This phenomenon would be unexpected in a 1D model as they generally do not support delocalisation in the presence of disorder except as the result of correlations in the emergent disorder potential <span class="citation" data-cites="croyAndersonLocalization1D2011 goldshteinPurePointSpectrum1977"> [<a href="#ref-croyAndersonLocalization1D2011" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>,<a href="#ref-goldshteinPurePointSpectrum1977" role="doc-biblioref">8</a>]</span>. However, we later show by comparison to an uncorrelated Anderson model that these nonzero exponents are a finite size effect and the states are localised with a finite <span class="math inline">\(\xi\)</span> similar to the system size, an example of weak localisation. As a result, the IPR does not scale correctly until the system size has grown much larger than <span class="math inline">\(\xi\)</span>. fig. <a href="#fig:DM_IPR_scaling">7</a> shows that the scaling of the IPR in the CDW phase does flatten out eventually.</p>
-<p>Next, we use the DOS and the scaling exponent <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> to explore the localisation properties over the energy-temperature plane in fig. <a href="#fig:gap_opening_U2">5</a> and fig. <a href="#fig:gap_opening_U5">4</a>. Gapped areas are shown in white, which highlights the distinction between the gapped Mott phase and the ungapped Anderson phase. In-gap states appear just below the critical point, smoothly filling the bandgap in the Anderson phase and forming islands in the Mott phase. As in the finite <span class="citation" data-cites="zondaGaplessRegimeCharge2019"> [<a href="#ref-zondaGaplessRegimeCharge2019" role="doc-biblioref">9</a>]</span> and infinite dimensional <span class="citation" data-cites="hassanSpectralPropertiesChargedensitywave2007"> [<a href="#ref-hassanSpectralPropertiesChargedensitywave2007" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>]</span> cases, the in-gap states merge and are pushed to lower energy for decreasing U as the <span class="math inline">\(T=0\)</span> CDW gap closes. Intuitively, the presence of in-gap states can be understood as a result of domain wall fluctuations away from the AFM ordered background. These domain walls act as local potentials for impurity-like bound states <span class="citation" data-cites="zondaGaplessRegimeCharge2019"> [<a href="#ref-zondaGaplessRegimeCharge2019" role="doc-biblioref">9</a>]</span>.</p>
-<figure>
 <img src="/assets/thesis/fk_chapter/gap_opening/gap_opening_U2.svg" id="fig-gap_opening_U2" data-short-caption="The transition from CDW to the Anderson Phase" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 5: The DOS (a) and scaling exponent \tau (b) as a function of energy for the CDW phase to the gapless Anderson insulating phase at U=2. Regions where the DOS is close to zero are shown in white. The scaling exponent \tau is obtained from fits to IPR(N) = A N^{-\lambda} for a range of system sizes. J = 5,\;\alpha = 1.25" />
 <figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 5: The DOS (a) and scaling exponent <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> (b) as a function of energy for the CDW phase to the gapless Anderson insulating phase at <span class="math inline">\(U=2\)</span>. Regions where the DOS is close to zero are shown in white. The scaling exponent <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> is obtained from fits to <span class="math inline">\(IPR(N) = A N^{-\lambda}\)</span> for a range of system sizes. <span class="math inline">\(J = 5,\;\alpha = 1.25\)</span></figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>In order to understand the localisation properties we can compare the behaviour of our model with that of a simpler Anderson disorder model in which the spins are replaced by a CDW background with uncorrelated binary defect potentials. This is defined by replacing the spin degree of freedom in the FK model <span class="math inline">\(S_i = \pm \tfrac{1}{2}\)</span> with a disorder potential <span class="math inline">\(d_i = \pm \tfrac{1}{2}\)</span> controlled by a defect density <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span> such that <span class="math inline">\(d_i = -\tfrac{1}{2}\)</span> with probability <span class="math inline">\(\rho/2\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(d_i = \tfrac{1}{2}\)</span> otherwise. <span class="math inline">\(\rho/2\)</span> is used rather than <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span> so that the disorder potential takes on the zero temperature CDW ground state at <span class="math inline">\(\rho = 0\)</span> and becomes a random choice over spin states at <span class="math inline">\(\rho = 1\)</span> i.e the infinite temperature limit.</p>
+<p>The scaling of the IPR with system size <span class="math inline">\(\mathrm{IPR} \propto N^{-\tau}\)</span> depends on the localisation properties of states at that energy. For delocalised states, e.g. Bloch waves, <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> is the physical dimension. For fully localised states <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> goes to zero in the thermodynamic limit. However, for special types of disorder, such as binary disorder, the localisation lengths can be large, comparable to the system size. This can make it difficult to extract the correct scaling. An additional complication arises from the fact that the scaling exponent may display intermediate behaviours for correlated disorder and in the vicinity of a localisation-delocalisation transition <span class="citation" data-cites="kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993 eversAndersonTransitions2008"> [<a href="#ref-kramerLocalizationTheoryExperiment1993" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>,<a href="#ref-eversAndersonTransitions2008" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>. The thermal defects of the CDW phase lead to a binary disorder potential with a finite correlation length. The key question for our system is then: How is the <span class="math inline">\(T=0\)</span> CDW phase with fully delocalised fermionic states connected to the fully localised phase at high temperatures?</p>
-<p><span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
-H_{\mathrm{DM}} = &amp; \;U \sum_{i} (-1)^i \; d_i \;(c^\dagger_{i}c_{i} - \tfrac{1}{2}) \\
-&amp; -\;t \sum_{i} c^\dagger_{i}c_{i+1} + c^\dagger_{i+1}c_{i}
-\end{aligned}\]</span></p>
-<p>fig. <a href="#fig:DM_DOS">6</a> and fig. <a href="#fig:DM_IPR_scaling">7</a> compare the FK model to the disorder model at different system sizes, matching the defect densities of the disorder model to the FK model at <span class="math inline">\(N = 270\)</span> above and below the CDW transition. We find very good, even quantitative, agreement between the FK and disorder models, which suggests that correlations in the spin sector do not play a significant role.</p>
 <figure>
 <img src="/assets/thesis/fk_chapter/disorder_model/DM_DOS.svg" id="fig-DM_DOS" data-short-caption="FK model compared to binary disorder model: DOS" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 6: A comparison of the full FK model to a simple binary disorder model with a CDW wave background perturbed by uncorrelated defects at density 0 &lt; \rho &lt; 1 matched to the \rho for the largest corresponding FK model. As in fig. 2, the Energy resolved DOS(\omega) is shown. The DOSs match well implying that correlations in the CDW wave fluctuations are not relevant at these system parameters." />
 <figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 6: A comparison of the full FK model to a simple binary disorder model with a CDW wave background perturbed by uncorrelated defects at density <span class="math inline">\(0 &lt; \rho &lt; 1\)</span> matched to the <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span> for the largest corresponding FK model. As in fig. <a href="#fig:DOS">2</a>, the Energy resolved DOS(<span class="math inline">\(\omega\)</span>) is shown. The DOSs match well implying that correlations in the CDW wave fluctuations are not relevant at these system parameters.</figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>As we can sample directly from the disorder model, rather than through MCMC, the samples are uncorrelated. Hence we can evaluate much larger system sizes with the disorder model which enables us to pin down the correct localisation effects. In particular, what appear to be delocalised states for small system sizes eventually turn out to be states with large localisation length. The localisation length diverges towards the ordered zero temperature CDW state. The interplay of interactions, which here produce as peculiar binary potential, and localisation can be very intricate and the added advantage of a 1D model is that we can explore very large system sizes.</p>
+<p>For a representative set of parameters covering all three phases, fig. <a href="#fig:DOS">2</a> shows the density of states as function of energy while fig. <a href="#fig:IPR_scaling">3</a> shows <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span>, the scaling exponent of the IPR with system size. The DOS is symmetric about <span class="math inline">\(0\)</span> because of the particle hole symmetry of the model. At high temperatures, all of the eigenstates are localised in both the Mott and Anderson phases (with <span class="math inline">\(\tau \leq 0.07\)</span> for our system sizes). We also checked that the states are localised by direct inspection. Note that there are in-gap states, for instance at <span class="math inline">\(\omega_0\)</span>, below the upper band which are localised and smoothly connected across the phase transition.</p>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/fk_chapter/disorder_model/DM_IPR_scaling.svg" id="fig-DM_IPR_scaling" data-short-caption="FK model compared to binary disorder model: IPR Scaling" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 7: A comparison of the full FK model to a simple binary disorder model with a CDW wave background perturbed by uncorrelated defects at density 0 &lt; \rho &lt; 1 matched to the \rho for the largest corresponding FK model. As in fig. 3 \tau(\omega) the scaling of IPR(\omega) with system size, , is shown both in gap (\omega_0) and in the band (\omega_1). This data makes clear that the apparent scaling of IPR with system size at small sysis a finite size effect due to weak localisation  [1], hence all the states are indeed localised as one would expect in 1D. The disorder model \tau_0,\tau_1 for each figure are: (a) 0.01\pm0.05, -0.02\pm0.06 (b) 0.01\pm0.04, -0.01\pm0.04 (c) 0.05\pm0.06, 0.04\pm0.06 (d) -0.03\pm0.06, 0.01\pm0.06. The lines are fit on system sizes N &gt; 400" />
+<img src="/assets/thesis/fk_chapter/disorder_model/DM_IPR_scaling.svg" id="fig-DM_IPR_scaling" data-short-caption="FK model compared to binary disorder model: IPR Scaling" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 7: A comparison of the full FK model to a simple binary disorder model with a CDW wave background perturbed by uncorrelated defects at density 0 &lt; \rho &lt; 1 matched to the \rho for the largest corresponding FK model. As in fig. 3 \tau(\omega) the scaling of IPR(\omega) with system size, is shown both in gap (\omega_0) and in the band (\omega_1). This data makes clear that the apparent scaling of IPR with system size at small sizes is a finite size effect due to weak localisation  [1]. Hence all the states are indeed localised as one would expect in 1D. The disorder model \tau_0,\tau_1 for each figure are: (a) 0.01\pm0.05, -0.02\pm0.06 (b) 0.01\pm0.04, -0.01\pm0.04 (c) 0.05\pm0.06, 0.04\pm0.06 (d) -0.03\pm0.06, 0.01\pm0.06. The lines are fit on system sizes N &gt; 400" />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 7: A comparison of the full FK model to a simple binary disorder model with a CDW wave background perturbed by uncorrelated defects at density <span class="math inline">\(0 &lt; \rho &lt; 1\)</span> matched to the <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span> for the largest corresponding FK model. As in fig. <a href="#fig:IPR_scaling">3</a> <span class="math inline">\(\tau(\omega)\)</span> the scaling of IPR(<span class="math inline">\(\omega\)</span>) with system size, , is shown both in gap (<span class="math inline">\(\omega_0\)</span>) and in the band (<span class="math inline">\(\omega_1\)</span>). This data makes clear that the apparent scaling of IPR with system size at small sysis a finite size effect due to weak localisation <span class="citation" data-cites="antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016"> [<a href="#ref-antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>, hence all the states are indeed localised as one would expect in 1D. The disorder model <span class="math inline">\(\tau_0,\tau_1\)</span> for each figure are: (a) <span class="math inline">\(0.01\pm0.05, -0.02\pm0.06\)</span> (b) <span class="math inline">\(0.01\pm0.04, -0.01\pm0.04\)</span> (c) <span class="math inline">\(0.05\pm0.06, 0.04\pm0.06\)</span> (d) <span class="math inline">\(-0.03\pm0.06, 0.01\pm0.06\)</span>. The lines are fit on system sizes <span class="math inline">\(N &gt; 400\)</span></figcaption>
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 7: A comparison of the full FK model to a simple binary disorder model with a CDW wave background perturbed by uncorrelated defects at density <span class="math inline">\(0 &lt; \rho &lt; 1\)</span> matched to the <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span> for the largest corresponding FK model. As in fig. <a href="#fig:IPR_scaling">3</a> <span class="math inline">\(\tau(\omega)\)</span> the scaling of IPR(<span class="math inline">\(\omega\)</span>) with system size, is shown both in gap (<span class="math inline">\(\omega_0\)</span>) and in the band (<span class="math inline">\(\omega_1\)</span>). This data makes clear that the apparent scaling of IPR with system size at small sizes is a finite size effect due to weak localisation <span class="citation" data-cites="antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016"> [<a href="#ref-antipovInteractionTunedAndersonMott2016" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>. Hence all the states are indeed localised as one would expect in 1D. The disorder model <span class="math inline">\(\tau_0,\tau_1\)</span> for each figure are: (a) <span class="math inline">\(0.01\pm0.05, -0.02\pm0.06\)</span> (b) <span class="math inline">\(0.01\pm0.04, -0.01\pm0.04\)</span> (c) <span class="math inline">\(0.05\pm0.06, 0.04\pm0.06\)</span> (d) <span class="math inline">\(-0.03\pm0.06, 0.01\pm0.06\)</span>. The lines are fit on system sizes <span class="math inline">\(N &gt; 400\)</span></figcaption>
 </figure>
+<p>In the CDW phases, at <span class="math inline">\(U=2\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(U=5\)</span>, we find that states within the gapped CDW bands, e.g. at <span class="math inline">\(\omega_1\)</span>, have scaling exponents <span class="math inline">\(\tau = 0.30\pm0.03\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(\tau = 0.15\pm0.05\)</span>, respectively. This surprising finding suggests that the CDW bands are partially delocalised with multi-fractal behaviour of the wavefunctions <span class="citation" data-cites="eversAndersonTransitions2008"> [<a href="#ref-eversAndersonTransitions2008" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>. This phenomenon would be unexpected in a 1D model as they generally do not support delocalisation in the presence of disorder except as the result of correlations in the emergent disorder potential <span class="citation" data-cites="croyAndersonLocalization1D2011 goldshteinPurePointSpectrum1977"> [<a href="#ref-croyAndersonLocalization1D2011" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>,<a href="#ref-goldshteinPurePointSpectrum1977" role="doc-biblioref">8</a>]</span>. However, we show later, by comparison to an uncorrelated Anderson model, that these nonzero exponents are a finite size effect and the states are localised with a finite <span class="math inline">\(\xi\)</span> similar to the system size. This is an example of weak localisation. As a result, the IPR does not scale correctly until the system size has grown much larger than <span class="math inline">\(\xi\)</span>. Fig. <a href="#fig:DM_IPR_scaling">7</a> shows that the scaling of the IPR in the CDW phase does flatten out eventually.</p>
+<p>Next, we use the DOS and the scaling exponent <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> to explore the localisation properties over the energy-temperature plane in fig. <a href="#fig:gap_opening_U2">5</a> and fig. <a href="#fig:gap_opening_U5">4</a>. Gapped areas are shown in white, which highlights the distinction between the gapped Mott phase and the ungapped Anderson phase. In-gap states appear just below the critical point, smoothly filling the bandgap in the Anderson phase and forming islands in the Mott phase. As in the finite <span class="citation" data-cites="zondaGaplessRegimeCharge2019"> [<a href="#ref-zondaGaplessRegimeCharge2019" role="doc-biblioref">9</a>]</span> and infinite dimensional <span class="citation" data-cites="hassanSpectralPropertiesChargedensitywave2007"> [<a href="#ref-hassanSpectralPropertiesChargedensitywave2007" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>]</span> cases, the in-gap states merge and are pushed to lower energy for decreasing U as the <span class="math inline">\(T=0\)</span> CDW gap closes. Intuitively, the presence of in-gap states can be understood as a result of domain wall fluctuations away from the AFM ordered background. These domain walls act as local potentials for impurity-like bound states <span class="citation" data-cites="zondaGaplessRegimeCharge2019"> [<a href="#ref-zondaGaplessRegimeCharge2019" role="doc-biblioref">9</a>]</span>.</p>
+<p>To understand the localisation properties we can compare the behaviour of our model with that of a simpler Anderson disorder model in which the spins are replaced by a CDW background with uncorrelated binary defect potentials. This is defined by replacing the spin degree of freedom in the FK model <span class="math inline">\(S_i = \pm \tfrac{1}{2}\)</span> with a disorder potential <span class="math inline">\(d_i = \pm \tfrac{1}{2}\)</span> controlled by a defect density <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span> such that <span class="math inline">\(d_i = -\tfrac{1}{2}\)</span> with probability <span class="math inline">\(\rho/2\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(d_i = \tfrac{1}{2}\)</span> otherwise. <span class="math inline">\(\rho/2\)</span> is used rather than <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span> so that the disorder potential takes on the zero temperature CDW ground state at <span class="math inline">\(\rho = 0\)</span> and becomes a random choice over spin states at <span class="math inline">\(\rho = 1\)</span> i.e the infinite temperature limit.</p>
+<p><span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
+H_{\mathrm{DM}} = &amp; \;U \sum_{i} (-1)^i \; d_i \;(c^\dagger_{i}c_{i} - \tfrac{1}{2}) \\
+&amp; -\;t \sum_{i} c^\dagger_{i}c_{i+1} + c^\dagger_{i+1}c_{i}
+\end{aligned}\]</span></p>
+<p>Figures -fig. <a href="#fig:DM_DOS">6</a> and -fig. <a href="#fig:DM_IPR_scaling">7</a> compare the FK model to the disorder model at different system sizes, matching the defect densities of the disorder model to the FK model at <span class="math inline">\(N = 270\)</span> above and below the CDW transition. We find very good, even quantitative, agreement between the FK and disorder models. This suggests that correlations in the spin sector do not play a significant role.</p>
+<p>As we can sample directly from the disorder model, rather than through MCMC, the samples are uncorrelated. Hence we can evaluate much larger system sizes with the disorder model. This enables us to pin down the correct localisation effects. In particular, what appear to be delocalised states for small system sizes eventually turn out to be states with large localisation length. The localisation length diverges towards the ordered zero temperature CDW state. The interplay of interactions, which here produces a binary potential, and localisation can be very intricate and the added advantage of a 1D model is that we can explore very large system sizes.</p>
 </section>
 </section>
 <section id="fk-conclusion" class="level1">
 <h1>Discussion and Conclusion</h1>
-<p>The FK model is one of the simplest non-trivial models of interacting fermions. We studied its thermodynamic and localisation properties brought down in dimensionality to 1D by adding a novel long-ranged coupling designed to stabilise the CDW phase present in dimension two and above.</p>
+<p>The FK model is one of the simplest non-trivial models of interacting fermions. I studied its thermodynamic and localisation properties brought down in dimensionality to 1D by adding a novel long-ranged coupling designed to stabilise the CDW phase present in dimension two and above.</p>
-<p>Our MCMC approach emphasises the presence of a disorder-free localisation mechanism within the translationally invariant system. Further, it gives a significant speed up over the naive method. We show that the LRFK model retains much of the rich phase diagram of its higher dimensional cousins. Careful scaling analysis indicates that all the single particle eigenstates eventually localise at non-zero temperature albeit only for very large system sizes of several thousand.</p>
+<p>My MCMC approach emphasises the presence of a disorder-free localisation mechanism within the translationally invariant system. Further, it gives a significant speed up over the naive method. We show that the LRFK model retains much of the rich phase diagram of its higher dimensional cousins. Careful scaling analysis indicates that all the single particle eigenstates eventually localise at non-zero temperature albeit only for very large system sizes of several thousand.</p>
-<p>This work raises a number of interesting questions for future research. A straightforward but numerically challenging problem is to pin down the model’s behaviour closer to the critical point where correlations in the spin sector would become significant. Would this modify the localisation behaviour? It has been shown that Anderson models with long-range correlated disorder potentials can have complex localisation behaviour not normally seen in 1D <span class="citation" data-cites="aubryAnalyticityBreakingAnderson1980 shimasakiAnomalousLocalizationMultifractality2022"> [<a href="#ref-aubryAnalyticityBreakingAnderson1980" role="doc-biblioref">11</a>,<a href="#ref-shimasakiAnomalousLocalizationMultifractality2022" role="doc-biblioref">12</a>]</span>. MCMC methods with local spin updates tend to experience critical slowing down near classical critical points <span class="citation" data-cites="geyerPracticalMarkovChain1992 levinMarkovChainsMixing2017 vatsMultivariateOutputAnalysis2015"> [<a href="#ref-geyerPracticalMarkovChain1992" role="doc-biblioref">13</a>–<a href="#ref-vatsMultivariateOutputAnalysis2015" role="doc-biblioref">15</a>]</span>. Cluster updates methods can help to alleviate this but it is not clear if they can be adapted to incorporate the energetic contributions from the fermion sector <span class="citation" data-cites="evertzClusterAlgorithmVertex1993 fukuiOrderNClusterMonte2009 wolffCollectiveMonteCarlo1989"> [<a href="#ref-evertzClusterAlgorithmVertex1993" role="doc-biblioref">16</a>–<a href="#ref-wolffCollectiveMonteCarlo1989" role="doc-biblioref">18</a>]</span>.</p>
+<p>This chapter raises a number of interesting questions for future research. A straightforward but numerically challenging problem is to pin down the LRFK model’s behaviour closer to the critical point where correlations in the spin sector would become significant. This would lead to a long-range correlated effective disorder potential for the fermions. Would this modify the localisation behaviour? It has been shown that Anderson models with long-range correlated disorder potentials can have complex localisation behaviour not normally seen in 1D <span class="citation" data-cites="aubryAnalyticityBreakingAnderson1980 shimasakiAnomalousLocalizationMultifractality2022"> [<a href="#ref-aubryAnalyticityBreakingAnderson1980" role="doc-biblioref">11</a>,<a href="#ref-shimasakiAnomalousLocalizationMultifractality2022" role="doc-biblioref">12</a>]</span> so this seems like a promising line of research. The main difficulty would be that MCMC methods with local spin updates, such as ours, experience critical slowing down near classical critical points <span class="citation" data-cites="geyerPracticalMarkovChain1992 levinMarkovChainsMixing2017 vatsMultivariateOutputAnalysis2015"> [<a href="#ref-geyerPracticalMarkovChain1992" role="doc-biblioref">13</a>–<a href="#ref-vatsMultivariateOutputAnalysis2015" role="doc-biblioref">15</a>]</span>. Cluster updates methods can help to alleviate this, but it is not clear if they can be adapted to incorporate the energetic contributions from the fermion sector <span class="citation" data-cites="evertzClusterAlgorithmVertex1993 fukuiOrderNClusterMonte2009 wolffCollectiveMonteCarlo1989"> [<a href="#ref-evertzClusterAlgorithmVertex1993" role="doc-biblioref">16</a>–<a href="#ref-wolffCollectiveMonteCarlo1989" role="doc-biblioref">18</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>Similar to other solvable models of disorder-free localisation, we expect intriguing out-of equilibrium physics, for example slow entanglement dynamics akin to more generic interacting systems <span class="citation" data-cites="hartLogarithmicEntanglementGrowth2020"> [<a href="#ref-hartLogarithmicEntanglementGrowth2020" role="doc-biblioref">19</a>]</span>. One could also investigate whether the rich ground state phenomenology of the FK model as a function of filling <span class="citation" data-cites="gruberGroundStatesSpinless1990"> [<a href="#ref-gruberGroundStatesSpinless1990" role="doc-biblioref">20</a>]</span> such as the devil’s staircase <span class="citation" data-cites="michelettiCompleteDevilTextquotesingles1997"> [<a href="#ref-michelettiCompleteDevilTextquotesingles1997" role="doc-biblioref">21</a>]</span> as well as superconductor like states <span class="citation" data-cites="caiVisualizingEvolutionMott2016"> [<a href="#ref-caiVisualizingEvolutionMott2016" role="doc-biblioref">22</a>]</span> could be stabilised at finite temperature.</p>
+<p>Similar to other solvable models of disorder-free localisation, we expect intriguing out-of equilibrium physics. For example, slow entanglement dynamics akin to more generic interacting systems <span class="citation" data-cites="hartLogarithmicEntanglementGrowth2021"> [<a href="#ref-hartLogarithmicEntanglementGrowth2021" role="doc-biblioref">19</a>]</span>. One could also investigate whether the rich ground state phenomenology of the FK model as a function of filling <span class="citation" data-cites="gruberGroundStatesSpinless1990"> [<a href="#ref-gruberGroundStatesSpinless1990" role="doc-biblioref">20</a>]</span>, such as the devil’s staircase <span class="citation" data-cites="michelettiCompleteDevilStaircase1997"> [<a href="#ref-michelettiCompleteDevilStaircase1997" role="doc-biblioref">21</a>]</span> as well as superconductor like states <span class="citation" data-cites="caiVisualizingEvolutionMott2016"> [<a href="#ref-caiVisualizingEvolutionMott2016" role="doc-biblioref">22</a>]</span>, could be stabilised at finite temperature.</p>
-<p>In a broader context, we envisage that long-range interactions can also be used to gain a deeper understanding of the temperature evolution of topological phases. One example would be a LRFK version of the celebrated Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model where one could explore the interplay of topological bound states and thermal domain wall defects. Finally, the rich physics of our model should be realisable in systems with long-range interactions, such as trapped ion quantum simulators, where one can also explore the fully interacting regime with a dynamical background field.</p>
+<p>In a broader context, we envisage that long-range interactions could also be used to gain a deeper understanding of the temperature evolution of topological phases. One example would be a LRFK version of the celebrated Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model <span class="citation" data-cites="batraPhysicsCoffeeDoughnuts2020 suSolitonsPolyacetylene1979"> [<a href="#ref-batraPhysicsCoffeeDoughnuts2020" role="doc-biblioref">23</a>,<a href="#ref-suSolitonsPolyacetylene1979" role="doc-biblioref">24</a>]</span> where one could explore the interplay of topological bound states and thermal domain wall defects.</p>
+<p>Finally, the rich physics of our model should be realisable in systems with long-range interactions, such as trapped ion quantum simulators, where one can also explore the fully interacting regime with a dynamical background field.</p>
 <p>Next Chapter: <a href="../4_Amorphous_Kitaev_Model/4.1_AMK_Model.html">4 The Amorphous Kitaev Model</a></p>
 </section>
 <section id="bibliography" class="level1 unnumbered">
@@ -201,18 +201,24 @@ H_{\mathrm{DM}} = &amp; \;U \sum_{i} (-1)^i \; d_i \;(c^\dagger_{i}c_{i} - \tfra
 <div id="ref-wolffCollectiveMonteCarlo1989" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[18] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">U. Wolff, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.361">Collective Monte Carlo Updating for Spin Systems</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>62</strong>, 361 (1989).</div>
 </div>
-<div id="ref-hartLogarithmicEntanglementGrowth2020" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div id="ref-hartLogarithmicEntanglementGrowth2021" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[19] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">O. Hart, S. Gopalakrishnan, and C. Castelnovo, <em><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.00618">Logarithmic Entanglement Growth from Disorder-Free Localisation in the Two-Leg Compass Ladder</a></em>, arXiv:2009.00618 [Cond-Mat] (2020).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[19] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">O. Hart, S. Gopalakrishnan, and C. Castelnovo, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.227202">Logarithmic Entanglement Growth from Disorder-Free Localization in the Two-Leg Compass Ladder</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>126</strong>, 227202 (2021).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-gruberGroundStatesSpinless1990" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[20] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Gruber, J. Iwanski, J. Jedrzejewski, and P. Lemberger, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.2198">Ground States of the Spinless Falicov-Kimball Model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>41</strong>, 2198 (1990).</div>
 </div>
-<div id="ref-michelettiCompleteDevilTextquotesingles1997" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div id="ref-michelettiCompleteDevilStaircase1997" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[21] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Micheletti, A. B. Harris, and J. M. Yeomans, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/30/21/002">A Complete Devil\textquotesingles Staircase in the Falicov - Kimball Model</a></em>, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. <strong>30</strong>, L711 (1997).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[21] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Micheletti, A. B. Harris, and J. M. Yeomans, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/30/21/002">A Complete Devil’s Staircase in the Falicov-Kimball Model</a></em>, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. <strong>30</strong>, L711 (1997).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-caiVisualizingEvolutionMott2016" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[22] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. Cai, W. Ruan, Y. Peng, C. Ye, X. Li, Z. Hao, X. Zhou, D.-H. Lee, and Y. Wang, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3840">Visualizing the Evolution from the Mott Insulator to a Charge-Ordered Insulator in Lightly Doped Cuprates</a></em>, Nature Phys <strong>12</strong>, 11 (2016).</div>
 </div>
+<div id="ref-batraPhysicsCoffeeDoughnuts2020" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[23] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">N. Batra and G. Sheet, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-020-0995-x">Physics with Coffee and Doughnuts</a></em>, Reson <strong>25</strong>, 765 (2020).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-suSolitonsPolyacetylene1979" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[24] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.1698">Solitons in Polyacetylene</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>42</strong>, 1698 (1979).</div>
+</div>
 </div>
 </section>
 

_thesis/4_Amorphous_Kitaev_Model/4.1_AMK_Model.html

@@ -87,15 +87,15 @@ image:
 <p>The material in this chapter expands on work presented in</p>
 <p> <span class="citation" data-cites="cassellaExactChiralAmorphous2022"> [<a href="#ref-cassellaExactChiralAmorphous2022" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span> Cassella, G., D’Ornellas, P., Hodson, T., Natori, W. M., &amp; Knolle, J. (2022). An exact chiral amorphous spin liquid. <em>arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.08246.</em></p>
 <p>All the code is available online as a Python package called Koala <span class="citation" data-cites="hodsonKoalaKitaevAmorphous2022"> [<a href="#ref-hodsonKoalaKitaevAmorphous2022" role="doc-biblioref">2</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>This was a joint project of Gino, Peru and myself with advice and guidance from Willian and Johannes, all authors of the above. The project grew out of an interest the three of us had in studying amorphous systems, coupled with Johannes’ expertise on the Kitaev model. The idea to use Voronoi partitions came from <span class="citation" data-cites="marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpe2020"> [<a href="#ref-marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpe2020" role="doc-biblioref">3</a>]</span> and Gino did the implementation of this. The idea and implementation of the edge colouring using SAT solvers and the mapping from flux sector to bond sector using A* search were both entirely my work. Peru produced the numerical evidence for the ground state and implemented the local markers. Gino and I did much of the rest of the programming for Koala collaboratively, often pair programming, this included the phase diagram, edge mode and finite temperature analyses as well as the derivation of the projector in the amorphous case.</p>
+<p>This was a joint project of Gino, Peru and me with advice and guidance from Willian and Johannes, all authors of the above. The project grew out of an interest the three of us had in studying amorphous systems, coupled with Johannes’ expertise on the Kitaev model. The idea to use Voronoi partitions came from <span class="citation" data-cites="marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpe2020"> [<a href="#ref-marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpe2020" role="doc-biblioref">3</a>]</span> and Gino did the implementation of this. The idea and implementation of the edge colouring using SAT solvers and the mapping from flux sector to bond sector using A* search were both entirely my work. Peru produced the numerical evidence for the ground state and implemented the local markers. Gino and I did much of the rest of the programming for Koala collaboratively, often pair programming, this included the phase diagram, edge mode and finite temperature analyses as well as the derivation of the projector in the amorphous case.</p>
 </section>
 <section id="ak-summary" class="level3">
 <h3>Chapter Summary</h3>
-<p>In this chapter I will, first, define the amorphous Kitaev (AK) model and discuss the construction of amorphous lattices. Second, I will present some more details of the the methods, including Voronisation and graph colouring in the <a href="../4_Amorphous_Kitaev_Model/4.2_AMK_Methods.html#amk-methods">methods</a> section. Finally I will then present and interpret the <a href="../4_Amorphous_Kitaev_Model/4.3_AMK_Results.html#amk-results">results</a> obtained.</p>
+<p>In this chapter, I will first define the amorphous Kitaev (AK) model and discuss the construction of amorphous lattices. Second, in the <a href="../4_Amorphous_Kitaev_Model/4.2_AMK_Methods.html#amk-methods">methods</a> section I will discuss the details of voronisation and graph colouring. Finally I will present and interpret the <a href="../4_Amorphous_Kitaev_Model/4.3_AMK_Results.html#amk-results">results</a> obtained.</p>
-<p>From its introduction it was known that Kitaev Honeycomb (KH) model would remain solvable on any trivalent graph. This has been used to generalise the model to many lattices <span class="citation" data-cites="eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020 Yao2009 eschmann2019thermodynamics Peri2020"> [<a href="#ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>–<a href="#ref-Peri2020" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>]</span> but so far none have fully broken the translation symmetry of the model.</p>
+<p>From its introduction it was known that the Kitaev Honeycomb (KH) model is solvable on any trivalent lattice. Consequently, it has been generalised to many such lattices <span class="citation" data-cites="eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020 Yao2009 eschmann2019thermodynamics Peri2020"> [<a href="#ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>–<a href="#ref-Peri2020" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>]</span> but so far none that entirely lack translation symmetry. Here we will do just that.</p>
 <p>Amorphous lattices are characterised by local constraints but no long-range order. They arise, for instance, in amorphous semiconductors like Silicon and Germanium <span class="citation" data-cites="Yonezawa1983 zallen2008physics"> [<a href="#ref-Yonezawa1983" role="doc-biblioref">8</a>,<a href="#ref-zallen2008physics" role="doc-biblioref">9</a>]</span>. Recent work has shown that topological insulating (TI) phases, characterised by protected edge states and topological bulk invariants, can exist in amorphous systems <span class="citation" data-cites="mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018 agarwala2019topological marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpeModels2020 costa2019toward agarwala2020higher spring2021amorphous corbae2019evidence"> [<a href="#ref-mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>–<a href="#ref-corbae2019evidence" role="doc-biblioref">16</a>]</span>. TI phases, however, arise in non-interacting systems. In this context, we might ask whether Quantum Spin Liquid (QSL) systems and the Kitaev Honeycomb (KH) model, in particular, could be realised on amorphous lattices. The phases of the KH model have many similarities with TIs but differ in that the KH model is an interacting system. In general, research on amorphous electronic systems has been focused mainly on non-interacting systems with the exception of amorphous superconductivity <span class="citation" data-cites="buckel1954einfluss mcmillan1981electron meisel1981eliashberg bergmann1976amorphous mannaNoncrystallineTopologicalSuperconductors2022"> [<a href="#ref-buckel1954einfluss" role="doc-biblioref">17</a>–<a href="#ref-mannaNoncrystallineTopologicalSuperconductors2022" role="doc-biblioref">21</a>]</span> or very recent work looking to understand the effect of strong electron repulsion in TIs <span class="citation" data-cites="kim2022fractionalization"> [<a href="#ref-kim2022fractionalization" role="doc-biblioref">22</a>]</span>.</p>
 <p>The KH model is a magnetic system. Magnetism in amorphous systems has been investigated since the 1960s, mostly through the adaptation of theoretical tools developed for disordered systems <span class="citation" data-cites="aharony1975critical Petrakovski1981 kaneyoshi1992introduction Kaneyoshi2018"> [<a href="#ref-aharony1975critical" role="doc-biblioref">23</a>–<a href="#ref-Kaneyoshi2018" role="doc-biblioref">26</a>]</span>. This is not always ideal, we have already seen that the topological disorder of amorphous lattices can be qualitatively different from standard bond or site disorder, especially in 2D <span class="citation" data-cites="barghathiPhaseTransitionsRandom2014 schrauthViolationHarrisBarghathiVojtaCriterion2018"> [<a href="#ref-barghathiPhaseTransitionsRandom2014" role="doc-biblioref">27</a>,<a href="#ref-schrauthViolationHarrisBarghathiVojtaCriterion2018" role="doc-biblioref">28</a>]</span>. Research focused on classical Heisenberg and Ising models has accounted for the observed behaviour of ferromagnetism, disordered antiferromagnetism and widely observed spin glass behaviour <span class="citation" data-cites="coey1978amorphous"> [<a href="#ref-coey1978amorphous" role="doc-biblioref">29</a>]</span>. However, the role of the spin-anisotropic interactions and quantum effects that we see in the KH model has not been addressed in amorphous magnets. It is an open question whether frustrated magnetic interactions on amorphous lattices can give rise to genuine quantum phases such as QSLs <span class="citation" data-cites="Anderson1973 Knolle2019 Savary2016 Lacroix2011"> [<a href="#ref-Anderson1973" role="doc-biblioref">30</a>–<a href="#ref-Lacroix2011" role="doc-biblioref">33</a>]</span>. This chapter will answer that question by demonstrating that the Kitaev model on amorphous lattices leads to a kind of QSL called a chiral spin liquid.</p>
-<p>In this section I will discuss how to generalise the KH to an amorphous lattice. The <a href="../4_Amorphous_Kitaev_Model/4.2_AMK_Methods.html#amk-methods">methods section</a> discusses how to generate such lattices using Voronoi partitions of the plane <span class="citation" data-cites="mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018 marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpeModels2020"> [<a href="#ref-mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>,<a href="#ref-marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpeModels2020" role="doc-biblioref">12</a>]</span>, colour them using a SAT solver and how to map back and forth between gauge field configurations and flux configurations. In the <a href="../4_Amorphous_Kitaev_Model/4.3_AMK_Results.html#amk-results">results section</a>, I will show extensive numerical evidence that the model follows the simple generalisation to Lieb’s theorem <span class="citation" data-cites="lieb_flux_1994"> [<a href="#ref-lieb_flux_1994" role="doc-biblioref">34</a>]</span> found by other works <span class="citation" data-cites="eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020 Yao2009 eschmann2019thermodynamics Peri2020"> [<a href="#ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>–<a href="#ref-Peri2020" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>]</span>. I then map out the phase diagram of the model and show that the chiral phase around the symmetric point (<span class="math inline">\(J_x = J_y = J_z\)</span>) is gapped and non-Abelian. We use a quantised local Chern number <span class="math inline">\(\nu\)</span> <span class="citation" data-cites="peru_preprint mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018"> [<a href="#ref-mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>,<a href="#ref-peru_preprint" role="doc-biblioref">35</a>]</span> as well as the presence of protected chiral Majorana edge modes to determine this. Finally, I look at the role of finite temperature fluctuations and show that the proliferation of flux excitations leads to an Anderson transition, similar to that of the Falicov-Kimball model, to a thermal metal phase <span class="citation" data-cites="Laumann2012 lahtinenTopologicalLiquidNucleation2012 selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019"> [<a href="#ref-Laumann2012" role="doc-biblioref">36</a>–<a href="#ref-selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019" role="doc-biblioref">38</a>]</span>. Finally, I consider possible physical realisations of the model and other generalisations.</p>
+<p>In this section, I will discuss how to generalise the KH to an amorphous lattice. The <a href="../4_Amorphous_Kitaev_Model/4.2_AMK_Methods.html#amk-methods">methods section</a> discusses how to generate amorphous lattices using Voronoi partitions of the plane <span class="citation" data-cites="mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018 marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpeModels2020"> [<a href="#ref-mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>,<a href="#ref-marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpeModels2020" role="doc-biblioref">12</a>]</span>, colour them using a SAT solver and how to map back and forth between gauge field configurations and flux configurations. In the <a href="../4_Amorphous_Kitaev_Model/4.3_AMK_Results.html#amk-results">results section</a>, I will show extensive numerical evidence that the AK model follows the simple generalisation to Lieb’s theorem <span class="citation" data-cites="lieb_flux_1994"> [<a href="#ref-lieb_flux_1994" role="doc-biblioref">34</a>]</span> found by other works <span class="citation" data-cites="eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020 Yao2009 eschmann2019thermodynamics Peri2020"> [<a href="#ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>–<a href="#ref-Peri2020" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>]</span>. I then map out the phase diagram of the AK model and show that the chiral phase around the symmetric point (<span class="math inline">\(J_x = J_y = J_z\)</span>) is gapped and non-Abelian. We use a quantised local Chern number <span class="math inline">\(\nu\)</span> <span class="citation" data-cites="peru_preprint mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018"> [<a href="#ref-mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>,<a href="#ref-peru_preprint" role="doc-biblioref">35</a>]</span> as well as the presence of protected chiral Majorana edge modes to determine this. Finally, I look at the role of finite temperature fluctuations and show that the proliferation of flux excitations leads to an Anderson transition, similar to that of the Falicov-Kimball model, to a thermal metal phase <span class="citation" data-cites="Laumann2012 lahtinenTopologicalLiquidNucleation2012 selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019"> [<a href="#ref-Laumann2012" role="doc-biblioref">36</a>–<a href="#ref-selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019" role="doc-biblioref">38</a>]</span>. Finally, I consider possible physical realisations of the AK model and other generalisations.</p>
 </section>
 </section>
 <section id="amk-Model" class="level1">
@@ -104,20 +104,20 @@ image:
 <img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/intro/amk_zoom/amk_zoom_by_hand.svg" id="fig-amk-zoom" data-short-caption="The Kitaev Honeycomb Model" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 1: (a) The standard Kitaev model is defined on a honeycomb lattice. The special feature of the honeycomb lattice that makes the model solvable is that each vertex is joined by exactly three bonds, i.e. the lattice is trivalent. One of three labels is assigned to each (b). We represent the antisymmetric gauge degree of freedom u_{jk} = \pm 1 with arrows that point in the direction u_{jk} = +1 (c). The Majorana transformation can be visualised as breaking each spin into four Majoranas which then pair along the bonds. The pairs of x,y and z Majoranas become part of the classical \mathbb{Z}_2 gauge field u_{ij}. This leaves a single Majorana c_i per site." />
 <figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1: <strong>(a)</strong> The standard Kitaev model is defined on a honeycomb lattice. The special feature of the honeycomb lattice that makes the model solvable is that each vertex is joined by exactly three bonds, i.e. the lattice is trivalent. One of three labels is assigned to each <strong>(b)</strong>. We represent the antisymmetric gauge degree of freedom <span class="math inline">\(u_{jk} = \pm 1\)</span> with arrows that point in the direction <span class="math inline">\(u_{jk} = +1\)</span> <strong>(c)</strong>. The Majorana transformation can be visualised as breaking each spin into four Majoranas which then pair along the bonds. The pairs of x,y and z Majoranas become part of the classical <span class="math inline">\(\mathbb{Z}_2\)</span> gauge field <span class="math inline">\(u_{ij}\)</span>. This leaves a single Majorana <span class="math inline">\(c_i\)</span> per site.</figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>The KH model is solvable on any lattice which satisfies two properties. First the lattice must first be trivalent, every vertex must have three edges attached to it <span class="citation" data-cites="kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006 Nussinov2009"> [<a href="#ref-kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006" role="doc-biblioref">39</a>,<a href="#ref-Nussinov2009" role="doc-biblioref">40</a>]</span>. A well studied class of amorphous trivalent lattices are the 2D Voronoi lattices <span class="citation" data-cites="mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018 florescu_designer_2009 marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpeModels2020"> [<a href="#ref-mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>,<a href="#ref-marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpeModels2020" role="doc-biblioref">12</a>,<a href="#ref-florescu_designer_2009" role="doc-biblioref">41</a>]</span>. These arise from Voronoi partitions of the plane. Given a set of seed points, the Voronoi partition divides the plane into basins, based on which seed point is closest by some metric, usually the euclidean metric. The basins of each seed point form the plaquettes of the resulting lattices, while the boundaries become the edges. The Voronoi partition exists in arbitrary dimension <span class="math inline">\(d\)</span> and produces lattices with degree <span class="math inline">\(d+1\)</span> except for degenerate cases with measure zero <span class="citation" data-cites="voronoiNouvellesApplicationsParamètres1908 watsonComputingNdimensionalDelaunay1981"> [<a href="#ref-voronoiNouvellesApplicationsParamètres1908" role="doc-biblioref">42</a>,<a href="#ref-watsonComputingNdimensionalDelaunay1981" role="doc-biblioref">43</a>]</span>. Hence Voronoi lattices in 2D lends themselves naturally to the Kitaev model.</p>
+<p>The KH model is solvable on any lattice which satisfies two properties: it must be trivalent and it must three-edge-colourable. The first property means every vertex must have three edges attached to it <span class="citation" data-cites="kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006 Nussinov2009"> [<a href="#ref-kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006" role="doc-biblioref">39</a>,<a href="#ref-Nussinov2009" role="doc-biblioref">40</a>]</span>. 2D Voronoi lattices are a well studied class of amorphous trivalent lattices <span class="citation" data-cites="mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018 florescu_designer_2009 marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpeModels2020"> [<a href="#ref-mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>,<a href="#ref-marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpeModels2020" role="doc-biblioref">12</a>,<a href="#ref-florescu_designer_2009" role="doc-biblioref">41</a>]</span>. Given a set of seed points, the Voronoi partition divides the plane into basins, based on which seed point is closest by some metric, usually the euclidean metric. The basins of each seed point form the plaquettes of the resulting lattices, while the boundaries become the edges. The Voronoi partition exists in arbitrary dimension <span class="math inline">\(d\)</span> and produces lattices with degree <span class="math inline">\(d+1\)</span> except for degenerate cases with measure zero <span class="citation" data-cites="voronoiNouvellesApplicationsParamètres1908 watsonComputingNdimensionalDelaunay1981"> [<a href="#ref-voronoiNouvellesApplicationsParamètres1908" role="doc-biblioref">42</a>,<a href="#ref-watsonComputingNdimensionalDelaunay1981" role="doc-biblioref">43</a>]</span>. Voronoi lattices in 2D are trivalent so lend themselves naturally to the Kitaev model.</p>
-<p>Other methods of lattice generation are possible. One can connect randomly placed sites based on proximity <span class="citation" data-cites="agarwala2019topological"> [<a href="#ref-agarwala2019topological" role="doc-biblioref">11</a>]</span> or create simplices from random sites <span class="citation" data-cites="christRandomLatticeField1982"> [<a href="#ref-christRandomLatticeField1982" role="doc-biblioref">44</a>]</span>. However these methods do not present a natural way to restrict the vertex degree to a constant. Perhaps ideally, we would sample uniformly from the space of possible trivalent graphs, there has been some work on how to do this using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach <span class="citation" data-cites="alyamiUniformSamplingDirected2016"> [<a href="#ref-alyamiUniformSamplingDirected2016" role="doc-biblioref">45</a>]</span>. However, it does not guarantee that the resulting graph is planar, which is necessary to be able to three-edge-colour the lattice, our second constraint.</p>
+<p>Other methods of lattice generation exist. One can connect randomly placed sites based on proximity <span class="citation" data-cites="agarwala2019topological"> [<a href="#ref-agarwala2019topological" role="doc-biblioref">11</a>]</span> or create simplices from random sites <span class="citation" data-cites="christRandomLatticeField1982"> [<a href="#ref-christRandomLatticeField1982" role="doc-biblioref">44</a>]</span>. However these methods do not present a natural way to restrict the vertex degree to a constant. The most unbiased way to select trivalent graphs would be to sample uniformly from the space of possible trivalent graphs. There has been some work on how to do this using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach <span class="citation" data-cites="alyamiUniformSamplingDirected2016"> [<a href="#ref-alyamiUniformSamplingDirected2016" role="doc-biblioref">45</a>]</span>. However, it does not guarantee that the resulting graph is planar, which is necessary to be able to three-edge-colour the lattice, our second constraint.</p>
-<p>The second constraint required for the Kitaev model to remain solvable is that we must be able to assign labels to each bond <span class="math inline">\(\{x,y,z\}\)</span> such that each no two edges with the same label meet at a vertex. Such an assignment is is known as a three-edge-colouring. For translation invariant models we need only find a solution for the unit cell. This problem is usually small enough that this can be done by hand or using symmetry. For amorphous lattices, the difficulty is that, to the best of my knowledge, the problem of edge-colouring these lattices in general is in NP. To find colourings in practice, we will employ a standard method from the computer science literature for finding solutions of NP problems called a SAT solver, this is discussed in more detail in the <a href="../4_Amorphous_Kitaev_Model/4.2_AMK_Methods.html#amk-methods">methods secton</a>.</p>
+<p>The second constraint, three-edge-colourability, requires that we must be able to assign labels to each bond <span class="math inline">\(\{x,y,z\}\)</span> such that no two edges with the same label meet at a vertex. Such an assignment is known as a three-edge-colouring. For translation invariant models we need only find a solution for the unit cell. This problem is usually small enough that this can be done by hand or using symmetry. For amorphous lattices, the difficulty is that, to the best of my knowledge, the problem of edge-colouring these lattices in general is in NP. To find colourings in practice, we will employ a standard method from the computer science literature for finding solutions of NP problems called a SAT solver, this is discussed in more detail in the <a href="../4_Amorphous_Kitaev_Model/4.2_AMK_Methods.html#amk-methods">methods secton</a>.</p>
 <p>We find that for large lattices there are many valid colourings. In the isotropic case <span class="math inline">\(J^\alpha = 1\)</span> the colouring has no physical significance as the definition of the four Majoranas at a site is arbitrary. In the anisotropic case this symmetry is broken at the local level but we nevertheless expect the lattices to exhibit a self averaging behaviour in larger systems such that the choice of colouring doesn’t matter.</p>
 <figure>
 <img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/intro/state_decomposition_animated/state_decomposition_animated.gif" id="fig-state_decomposition_animated" data-short-caption="State Decomposition" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 2: (Bond Sector) A state in the bond sector is specified by assigning \pm 1 to each edge of the lattice. However, this description has a substantial gauge degeneracy. To remove it, we decompose each state into the product of three kinds of objects: (Flux Sector) The main physically relevant quantities. Only a small number of bonds need to be flipped (compared to some arbitrary fixed reference) to reconstruct the flux sector. Here, the edges are chosen from a spanning tree of the dual lattice, so there are no loops. (Gauge Field) The ‘loopiness’ of the bond sector is in this part. This is a network of loops that can always be written as a product of the gauge operators D_j. (Topological Sector) Finally, there are two loops that have no effect on the vortex sector, nor can they be constructed from gauge symmetries D_j. These can be thought of as two fluxes \Phi_{x/y} that thread through the major and minor axes of the torus. Measuring \Phi_{x/y} amounts to constructing Wilson loops around the axes of the torus. We can flip the value of \Phi_{x} by transporting a vortex pair around the torus in the y direction, as shown here. In each of the three figures on the right, black bonds correspond to those that must be flipped, while red line are those same edges on the dual lattice. Composing the three objects together gives back the original bond sector on the left." />
 <figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 2: (Bond Sector) A state in the bond sector is specified by assigning <span class="math inline">\(\pm 1\)</span> to each edge of the lattice. However, this description has a substantial gauge degeneracy. To remove it, we decompose each state into the product of three kinds of objects: (Flux Sector) The main physically relevant quantities. Only a small number of bonds need to be flipped (compared to some arbitrary fixed reference) to reconstruct the flux sector. Here, the edges are chosen from a spanning tree of the dual lattice, so there are no loops. (Gauge Field) The ‘loopiness’ of the bond sector is in this part. This is a network of loops that can always be written as a product of the gauge operators <span class="math inline">\(D_j\)</span>. (Topological Sector) Finally, there are two loops that have no effect on the vortex sector, nor can they be constructed from gauge symmetries <span class="math inline">\(D_j\)</span>. These can be thought of as two fluxes <span class="math inline">\(\Phi_{x/y}\)</span> that thread through the major and minor axes of the torus. Measuring <span class="math inline">\(\Phi_{x/y}\)</span> amounts to constructing Wilson loops around the axes of the torus. We can flip the value of <span class="math inline">\(\Phi_{x}\)</span> by transporting a vortex pair around the torus in the <span class="math inline">\(y\)</span> direction, as shown here. In each of the three figures on the right, black bonds correspond to those that must be flipped, while red line are those same edges on the dual lattice. Composing the three objects together gives back the original bond sector on the left.</figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>On a lattice with the above properties, the solution for the KH model in <a href="../2_Background/2.2_HKM_Model.html#bg-hkm-model">section 2.2</a> remains applicable to our AK model. See fig. <a href="#fig:amk-zoom">1</a> for an example lattice generated by our method. The main differences are twofold. Firstly, the lattices are no longer bipartite in general and therefore contain plaquettes with an odd number of sides which have flux <span class="math inline">\(\pm i\)</span>. This leads the AK model to have a ground state with spontaneously broken chiral symmetry <span class="citation" data-cites="Chua2011 yaoExactChiralSpin2007 ChuaPRB2011 Fiete2012 Natori2016 Wu2009 Peri2020 WangHaoranPRB2021"> [<a href="#ref-Peri2020" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>,<a href="#ref-Chua2011" role="doc-biblioref">46</a>–<a href="#ref-WangHaoranPRB2021" role="doc-biblioref">52</a>]</span>. This is similar to the behaviour of the original Kitaev model in response to a magnetic field. One ground state is related to the other by globally inverting the imaginary <span class="math inline">\(\phi_i\)</span> fluxes <span class="citation" data-cites="yaoExactChiralSpin2007"> [<a href="#ref-yaoExactChiralSpin2007" role="doc-biblioref">47</a>]</span>. Secondly, as the model is no longer translationally invariant, Lieb’s theorem for the ground state flux sector no longer applies. However as discussed in the background, a simple generalisation of Lieb’s theorem has been shown numerically to be applicable to many generalised Kitaev models <span class="citation" data-cites="eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020 Yao2009 eschmann2019thermodynamics Peri2020"> [<a href="#ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>–<a href="#ref-Peri2020" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>]</span>. This generalisation states that the ground state flux configuration depends on on the number of sides of each plaquette as</p>
+<p>On a lattice with the above properties, the solution for the KH model laid out in <a href="../2_Background/2.2_HKM_Model.html#bg-hkm-model">section 2.2</a> remains applicable to our AK model. See fig. <a href="#fig:amk-zoom">1</a> for an example lattice generated by our method. The main differences are twofold. Firstly, the lattices are no longer bipartite in general and therefore contain plaquettes with an odd number of sides which enclose flux <span class="math inline">\(\pm i\)</span>. This leads the AK model to have a ground state with spontaneously broken chiral symmetry <span class="citation" data-cites="Chua2011 yaoExactChiralSpin2007 ChuaPRB2011 Fiete2012 Natori2016 Wu2009 Peri2020 WangHaoranPRB2021"> [<a href="#ref-Peri2020" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>,<a href="#ref-Chua2011" role="doc-biblioref">46</a>–<a href="#ref-WangHaoranPRB2021" role="doc-biblioref">52</a>]</span>. This is analogous to the behaviour of the original Kitaev model in response to a magnetic field. One ground state is related to the other by globally inverting the imaginary <span class="math inline">\(\phi_i\)</span> fluxes <span class="citation" data-cites="yaoExactChiralSpin2007"> [<a href="#ref-yaoExactChiralSpin2007" role="doc-biblioref">47</a>]</span>. Secondly, as the model is no longer translationally invariant, Lieb’s theorem for the ground state flux sector no longer applies. However as discussed in the background, a simple generalisation of Lieb’s theorem has been shown numerically to be applicable to many generalised Kitaev models <span class="citation" data-cites="eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020 Yao2009 eschmann2019thermodynamics Peri2020"> [<a href="#ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>–<a href="#ref-Peri2020" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>]</span>. This generalisation states that the ground state flux configuration depends on the number of sides of each plaquette as</p>
 <p><span id="eq:gs-flux-sector"><span class="math display">\[\phi = -(\pm i)^{n_{\mathrm{sides}}}\qquad{(1)}\]</span></span></p>
 <p>with a twofold global chiral degeneracy (picking either <span class="math inline">\(+i\)</span> or <span class="math inline">\(-i\)</span> in eq. <a href="#eq:gs-flux-sector">1</a>).</p>
-<p>To verify that this generalises to the AK model numerically, the obvious approach would be via exhaustive checking of flux configurations. However this is problematic because the number of states to check scales exponentially with system size. We side-step this by gluing together two methods, we first work with lattices small enough that we can fully enumerate their flux sectors but tile them to reduce finite size effects. We then show that the effect of tiling scales away with system size.</p>
+<p>To verify numerically that Lieb’s theorem generalises to the AK model, the obvious approach would be via exhaustive checking of flux configurations. However, this is problematic because the number of states to check scales exponentially with system size. We side-step this by gluing together two methods, we first work with lattices small enough that we can fully enumerate their flux sectors but tile them to reduce finite size effects. We then show that the effect of tiling scales away with system size.</p>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/majorana_bound_states/majorana_bound_states.svg" id="fig-majorana_bound_states" data-short-caption="Majorana Bound States" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 3: (Left) A large amorphous lattice in the ground state save for a single pair of vortices shown in red, separated by the string of bonds that we flipped to create them. (Right) The density of the lowest energy Majorana state in this vortex sector. These Majorana states are bound to the vortices. They ‘dress’ the vortices to create a composite object." />
+<img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/intro/majorana_bound_states_animated/majorana_bound_states_animated.svg" id="fig-majorana_bound_states_animated" data-short-caption="Majorana Bound States" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 3: (Left) A large amorphous lattice in the ground state save for a single pair of vortices shown in red, separated by the string of bonds that we flipped to create them. (Right) The density of the lowest energy Majorana state in this vortex sector. These Majorana states are bound to the vortices. They ‘dress’ the vortices to create a composite object." />
 <figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 3: (Left) A large amorphous lattice in the ground state save for a single pair of vortices shown in red, separated by the string of bonds that we flipped to create them. (Right) The density of the lowest energy Majorana state in this vortex sector. These Majorana states are bound to the vortices. They ‘dress’ the vortices to create a composite object.</figcaption>
 </figure>
 <p>In order to evaluate the Chern marker later, we need a way to evaluate the model on open boundary conditions. Simply removing bonds from the lattice leaves behind unpaired <span class="math inline">\(b^\alpha\)</span> operators that must be paired in some way to arrive at fermionic modes. To fix a pairing, we always start from a lattice defined on the torus and generate a lattice with open boundary conditions by defining the bond coupling <span class="math inline">\(J^{\alpha}_{ij} = 0\)</span> for sites joined by bonds <span class="math inline">\((i,j)\)</span> that we want to remove. This creates fermionic zero modes <span class="math inline">\(u_{ij}\)</span> associated with these cut bonds which we set to 1 when calculating the projector. Alternatively, since all the fermionic zero modes are degenerate anyway, an arbitrary pairing of the unpaired <span class="math inline">\(b^\alpha\)</span> operators can be performed.</p>
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ The same as @fig:flood_fill but for the amorphous lattice.
 <p>For the case of the torus where <span class="math inline">\(g = 1\)</span>, we can rearrange this and exponentiate it to read:</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[2^B = 2^{P-1}\cdot 2^{V-1} \cdot 2^2\]</span></p>
 <p>There are <span class="math inline">\(2^B\)</span> configurations of the bond variables <span class="math inline">\(\{u_{ij}\}\)</span>. Each of these configurations can be uniquely decomposed into a flux sector, a gauge sector and a topological sector, see fig. <a href="#fig:state_decomposition_animated">2</a>. Each of the <span class="math inline">\(P\)</span> plaquette operators <span class="math inline">\(\phi_i\)</span> takes two values but vortices are created in pairs so there are <span class="math inline">\(2^{P-1}\)</span> vortex sectors in total. There are <span class="math inline">\(2^{V-1}\)</span> gauge symmetries formed from the <span class="math inline">\(V\)</span> symmetry operators <span class="math inline">\(D_i\)</span> because <span class="math inline">\(\prod_{j} D_j = \mathbb{I}\)</span> is enforced by the projector. Finally, the two topological fluxes <span class="math inline">\(\Phi_x\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(\Phi_y\)</span> account for the last factor of <span class="math inline">\(2^2\)</span>.</p>
-<p>In addition, the fact that we only work with trivalent lattices implies that each vertex shares three bonds with other vertices so effectively comes with <span class="math inline">\(3/2\)</span> bonds. This is consistent with the fact that, in the Majorana representation on the torus, each vertex brings three <span class="math inline">\(b^\alpha\)</span> operators which then pair along bonds to give <span class="math inline">\(3/2\)</span> bonds per vertex. Substituting <span class="math inline">\(3V = 2B\)</span> into Euler’s equation tells us that any trivalent lattice on the torus with <span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> plaquettes has <span class="math inline">\(2N\)</span> vertices and <span class="math inline">\(3N\)</span> bonds. Since each bond is part of two plaquettes this implies that the mean number of sides of a plaquette is exactly six and that odd sides plaquettes must come in pairs.</p>
+<p>In a trivalent lattice, there are three bonds for every 2 vertices. Substituting <span class="math inline">\(3V = 2B\)</span> into Euler’s equation tells us that any trivalent lattice on the torus with <span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> plaquettes has <span class="math inline">\(2N\)</span> vertices and <span class="math inline">\(3N\)</span> bonds. Since each bond is part of two plaquettes this implies that the mean number of sides of a plaquette is exactly six and that odd sides plaquettes must come in pairs.</p>
 <p>Next Section: <a href="../4_Amorphous_Kitaev_Model/4.2_AMK_Methods.html">Methods</a></p>
 </section>
 </section>
@@ -163,13 +163,13 @@ The same as @fig:flood_fill but for the amorphous lattice.
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[5] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">H. Yao, S.-C. Zhang, and S. A. Kivelson, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.217202">Algebraic Spin Liquid in an Exactly Solvable Spin Model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>102</strong>, 217202 (2009).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-eschmann2019thermodynamics" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[6] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Eschmann, P. A. Mishchenko, T. A. Bojesen, Y. Kato, M. Hermanns, Y. Motome, and S. Trebst, <em>Thermodynamics of a Gauge-Frustrated Kitaev Spin Liquid</em>, Physical Review Research <strong>1</strong>, 032011(R) (2019).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[6] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Eschmann, P. A. Mishchenko, T. A. Bojesen, Y. Kato, M. Hermanns, Y. Motome, and S. Trebst, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.032011">Thermodynamics of a Gauge-Frustrated Kitaev Spin Liquid</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Research <strong>1</strong>, 032011 (2019).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Peri2020" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[7] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">V. Peri, S. Ok, S. S. Tsirkin, T. Neupert, G. Baskaran, M. Greiter, R. Moessner, and R. Thomale, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.041114">Non-Abelian Chiral Spin Liquid on a Simple Non-Archimedean Lattice</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>101</strong>, 041114 (2020).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Yonezawa1983" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[8] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">F. Yonezawa and T. Ninomiya, editors, <em>Topological Disorder in Condensed Matter</em>, Vol. 46 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1983).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[8] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">F. Yonezawa and T. Ninomiya, editors, <em><a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-82104-2">Topological Disorder in Condensed Matter</a></em>, Vol. 46 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1983).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-zallen2008physics" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[9] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">R. Zallen, <em>The Physics of Amorphous Solids</em> (John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2008).</div>
@@ -178,52 +178,52 @@ The same as @fig:flood_fill but for the amorphous lattice.
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[10] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">N. P. Mitchell, L. M. Nash, D. Hexner, A. M. Turner, and W. T. M. Irvine, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-017-0024-5">Amorphous topological insulators constructed from random point sets</a></em>, Nature Phys <strong>14</strong>, 380 (2018).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-agarwala2019topological" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[11] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Agarwala, <em>Topological Insulators in Amorphous Systems</em>, in <em>Excursions in Ill-Condensed Quantum Matter</em> (Springer, 2019), pp. 61–79.</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[11] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Agarwala, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21511-8_3">Topological Insulators in Amorphous Systems</a></em>, in <em>Excursions in Ill-Condensed Quantum Matter: From Amorphous Topological Insulators to Fractional Spins</em>, edited by A. Agarwala (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019), pp. 61–79.</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpeModels2020" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[12] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">Q. Marsal, D. Varjas, and A. G. Grushin, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2007384117">Topological Weaire-Thorpe Models of Amorphous Matter</a></em>, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. <strong>117</strong>, 30260 (2020).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-costa2019toward" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[13] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. Costa, G. R. Schleder, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, C. Lewenkopf, and A. Fazzio, <em>Toward Realistic Amorphous Topological Insulators</em>, Nano Letters <strong>19</strong>, 8941 (2019).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[13] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. Costa, G. R. Schleder, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, C. Lewenkopf, and A. Fazzio, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03881">Toward Realistic Amorphous Topological Insulators</a></em>, Nano Lett. <strong>19</strong>, 8941 (2019).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-agarwala2020higher" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[14] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Agarwala, V. Juričić, and B. Roy, <em>Higher-Order Topological Insulators in Amorphous Solids</em>, Physical Review Research <strong>2</strong>, 012067 (2020).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[14] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Agarwala, V. Juričić, and B. Roy, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.012067">Higher-Order Topological Insulators in Amorphous Solids</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Research <strong>2</strong>, 012067 (2020).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-spring2021amorphous" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[15] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">H. Spring, A. Akhmerov, and D. Varjas, <em>Amorphous Topological Phases Protected by Continuous Rotation Symmetry</em>, SciPost Physics <strong>11</strong>, 022 (2021).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[15] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">H. Spring, A. Akhmerov, and D. Varjas, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.11.2.022">Amorphous Topological Phases Protected by Continuous Rotation Symmetry</a></em>, SciPost Physics <strong>11</strong>, 022 (2021).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-corbae2019evidence" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[16] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. Corbae et al., <em>Evidence for Topological Surface States in Amorphous Bi _ {2} Se _ {3}</em>, arXiv Preprint arXiv:1910.13412 (2019).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[16] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. Corbae et al., <em>Evidence for Topological Surface States in Amorphous Bi₂Se₃</em>, arXiv Preprint arXiv:1910.13412 (2019).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-buckel1954einfluss" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[17] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">W. Buckel and R. Hilsch, <em>Einfluß Der Kondensation Bei Tiefen Temperaturen Auf Den Elektrischen Widerstand Und Die Supraleitung Für Verschiedene Metalle</em>, Zeitschrift Für Physik <strong>138</strong>, 109 (1954).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[17] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">W. Buckel and R. Hilsch, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01337903">Einfluß der Kondensation bei tiefen Temperaturen auf den elektrischen Widerstand und die Supraleitung für verschiedene Metalle</a></em>, Z. Physik <strong>138</strong>, 109 (1954).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-mcmillan1981electron" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[18] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">W. McMillan and J. Mochel, <em>Electron Tunneling Experiments on Amorphous Ge 1- x Au x</em>, Physical Review Letters <strong>46</strong>, 556 (1981).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[18] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">W. McMillan and J. Mochel, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.46.556">Electron Tunneling Experiments on Amorphous Ge_{1- x} Au_x</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>46</strong>, 556 (1981).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-meisel1981eliashberg" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[19] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">L. V. Meisel and P. J. Cote, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.23.5834">Eliashberg Function in Amorphous Metals</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>23</strong>, 5834 (1981).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-bergmann1976amorphous" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[20] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">G. Bergmann, <em>Amorphous Metals and Their Superconductivity</em>, Physics Reports <strong>27</strong>, 159 (1976).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[20] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">G. Bergmann, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(76)90040-5">Amorphous Metals and Their Superconductivity</a></em>, Physics Reports <strong>27</strong>, 159 (1976).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-mannaNoncrystallineTopologicalSuperconductors2022" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[21] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. Manna, S. K. Das, and B. Roy, <em><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.02203">Noncrystalline Topological Superconductors</a></em>, arXiv:2207.02203.</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[21] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. Manna, S. K. Das, and B. Roy, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.02203">Noncrystalline Topological Superconductors</a></em>, arXiv:2207.02203.</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-kim2022fractionalization" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[22] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. Kim, A. Agarwala, and D. Chowdhury, <em>Fractionalization and Topology in Amorphous Electronic Solids</em>, arXiv Preprint arXiv:2205.11523 (2022).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-aharony1975critical" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[23] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Aharony, <em>Critical Behavior of Amorphous Magnets</em>, Physical Review B <strong>12</strong>, 1038 (1975).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[23] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Aharony, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.12.1038">Critical Behavior of Amorphous Magnets</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>12</strong>, 1038 (1975).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Petrakovski1981" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[24] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">G. A. Petrakovskii, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1070/pu1981v024n06abeh004850">Amorphous Magnetic Materials</a></em>, Soviet Physics Uspekhi <strong>24</strong>, 511 (1981).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-kaneyoshi1992introduction" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[25] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Kaneyoshi, <em>Introduction to Amorphous Magnets</em> (World Scientific Publishing Company, 1992).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[25] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Kaneyoshi, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/1710">Introduction to Amorphous Magnets</a></em> (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 1992).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Kaneyoshi2018" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[26] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Kaneyoshi, editor, <em>Amorphous Magnetism</em> (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2018).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[26] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Kaneyoshi, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351069618">Amorphous Magnetism</a></em> (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2017).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-barghathiPhaseTransitionsRandom2014" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[27] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">H. Barghathi and T. Vojta, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.120602">Phase Transitions on Random Lattices: How Random Is Topological Disorder?</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>113</strong>, 120602 (2014).</div>
@@ -232,16 +232,16 @@ The same as @fig:flood_fill but for the amorphous lattice.
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[28] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. Schrauth, J. Portela, and F. Goth, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.100601">Violation of the Harris-Barghathi-Vojta Criterion</a></em>, Physical Review Letters <strong>121</strong>, (2018).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-coey1978amorphous" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[29] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Coey, <em>Amorphous Magnetic Order</em>, Journal of Applied Physics <strong>49</strong>, 1646 (1978).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[29] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. M. D. Coey, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.324880">Amorphous Magnetic Order</a></em>, Journal of Applied Physics <strong>49</strong>, 1646 (1978).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Anderson1973" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[30] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. W. Anderson, <em>Resonating Valence Bonds: A New Kind of Insulator?</em>, Mater. Res. Bull. <strong>8</strong>, 153 (1973).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[30] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. W. Anderson, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5408(73)90167-0">Resonating Valence Bonds: A New Kind of Insulator?</a></em>, Materials Research Bulletin <strong>8</strong>, 153 (1973).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Knolle2019" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[31] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Knolle and R. Moessner, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013401">A Field Guide to Spin Liquids</a></em>, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics <strong>10</strong>, 451 (2019).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Savary2016" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[32] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">L. Savary and L. Balents, <em>Quantum Spin Liquids: A Review</em>, Reports on Progress in Physics <strong>80</strong>, 016502 (2017).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[32] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">L. Savary and L. Balents, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/80/1/016502">Quantum Spin Liquids: A Review</a></em>, Rep. Prog. Phys. <strong>80</strong>, 016502 (2016).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Lacroix2011" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[33] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Lacroix, P. Mendels, and F. Mila, editors, <em>Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism</em>, Vol. 164 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2011).</div>
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ The same as @fig:flood_fill but for the amorphous lattice.
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[34] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">E. H. Lieb, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.2158">Flux Phase of the Half-Filled Band</a></em>, Physical Review Letters <strong>73</strong>, 2158 (1994).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-peru_preprint" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[35] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. d’Ornellas, R. Barnett, and D. K. K. Lee, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2207.01389">Quantised Bulk Conductivity as a Local Chern Marker</a></em>, arXiv Preprint (2022).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[35] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. d’Ornellas, R. Barnett, and D. K. K. Lee, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.155124">Quantized Bulk Conductivity as a Local Chern Marker</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>106</strong>, 155124 (2022).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Laumann2012" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[36] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. R. Laumann, A. W. W. Ludwig, D. A. Huse, and S. Trebst, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.161301">Disorder-Induced Majorana Metal in Interacting Non-Abelian Anyon Systems</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>85</strong>, 161301 (2012).</div>

_thesis/4_Amorphous_Kitaev_Model/4.2_AMK_Methods.html

@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ image:
 <img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/lattice_construction_animated/lattice_construction_animated.gif" id="fig-lattice_construction_animated" data-short-caption="Lattice Construction" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 1: (Left) Lattice construction begins with the Voronoi partition of the plane with respect to a set of seed points (black points) sampled uniformly from \mathbb{R}^2. (Center) However, we want the Voronoi partition of the torus, so we tile the seed points into a three by three grid. The boundaries of each tile are shown in light grey. (Right) Finally, we identify edges corresponding to each other across the boundaries to produce a graph on the torus." />
 <figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1: (Left) Lattice construction begins with the Voronoi partition of the plane with respect to a set of seed points (black points) sampled uniformly from <span class="math inline">\(\mathbb{R}^2\)</span>. (Center) However, we want the Voronoi partition of the torus, so we tile the seed points into a three by three grid. The boundaries of each tile are shown in light grey. (Right) Finally, we identify edges corresponding to each other across the boundaries to produce a graph on the torus.</figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>The lattices we use are Voronoi partitions of the torus <span class="citation" data-cites="mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018 marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpeModels2020 florescu_designer_2009"> [<a href="#ref-mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018" role="doc-biblioref">2</a>–<a href="#ref-florescu_designer_2009" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>]</span>. We start by sampling <em>seed points</em> uniformly on the torus. As most off the shelf routines for computing Voronoi partitions are defined on the plane rather than the torus, we tile our seed points into a <span class="math inline">\(3\times3\)</span> pr <span class="math inline">\(5\times5\)</span> grid before calling a standard Voronoi routine <span class="citation" data-cites="barberQuickhullAlgorithmConvex1996"> [<a href="#ref-barberQuickhullAlgorithmConvex1996" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>]</span> from the python package Scipy <span class="citation" data-cites="virtanenSciPyFundamentalAlgorithms2020"> [<a href="#ref-virtanenSciPyFundamentalAlgorithms2020" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>. Finally, we undo the tiling to the grid by identifying edges in the tiled lattice which are identical, yielding a trivalent lattice on the torus. We encode our lattices with edge lists <span class="math inline">\([(i,j), (k,l)\ldots]\)</span> and an additional 2D vector <span class="math inline">\(\vec{v} \in \{-1,0,+1\}^2\)</span> for each edge that encodes the sense in which it crosses the periodic boundary conditions. This is equivalent to how the edge would leave the unit cell were the system to tile the plane, see <a href="../6_Appendices/A.3_Lattice_Generation.html#app-lattice-generation">appendix A.3</a> for more detail. The graph generated by a Voronoi partition of a 2D surface is always planar. This means that no edges cross each other when the graph is embedded into the plane. It is also trivalent in that every vertex is connected to exactly three edges <span class="citation" data-cites="voronoiNouvellesApplicationsParamètres1908 watsonComputingNdimensionalDelaunay1981"> [<a href="#ref-voronoiNouvellesApplicationsParamètres1908" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>,<a href="#ref-watsonComputingNdimensionalDelaunay1981" role="doc-biblioref">8</a>]</span>.</p>
+<p>The lattices we use are Voronoi partitions of the torus <span class="citation" data-cites="mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018 marsalTopologicalWeaireThorpeModels2020 florescu_designer_2009"> [<a href="#ref-mitchellAmorphousTopologicalInsulators2018" role="doc-biblioref">2</a>–<a href="#ref-florescu_designer_2009" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>]</span>. We start by sampling <em>seed points</em> uniformly on the torus. As most off the shelf routines for computing Voronoi partitions are defined on the plane rather than the torus, we tile our seed points into a <span class="math inline">\(3\times3\)</span> or <span class="math inline">\(5\times5\)</span> grid] <a href="#fn1" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref1" role="doc-noteref"><sup>1</sup></a> before calling a standard Voronoi routine <span class="citation" data-cites="barberQuickhullAlgorithmConvex1996"> [<a href="#ref-barberQuickhullAlgorithmConvex1996" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>]</span> from the Python package Scipy <span class="citation" data-cites="virtanenSciPyFundamentalAlgorithms2020"> [<a href="#ref-virtanenSciPyFundamentalAlgorithms2020" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>. Finally, we convert the lattice defined by the central cell into a toroidal lattice. We do this by reassigning edges that cross the boundaries to connect to the corresponding point within the lattice, yielding a trivalent lattice on the torus. We encode our lattices with edge lists <span class="math inline">\([(i,j), (k,l)\ldots]\)</span>. The information about which edges crossed the boundaries is stored in an additional 2D vector <span class="math inline">\(\vec{v} \in \{-1,0,+1\}^2\)</span> for each edge that encodes the sense in which it crosses the periodic boundary conditions. This is equivalent to how the edge would leave the unit cell were the system to tile the plane, see <a href="../6_Appendices/A.3_Lattice_Generation.html#app-lattice-generation">appendix A.4</a> for more detail. The graph generated by a Voronoi partition of a 2D surface is always planar. This means that no edges cross each other when the graph is embedded into the plane. It is also trivalent in that every vertex is connected to exactly three edges <span class="citation" data-cites="voronoiNouvellesApplicationsParamètres1908 watsonComputingNdimensionalDelaunay1981"> [<a href="#ref-voronoiNouvellesApplicationsParamètres1908" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>,<a href="#ref-watsonComputingNdimensionalDelaunay1981" role="doc-biblioref">8</a>]</span>.</p>
 </section>
 <section id="colouring-the-bonds" class="level2">
 <h2>Colouring the Bonds</h2>
@@ -93,9 +93,9 @@ image:
 </figure>
 <p>To be solvable, the AK model requires that each edge in the lattice be assigned a label <span class="math inline">\(x\)</span>, <span class="math inline">\(y\)</span> or <span class="math inline">\(z\)</span>, such that each vertex has exactly one edge of each type connected to it, a three-edge-colouring. This problem must be distinguished from that considered by the famous four-colour theorem <span class="citation" data-cites="appelEveryPlanarMap1989"> [<a href="#ref-appelEveryPlanarMap1989" role="doc-biblioref">9</a>]</span>. The four-colour theorem is concerned with assigning colours to the <strong>vertices</strong> of planar graphs, such that no vertices that share an edge have the same colour.</p>
 <p>For a graph of maximum degree <span class="math inline">\(\Delta\)</span>, <span class="math inline">\(\Delta + 1\)</span> colours are always enough to edge-colour it. An <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{O}(mn)\)</span> algorithm exists to do this for a graph with <span class="math inline">\(m\)</span> edges and <span class="math inline">\(n\)</span> vertices <span class="citation" data-cites="gEstimateChromaticClass1964"> [<a href="#ref-gEstimateChromaticClass1964" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>]</span>. Graphs with <span class="math inline">\(\Delta = 3\)</span> are known as cubic graphs. Cubic graphs can be four-edge-coloured in linear time <span class="citation" data-cites="skulrattanakulchai4edgecoloringGraphsMaximum2002"> [<a href="#ref-skulrattanakulchai4edgecoloringGraphsMaximum2002" role="doc-biblioref">11</a>]</span>. However we need a three-edge-colouring of our cubic graphs, which turns out to be more difficult. Cubic, planar, <em>bridgeless</em> graphs can be three-edge-coloured if and only if they can be four-face-coloured <span class="citation" data-cites="tait1880remarks"> [<a href="#ref-tait1880remarks" role="doc-biblioref">12</a>]</span>. Bridges are edges that connect otherwise disconnected components. An <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{O}(n^2)\)</span> algorithm exists for these <span class="citation" data-cites="robertson1996efficiently"> [<a href="#ref-robertson1996efficiently" role="doc-biblioref">13</a>]</span>. However, it is not clear whether this extends to cubic, <strong>toroidal</strong> bridgeless graphs.</p>
-<p>A four-face-colouring is equivalent to a four-vertex-colouring of the dual graph, see <a href="../6_Appendices/A.3_Lattice_Generation.html#app-lattice-generation">appendix A.3</a>. So if we could find a four-vertex-colouring of the dual graph we would be done. However vertex-colouring a toroidal graph may require up to seven colours <span class="citation" data-cites="heawoodMapColouringTheorems"> [<a href="#ref-heawoodMapColouringTheorems" role="doc-biblioref">14</a>]</span>! The complete graph of seven vertices <span class="math inline">\(K_7\)</span> is a good example of a toroidal graph that requires seven colours.</p>
+<p>A four-face-colouring is equivalent to a four-vertex-colouring of the dual graph, see <a href="../6_Appendices/A.3_Lattice_Generation.html#app-lattice-generation">appendix A.4</a>. So if we could find a four-vertex-colouring of the dual graph we would be done. However vertex-colouring a toroidal graph may require up to seven colours <span class="citation" data-cites="heawoodMapColouringTheorems"> [<a href="#ref-heawoodMapColouringTheorems" role="doc-biblioref">14</a>]</span>! The complete graph of seven vertices <span class="math inline">\(K_7\)</span> is a good example of a toroidal graph that requires seven colours.</p>
-<p>Luckily, some problems are easier in practice. Three-edge-colouring cubic toroidal graphs appears to be one of those things. To find colourings, we use a Boolean Satisfiability Solver or SAT solver. A SAT problem is a set of statements about a set of boolean variables <span class="math inline">\([x_1, x_2\ldots]\)</span>, such as “<span class="math inline">\(x_1\)</span> or not <span class="math inline">\(x_3\)</span> is true”. A solution to a SAT problem is a assignment <span class="math inline">\(x_i \in {0,1}\)</span> that satisfies all the statements <span class="citation" data-cites="Karp1972"> [<a href="#ref-Karp1972" role="doc-biblioref">15</a>]</span>. General purpose, high performance programs for solving SAT problems have been an area of active research for decades <span class="citation" data-cites="alounehComprehensiveStudyAnalysis2019"> [<a href="#ref-alounehComprehensiveStudyAnalysis2019" role="doc-biblioref">16</a>]</span>. Such programs are useful because, by the Cook-Levin theorem <span class="citation" data-cites="cookComplexityTheoremprovingProcedures1971 levin1973universal"> [<a href="#ref-cookComplexityTheoremprovingProcedures1971" role="doc-biblioref">17</a>,<a href="#ref-levin1973universal" role="doc-biblioref">18</a>]</span>, any NP problem can be encoded (in polynomial time) as an instance of a SAT problem. This property is what makes SAT one of the subset of NP problems called NP-Complete. It is a relatively standard technique in the computer science community to solve NP problems by first transforming them to SAT instances and then using an off-the-shelf SAT solver. The output of this can then be mapped back to the original problem domain.</p>
+<p>Luckily, some problems are easier in practice. Three-edge-colouring cubic toroidal graphs is one of those things. To find colourings, we use a Boolean Satisfiability Solver or SAT solver. A SAT problem is a set of statements about a set of boolean variables <span class="math inline">\([x_1, x_2\ldots]\)</span>, such as “<span class="math inline">\(x_1\)</span> or not <span class="math inline">\(x_3\)</span> is true”. A solution to a SAT problem is an assignment <span class="math inline">\(x_i \in {0,1}\)</span> that satisfies all the statements <span class="citation" data-cites="Karp1972"> [<a href="#ref-Karp1972" role="doc-biblioref">15</a>]</span>. General purpose, high performance programs for solving SAT problems have been an area of active research for decades <span class="citation" data-cites="alounehComprehensiveStudyAnalysis2019"> [<a href="#ref-alounehComprehensiveStudyAnalysis2019" role="doc-biblioref">16</a>]</span>. Such programs are useful because, by the Cook-Levin theorem <span class="citation" data-cites="cookComplexityTheoremprovingProcedures1971 levin1973universal"> [<a href="#ref-cookComplexityTheoremprovingProcedures1971" role="doc-biblioref">17</a>,<a href="#ref-levin1973universal" role="doc-biblioref">18</a>]</span>, any NP problem can be encoded (in polynomial time) as an instance of a SAT problem. This property is what makes SAT one of the subset of NP problems called NP-Complete. It is a relatively standard technique in the computer science community to solve NP problems by first transforming them to SAT instances and then using an off-the-shelf SAT solver. The output of this can then be mapped back to the original problem domain.</p>
-<p>Whether graph colouring problems are in NP or P seems to depend delicately on the class of graphs considered, the maximum degree and the number of colours used. It is therefore possible that a polynomial time algorithm may exist for our problem. However using a SAT solver turns out to be fast enough in practice that it is by no means the rate limiting step for generating and solving instances of the AK model. In <a href="../6_Appendices/A.3_Lattice_Generation.html#app-lattice-generation">appendix A.3</a> I detail the specifics of how I mapped edge-colouring problems to SAT instances and show a breakdown of where the computational effort is spent, the majority being on diagonalisation.</p>
+<p>Whether graph colouring problems are in NP or P seems to depend delicately on the class of graphs considered, the maximum degree and the number of colours used. It is therefore possible that a polynomial time algorithm may exist for our problem. However using a SAT solver turns out to be fast enough in practice that it is by no means the rate limiting step for generating and solving instances of the AK model. In <a href="../6_Appendices/A.3_Lattice_Generation.html#app-lattice-generation">appendix A.4</a> I detail the specifics of how I mapped edge-colouring problems to SAT instances and show a breakdown of where the computational effort is spent, the majority being on matrix diagonalisation.</p>
 </section>
 <section id="mapping-between-flux-sectors-and-bond-sectors" class="level2">
 <h2>Mapping between flux sectors and bond sectors</h2>
@@ -105,12 +105,12 @@ image:
 </figure>
 <p>In the AK model, going from the bond sector to flux sector is done simply from the definition of the fluxes</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[ \phi_i = \prod_{(j,k) \; \in \; \partial \phi_i} i u_{jk}.\]</span></p>
-<p>The reverse, constructing a bond sector <span class="math inline">\(\{u_{jk}\}\)</span> that corresponds to a particular flux sector <span class="math inline">\(\{\{\Phi_i\}\)</span> is not so trivial. The algorithm I used, shown visually in fig. <a href="#fig:flux_finding">3</a> is this:</p>
+<p>The reverse, constructing a bond sector <span class="math inline">\(\{u_{jk}\}\)</span> that corresponds to a particular flux sector <span class="math inline">\(\{\Phi_i\}\)</span> is not so trivial. The algorithm I used, shown visually in fig. <a href="#fig:flux_finding">3</a> is this:</p>
 <ol type="1">
 <li><p>Fix the gauge by choosing some arbitrary <span class="math inline">\(u_{jk}\)</span> configuration. In practice, we use <span class="math inline">\(u_{jk} = +1\)</span>. This chooses an arbitrary one of the four topological sectors.</p></li>
-<li><p>Compute the current flux configuration and how it differs from the target one. Consider any plaquette that differs from the target as a defect.</p></li>
+<li><p>Compute the current flux configuration and how it differs from the target. Consider any plaquette that differs from the target as a defect.</p></li>
 <li><p>Find any adjacent pairs of defects and flip the <span class="math inline">\(u_{jk}\)</span> between them. This leaves a set of isolated defects.</p></li>
-<li><p>Pair the defects up using a greedy algorithm and compute paths along the dual lattice between each pair of plaquettes using A*. Flipping the corresponding set of bonds transports one flux to the other and annihilates both.</p></li>
+<li><p>Pair the defects up using a greedy algorithm and compute paths along the dual lattice between each pair of plaquettes using the A* pathfinding algorithm <span class="citation" data-cites="hartFormalBasisHeuristic1968"> [<a href="#ref-hartFormalBasisHeuristic1968" role="doc-biblioref">19</a>]</span>. Flipping the corresponding set of bonds transports one flux to the other and annihilates both.</p></li>
 </ol>
 <p>Next Section: <a href="../4_Amorphous_Kitaev_Model/4.3_AMK_Results.html">Results</a></p>
 </section>
@@ -172,7 +172,16 @@ image:
 <div id="ref-levin1973universal" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[18] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">L. A. Levin, <em>Universal Sequential Search Problems</em>, Problemy Peredachi Informatsii <strong>9</strong>, 115 (1973).</div>
 </div>
+<div id="ref-hartFormalBasisHeuristic1968" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[19] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. E. Hart, N. J. Nilsson, and B. Raphael, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TSSC.1968.300136">A Formal Basis for the Heuristic Determination of Minimum Cost Paths</a></em>, IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics <strong>4</strong>, 100 (1968).</div>
 </div>
+</div>
+</section>
+<section class="footnotes footnotes-end-of-document" role="doc-endnotes">
+<hr />
+<ol>
+<li id="fn1" role="doc-endnote"><p>To see why we sometimes need to tile to <span class="math inline">\(5\times 5\)</span>, consider the left panel of fig. <a href="#fig:lattice_construction_animated">1</a>. At the boundaries some of the edges emanate out to infinity. In the middle panel we see that tiling to <span class="math inline">\(3\times 3\)</span> removes the infinite edges emanating from the central cell. This is necessary in order to transform this to a toroidal graph since we do not allow a vertex to be located at the point at infinity. For very small lattices, there can sometimes still be infinite edges emanating from the central cell. This is generally fixed by going to a <span class="math inline">\(5\times 5\)</span> tiling.<a href="#fnref1" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
+</ol>
 </section>
 
 

_thesis/4_Amorphous_Kitaev_Model/4.3_AMK_Results.html

@@ -97,20 +97,20 @@ image:
 <p>This section contains our results on the AK model, we first look at how we checked numerically that Lieb’s theorem generalises to our model. Next we compute the ground state diagram and look at the two phases that arise there. We then use a local Chern marker and the presence of edge modes to characterise these phases as having Abelian or non-Abelian statistics. Finally we look at the finite temperature behaviour of the model.</p>
 <section id="the-ground-state-flux-sector" class="level2">
 <h2>The Ground State Flux Sector</h2>
-<p>We will check that Lieb’s theorem generalises to our model by enumerating all the flux sectors of many separate amorphous lattice realisations. However we have two seemingly irreconcilable problems. Finite size effects have a large energetic contribution for small systems <span class="citation" data-cites="kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006"> [<a href="#ref-kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span> so we would like to perform our analysis for very large lattices. However for an amorphous system with <span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> plaquettes, <span class="math inline">\(2N\)</span> edges and <span class="math inline">\(3N\)</span> vertices we have <span class="math inline">\(2^{N-1}\)</span> flux sectors to check and diagonalisation scales with <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{O}(N^3)\)</span>. That exponential scaling makes it difficult to work with lattices much larger than <span class="math inline">\(16\)</span> plaquettes with the resources.</p>
+<p>We will check that Lieb’s theorem generalises to our model by enumerating all the flux sectors of many separate amorphous lattice realisations. However, we have two seemingly irreconcilable problems. Finite size effects have a large energetic contribution for small systems <span class="citation" data-cites="kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006"> [<a href="#ref-kitaevAnyonsExactlySolved2006" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span> so we would like to perform our analysis for very large lattices. For an amorphous system with <span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> plaquettes, <span class="math inline">\(2N\)</span> edges and <span class="math inline">\(3N\)</span> vertices we have <span class="math inline">\(2^{N-1}\)</span> flux sectors to check and diagonalisation scales with <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{O}(N^3)\)</span>. That exponential scaling makes it difficult to work with lattices much larger than <span class="math inline">\(16\)</span> plaquettes with the resources.</p>
-<p>To get around this we instead look at periodic systems with amorphous unit cells. For a similarly sized periodic system with <span class="math inline">\(A\)</span> unit cells and <span class="math inline">\(B\)</span> plaquettes in each unit cell where <span class="math inline">\(N \sim AB\)</span> things get much better. We can use Bloch’s theorem to diagonalise this system in about <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{O}(A B^3)\)</span> operations, and more importantly there are only <span class="math inline">\(2^{B-1}\)</span> flux sectors to check. We fully enumerated the flux sectors of <span class="math inline">\(\sim\)</span> 25,000 periodic systems with disordered unit cells of up to <span class="math inline">\(B = 16\)</span> plaquettes and <span class="math inline">\(A = 100\)</span> unit cells. However, showing that our guess is correct for periodic systems with disordered unit cells is not quite convincing on its own as we have effectively removed longer-range disorder from our lattices.</p>
+<p>To get around this, we instead look at periodic systems with amorphous unit cells. For a similarly sized periodic system with <span class="math inline">\(A\)</span> unit cells and <span class="math inline">\(B\)</span> plaquettes in each unit cell where <span class="math inline">\(N \sim AB\)</span> things get much better. We can use Bloch’s theorem to diagonalise this system in about <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{O}(A B^3)\)</span> operations, and more importantly there are only <span class="math inline">\(2^{B-1}\)</span> flux sectors to check. We fully enumerated the flux sectors of <span class="math inline">\(\sim\)</span> 25,000 periodic systems with disordered unit cells of up to <span class="math inline">\(B = 16\)</span> plaquettes and <span class="math inline">\(A = 100\)</span> unit cells. However, showing that our guess is correct for periodic systems with disordered unit cells is not quite convincing on its own as we have effectively removed longer-range disorder from our lattices.</p>
-<p>The second part of the argument is to show that the energetic effect of introducing periodicity scales away as we go to larger system sizes and has already diminished to a small enough value at 16 plaquettes, which is indeed what we find. From this we argue that the results for small periodic systems generalise to large amorphous systems. In the isotropic case (<span class="math inline">\(J^\alpha = 1\)</span>), Lieb’s theorem correctly predicts the ground state flux sector for all of the lattices we tested. For the toric code phase (<span class="math inline">\(J^x = J^y = 0.25, J^z = 1\)</span>) all but around (<span class="math inline">\(\sim 0.5 \%\)</span>) lattices had ground states conforming to our conjecture. In these cases, the energy difference between the true ground state and our prediction was on the order of <span class="math inline">\(10^{-6} J\)</span>.</p>
+<p>The second part of the argument is to show that the energetic effect of introducing periodicity scales away as we go to larger system sizes and has already diminished to a small enough value at 16 plaquettes, which is indeed what we find. From this, we argue that the results for small periodic systems generalise to large amorphous systems. In the isotropic case (<span class="math inline">\(J^\alpha = 1\)</span>), Lieb’s theorem correctly predicts the ground state flux sector for all of the lattices we tested. For the toric code phase (<span class="math inline">\(J^x = J^y = 0.25, J^z = 1\)</span>) all but around (<span class="math inline">\(\sim 0.5 \%\)</span>) lattices had ground states conforming to our conjecture. In these cases, the energy difference between the true ground state and our prediction was on the order of <span class="math inline">\(10^{-6} J\)</span>.</p>
 <p>The spin Kitaev Hamiltonian is real and therefore has time reversal symmetry. However in the ground state the flux <span class="math inline">\(\phi_p\)</span> through any plaquette with an odd number of sides has imaginary eigenvalues <span class="math inline">\(\pm i\)</span>. Thus, states with a fixed flux sector spontaneously break time reversal symmetry. Kiteav noted this in his original paper but it was first explored in a concrete model by Yao and Kivelson for a translation invariant Kitaev model with odd sided plaquettes <span class="citation" data-cites="Yao2011"> [<a href="#ref-Yao2011" role="doc-biblioref">2</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>So we have flux sectors that come in degenerate pairs, where time reversal is equivalent to inverting the flux through every odd plaquette, a general feature for lattices with odd plaquettes <span class="citation" data-cites="yaoExactChiralSpin2007 Peri2020"> [<a href="#ref-yaoExactChiralSpin2007" role="doc-biblioref">3</a>,<a href="#ref-Peri2020" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>]</span>. This spontaneously broken symmetry serves a role analogous to the external magnetic field in the original honeycomb model, leading the AK model to have a non-Abelian anyonic phase without an external magnetic field.</p>
+<p>Flux sectors come in degenerate pairs, where time reversal is equivalent to inverting the flux through every odd plaquette, a general feature for lattices with odd plaquettes <span class="citation" data-cites="yaoExactChiralSpin2007 Peri2020"> [<a href="#ref-yaoExactChiralSpin2007" role="doc-biblioref">3</a>,<a href="#ref-Peri2020" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>]</span>. This spontaneously broken symmetry serves a role analogous to the external magnetic field in the original honeycomb model, leading the AK model to have a non-Abelian anyonic phase without an external magnetic field.</p>
 </section>
 <section id="ground-state-phase-diagram" class="level2">
 <h2>Ground State Phase Diagram</h2>
-<p>The triangular <span class="math inline">\(J_x, J_y, J_z\)</span> phase diagram of this family of models arises from setting the energy scale with <span class="math inline">\(J_x + J_y + J_z = 1\)</span>. The intersection of this plane and the unit cube is what yields the equilateral triangles seen in diagrams like fig. <a href="#fig:phase_diagram">1</a>. The KH model has an Abelian, gapped phase in the anisotropic region (the A phase) and is gapless in the isotropic region. The introduction of a magnetic field breaks the chiral symmetry, leading to the isotropic region becoming a gapped, non-Abelian phase, the B phase.</p>
+<p>The triangular <span class="math inline">\(J_x, J_y, J_z\)</span> phase diagram of this family of models arises from setting the energy scale with <span class="math inline">\(J_x + J_y + J_z = 1\)</span>. The intersection of this plane and the unit cube is what yields the equilateral triangles seen in diagrams like fig. <a href="#fig:phase_diagram">1</a>. The KH model has an Abelian gapped phase in the anisotropic region (the A phase) and is gapless in the isotropic region. The introduction of a magnetic field breaks the chiral symmetry, leading to the isotropic region becoming a gapped, non-Abelian phase, the B phase.</p>
-<p>Similar to the KH model with a magnetic field, we find that the amorphous model is only gapless along critical lines, see fig. <a href="#fig:phase_diagram">1</a> (Left). Interestingly, in finite size systems the gap closing exists in only one of the four topological sectors though the sectors become degenerate in the thermodynamic limit. Nevertheless this could be a useful way to define the (0, 0) topological flux sector for the amorphous model which otherwise has no natural way to choose it.</p>
+<p>Similar to the KH model with a magnetic field, we find that the amorphous model is only gapless along critical lines, see fig. <a href="#fig:phase_diagram">1</a> (Left). Interestingly, in finite size systems the gap closing exists in only one of the four topological sectors though the sectors become degenerate in the thermodynamic limit. Nevertheless, this could be a useful way to define the (0, 0) topological flux sector for the amorphous model which otherwise has no natural way to choose it.</p>
-<p>In the honeycomb model, the phase boundaries are located on the straight lines <span class="math inline">\(|J^x| = |J^y| \;+ \;|J^x|\)</span> and permutations of <span class="math inline">\(x,y,z\)</span>. These are shown as dotted lines in fig. <a href="#fig:phase_diagram">1</a> (Right). We find that on the amorphous lattice these boundaries exhibit an inward curvature, similar to honeycomb Kitaev models with flux or bond disorder <span class="citation" data-cites="knolle_dynamics_2016 Nasu_Thermal_2015 lahtinenPerturbedVortexLattices2014 willansDisorderQuantumSpin2010 zschockePhysicalStatesFinitesize2015 kaoDisorderDisorderLocalization2021"> [<a href="#ref-knolle_dynamics_2016" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>–<a href="#ref-kaoDisorderDisorderLocalization2021" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>]</span>.</p>
+<p>In the honeycomb model, the phase boundaries are located on the straight lines <span class="math inline">\(|J^x| = |J^y| \;+ \;|J^z|\)</span> and permutations of <span class="math inline">\(x,y,z\)</span>. These are shown as dotted lines in fig. <a href="#fig:phase_diagram">1</a> (Right). We find that on the amorphous lattice these boundaries exhibit an inward curvature, similar to honeycomb Kitaev models with flux or bond disorder <span class="citation" data-cites="knolle_dynamics_2016 Nasu_Thermal_2015 lahtinenPerturbedVortexLattices2014 willansDisorderQuantumSpin2010 zschockePhysicalStatesFinitesize2015 kaoDisorderDisorderLocalization2021"> [<a href="#ref-knolle_dynamics_2016" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>–<a href="#ref-kaoDisorderDisorderLocalization2021" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>]</span>.</p>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/results/phase_diagram/phase_diagram.svg" id="fig-phase_diagram" data-short-caption="The Ground State Phase Diagram" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 1: The phase diagram of the model can be characterised by an equilateral triangle whose corners indicate points where J_\alpha = 1, J_\beta = J_\gamma = 0 while the centre denotes J_x = J_y = J_z. (Center) To compute critical lines efficiently in this space we evaluate the order parameter of interest along rays shooting from the corners of the phase diagram. The ray highlighted in red defines the values of J used for the left figure. (Left) The fermion gap as a function of J for an amorphous system with 20 plaquettes, where the x axis is the position on the red line in the central figure from 0 to 1. For finite size systems the four topological sectors are not degenerate and only one of them (in green) has a true gap closing. (Right) The Abelian A_\alpha phases of the model and the non-Abelian B phase separated by critical lines where the fermion gap closes. Later we will show that the Chern number \nu changes from 0 to \pm 1 from the A phases to the B phase. Indeed the gap must close in order for the Chern number to change  [11]." />
+<img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/results/phase_diagram/phase_diagram.svg" id="fig-phase_diagram" data-short-caption="The Ground State Phase Diagram" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 1: The phase diagram of the model can be characterised by an equilateral triangle whose corners indicate points where J_\alpha = 1, J_\beta = J_\gamma = 0 while the centre denotes J_x = J_y = J_z. (Center) To compute critical lines efficiently in this space, we evaluate the order parameter of interest along rays shooting from the corners of the phase diagram. The ray highlighted in red defines the values of J used for the left figure. (Left) The fermion gap as a function of J for an amorphous system with 20 plaquettes, where the x axis is the position on the red line in the central figure from 0 to 1. For finite size systems the four topological sectors are not degenerate and only one of them (in green) has a true gap closing. (Right) The Abelian A_\alpha phases of the model and the non-Abelian B phase separated by critical lines where the fermion gap closes. Later we will show that the Chern number \nu changes from 0 to \pm 1 from the A phases to the B phase. Indeed, the gap must close in order for the Chern number to change  [11]." />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1: The phase diagram of the model can be characterised by an equilateral triangle whose corners indicate points where <span class="math inline">\(J_\alpha = 1, J_\beta = J_\gamma = 0\)</span> while the centre denotes <span class="math inline">\(J_x = J_y = J_z\)</span>. (Center) To compute critical lines efficiently in this space we evaluate the order parameter of interest along rays shooting from the corners of the phase diagram. The ray highlighted in red defines the values of J used for the left figure. (Left) The fermion gap as a function of J for an amorphous system with 20 plaquettes, where the x axis is the position on the red line in the central figure from 0 to 1. For finite size systems the four topological sectors are not degenerate and only one of them (in green) has a true gap closing. (Right) The Abelian <span class="math inline">\(A_\alpha\)</span> phases of the model and the non-Abelian B phase separated by critical lines where the fermion gap closes. Later we will show that the Chern number <span class="math inline">\(\nu\)</span> changes from <span class="math inline">\(0\)</span> to <span class="math inline">\(\pm 1\)</span> from the A phases to the B phase. Indeed the gap <em>must</em> close in order for the Chern number to change <span class="citation" data-cites="ezawaTopologicalPhaseTransition2013"> [<a href="#ref-ezawaTopologicalPhaseTransition2013" role="doc-biblioref">11</a>]</span>.</figcaption>
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1: The phase diagram of the model can be characterised by an equilateral triangle whose corners indicate points where <span class="math inline">\(J_\alpha = 1, J_\beta = J_\gamma = 0\)</span> while the centre denotes <span class="math inline">\(J_x = J_y = J_z\)</span>. (Center) To compute critical lines efficiently in this space, we evaluate the order parameter of interest along rays shooting from the corners of the phase diagram. The ray highlighted in red defines the values of J used for the left figure. (Left) The fermion gap as a function of J for an amorphous system with 20 plaquettes, where the x axis is the position on the red line in the central figure from 0 to 1. For finite size systems the four topological sectors are not degenerate and only one of them (in green) has a true gap closing. (Right) The Abelian <span class="math inline">\(A_\alpha\)</span> phases of the model and the non-Abelian B phase separated by critical lines where the fermion gap closes. Later we will show that the Chern number <span class="math inline">\(\nu\)</span> changes from <span class="math inline">\(0\)</span> to <span class="math inline">\(\pm 1\)</span> from the A phases to the B phase. Indeed, the gap <em>must</em> close in order for the Chern number to change <span class="citation" data-cites="ezawaTopologicalPhaseTransition2013"> [<a href="#ref-ezawaTopologicalPhaseTransition2013" role="doc-biblioref">11</a>]</span>.</figcaption>
 </figure>
 <section id="abelian-or-non-abelian-statistics-of-the-gapped-phase" class="level3">
 <h3>Abelian or non-Abelian statistics of the Gapped Phase</h3>
@@ -122,11 +122,11 @@ image:
     \hat{P}\;\hat{\theta}(x-x_0)\;\hat{P}\;\hat{\theta}(y-y_0)\; \hat{P}
     \right ),
 \end{aligned}\]</span></p>
-<p>when the trace is taken over a region <span class="math inline">\(B\)</span> around <span class="math inline">\((x_0, y_0)\)</span> that is large enough to include local information about the system but does not come too close to the edges. If these conditions are met then then this quantity will be very close to quantised to the Chern number, see fig. <a href="#fig:phase_diagram_chern">2</a>. We’ll use the crosshair marker to assess the Abelian/non-Abelian character of the phases.</p>
+<p>when the trace is taken over a region <span class="math inline">\(B\)</span> around <span class="math inline">\((x_0, y_0)\)</span> that is large enough to include local information about the system but does not come too close to the edges. If these conditions are met then this quantity will be very close to quantised to the Chern number, see fig. <a href="#fig:phase_diagram_chern">2</a>. We’ll use the crosshair marker to assess the Abelian/non-Abelian character of the phases.</p>
-<p>In the A phase of the amorphous model we find that <span class="math inline">\(\nu=0\)</span> and hence the excitations have Abelian character, similar to the honeycomb model. This phase is thus the amorphous analogue of the Abelian toric-code QSL <span class="citation" data-cites="kitaev_fault-tolerant_2003"> [<a href="#ref-kitaev_fault-tolerant_2003" role="doc-biblioref">20</a>]</span>. The B phase has <span class="math inline">\(\nu=\pm1\)</span> so is a non-Abelian Chiral Spin Liquid (CSL) similar to that of the Yao-Kivelson model <span class="citation" data-cites="yaoExactChiralSpin2007"> [<a href="#ref-yaoExactChiralSpin2007" role="doc-biblioref">3</a>]</span>. The CSL state is the magnetic analogue of the fractional quantum Hall state <span class="citation" data-cites="laughlinPropertiesChiralspinliquidState1990"> [<a href="#ref-laughlinPropertiesChiralspinliquidState1990" role="doc-biblioref">21</a>]</span>. Hereafter we focus our attention on this phase.</p>
+<p>In the A phase of the amorphous model, we find that <span class="math inline">\(\nu=0\)</span> and hence the excitations have Abelian character, similar to the honeycomb model. This phase is thus the amorphous analogue of the Abelian toric-code QSL <span class="citation" data-cites="kitaev_fault-tolerant_2003"> [<a href="#ref-kitaev_fault-tolerant_2003" role="doc-biblioref">20</a>]</span>. The B phase has <span class="math inline">\(\nu=\pm1\)</span> so is a non-Abelian Chiral Spin Liquid (CSL) similar to that of the Yao-Kivelson model <span class="citation" data-cites="yaoExactChiralSpin2007"> [<a href="#ref-yaoExactChiralSpin2007" role="doc-biblioref">3</a>]</span>. The CSL state is the magnetic analogue of the fractional quantum Hall state <span class="citation" data-cites="laughlinPropertiesChiralspinliquidState1990"> [<a href="#ref-laughlinPropertiesChiralspinliquidState1990" role="doc-biblioref">21</a>]</span>. Hereafter, we focus our attention on this phase.</p>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/results/phase_diagram_chern/phase_diagram_chern.svg" id="fig-phase_diagram_chern" data-short-caption="Local Chern Markers" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 2: (Center) The crosshair marker  [18], a local topological marker, evaluated on the Amorphous Kitaev model. The marker is defined around a point, denoted by the dotted crosshair. Information about the local topological properties of the system are encoded within a region around that point. (Left) Summing these contributions up to some finite radius (dotted line here, dotted circle in the centre) gives a generalised version of the Chern number for the system which becomes quantised in the thermodynamic limit. The radius must be chosen large enough to capture information about the local properties of the lattice while not so large as to include contributions from the edge states. The isotropic regime J_\alpha = 1 in red has \nu = \pm 1 implying it supports excitations with non-Abelian statistics, while the anisotropic regime in orange has \nu = 0 implying it has Abelian statistics. (Right) Extending this analysis to the whole J_\alpha phase diagram with fixed r = 0.3 nicely confirms that the isotropic phase is non-Abelian." />
+<img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/results/phase_diagram_chern/phase_diagram_chern.svg" id="fig-phase_diagram_chern" data-short-caption="Local Chern Markers" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 2: (Center) The crosshair marker  [18], a local topological marker, evaluated on the Amorphous Kitaev model. The marker is defined around a point, denoted by the dotted crosshair. Information about the local topological properties of the system is encoded within a region around that point. (Left) Summing these contributions up to some finite radius (dotted line here, dotted circle in the centre) gives a generalised version of the Chern number for the system which becomes quantised in the thermodynamic limit. The radius must be chosen large enough to capture information about the local properties of the lattice while not so large as to include contributions from the edge states. The isotropic regime J_\alpha = 1 in red has \nu = \pm 1 implying it supports excitations with non-Abelian statistics, while the anisotropic regime in orange has \nu = 0 implying Abelian statistics. (Right) Extending this analysis to the whole J_\alpha phase diagram with fixed r = 0.3 nicely confirms that the isotropic phase is non-Abelian." />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 2: (Center) The crosshair marker <span class="citation" data-cites="peru_preprint"> [<a href="#ref-peru_preprint" role="doc-biblioref">18</a>]</span>, a local topological marker, evaluated on the Amorphous Kitaev model. The marker is defined around a point, denoted by the dotted crosshair. Information about the local topological properties of the system are encoded within a region around that point. (Left) Summing these contributions up to some finite radius (dotted line here, dotted circle in the centre) gives a generalised version of the Chern number for the system which becomes quantised in the thermodynamic limit. The radius must be chosen large enough to capture information about the local properties of the lattice while not so large as to include contributions from the edge states. The isotropic regime <span class="math inline">\(J_\alpha = 1\)</span> in red has <span class="math inline">\(\nu = \pm 1\)</span> implying it supports excitations with non-Abelian statistics, while the anisotropic regime in orange has <span class="math inline">\(\nu = 0\)</span> implying it has Abelian statistics. (Right) Extending this analysis to the whole <span class="math inline">\(J_\alpha\)</span> phase diagram with fixed <span class="math inline">\(r = 0.3\)</span> nicely confirms that the isotropic phase is non-Abelian.</figcaption>
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 2: (Center) The crosshair marker <span class="citation" data-cites="peru_preprint"> [<a href="#ref-peru_preprint" role="doc-biblioref">18</a>]</span>, a local topological marker, evaluated on the Amorphous Kitaev model. The marker is defined around a point, denoted by the dotted crosshair. Information about the local topological properties of the system is encoded within a region around that point. (Left) Summing these contributions up to some finite radius (dotted line here, dotted circle in the centre) gives a generalised version of the Chern number for the system which becomes quantised in the thermodynamic limit. The radius must be chosen large enough to capture information about the local properties of the lattice while not so large as to include contributions from the edge states. The isotropic regime <span class="math inline">\(J_\alpha = 1\)</span> in red has <span class="math inline">\(\nu = \pm 1\)</span> implying it supports excitations with non-Abelian statistics, while the anisotropic regime in orange has <span class="math inline">\(\nu = 0\)</span> implying Abelian statistics. (Right) Extending this analysis to the whole <span class="math inline">\(J_\alpha\)</span> phase diagram with fixed <span class="math inline">\(r = 0.3\)</span> nicely confirms that the isotropic phase is non-Abelian.</figcaption>
 </figure>
 </section>
 <section id="edge-modes" class="level3">
@@ -142,13 +142,12 @@ image:
 <section id="anderson-transition-to-a-thermal-metal" class="level2">
 <h2>Anderson Transition to a Thermal Metal</h2>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/results/fermion_gap_vs_L/fermion_gap_vs_L.svg" id="fig-fermion_gap_vs_L" data-short-caption="Finite Size Scaing of the Fermion Gap" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 4: Within a flux sector, the fermion gap \Delta_f measures the energy between the fermionic ground state and the first excited state. This graph shows the fermion gap as a function of system size for the ground state flux sector and for a configuration of random fluxes. We see that the disorder induced by an putting the Kitaev model on an amorphous lattice does not close the gap in the ground state. The gap closes in the flux disordered limit is good evidence that the system transitions to a gapless thermal metal state at high temperature. Each point shows an average over 100 lattice realisations. System size L is defined \sqrt{N} where N is the number of plaquettes in the system. Error bars shown are 3 times the standard error of the mean. The lines shown are fits of \tfrac{\Delta_f}{J} = aL ^ b with fit parameters: Ground State: a = 0.138 \pm 0.002, b = -0.0972 \pm 0.004 Random Flux Sector: a = 1.8 \pm 0.2, b = -2.21 \pm 0.03" />
+<img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/results/fermion_gap_vs_L/fermion_gap_vs_L.svg" id="fig-fermion_gap_vs_L" data-short-caption="Finite Size Scaling of the Fermion Gap" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 4: Within a flux sector, the fermion gap \Delta_f measures the energy between the fermionic ground state and the first excited state. This graph shows the fermion gap as a function of system size for the ground state flux sector and for a configuration of random fluxes. We see that the disorder induced by an putting the Kitaev model on an amorphous lattice does not close the gap in the ground state. The gap closing in the flux disordered limit is good evidence that the system transitions to a gapless thermal metal state at high temperature. Each point shows an average over 100 lattice realisations. System size L is defined \sqrt{N} where N is the number of plaquettes in the system. Error bars shown are 3 times the standard error of the mean. The lines shown are fits of \tfrac{\Delta_f}{J} = aL ^ b with fit parameters: Ground State: a = 0.138 \pm 0.002, b = -0.0972 \pm 0.004 Random Flux Sector: a = 1.8 \pm 0.2, b = -2.21 \pm 0.03" />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 4: Within a flux sector, the fermion gap <span class="math inline">\(\Delta_f\)</span> measures the energy between the fermionic ground state and the first excited state. This graph shows the fermion gap as a function of system size for the ground state flux sector and for a configuration of random fluxes. We see that the disorder induced by an putting the Kitaev model on an amorphous lattice does not close the gap in the ground state. The gap closes in the flux disordered limit is good evidence that the system transitions to a gapless thermal metal state at high temperature. Each point shows an average over 100 lattice realisations. System size <span class="math inline">\(L\)</span> is defined <span class="math inline">\(\sqrt{N}\)</span> where N is the number of plaquettes in the system. Error bars shown are <span class="math inline">\(3\)</span> times the standard error of the mean. The lines shown are fits of <span class="math inline">\(\tfrac{\Delta_f}{J} = aL ^ b\)</span> with fit parameters: Ground State: <span class="math inline">\(a = 0.138 \pm 0.002, b = -0.0972 \pm 0.004\)</span> Random Flux Sector: <span class="math inline">\(a = 1.8 \pm 0.2, b = -2.21 \pm 0.03\)</span></figcaption>
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 4: Within a flux sector, the fermion gap <span class="math inline">\(\Delta_f\)</span> measures the energy between the fermionic ground state and the first excited state. This graph shows the fermion gap as a function of system size for the ground state flux sector and for a configuration of random fluxes. We see that the disorder induced by an putting the Kitaev model on an amorphous lattice does not close the gap in the ground state. The gap closing in the flux disordered limit is good evidence that the system transitions to a gapless thermal metal state at high temperature. Each point shows an average over 100 lattice realisations. System size <span class="math inline">\(L\)</span> is defined <span class="math inline">\(\sqrt{N}\)</span> where N is the number of plaquettes in the system. Error bars shown are <span class="math inline">\(3\)</span> times the standard error of the mean. The lines shown are fits of <span class="math inline">\(\tfrac{\Delta_f}{J} = aL ^ b\)</span> with fit parameters: Ground State: <span class="math inline">\(a = 0.138 \pm 0.002, b = -0.0972 \pm 0.004\)</span> Random Flux Sector: <span class="math inline">\(a = 1.8 \pm 0.2, b = -2.21 \pm 0.03\)</span></figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>Previous work on the honeycomb model, at finite temperature has shown that the B phase undergoes a thermal transition from a QSL phase to a <em>thermal metal</em> phase <span class="citation" data-cites="selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019"> [<a href="#ref-selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019" role="doc-biblioref">23</a>]</span>. This happens because at finite temperature, thermal fluctuations lead to spontaneous vortex-pair formation. As discussed previously, these fluxes are dressed by Majorana bounds states and the composite object is an Ising-type non-Abelian anyon <span class="citation" data-cites="Beenakker2013"> [<a href="#ref-Beenakker2013" role="doc-biblioref">24</a>]</span>. The interactions between these anyons are oscillatory, similar to the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida (RKKY) exchange and decay exponentially with separation <span class="citation" data-cites="Laumann2012 Lahtinen_2011 lahtinenTopologicalLiquidNucleation2012"> [<a href="#ref-Laumann2012" role="doc-biblioref">25</a>–<a href="#ref-lahtinenTopologicalLiquidNucleation2012" role="doc-biblioref">27</a>]</span>. At sufficient density, the anyons hybridise to a macroscopically degenerate state known as <em>thermal metal</em> <span class="citation" data-cites="Laumann2012"> [<a href="#ref-Laumann2012" role="doc-biblioref">25</a>]</span>. At close range the oscillatory behaviour of the interactions can be modelled by a random sign which forms the basis for a random matrix theory description of the thermal metal state.</p>
+<p>Previous work on the honeycomb model at finite temperature has shown that the B phase undergoes a thermal transition from a QSL phase to a <em>thermal metal</em> phase <span class="citation" data-cites="selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019"> [<a href="#ref-selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019" role="doc-biblioref">23</a>]</span>. This happens because at finite temperature, thermal fluctuations excite spontaneous vortex-pair formation. As discussed previously, these fluxes are dressed by Majorana bounds states and the composite object is an Ising-type non-Abelian anyon <span class="citation" data-cites="Beenakker2013"> [<a href="#ref-Beenakker2013" role="doc-biblioref">24</a>]</span>. The interactions between these anyons are oscillatory, similar to the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida (RKKY) exchange and decay exponentially with separation <span class="citation" data-cites="Laumann2012 Lahtinen_2011 lahtinenTopologicalLiquidNucleation2012"> [<a href="#ref-Laumann2012" role="doc-biblioref">25</a>–<a href="#ref-lahtinenTopologicalLiquidNucleation2012" role="doc-biblioref">27</a>]</span>. At sufficient density, the anyons hybridise to a macroscopically degenerate state known as <em>thermal metal</em> <span class="citation" data-cites="Laumann2012"> [<a href="#ref-Laumann2012" role="doc-biblioref">25</a>]</span>. At close range the oscillatory behaviour of the interactions can be modelled by a random sign which forms the basis for a random matrix theory description of the thermal metal state.</p>
-<p>The amorphous chiral spin liquid undergoes the same form of Anderson transition to a thermal metal state. Markov Chain Monte Carlo would be necessary to simulate this in full detail <span class="citation" data-cites="selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019"> [<a href="#ref-selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019" role="doc-biblioref">23</a>]</span> but in order to avoid that complexity in the current work we instead opted to use vortex density <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span> as a proxy for temperature. We give each plaquette the probability <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span> of being a vortex, possibly with one additional adjustment to preserve overall vortex parity. This approximation is exact in the limits <span class="math inline">\(T = 0\)</span> (corresponding to <span class="math inline">\(\rho = 0\)</span>) and <span class="math inline">\(T \to \infty\)</span> (corresponding to <span class="math inline">\(\rho = 0.5\)</span>) while at intermediate temperatures there may be vortex-vortex correlations that are not captured by our uncorrelated vortex placement.</p>
+<p>The amorphous chiral spin liquid undergoes the same Anderson transition to a thermal metal state. Markov Chain Monte Carlo would be necessary to simulate this in full detail <span class="citation" data-cites="selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019"> [<a href="#ref-selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019" role="doc-biblioref">23</a>]</span> but in order to avoid that complexity in the current work we instead opted to use vortex density <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span> as a proxy for temperature. We give each plaquette the probability <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span> of being a vortex, possibly with one additional adjustment to preserve overall vortex parity. This approximation is exact in the limits <span class="math inline">\(T = 0\)</span> (corresponding to <span class="math inline">\(\rho = 0\)</span>) and <span class="math inline">\(T \to \infty\)</span> (corresponding to <span class="math inline">\(\rho = 0.5\)</span>) while at intermediate temperatures there may be vortex-vortex correlations that are not captured by our uncorrelated vortex placement.</p>
-<p>First we performed a finite size scaling to show that the presence of a gap in the CSL ground state and absence of a gap in the thermal metal phase are both robust as we go to larger systems, see fig. <a href="#fig:fermion_gap_vs_L">4</a>.</p>
+<p>First, we performed a finite size scaling to check that the presence of a gap in the CSL ground state and absence of a gap in the thermal metal phase are both robust as we go to larger systems, see fig. <a href="#fig:fermion_gap_vs_L">4</a>. Next we evaluated the fermionic density of states (DOS), Inverse Participation Ratio and IPR scaling exponent <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> as functions of the vortex density <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span>, see fig. <a href="#fig:DOS_vs_rho">5</a>. This leads to a nice picture of what happens as we raise the temperature of the system away from the gapped, insulating CSL phase. At small <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span>, states begin to populate the gap but they have <span class="math inline">\(\tau\approx0\)</span>, indicating that they are localised states pinned to the vortices, and the system remains insulating. At large <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span>, the in-gap states merge with the bulk band and become extensive, closing the gap, and the system transitions to the thermal metal phase.</p>
-<p>Next we evaluated the fermionic density of states (DOS), Inverse Participation Ratio and IPR scaling exponent <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> as functions of the vortex density <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span>, see fig. <a href="#fig:DOS_vs_rho">5</a>. This leads to a nice picture of what happens as we raise the temperature of the system away from the gapped, insulating CSL phase. At small <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span>, states begin to populate the gap but they have <span class="math inline">\(\tau\approx0\)</span>, indicating that they are localised states pinned to the vortices, and the system remains insulating. At large <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span>, the in-gap states merge with the bulk band and become extensive, closing the gap, and the system transitions to the thermal metal phase.</p>
 <figure>
 <img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/results/DOS_vs_rho/DOS_vs_rho.svg" id="fig-DOS_vs_rho" data-short-caption="Transition to a Thermal Metal" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 5: (Top) Density of states and (Bottom) scaling exponent \tau of the amorphous Kitaev model as a vortex density \rho is increased. The scaling exponent \tau is the exponent with which the inverse participation ratio scales with system size. It gives a measure of the degree of localisation of the states in each (E/J, \rho) bin. At zero \rho we have the gapped ground state. At small \rho, states begin to populate the gap. These states have \tau\approx0, indicating that they are localised states pinned to fluxes, and the system remains insulating. As \rho increases further, the in-gap states merge with the bulk band and become extensive, fully closing the gap, and the system transitions to a thermal metal phase." />
 <figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 5: (Top) Density of states and (Bottom) scaling exponent <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> of the amorphous Kitaev model as a vortex density <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span> is increased. The scaling exponent <span class="math inline">\(\tau\)</span> is the exponent with which the inverse participation ratio scales with system size. It gives a measure of the degree of localisation of the states in each <span class="math inline">\((E/J, \rho)\)</span> bin. At zero <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span> we have the gapped ground state. At small <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span>, states begin to populate the gap. These states have <span class="math inline">\(\tau\approx0\)</span>, indicating that they are localised states pinned to fluxes, and the system remains insulating. As <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span> increases further, the in-gap states merge with the bulk band and become extensive, fully closing the gap, and the system transitions to a thermal metal phase.</figcaption>
@@ -165,18 +164,18 @@ image:
 <p>In this chapter we have looked at an extension of the KH model to amorphous lattices with coordination number three. We discussed a method to construct arbitrary trivalent lattices using Voronoi partitions, how to embed them onto the torus and how to edge-colour them using a SAT solver. We showed numerically that the ground state flux sector of the model is given by a simple extension of Lieb’s theorem. The model has two gapped QSL phases. The two phases support excitations with different anyonic statistics, Abelian and non-Abelian, distinguished using a real-space generalisation of the Chern number <span class="citation" data-cites="peru_preprint"> [<a href="#ref-peru_preprint" role="doc-biblioref">18</a>]</span>. The presence of odd-sided plaquettes in the model resulted in spontaneous breaking of time reversal symmetry, leading to the emergence of a chiral spin liquid phase. Finally we showed evidence that the amorphous system undergoes an Anderson transition to a thermal metal phase, driven by the proliferation of vortices with increasing temperature. The AK model is an exactly solvable model of the chiral QSL state, one of the first models to exhibit a topologically non-trivial quantum many-body phase on an amorphous lattice. As such this study provides a number of future lines of research.</p>
 <section id="experimental-realisations-and-signatures" class="level3">
 <h3>Experimental Realisations and Signatures</h3>
-<p>We should consider whether a physical amorphous system that supports a QSL ground state could exist. The search for translation invariant Kitaev systems is already motivated by the prospect of a physically realised QSL state, Majorana fermions and direct access to a system with emergent <span class="math inline">\(\mathbb{Z}_2\)</span> gauge physics <span class="citation" data-cites="TrebstPhysRep2022"> [<a href="#ref-TrebstPhysRep2022" role="doc-biblioref">29</a>]</span>. An amorphous Kitaev model would provide all this and in addition the possibility of exploring the CSL state and potentially very different routes to a physical realisation. One route would be to ask if any crystalline Kitaev material candidates can be heated and rapidly quenched <span class="citation" data-cites="Weaire1976 Petrakovski1981 Kaneyoshi2018"> [<a href="#ref-Weaire1976" role="doc-biblioref">30</a>–<a href="#ref-Kaneyoshi2018" role="doc-biblioref">32</a>]</span> to produce amorphous analogues that might preserve enough of their local structure to support a QSL state.</p>
+<p>We should consider whether a physical amorphous system that supports a QSL ground state could exist. The search for translation invariant Kitaev systems is already motivated by the prospect of a physically realised QSL state, Majorana fermions and direct access to a system with emergent <span class="math inline">\(\mathbb{Z}_2\)</span> gauge physics <span class="citation" data-cites="TrebstPhysRep2022"> [<a href="#ref-TrebstPhysRep2022" role="doc-biblioref">29</a>]</span>. In addition to all this, an amorphous Kitaev model would provide the possibility of exploring the CSL state and potentially very different routes to a physical realisation. One route would be to ask if any crystalline Kitaev material candidates can be heated and rapidly quenched <span class="citation" data-cites="Weaire1976 Petrakovski1981 Kaneyoshi2018"> [<a href="#ref-Weaire1976" role="doc-biblioref">30</a>–<a href="#ref-Kaneyoshi2018" role="doc-biblioref">32</a>]</span> to produce amorphous analogues that might preserve enough of their local structure to support a QSL state.</p>
 <p>Considering more designer materials, metal organic frameworks (MOFs) could present a platform for a synthetic Kitaev material. These materials are composed of repeating units of large organic molecules coordinated with metal ions. Amorphous MOFs can be generated with mechanical processes that introduce disorder into crystalline MOFs <span class="citation" data-cites="bennett2014amorphous"> [<a href="#ref-bennett2014amorphous" role="doc-biblioref">33</a>]</span> and there have been recent proposals for realising strong Kitaev interactions <span class="citation" data-cites="yamadaDesigningKitaevSpin2017"> [<a href="#ref-yamadaDesigningKitaevSpin2017" role="doc-biblioref">34</a>]</span> in them as potential signatures of a resonating valence bond QSL state in MOFs with Kagome geometry <span class="citation" data-cites="misumiQuantumSpinLiquid2020"> [<a href="#ref-misumiQuantumSpinLiquid2020" role="doc-biblioref">35</a>]</span>. Finally, MOFs are composed of large synthetic molecules so may provide more opportunity for fine tuning to target particular physics than with ionic compounds. There have also been proposals to realise Kitaev physics in optical lattice experiments <span class="citation" data-cites="duanControllingSpinExchange2003 micheliToolboxLatticespinModels2006"> [<a href="#ref-duanControllingSpinExchange2003" role="doc-biblioref">36</a>,<a href="#ref-micheliToolboxLatticespinModels2006" role="doc-biblioref">37</a>]</span> which can also support amorphous lattices <span class="citation" data-cites="sadeghiAmorphousTwodimensionalOptical2005"> [<a href="#ref-sadeghiAmorphousTwodimensionalOptical2005" role="doc-biblioref">38</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>A physical realisation in either an amorphous compound or a MOF would likely entail a high degree of defects. Amorphous silicon, for instance, tends to contain dangling bonds which must be passivated by hydrogenation to improve its physical properties <span class="citation" data-cites="streetHydrogenatedAmorphousSilicon1991"> [<a href="#ref-streetHydrogenatedAmorphousSilicon1991" role="doc-biblioref">39</a>]</span>. In both cases, if we assume that Kitaev physics can be realised by crystalline systems, it is not clear if the necessary superexchange couplings would survive the addition of disorder to the lattice. It would therefore make sense theoretically to examine how robust the CSL ground state of the AK model is to additional disorder in the Hamiltonian, for example mis-colourings of the bonds, vertex degree disorder and disorder in coupling strengths. Relatedly, one could look at perturbations to the Hamiltonian that break integrability <span class="citation" data-cites="Rau2014 Chaloupka2010 Chaloupka2013 Chaloupka2015 Winter2016"> [<a href="#ref-Rau2014" role="doc-biblioref">40</a>–<a href="#ref-Winter2016" role="doc-biblioref">44</a>]</span>.</p>
+<p>A physical realisation in either an amorphous compound or a MOF would likely incorporate a considerable density of defects. Amorphous silicon, for instance, tends to contain dangling bonds which must be passivated by hydrogenation to improve its physical properties <span class="citation" data-cites="streetHydrogenatedAmorphousSilicon1991"> [<a href="#ref-streetHydrogenatedAmorphousSilicon1991" role="doc-biblioref">39</a>]</span>. In both cases, if we assume that Kitaev physics can be realised by crystalline systems, it is not clear if the necessary superexchange couplings would survive the addition of disorder to the lattice. It would therefore make sense theoretically to examine how robust the CSL ground state of the AK model is to additional disorder in the Hamiltonian, for example mis-colourings of the bonds, vertex degree disorder and disorder in coupling strengths. Relatedly, one could look at perturbations to the Hamiltonian that break integrability <span class="citation" data-cites="Rau2014 Chaloupka2010 Chaloupka2013 Chaloupka2015 Winter2016"> [<a href="#ref-Rau2014" role="doc-biblioref">40</a>–<a href="#ref-Winter2016" role="doc-biblioref">44</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>Considering experimental signatures, we expect that the chiral amorphous QSL will display a half-quantised thermal Hall effect similar to the magnetic field induced behaviour of KH materials <span class="citation" data-cites="Kasahara2018 Yokoi2021 Yamashita2020 Bruin2022"> [<a href="#ref-Kasahara2018" role="doc-biblioref">45</a>–<a href="#ref-Bruin2022" role="doc-biblioref">48</a>]</span>. Alternatively, the CSL state could be characterised by local probes such as spin-polarised scanning tunnelling microscopy <span class="citation" data-cites="Feldmeier2020 Konig2020 Udagawa2021"> [<a href="#ref-Feldmeier2020" role="doc-biblioref">49</a>–<a href="#ref-Udagawa2021" role="doc-biblioref">51</a>]</span> while the thermal metal phase displays characteristic longitudinal heat transport signatures <span class="citation" data-cites="Beenakker2013"> [<a href="#ref-Beenakker2013" role="doc-biblioref">24</a>]</span>. Local perturbations, such as those that might come from an atomic force microscope, could potentially be used to create and control vortices <span class="citation" data-cites="jangVortexCreationControl2021"> [<a href="#ref-jangVortexCreationControl2021" role="doc-biblioref">52</a>]</span>. To this end it one could look at how the move to amorphous lattices affects vortex time dynamics in perturbed KH models <span class="citation" data-cites="joyDynamicsVisonsThermal2022"> [<a href="#ref-joyDynamicsVisonsThermal2022" role="doc-biblioref">53</a>]</span>.</p>
+<p>Considering experimental signatures, we expect that the chiral amorphous QSL will display a half-quantised thermal Hall effect similar to the magnetic field induced behaviour of KH materials <span class="citation" data-cites="Kasahara2018 Yokoi2021 Yamashita2020 Bruin2022"> [<a href="#ref-Kasahara2018" role="doc-biblioref">45</a>–<a href="#ref-Bruin2022" role="doc-biblioref">48</a>]</span>. Alternatively, the CSL state could be characterised by local probes such as spin-polarised scanning tunnelling microscopy <span class="citation" data-cites="Feldmeier2020 Konig2020 Udagawa2021"> [<a href="#ref-Feldmeier2020" role="doc-biblioref">49</a>–<a href="#ref-Udagawa2021" role="doc-biblioref">51</a>]</span> while the thermal metal phase displays characteristic longitudinal heat transport signatures <span class="citation" data-cites="Beenakker2013"> [<a href="#ref-Beenakker2013" role="doc-biblioref">24</a>]</span>. Local perturbations, such as those that might come from an atomic force microscope, could potentially be used to create and control vortices <span class="citation" data-cites="jangVortexCreationControl2021"> [<a href="#ref-jangVortexCreationControl2021" role="doc-biblioref">52</a>]</span>. To this end, one could look at how the move to amorphous lattices affects vortex time dynamics in perturbed KH models <span class="citation" data-cites="joyDynamicsVisonsThermal2022"> [<a href="#ref-joyDynamicsVisonsThermal2022" role="doc-biblioref">53</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>Given the lack of unambiguous signatures of the QSL state, it can be hard to distinguish the effects of the QSL state from the effect of disorder. So introducing topological disorder may only increase the experimental challenges. Three dimensional realisations could get around this as they would be expected to have a true Finite-Temperature Phase Transition (FTPT) to the thermal metal state that could be a useful experimental signature <span class="citation" data-cites="eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020 OBrienPRB2016"> [<a href="#ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" role="doc-biblioref">54</a>,<a href="#ref-OBrienPRB2016" role="doc-biblioref">55</a>]</span>. Three dimensional Kitaev systems can also support CSL ground states <span class="citation" data-cites="mishchenkoChiralSpinLiquids2020"> [<a href="#ref-mishchenkoChiralSpinLiquids2020" role="doc-biblioref">56</a>]</span>.</p>
+<p>Given the lack of unambiguous signatures of the QSL state, it can be hard to distinguish the effects of the QSL state from the effect of disorder. So introducing topological disorder may only increase the experimental challenges. That being said, the presence of topological disorder may suppress competing interactions that would otherwise induce magnetic ordering at zero temperature potentially widening the class of materials that could host a QSL ground state. Alternatively, 3D realisations of the AK model could get around this issue of confusing a QSL with disorder because 3D would be expected to have a true Finite-Temperature Phase Transition (FTPT) to the thermal metal state that could be a useful experimental signature <span class="citation" data-cites="eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020 OBrienPRB2016"> [<a href="#ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" role="doc-biblioref">54</a>,<a href="#ref-OBrienPRB2016" role="doc-biblioref">55</a>]</span>. 3D Kitaev systems can also support CSL ground states <span class="citation" data-cites="mishchenkoChiralSpinLiquids2020"> [<a href="#ref-mishchenkoChiralSpinLiquids2020" role="doc-biblioref">56</a>]</span>.</p>
 </section>
 <section id="thermodynamics" class="level3">
 <h3>Thermodynamics</h3>
 <p>The KH model can be extended to 3D either on trivalent lattices <span class="citation" data-cites="eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020 OBrienPRB2016"> [<a href="#ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" role="doc-biblioref">54</a>,<a href="#ref-OBrienPRB2016" role="doc-biblioref">55</a>]</span> or it can be generalised to an exactly solvable spin-<span class="math inline">\(\tfrac{3}{2}\)</span> model on 3D four-coordinate lattices <span class="citation" data-cites="yaoAlgebraicSpinLiquid2009 wenQuantumOrderStringnet2003 ryuThreedimensionalTopologicalPhase2009 Baskaran2008 Nussinov2009 Yao2011 Chua2011 Natori2020 Chulliparambil2020 Chulliparambil2021 Seifert2020 WangHaoranPRB2021 Wu2009"> [<a href="#ref-Yao2011" role="doc-biblioref">2</a>,<a href="#ref-yaoAlgebraicSpinLiquid2009" role="doc-biblioref">57</a>–<a href="#ref-Wu2009" role="doc-biblioref">68</a>]</span>. In <span class="citation" data-cites="yaoAlgebraicSpinLiquid2009"> [<a href="#ref-yaoAlgebraicSpinLiquid2009" role="doc-biblioref">57</a>]</span>, the 2D square lattice with 4 bond types (<span class="math inline">\(J_w, J_x, J_y, J_z\)</span>) is considered. Since Voronoi partitions in 3D produce lattices of degree four, one interesting generalisation of this work would be to look at the spin-<span class="math inline">\(\tfrac{3}{2}\)</span> Kitaev model on amorphous lattices.</p>
 <p>We did not perform a full Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation of the AK model at finite temperature but the possible extension to a 3D model with an FTPT would motivate this full analysis. This MCMC simulation would be a numerically challenging task but poses no conceptual barriers <span class="citation" data-cites="Laumann2012 lahtinenTopologicalLiquidNucleation2012 selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019"> [<a href="#ref-selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019" role="doc-biblioref">23</a>,<a href="#ref-Laumann2012" role="doc-biblioref">25</a>,<a href="#ref-lahtinenTopologicalLiquidNucleation2012" role="doc-biblioref">27</a>]</span>. Doing this would, first, allow one to look for possible violations of the Harris criterion <span class="citation" data-cites="harrisEffectRandomDefects1974"> [<a href="#ref-harrisEffectRandomDefects1974" role="doc-biblioref">69</a>]</span> for the Ising transition of the flux sector. Recall that topological disorder in 2D has radically different properties to that of other kinds of disorder due to the constraints imposed by the Euler equation and maintaining coordination number which allows it to violate otherwise quite general rules like the Harris criterion <span class="citation" data-cites="barghathiPhaseTransitionsRandom2014 schrauthViolationHarrisBarghathiVojtaCriterion2018"> [<a href="#ref-barghathiPhaseTransitionsRandom2014" role="doc-biblioref">70</a>,<a href="#ref-schrauthViolationHarrisBarghathiVojtaCriterion2018" role="doc-biblioref">71</a>]</span>. Second, incorporating the projector in addition to MCMC would allow for a full investigation of whether the effect of topological degeneracy is apparent at finite temperatures, this is done for the KH model in <span class="citation" data-cites="selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019"> [<a href="#ref-selfThermallyInducedMetallic2019" role="doc-biblioref">23</a>]</span>.</p>
-<p>Next, one could investigate whether a QSL phase may exist for other models defined on amorphous lattices with a view to more realistic prospects of observation. Do the properties of the Kitaev-Heisenberg model generalise from the honeycomb to the amorphous case? <span class="citation" data-cites="Chaloupka2010 Chaloupka2015 Jackeli2009 Kalmeyer1989 manousakisSpinTextonehalfHeisenberg1991"> [<a href="#ref-Chaloupka2010" role="doc-biblioref">41</a>,<a href="#ref-Chaloupka2015" role="doc-biblioref">43</a>,<a href="#ref-Jackeli2009" role="doc-biblioref">72</a>–<a href="#ref-manousakisSpinTextonehalfHeisenberg1991" role="doc-biblioref">74</a>]</span> Alternatively we might look at other lattice construction techniques. For instance we could construct lattices by linking close points <span class="citation" data-cites="agarwala2019topological"> [<a href="#ref-agarwala2019topological" role="doc-biblioref">75</a>]</span> or create simplices from random sites <span class="citation" data-cites="christRandomLatticeField1982"> [<a href="#ref-christRandomLatticeField1982" role="doc-biblioref">76</a>]</span>. Lattices constructed using these methods would likely have a large number of lattice defects where <span class="math inline">\(z \neq 3\)</span> in the bulk, leading to many localised Majorana zero modes.</p>
+<p>Next, one could investigate whether a QSL phase may exist for other models defined on amorphous lattices with a view to more realistic prospects of observation. Do the properties of the Kitaev-Heisenberg model generalise from the honeycomb to the amorphous case? <span class="citation" data-cites="Chaloupka2010 Chaloupka2015 Jackeli2009 Kalmeyer1989 manousakis1991"> [<a href="#ref-Chaloupka2010" role="doc-biblioref">41</a>,<a href="#ref-Chaloupka2015" role="doc-biblioref">43</a>,<a href="#ref-Jackeli2009" role="doc-biblioref">72</a>–<a href="#ref-manousakis1991" role="doc-biblioref">74</a>]</span> Alternatively we might look at other lattice construction techniques. For instance we could construct lattices by linking close points <span class="citation" data-cites="agarwala2019topological"> [<a href="#ref-agarwala2019topological" role="doc-biblioref">75</a>]</span> or create simplices from random sites <span class="citation" data-cites="christRandomLatticeField1982"> [<a href="#ref-christRandomLatticeField1982" role="doc-biblioref">76</a>]</span>. Lattices constructed using these methods would likely have a large number of lattice defects where <span class="math inline">\(z \neq 3\)</span> in the bulk, leading to many localised Majorana zero modes.</p>
-<p>We found a small number of lattices for which Lieb’s theorem did not correctly predict the true ground state flux sector. I see two possibilities for what could cause this. Firstly it could be a a finite size effect that is amplified by certain rare lattice configurations. It would be interesting to try to elucidate what lattice features are present when Lieb’s theorem fails. Alternatively, it might be telling that the ground state conjecture failed in the toric code A phase where the couplings are anisotropic. We showed that the colouring does not matter in the B phase. However an avenue that I did not explore was whether the particular choice of colouring for a lattice affects the physical properties in the toric code A phase. It is possible that some property of the particular colouring chosen is what leads to these rare failures of Lieb’s theorem.</p>
+<p>We found a small number of lattices for which Lieb’s theorem did not correctly predict the true ground state flux sector. I see two possibilities for what could cause this. Firstly it could be a finite size effect that is amplified by certain rare lattice configurations. It would be interesting to try to elucidate what lattice features are present when Lieb’s theorem fails. Alternatively, it might be telling that the ground state conjecture failed in the toric code A phase where the couplings are anisotropic. We showed that the colouring does not matter in the B phase. However an avenue that I did not explore was whether the particular choice of colouring for a lattice affects the physical properties in the toric code A phase. It is possible that some property of the particular colouring chosen is what leads to these rare failures of Lieb’s theorem.</p>
 <p>Overall, there has been surprisingly little research on amorphous quantum many-body phases despite there being plenty of material candidates. I expect the exact chiral amorphous spin liquid to find many generalisations to realistic amorphous quantum magnets.</p>
 <p>Next Chapter: <a href="../6_Appendices/A.1.2_Fermion_Free_Energy.html">5 Conclusion</a></p>
 </section>
@@ -197,7 +196,7 @@ image:
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[4] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">V. Peri, S. Ok, S. S. Tsirkin, T. Neupert, G. Baskaran, M. Greiter, R. Moessner, and R. Thomale, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.041114">Non-Abelian Chiral Spin Liquid on a Simple Non-Archimedean Lattice</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>101</strong>, 041114 (2020).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-knolle_dynamics_2016" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[5] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Knolle, Dynamics of a Quantum Spin Liquid, Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, 2016.</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[5] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Knolle, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23953-8">Dynamics of a Quantum Spin Liquid</a></em> (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Nasu_Thermal_2015" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[6] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Nasu, M. Udagawa, and Y. Motome, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.115122">Thermal Fractionalization of Quantum Spins in a Kitaev Model: Temperature-Linear Specific Heat and Coherent Transport of Majorana Fermions</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>92</strong>, 115122 (2015).</div>
@@ -236,7 +235,7 @@ image:
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[17] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">N. P. Mitchell, L. M. Nash, D. Hexner, A. M. Turner, and W. T. M. Irvine, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-017-0024-5">Amorphous topological insulators constructed from random point sets</a></em>, Nature Phys <strong>14</strong>, 380 (2018).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-peru_preprint" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[18] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. d’Ornellas, R. Barnett, and D. K. K. Lee, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2207.01389">Quantised Bulk Conductivity as a Local Chern Marker</a></em>, arXiv Preprint (2022).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[18] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. d’Ornellas, R. Barnett, and D. K. K. Lee, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.155124">Quantized Bulk Conductivity as a Local Chern Marker</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>106</strong>, 155124 (2022).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-hastingsLiebSchultzMattisHigherDimensions2004" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[19] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. B. Hastings, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.104431">Lieb-Schultz-Mattis in Higher Dimensions</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>69</strong>, 104431 (2004).</div>
@@ -278,7 +277,7 @@ image:
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[31] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">G. A. Petrakovskii, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1070/pu1981v024n06abeh004850">Amorphous Magnetic Materials</a></em>, Soviet Physics Uspekhi <strong>24</strong>, 511 (1981).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Kaneyoshi2018" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[32] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Kaneyoshi, editor, <em>Amorphous Magnetism</em> (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2018).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[32] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Kaneyoshi, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351069618">Amorphous Magnetism</a></em> (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2017).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-bennett2014amorphous" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[33] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. D. Bennett and A. K. Cheetham, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ar5000314">Amorphous Metal–Organic Frameworks</a></em>, Acc. Chem. Res. <strong>47</strong>, 1555 (2014).</div>
@@ -305,13 +304,13 @@ image:
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[40] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. G. Rau, E. K.-H. Lee, and H.-Y. Kee, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.077204">Generic Spin Model for the Honeycomb Iridates Beyond the Kitaev Limit</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>112</strong>, 077204 (2014).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Chaloupka2010" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[41] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli, and G. Khaliullin, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.027204">Kitaev-Heisenberg Model on a Honeycomb Lattice: Possible Exotic Phases in Iridium Oxides ${A}_{2}{\mathrm{IrO}}_{3}$</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>105</strong>, 027204 (2010).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[41] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli, and G. Khaliullin, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.027204">Kitaev-Heisenberg Model on a Honeycomb Lattice: Possible Exotic Phases in Iridium Oxides A₂IrO₃</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>105</strong>, 027204 (2010).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Chaloupka2013" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[42] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli, and G. Khaliullin, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.097204">Zigzag Magnetic Order in the Iridium Oxide Na₂IrO₃</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>110</strong>, 097204 (2013).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Chaloupka2015" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[43] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Chaloupka and G. Khaliullin, <em>Hidden Symmetries of the Extended Kitaev-Heisenberg Model: Implications for Honeycomb Lattice Iridates A₂IrO₃</em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>92</strong>, 024413 (2015).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[43] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Chaloupka and G. Khaliullin, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.024413">Hidden Symmetries of the Extended Kitaev-Heisenberg Model: Implications for Honeycomb Lattice Iridates A₂IrO₃</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>92</strong>, 024413 (2015).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-Winter2016" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[44] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. M. Winter, Y. Li, H. O. Jeschke, and R. Valentí, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.214431">Challenges in Design of Kitaev Materials: Magnetic Interactions from Competing Energy Scales</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>93</strong>, 214431 (2016).</div>
@@ -350,7 +349,7 @@ image:
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[55] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">K. O’Brien, M. Hermanns, and S. Trebst, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.085101">Classification of Gapless Z₂ Spin Liquids in Three-Dimensional Kitaev Models</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>93</strong>, 085101 (2016).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-mishchenkoChiralSpinLiquids2020" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[56] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. A. Mishchenko, Y. Kato, K. O’Brien, T. A. Bojesen, T. Eschmann, M. Hermanns, S. Trebst, and Y. Motome, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.045118">Chiral Spin Liquids with Crystalline ${\Mathbb{Z}}_{2}$ Gauge Order in a Three-Dimensional Kitaev Model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>101</strong>, 045118 (2020).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[56] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. A. Mishchenko, Y. Kato, K. O’Brien, T. A. Bojesen, T. Eschmann, M. Hermanns, S. Trebst, and Y. Motome, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.045118">Chiral Spin Liquids with Crystalline Z₂ Gauge Order in a Three-Dimensional Kitaev Model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>101</strong>, 045118 (2020).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-yaoAlgebraicSpinLiquid2009" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[57] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">H. Yao, S.-C. Zhang, and S. A. Kivelson, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.217202">Algebraic Spin Liquid in an Exactly Solvable Spin Model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>102</strong>, 217202 (2009).</div>
@@ -403,11 +402,11 @@ image:
 <div id="ref-Kalmeyer1989" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[73] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">V. Kalmeyer and R. B. Laughlin, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.39.11879">Theory of the Spin Liquid State of the Heisenberg Antiferromagnet</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>39</strong>, 11879 (1989).</div>
 </div>
-<div id="ref-manousakisSpinTextonehalfHeisenberg1991" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div id="ref-manousakis1991" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[74] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">E. Manousakis, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.63.1">The Spin-\Textonehalf{} Heisenberg Antiferromagnet on a Square Lattice and Its Application to the Cuprous Oxides</a></em>, Rev. Mod. Phys. <strong>63</strong>, 1 (1991).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[74] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">E. Manousakis, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.63.1">The Spin-1/2 Heisenberg Antiferromagnet on a Square Lattice and Its Application to the Cuprous Oxides</a></em>, Rev. Mod. Phys. <strong>63</strong>, 1 (1991).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-agarwala2019topological" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[75] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Agarwala, <em>Topological Insulators in Amorphous Systems</em>, in <em>Excursions in Ill-Condensed Quantum Matter</em> (Springer, 2019), pp. 61–79.</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[75] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Agarwala, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21511-8_3">Topological Insulators in Amorphous Systems</a></em>, in <em>Excursions in Ill-Condensed Quantum Matter: From Amorphous Topological Insulators to Fractional Spins</em>, edited by A. Agarwala (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019), pp. 61–79.</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-christRandomLatticeField1982" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
 <div class="csl-left-margin">[76] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">N. H. Christ, R. Friedberg, and T. D. Lee, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(82)90222-X">Random Lattice Field Theory: General Formulation</a></em>, Nuclear Physics B <strong>202</strong>, 89 (1982).</div>

_thesis/5_Conclusion/5_Conclusion.html

@@ -57,75 +57,152 @@ image:
  -->
 
 <!-- Main Page Body -->
-<p>This thesis has focussed on two strongly correlated systems. As is the case with many strongly correlated systems, their many-body ground states can be complex and often cannot be reduced to or even adiabatically connected to a product state. In this work, we looked at the Falicov-Kimball (FK) model and the Kitaev Honeycomb (KH) model and defined extensions to them: the Long-Range Falicov-Kimball (LRFK) and amorphous Kitaev (AK) models.</p>
+<p>This thesis has focussed on two strongly correlated systems. In these systems the many-body ground state can be complex and often cannot be reduced to or even adiabatically connected to a product state. I looked at the Falicov-Kimball (FK) model and the Kitaev Honeycomb (KH) model and defined extensions to them: the Long-Range Falicov-Kimball (LRFK) model and the Amorphous Kitaev (AK) model.</p>
-<p>These models are all exactly solvable. They contain extensively many conserved charges which allow their Hamiltonians, and crucially, the interaction terms within them, to be written in quadratic form. This allows them to be solved using the theoretical machinery of non-interacting systems. In the case of the FK and LRFK models, this solvability arises from what is essentially a separation of timescales. The heavy particles move so slowly that they can be treated as stationary. In the KH and AK models, on the other hand, the origin of the conserved degrees of freedom is more complex. Here, the algebra of the Pauli matrices interacts with the trivalent lattices on which the models are defined, to give rise to an emergent <span class="math inline">\(\mathbb{Z}_2\)</span> gauge field whose fluxes are conserved. This latter case is a beautiful example of emergence at play in condensed matter. The gauge and Majorana physics of the Kitaev models seem to arise spontaneously from nothing. Though, of course, this physics was hidden within the structure and local symmetries of the spin Hamiltonian all along.</p>
+<p>These models are all exactly solvable. They contain extensively many conserved charges which allow their Hamiltonians, and crucially, the interaction terms within them, to be written in quadratic form. This allows them to be solved using the theoretical machinery of non-interacting systems. In the case of the FK and LRFK models, this solvability arises from what is essentially a separation of timescales. The heavy particles move so slowly that they can be treated as stationary. In the KH and AK models, on the other hand, the origin of the conserved degrees of freedom is more complex. Here, the algebra of the Pauli matrices interacts with the trivalent lattices on which the models are defined, to give rise to an emergent <span class="math inline">\(\mathbb{Z}_2\)</span> gauge field whose fluxes are conserved. This latter case is a beautiful example of emergence at play in condensed matter. The gauge and Majorana physics of the KH and AK models seems to arise spontaneously from nothing. Of course, this physics was hidden within the structure and local symmetries of the spin Hamiltonian all along.</p>
-<p>At first glance, exactly solvable models can seem a little too fine tuned to be particularly relevant to the real world. Surely these models don’t spontaneously arise in nature? The models studied here provide two different ways to answer this. As we saw, the FK model arises quite naturally as a limit of the Hubbard model which is not exactly solvable. In fact, the FK model has been used as a way to understand more about the behaviour of the Hubbard model itself and of the Mott insulating state. We’ve also seen that it can provide insight into other phenomena such as disorder-free localisation. The KH model was not originally proposed as a model of any particular physical system. It was nevertheless a plausible microscopic Hamiltonian and, given its remarkable properties, it is little wonder that material candidates for Kitaev physics were quickly found. In neither case is the model expected to be a perfect description of any material, indeed more realistic corrections to each model are likely to break their integrability. Despite this, exactly solvable models, by virtue of being solvable, can provide important insights into the diverse physics of strongly correlated materials.</p>
+<p>At first glance, exactly solvable models can seem a little too fine tuned to be particularly relevant to the real world. Surely, these models don’t spontaneously arise in nature? The models studied here provide two different ways to answer this. As we saw in <a href="../2_Background/2.1_FK_Model.html">chapter 2</a>, the FK model arises quite naturally as a limit of the Hubbard model. The Hubbard model is not exactly solvable. In fact, the FK model has been used as a way to understand more about the behaviour of the Hubbard model itself and of the Mott insulating state. We have also seen that it can provide insight into other phenomena such as disorder-free localisation. The KH model was not originally proposed as a model of any particular physical system. It was nevertheless a plausible microscopic Hamiltonian and, given its remarkable properties, it is little wonder that material candidates for Kitaev physics were quickly found. In neither case is the model expected to be a perfect description of any material. Indeed, more realistic corrections to each model are likely to break their integrability. Despite this, exactly solvable models, by virtue of being solvable, can provide important insights into the diverse physics of strongly correlated materials.</p>
-<p>In <a href="../3_Long_Range_Falicov_Kimball/3.1_LRFK_Model.html">chapter 3</a>, we looked at a generalised FK model in 1D, the LRFK model. Metal-insulator transitions are a key theme of work on the FK model and our 1D extension to it was no exception. With the addition of long-range interactions, the model showed a similarly rich phase diagram as its higher dimensional cousins, allowing us to look at transitions between metallic states and, band, Anderson and Mott insulators. We also looked at thermodynamics in 1D and how thermal fluctuations of the conserved charges can lead to disorder-free localisation in the FK and LRFK models. Though the initial surprising results suggested the presence of a mobility edge in 1D it turned out to be a weak localisation effect present in finite sized systems. We propose that a topological variant of the LRFK model akin to the SSH model could be interesting as a point for further study. It could also be an interesting target for cold atom experiments that can naturally generate long-range interactions <span class="citation" data-cites="lepersLongrangeInteractionsUltracold2017"> [<a href="#ref-lepersLongrangeInteractionsUltracold2017" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>.</p>
+<p>In <a href="../3_Long_Range_Falicov_Kimball/3.1_LRFK_Model.html">chapter 3</a>, we looked at a generalised FK model in 1D: the LRFK model. Metal-insulator transitions are a key theme of work on the FK model and our 1D extension to it was no exception. With the addition of long-range interactions, the model showed a similarly rich phase diagram as its higher dimensional cousins, allowing us to look at transitions between metallic states and insulators of the band, Anderson and Mott variety. We also looked at thermodynamics in 1D and how thermal fluctuations of the conserved charges can lead to disorder-free localisation in the FK and LRFK models. The initial surprising results that suggested the presence of a mobility edge in 1D turned out to be a weak localisation effect present in finite sized systems.</p>
-<p>That the Mott insulating state is a key part of the work on the LRFK model is fitting because Mott insulators are the main route to the formation of Quantum Spin Liquid (QSL) states which are themselves a primary driver of interest in the KH model and our extension, the AK model. In <a href="../4_Amorphous_Kitaev_Model/4.1_AMK_Model.html">chapter 4</a>, we addressed the question of whether frustrated magnetic interactions on amorphous lattices can give rise to quantum phases such as the QSL state and found that indeed they can. The AK model, a generalisation of the KH model to random lattices with fixed coordination number three, supports a kind of symmetry broken QSL state called a chiral spin liquid. We showed numerically that the ground state of the model follows a simple generalisation of Lieb’s theorem <span class="citation" data-cites="lieb_flux_1994 OBrienPRB2016 eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020"> [<a href="#ref-lieb_flux_1994" role="doc-biblioref">2</a>–<a href="#ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>]</span>. As with other extensions of the KH model <span class="citation" data-cites="yaoExactChiralSpin2007"> [<a href="#ref-yaoExactChiralSpin2007" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>]</span>, we found that removing the chiral symmetry of the lattice allows the model to support a gapped phase with non-Abelian anyon excitations. The broken lattice symmetry plays the role of the external magnetic field in the original KH model. Finally, like the KH model, finite temperature causes vortex defects to proliferate, causing a transition to a thermal metal state. We have discussed the prospect of whether AK model physics might be realisable in amorphous versions of known KH candidate materials <span class="citation" data-cites="TrebstPhysRep2022"> [<a href="#ref-TrebstPhysRep2022" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>. Alternatively, we might be able to engineer them in synthetic materials such as Metal Organic Frameworks where both Kitaev interactions and amorphous lattices have already been proposed <span class="citation" data-cites="yamadaDesigningKitaevSpin2017 bennett2014amorphous"> [<a href="#ref-yamadaDesigningKitaevSpin2017" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>,<a href="#ref-bennett2014amorphous" role="doc-biblioref">8</a>]</span>.</p>
+<p>That the Mott insulating state is a key part of the work on the LRFK model is fitting because Mott insulators are the main route to the formation of Quantum Spin Liquid (QSL) states. QSLs are themselves a primary driver of interest in the KH model and our extension, the AK model. In <a href="../4_Amorphous_Kitaev_Model/4.1_AMK_Model.html">chapter 4</a>, we addressed the question of whether frustrated magnetic interactions on amorphous lattices can give rise to quantum phases such as the QSL state and found that indeed they can. The AK model, a generalisation of the KH model to random lattices with fixed coordination number three, supports a kind of symmetry broken QSL state called a chiral spin liquid. We showed numerically that the ground state of the model follows a simple generalisation of Lieb’s theorem <span class="citation" data-cites="lieb_flux_1994 OBrienPRB2016 eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020"> [<a href="#ref-lieb_flux_1994" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>–<a href="#ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" role="doc-biblioref">3</a>]</span>. As with other extensions of the KH model <span class="citation" data-cites="yaoExactChiralSpin2007"> [<a href="#ref-yaoExactChiralSpin2007" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>]</span>, we found that removing the chiral symmetry of the lattice allows the model to support a gapped phase with non-Abelian anyon excitations. The broken chiral symmetry plays the role of the external magnetic field in the original KH model. Finally, like the KH model, finite temperature causes vortex defects to proliferate. This triggers a transition to a thermal metal state.</p>
-<p>Unlike the 2D FK model and 1D LRFK models, the KH and AK models don’t have a Finite-Temperature Phase Transition (FTPT). They immediately disorder at any finite temperature <span class="citation" data-cites="eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020"> [<a href="#ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" role="doc-biblioref">4</a>]</span>. However, generalisations of the KH model to 3D do in general have an FTPT. Indeed, the role of dimensionality has been a key theme in this work. Both localisation and thermodynamic phenomena depend crucially on dimensionality, with thermodynamic order generally suppressed and localisation effects strengthened in low dimensions. The graph theory that underpins the KH and AK models itself also changes strongly with dimension. Voronisation in 2D produces trivalent lattices, on which the spin-<span class="math inline">\(1/2\)</span> AK model is exactly solvable. Meanwhile in 3D, Voronisation gives us <span class="math inline">\(z=4\)</span> lattices upon which a spin-<span class="math inline">\(3/2\)</span> generalisation to the KH model is exactly solvable <span class="citation" data-cites="yaoAlgebraicSpinLiquid2009 wenQuantumOrderStringnet2003 ryuThreedimensionalTopologicalPhase2009"> [<a href="#ref-yaoAlgebraicSpinLiquid2009" role="doc-biblioref">9</a>–<a href="#ref-ryuThreedimensionalTopologicalPhase2009" role="doc-biblioref">11</a>]</span>. Similarly, planar graphs are a uniquely 2D construct. Satisfying planarity imposes constraints on the connectivity of planar graphs leading amorphous planar graphs to have strong anti-correlations which can violate otherwise robust bounds like the Harris criterion <span class="citation" data-cites="harrisEffectRandomDefects1974"> [<a href="#ref-harrisEffectRandomDefects1974" role="doc-biblioref">12</a>]</span>. Contrast this with Anderson localisation in 1D where only longer range correlations in the disorder can produce surprising effects <span class="citation" data-cites="aubryAnalyticityBreakingAnderson1980 dassarmaLocalizationMobilityEdges1990 dunlapAbsenceLocalizationRandomdimer1990 izrailevLocalizationMobilityEdge1999 croyAndersonLocalization1D2011 izrailevAnomalousLocalizationLowDimensional2012"> [<a href="#ref-aubryAnalyticityBreakingAnderson1980" role="doc-biblioref">13</a>–<a href="#ref-izrailevAnomalousLocalizationLowDimensional2012" role="doc-biblioref">18</a>]</span>.</p>
+<figure>
-<p>Xiao-Gang Wen makes the case that one of the primary reasons to study QSLs is as a stepping stone to understanding the High-<span class="math inline">\(T_c\)</span> superconductors <span class="citation" data-cites="wenQuantumOrdersSymmetric2002"> [<a href="#ref-wenQuantumOrdersSymmetric2002" role="doc-biblioref">19</a>]</span>. His logic is that since the High-<span class="math inline">\(T_c\)</span> superconductors are believed to arise from doped Mott insulators, the QSLs, which arise from undoped Mott insulators, make a good jumping off point. This is where exactly solvable models like the FK and KH models shine. The FK model provides a tractable means to study superconductor like states in doped Mott insulators <span class="citation" data-cites="caiVisualizingEvolutionMott2016"> [<a href="#ref-caiVisualizingEvolutionMott2016" role="doc-biblioref">20</a>]</span>, while the KH model gives us a tangible QSL state to play with. The extensions introduced in this work serve to explore how far we can push these models. Overall, I believe that the results presented here show that exactly solvable models can be a useful theoretical tool for understanding the behaviour of generic strongly correlated materials.</p>
+<img src="/assets/thesis/conclusion/mof.svg" id="fig-mof" data-short-caption="Example of a Metal Organic Framework" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 1: An example of a Metal Organic Framework (MOF). MOFs are large synthetic organic ligands coordinated with metal ions that can cross link to form crystals. It has been demonstrated that these materials can sustain Kitaev-like interactions  [5]. They can also be made into amorphous materials  [6]. This image from  [7] is in the public domain." />
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1: An example of a Metal Organic Framework (MOF). MOFs are large synthetic organic ligands coordinated with metal ions that can cross link to form crystals. It has been demonstrated that these materials can sustain Kitaev-like interactions <span class="citation" data-cites="yamadaDesigningKitaevSpin2017"> [<a href="#ref-yamadaDesigningKitaevSpin2017" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>]</span>. They can also be made into amorphous materials <span class="citation" data-cites="bennett2014amorphous"> [<a href="#ref-bennett2014amorphous" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>. This image from <span class="citation" data-cites="rosiHydrogenStorageMicroporous2003"> [<a href="#ref-rosiHydrogenStorageMicroporous2003" role="doc-biblioref">7</a>]</span> is in the public domain.</figcaption>
+</figure>
+<p>Unlike the 2D FK model and 1D LRFK models, the KH and AK models don’t have a Finite-Temperature Phase Transition (FTPT). They immediately disorder at any finite temperature <span class="citation" data-cites="eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020"> [<a href="#ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" role="doc-biblioref">3</a>]</span>. However, generalisations of the KH model to 3D do in general have an FTPT. Indeed, the role of dimensionality has been a key theme in this work. Both localisation and thermodynamic phenomena depend crucially on dimensionality, with thermodynamic order generally suppressed and localisation effects strengthened in low dimensions. The graph theory that underpins the KH and AK models itself also changes strongly with dimension. Voronisation in 2D produces trivalent lattices, on which the spin-<span class="math inline">\(1/2\)</span> AK model is exactly solvable. Meanwhile in 3D, voronisation gives us <span class="math inline">\(z=4\)</span> lattices upon which a spin-<span class="math inline">\(3/2\)</span> generalisation to the KH model is exactly solvable <span class="citation" data-cites="yaoAlgebraicSpinLiquid2009 wenQuantumOrderStringnet2003 ryuThreedimensionalTopologicalPhase2009"> [<a href="#ref-yaoAlgebraicSpinLiquid2009" role="doc-biblioref">8</a>–<a href="#ref-ryuThreedimensionalTopologicalPhase2009" role="doc-biblioref">10</a>]</span>. Similarly, planar and toroidal graphs are a uniquely 2D construct. Satisfying planarity imposes constraints on the connectivity of planar graphs. This leads amorphous planar graphs to have strong anti-correlations which can violate otherwise robust bounds like the Harris criterion <span class="citation" data-cites="harrisEffectRandomDefects1974"> [<a href="#ref-harrisEffectRandomDefects1974" role="doc-biblioref">11</a>]</span>. Contrast this with Anderson localisation in 1D where only longer range correlations in the disorder can produce surprising effects <span class="citation" data-cites="aubryAnalyticityBreakingAnderson1980 dassarmaLocalizationMobilityEdges1990 dunlapAbsenceLocalizationRandomdimer1990 izrailevLocalizationMobilityEdge1999 croyAndersonLocalization1D2011 izrailevAnomalousLocalizationLowDimensional2012"> [<a href="#ref-aubryAnalyticityBreakingAnderson1980" role="doc-biblioref">12</a>–<a href="#ref-izrailevAnomalousLocalizationLowDimensional2012" role="doc-biblioref">17</a>]</span>.</p>
+<p>Looking towards future work, the LRFK model provides multiple possible routes. One interesting idea is to park the model at a thermal critical point. This would generate a scale-free disorder potential, which could potentially lead to complex localisation physics not often seen in 1D <span class="citation" data-cites="aubryAnalyticityBreakingAnderson1980 shimasakiAnomalousLocalizationMultifractality2022"> [<a href="#ref-aubryAnalyticityBreakingAnderson1980" role="doc-biblioref">12</a>,<a href="#ref-shimasakiAnomalousLocalizationMultifractality2022" role="doc-biblioref">18</a>]</span>. Like other solvable models of disorder-free localisation, the LRFK model should also exhibit intriguing out-of-equilibrium physics, such as slow entanglement dynamics. This could be used to help understand these phenomena in more generic interacting systems <span class="citation" data-cites="hartLogarithmicEntanglementGrowth2021"> [<a href="#ref-hartLogarithmicEntanglementGrowth2021" role="doc-biblioref">19</a>]</span>. There is also the rich ground state phenomenology of the FK model as a function of filling <span class="citation" data-cites="gruberGroundStatesSpinless1990"> [<a href="#ref-gruberGroundStatesSpinless1990" role="doc-biblioref">20</a>]</span>, such as the devil’s staircase <span class="citation" data-cites="michelettiCompleteDevilStaircase1997"> [<a href="#ref-michelettiCompleteDevilStaircase1997" role="doc-biblioref">21</a>]</span> as well as superconductor like states <span class="citation" data-cites="caiVisualizingEvolutionMott2016"> [<a href="#ref-caiVisualizingEvolutionMott2016" role="doc-biblioref">22</a>]</span>. Could the LRFK model stabilise these at finite temperature? Finally, a topological variant of the LRFK model akin to the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model could be an interesting way to probe the interplay of topological bound states and thermal domain wall defects.</p>
+<p>Looking at the AK model, we discussed whether its physics might be realisable in amorphous versions of known KH candidate materials <span class="citation" data-cites="TrebstPhysRep2022"> [<a href="#ref-TrebstPhysRep2022" role="doc-biblioref">23</a>]</span>. Alternatively, we might be able to engineer them in synthetic materials, such as Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs). Work on MOFs has already explored the possibility of both Kitaev-like interactions and amorphous lattices <span class="citation" data-cites="yamadaDesigningKitaevSpin2017 bennett2014amorphous"> [<a href="#ref-yamadaDesigningKitaevSpin2017" role="doc-biblioref">5</a>,<a href="#ref-bennett2014amorphous" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>. It is an open question whether the superexchange couplings that generate Kitaev interactions could survive the transition to an amorphous lattice. If the interactions do survive, there will likely be many defects of different kinds present in the resulting material. These might take the form of dangling bonds, vertex degree <span class="math inline">\(&gt; 3\)</span> or violations of the colouring conditions. I therefore hope that future work examines how robust the QSL and CSL states of the AK model are to these kinds of disorder. This is a difficult task, as many of these classes of defects would break the integrability of the AK model that we relied on to make the work computationally feasible <span class="citation" data-cites="Rau2014 Chaloupka2010 Chaloupka2013 Chaloupka2015 Winter2016"> [<a href="#ref-Rau2014" role="doc-biblioref">24</a>–<a href="#ref-Winter2016" role="doc-biblioref">28</a>]</span>. While we are considering models with defects, we might consider alternate lattice construction techniques <span class="citation" data-cites="agarwala2019topological christRandomLatticeField1982"> [<a href="#ref-agarwala2019topological" role="doc-biblioref">29</a>,<a href="#ref-christRandomLatticeField1982" role="doc-biblioref">30</a>]</span>. Lattices constructed using these methods would have defects but may have other desirable properties when compared to Voronoi lattices.</p>
+<p>In terms of experimental signatures, we discussed the quantised thermal Hall effect <span class="citation" data-cites="Kasahara2018 Yokoi2021 Yamashita2020 Bruin2022"> [<a href="#ref-Kasahara2018" role="doc-biblioref">31</a>–<a href="#ref-Bruin2022" role="doc-biblioref">34</a>]</span>, local probes such as spin-polarised scanning tunnelling microscopy <span class="citation" data-cites="Feldmeier2020 Konig2020 Udagawa2021"> [<a href="#ref-Feldmeier2020" role="doc-biblioref">35</a>–<a href="#ref-Udagawa2021" role="doc-biblioref">37</a>]</span>, and longitudinal heat transport signatures <span class="citation" data-cites="Beenakker2013"> [<a href="#ref-Beenakker2013" role="doc-biblioref">38</a>]</span>. One possible difficulty is that the introduction of topological disorder may dilute some of these signatures. On the brighter side, topological disorder may also suppress competing interactions that would otherwise induce magnetic ordering. This could potentially widen the class of materials that could host a QSL or CSL ground state.</p>
+<p>Both the LRFK and AK models could be interesting targets for quantum simulation. Cold atom experiments can naturally generate long-range interactions which would be well suited to simulations of the LRFK model <span class="citation" data-cites="lepersLongrangeInteractionsUltracold2017"> [<a href="#ref-lepersLongrangeInteractionsUltracold2017" role="doc-biblioref">39</a>]</span>. Optical lattice experiments are capable of supporting both Kitaev interactions <span class="citation" data-cites="duanControllingSpinExchange2003 micheliToolboxLatticespinModels2006"> [<a href="#ref-duanControllingSpinExchange2003" role="doc-biblioref">40</a>,<a href="#ref-micheliToolboxLatticespinModels2006" role="doc-biblioref">41</a>]</span> and amorphous lattices <span class="citation" data-cites="sadeghiAmorphousTwodimensionalOptical2005"> [<a href="#ref-sadeghiAmorphousTwodimensionalOptical2005" role="doc-biblioref">42</a>]</span> so it is natural to ask whether they could simulate the AK model too.</p>
+<p>Xiao-Gang Wen makes the case that one of the primary reasons to study QSLs is as a stepping stone to understanding the high-<span class="math inline">\(T_c\)</span> superconductors <span class="citation" data-cites="wenQuantumOrdersSymmetric2002"> [<a href="#ref-wenQuantumOrdersSymmetric2002" role="doc-biblioref">43</a>]</span>. His logic is that since the high-<span class="math inline">\(T_c\)</span> superconductors are believed to arise from doped Mott insulators, the QSLs, which arise from undoped Mott insulators, make a good jumping off point. This is where exactly solvable models like the FK and KH model shine. The FK model provides a tractable means to study superconductor like states in doped Mott insulators <span class="citation" data-cites="caiVisualizingEvolutionMott2016"> [<a href="#ref-caiVisualizingEvolutionMott2016" role="doc-biblioref">22</a>]</span>, while the KH model gives us a tangible QSL state to play with. The extensions introduced in this work serve to explore how far we can push these models. To what extent they are a useful theoretical tool for understanding the behaviour of generic strongly correlated materials remains to be seen. Either way, I hope that this works spurs more interest in amorphous quantum many-body phases and strongly correlated materials.</p>
 <section id="bibliography" class="level1 unnumbered">
 <h1 class="unnumbered">Bibliography</h1>
 <div id="refs" class="references csl-bib-body" role="doc-bibliography">
-<div id="ref-lepersLongrangeInteractionsUltracold2017" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[1] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. Lepers and O. Dulieu, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.02833">Long-Range Interactions Between Ultracold Atoms and Molecules</a></em>, arXiv:1703.02833.</div>
-</div>
 <div id="ref-lieb_flux_1994" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[2] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">E. H. Lieb, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.2158">Flux Phase of the Half-Filled Band</a></em>, Physical Review Letters <strong>73</strong>, 2158 (1994).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[1] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">E. H. Lieb, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.2158">Flux Phase of the Half-Filled Band</a></em>, Physical Review Letters <strong>73</strong>, 2158 (1994).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-OBrienPRB2016" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[3] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">K. O’Brien, M. Hermanns, and S. Trebst, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.085101">Classification of Gapless Z₂ Spin Liquids in Three-Dimensional Kitaev Models</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>93</strong>, 085101 (2016).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[2] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">K. O’Brien, M. Hermanns, and S. Trebst, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.085101">Classification of Gapless Z₂ Spin Liquids in Three-Dimensional Kitaev Models</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>93</strong>, 085101 (2016).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-eschmannThermodynamicClassificationThreedimensional2020" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[4] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Eschmann, P. A. Mishchenko, K. O’Brien, T. A. Bojesen, Y. Kato, M. Hermanns, Y. Motome, and S. Trebst, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.075125">Thermodynamic Classification of Three-Dimensional Kitaev Spin Liquids</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>102</strong>, 075125 (2020).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[3] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Eschmann, P. A. Mishchenko, K. O’Brien, T. A. Bojesen, Y. Kato, M. Hermanns, Y. Motome, and S. Trebst, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.075125">Thermodynamic Classification of Three-Dimensional Kitaev Spin Liquids</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>102</strong>, 075125 (2020).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-yaoExactChiralSpin2007" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[5] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">H. Yao and S. A. Kivelson, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.247203">An Exact Chiral Spin Liquid with Non-Abelian Anyons</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>99</strong>, 247203 (2007).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[4] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">H. Yao and S. A. Kivelson, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.247203">An Exact Chiral Spin Liquid with Non-Abelian Anyons</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>99</strong>, 247203 (2007).</div>
-</div>
-<div id="ref-TrebstPhysRep2022" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[6] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. Trebst and C. Hickey, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2021.11.003">Kitaev Materials</a></em>, Physics Reports <strong>950</strong>, 1 (2022).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-yamadaDesigningKitaevSpin2017" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[7] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. G. Yamada, H. Fujita, and M. Oshikawa, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.057202">Designing Kitaev Spin Liquids in Metal-Organic Frameworks</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>119</strong>, 057202 (2017).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[5] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. G. Yamada, H. Fujita, and M. Oshikawa, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.057202">Designing Kitaev Spin Liquids in Metal-Organic Frameworks</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>119</strong>, 057202 (2017).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-bennett2014amorphous" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[8] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. D. Bennett and A. K. Cheetham, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ar5000314">Amorphous Metal–Organic Frameworks</a></em>, Acc. Chem. Res. <strong>47</strong>, 1555 (2014).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[6] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. D. Bennett and A. K. Cheetham, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ar5000314">Amorphous Metal–Organic Frameworks</a></em>, Acc. Chem. Res. <strong>47</strong>, 1555 (2014).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-rosiHydrogenStorageMicroporous2003" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[7] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">N. L. Rosi, J. Eckert, M. Eddaoudi, D. T. Vodak, J. Kim, M. O’Keeffe, and O. M. Yaghi, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1083440">Hydrogen Storage in Microporous Metal-Organic Frameworks</a></em>, Science <strong>300</strong>, 1127 (2003).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-yaoAlgebraicSpinLiquid2009" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[9] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">H. Yao, S.-C. Zhang, and S. A. Kivelson, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.217202">Algebraic Spin Liquid in an Exactly Solvable Spin Model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>102</strong>, 217202 (2009).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[8] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">H. Yao, S.-C. Zhang, and S. A. Kivelson, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.217202">Algebraic Spin Liquid in an Exactly Solvable Spin Model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>102</strong>, 217202 (2009).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-wenQuantumOrderStringnet2003" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[10] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">X.-G. Wen, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.68.065003">Quantum Order from String-Net Condensations and the Origin of Light and Massless Fermions</a></em>, Phys. Rev. D <strong>68</strong>, 065003 (2003).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[9] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">X.-G. Wen, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.68.065003">Quantum Order from String-Net Condensations and the Origin of Light and Massless Fermions</a></em>, Phys. Rev. D <strong>68</strong>, 065003 (2003).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-ryuThreedimensionalTopologicalPhase2009" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[11] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. Ryu, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.075124">Three-Dimensional Topological Phase on the Diamond Lattice</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>79</strong>, 075124 (2009).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[10] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. Ryu, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.075124">Three-Dimensional Topological Phase on the Diamond Lattice</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>79</strong>, 075124 (2009).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-harrisEffectRandomDefects1974" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[12] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. B. Harris, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/7/9/009">Effect of Random Defects on the Critical Behaviour of Ising Models</a></em>, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. <strong>7</strong>, 1671 (1974).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[11] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. B. Harris, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/7/9/009">Effect of Random Defects on the Critical Behaviour of Ising Models</a></em>, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. <strong>7</strong>, 1671 (1974).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-aubryAnalyticityBreakingAnderson1980" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[13] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. Aubry and G. André, <em>Analyticity Breaking and Anderson Localization in Incommensurate Lattices</em>, Proceedings, VIII International Colloquium on Group-Theoretical Methods in Physics <strong>3</strong>, 18 (1980).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[12] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. Aubry and G. André, <em>Analyticity Breaking and Anderson Localization in Incommensurate Lattices</em>, Proceedings, VIII International Colloquium on Group-Theoretical Methods in Physics <strong>3</strong>, 18 (1980).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-dassarmaLocalizationMobilityEdges1990" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[14] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. Das Sarma, S. He, and X. C. Xie, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.5544">Localization, Mobility Edges, and Metal-Insulator Transition in a Class of One-Dimensional Slowly Varying Deterministic Potentials</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>41</strong>, 5544 (1990).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[13] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. Das Sarma, S. He, and X. C. Xie, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.5544">Localization, Mobility Edges, and Metal-Insulator Transition in a Class of One-Dimensional Slowly Varying Deterministic Potentials</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>41</strong>, 5544 (1990).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-dunlapAbsenceLocalizationRandomdimer1990" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[15] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">D. H. Dunlap, H.-L. Wu, and P. W. Phillips, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.88">Absence of Localization in a Random-Dimer Model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>65</strong>, 88 (1990).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[14] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">D. H. Dunlap, H.-L. Wu, and P. W. Phillips, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.88">Absence of Localization in a Random-Dimer Model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>65</strong>, 88 (1990).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-izrailevLocalizationMobilityEdge1999" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[16] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">F. M. Izrailev and A. A. Krokhin, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4062">Localization and the Mobility Edge in One-Dimensional Potentials with Correlated Disorder</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>82</strong>, 4062 (1999).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[15] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">F. M. Izrailev and A. A. Krokhin, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4062">Localization and the Mobility Edge in One-Dimensional Potentials with Correlated Disorder</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>82</strong>, 4062 (1999).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-croyAndersonLocalization1D2011" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[17] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Croy, P. Cain, and M. Schreiber, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2011-20212-1">Anderson Localization in 1d Systems with Correlated Disorder</a></em>, Eur. Phys. J. B <strong>82</strong>, 107 (2011).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[16] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Croy, P. Cain, and M. Schreiber, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2011-20212-1">Anderson Localization in 1d Systems with Correlated Disorder</a></em>, Eur. Phys. J. B <strong>82</strong>, 107 (2011).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-izrailevAnomalousLocalizationLowDimensional2012" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[18] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">F. M. Izrailev, A. A. Krokhin, and N. M. Makarov, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2011.11.002">Anomalous Localization in Low-Dimensional Systems with Correlated Disorder</a></em>, Physics Reports <strong>512</strong>, 125 (2012).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[17] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">F. M. Izrailev, A. A. Krokhin, and N. M. Makarov, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2011.11.002">Anomalous Localization in Low-Dimensional Systems with Correlated Disorder</a></em>, Physics Reports <strong>512</strong>, 125 (2012).</div>
 </div>
-<div id="ref-wenQuantumOrdersSymmetric2002" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div id="ref-shimasakiAnomalousLocalizationMultifractality2022" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[19] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">X.-G. Wen, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.165113">Quantum Orders and Symmetric Spin Liquids</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>65</strong>, 165113 (2002).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[18] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Shimasaki, M. Prichard, H. E. Kondakci, J. Pagett, Y. Bai, P. Dotti, A. Cao, T.-C. Lu, T. Grover, and D. M. Weld, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.09442">Anomalous Localization and Multifractality in a Kicked Quasicrystal</a></em>, arXiv:2203.09442.</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-hartLogarithmicEntanglementGrowth2021" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[19] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">O. Hart, S. Gopalakrishnan, and C. Castelnovo, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.227202">Logarithmic Entanglement Growth from Disorder-Free Localization in the Two-Leg Compass Ladder</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>126</strong>, 227202 (2021).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-gruberGroundStatesSpinless1990" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[20] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Gruber, J. Iwanski, J. Jedrzejewski, and P. Lemberger, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.2198">Ground States of the Spinless Falicov-Kimball Model</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>41</strong>, 2198 (1990).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-michelettiCompleteDevilStaircase1997" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[21] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Micheletti, A. B. Harris, and J. M. Yeomans, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/30/21/002">A Complete Devil’s Staircase in the Falicov-Kimball Model</a></em>, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. <strong>30</strong>, L711 (1997).</div>
 </div>
 <div id="ref-caiVisualizingEvolutionMott2016" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[20] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. Cai, W. Ruan, Y. Peng, C. Ye, X. Li, Z. Hao, X. Zhou, D.-H. Lee, and Y. Wang, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3840">Visualizing the Evolution from the Mott Insulator to a Charge-Ordered Insulator in Lightly Doped Cuprates</a></em>, Nature Phys <strong>12</strong>, 11 (2016).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[22] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">P. Cai, W. Ruan, Y. Peng, C. Ye, X. Li, Z. Hao, X. Zhou, D.-H. Lee, and Y. Wang, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3840">Visualizing the Evolution from the Mott Insulator to a Charge-Ordered Insulator in Lightly Doped Cuprates</a></em>, Nature Phys <strong>12</strong>, 11 (2016).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-TrebstPhysRep2022" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[23] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. Trebst and C. Hickey, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2021.11.003">Kitaev Materials</a></em>, Physics Reports <strong>950</strong>, 1 (2022).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-Rau2014" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[24] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. G. Rau, E. K.-H. Lee, and H.-Y. Kee, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.077204">Generic Spin Model for the Honeycomb Iridates Beyond the Kitaev Limit</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>112</strong>, 077204 (2014).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-Chaloupka2010" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[25] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli, and G. Khaliullin, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.027204">Kitaev-Heisenberg Model on a Honeycomb Lattice: Possible Exotic Phases in Iridium Oxides A₂IrO₃</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>105</strong>, 027204 (2010).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-Chaloupka2013" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[26] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli, and G. Khaliullin, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.097204">Zigzag Magnetic Order in the Iridium Oxide Na₂IrO₃</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>110</strong>, 097204 (2013).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-Chaloupka2015" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[27] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Chaloupka and G. Khaliullin, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.024413">Hidden Symmetries of the Extended Kitaev-Heisenberg Model: Implications for Honeycomb Lattice Iridates A₂IrO₃</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>92</strong>, 024413 (2015).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-Winter2016" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[28] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. M. Winter, Y. Li, H. O. Jeschke, and R. Valentí, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.214431">Challenges in Design of Kitaev Materials: Magnetic Interactions from Competing Energy Scales</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>93</strong>, 214431 (2016).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-agarwala2019topological" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[29] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Agarwala, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21511-8_3">Topological Insulators in Amorphous Systems</a></em>, in <em>Excursions in Ill-Condensed Quantum Matter: From Amorphous Topological Insulators to Fractional Spins</em>, edited by A. Agarwala (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019), pp. 61–79.</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-christRandomLatticeField1982" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[30] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">N. H. Christ, R. Friedberg, and T. D. Lee, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(82)90222-X">Random Lattice Field Theory: General Formulation</a></em>, Nuclear Physics B <strong>202</strong>, 89 (1982).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-Kasahara2018" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[31] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">Y. Kasahara, T. Ohnishi, Y. Mizukami, et al., <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0274-0">Majorana Quantization and Half-Integer Thermal Quantum Hall Effect in a Kitaev Spin Liquid</a></em>, Nature <strong>559</strong>, 227 (2018).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-Yokoi2021" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[32] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">T. Yokoi, S. Ma, Y. Kasahara, et al., <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay5551">Majorana Quantization and Half-Integer Thermal Quantum Hall Effect in a Kitaev Spin Liquid</a></em>, Science <strong>373</strong>, 568 (2021).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-Yamashita2020" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[33] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. Yamashita, J. Gouchi, Y. Uwatoko, N. Kurita, and H. Tanaka, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.220404">Sample Dependence of Half-Integer Quantized Thermal Hall Effect in the Kitaev Spin-Liquid Candidate α-RuCl₃</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>102</strong>, 220404 (2020).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-Bruin2022" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[34] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. A. N. Bruin, R. R. Claus, Y. Matsumoto, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, and H. Takagi, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01501-y">Majorana Quantization and Half-Integer Thermal Quantum Hall Effect in a Kitaev Spin Liquid</a></em>, Nature Physics <strong>18</strong>, 401 (2022).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-Feldmeier2020" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[35] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">J. Feldmeier, W. Natori, M. Knap, and J. Knolle, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.134423">Local Probes for Charge-Neutral Edge States in Two-Dimensional Quantum Magnets</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>102</strong>, 134423 (2020).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-Konig2020" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[36] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">E. J. König, M. T. Randeria, and B. Jäck, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.267206">Tunneling Spectroscopy of Quantum Spin Liquids</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>125</strong>, 267206 (2020).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-Udagawa2021" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[37] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. Udagawa, S. Takayoshi, and T. Oka, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.127201">Scanning Tunneling Microscopy as a Single Majorana Detector of Kitaev’s Chiral Spin Liquid</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>126</strong>, 127201 (2021).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-Beenakker2013" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[38] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. W. J. Beenakker, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-030212-184337">Search for Majorana Fermions in Superconductors</a></em>, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics <strong>4</strong>, 113 (2013).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-lepersLongrangeInteractionsUltracold2017" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[39] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">M. Lepers and O. Dulieu, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.02833">Long-Range Interactions Between Ultracold Atoms and Molecules</a></em>, arXiv:1703.02833.</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-duanControllingSpinExchange2003" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[40] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">L.-M. Duan, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.090402">Controlling Spin Exchange Interactions of Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices</a></em>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>91</strong>, 090402 (2003).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-micheliToolboxLatticespinModels2006" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[41] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">A. Micheli, G. K. Brennen, and P. Zoller, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys287">A Toolbox for Lattice-Spin Models with Polar Molecules</a></em>, Nature Phys <strong>2</strong>, 5 (2006).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-sadeghiAmorphousTwodimensionalOptical2005" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[42] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">S. M. Sadeghi, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.125336">Amorphous Two-Dimensional Optical Lattices with Coherently Controlled Morphologies in Quantum Well Structures</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>72</strong>, 125336 (2005).</div>
+</div>
+<div id="ref-wenQuantumOrdersSymmetric2002" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[43] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">X.-G. Wen, <em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.165113">Quantum Orders and Symmetric Spin Liquids</a></em>, Phys. Rev. B <strong>65</strong>, 165113 (2002).</div>
 </div>
 </div>
 </section>

_thesis/6_Appendices/A.1.2_Fermion_Free_Energy.html

@@ -68,23 +68,29 @@ image:
 </section>
 <section id="evaluation-of-the-fermion-free-energy" class="level1">
 <h1>Evaluation of the Fermion Free Energy</h1>
-<p>There are <span class="math inline">\(2^N\)</span> possible ion configurations <span class="math inline">\(\{ n_i \}\)</span>, we define <span class="math inline">\(n^k_i\)</span> to be the occupation of the ith site of the kth configuration. The quantum part of the free energy can then be defined through the quantum partition function <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{Z}^k\)</span> associated with each ionic state <span class="math inline">\(n^k_i\)</span>: <span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
+<p>There are <span class="math inline">\(2^N\)</span> possible configurations of the spins in the LRFK model. In the language of ions and electrons (immobile and mobile species), we define <span class="math inline">\(n^k_i\)</span> to be the occupation of the <span class="math inline">\(i\)</span>th site of the <span class="math inline">\(k\)</span>th configuration. The quantum part of the free energy can then be defined through the quantum partition function <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{Z}^k\)</span> associated with each state <span class="math inline">\(n^k_i\)</span>:</p>
+<p><span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
 F^k &amp;= -1/\beta \ln{\mathcal{Z}^k} \\
-\end{aligned}\]</span> % Such that the overall partition function is: <span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
+\end{aligned}\]</span></p>
+<p>Such that the overall partition function is:</p>
+<p><span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
 \mathcal{Z} &amp;= \sum_k e^{- \beta H^k} Z^k \\
 &amp;= \sum_k e^{-\beta (H^k + F^k)} \\
 \end{aligned}\]</span></p>
-<p>Because fermions are limited to occupation numbers of 0 or 1 <span class="math inline">\(Z^k\)</span> simplifies nicely. If <span class="math inline">\(m^j_i = \{0,1\}\)</span> is defined as the occupation of the level with energy <span class="math inline">\(\epsilon^k_i\)</span> then the partition function is a sum over all the occupation states labelled by j: <span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
+<p>Because fermions are limited to occupation numbers of 0 or 1, <span class="math inline">\(Z^k\)</span> simplifies nicely. If <span class="math inline">\(m^j_i = \{0,1\}\)</span> is defined as the occupation of the level with energy <span class="math inline">\(\epsilon^k_i\)</span> then the partition function is a sum over all the occupation states labelled by <span class="math inline">\(j\)</span>:</p>
+<p><span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
 Z^k    &amp;= \mathrm{Tr} e^{-\beta F^k} = \sum_j e^{-\beta \sum_i m^j_i \epsilon^k_i}\\
        &amp;= \sum_j \prod_i e^{- \beta m^j_i \epsilon^k_i}= \prod_i \sum_j e^{- \beta m^j_i \epsilon^k_i}\\
        &amp;= \prod_i (1 + e^{- \beta \epsilon^k_i})\\
 F^k    &amp;= -1/\beta \sum_k \ln{(1 + e^{- \beta \epsilon^k_i})}
-\end{aligned}\]</span> % Observables can then be calculated from the partition function, for examples the occupation numbers:</p>
+\end{aligned}\]</span></p>
+<p>Observables can then be calculated from the partition function, for examples the occupation numbers:</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
 \langle N \rangle &amp;= \frac{1}{\beta} \frac{1}{Z} \frac{\partial Z}{\partial \mu} = - \frac{\partial F}{\partial \mu}\\
     &amp;= \frac{1}{\beta} \frac{1}{Z} \frac{\partial}{\partial \mu} \sum_k e^{-\beta (H^k + F^k)}\\
     &amp;= 1/Z \sum_k (N^k_{\mathrm{ion}} + N^k_{\mathrm{electron}}) e^{-\beta (H^k + F^k)}\\
-\end{aligned}\]</span> % with the definitions:</p>
+\end{aligned}\]</span></p>
+<p>with the definitions:</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
 N^k_{\mathrm{ion}} &amp;= - \frac{\partial H^k}{\partial \mu} = \sum_i n^k_i\\
 N^k_{\mathrm{electron}} &amp;= - \frac{\partial F^k}{\partial \mu} = \sum_i \left(1 + e^{\beta \epsilon^k_i}\right)^{-1}\\

_thesis/6_Appendices/A.1_Particle_Hole_Symmetry.html

@@ -67,10 +67,10 @@ image:
 <h1>Particle-Hole Symmetry</h1>
 <p>The Hubbard and FK models on a bipartite lattice have particle-hole (PH) symmetry <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{P}^\dagger H \mathcal{P} = - H\)</span>, accordingly they have symmetric energy spectra. The associated symmetry operator <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{P}\)</span> exchanges creation and annihilation operators along with a sign change between the two sublattices. In the language of the Hubbard model of electrons <span class="math inline">\(c_{\alpha,i}\)</span> with spin <span class="math inline">\(\alpha\)</span> at site <span class="math inline">\(i\)</span> the particle hole operator corresponds to the substitution of new fermion operators <span class="math inline">\(d^\dagger_{\alpha,i}\)</span> and number operators <span class="math inline">\(m_{\alpha,i}\)</span> where</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[d^\dagger_{\alpha,i} = \epsilon_i c_{\alpha,i}\]</span> <span class="math display">\[m_{\alpha,i} = d^\dagger_{\alpha,i}d_{\alpha,i}\]</span></p>
-<p>the lattices must be bipartite because to make this work we set <span class="math inline">\(\epsilon_i = +1\)</span> for the A sublattice and <span class="math inline">\(-1\)</span> for the even sublattice <span class="citation" data-cites="gruberFalicovKimballModel2005"> [<a href="#ref-gruberFalicovKimballModel2005" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>.</p>
+<p>the lattices must be bipartite because to make this work we set <span class="math inline">\(\epsilon_i = +1\)</span> for the A sublattice and <span class="math inline">\(-1\)</span> for the even sublattice <span class="citation" data-cites="gruberFalicovKimballModel2006"> [<a href="#ref-gruberFalicovKimballModel2006" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>.</p>
 <p>The entirely filled state <span class="math inline">\(\ket{\Omega} = \sum_{\alpha,i} c^\dagger_{\alpha,i} \ket{0}\)</span> becomes the new vacuum state <span class="math display">\[d_{i\sigma} \ket{\Omega} = (-1)^i c^\dagger_{i\sigma} \sum_{j\rho} c^\dagger_{j\rho} \ket{0} = 0.\]</span></p>
-<p>The number operator <span class="math inline">\(m_{\alpha,i} = 0,1\)</span> counts holes rather than electrons <span class="math display">\[ m_{\alpha,i} = c_{\alpha,i} c^\dagger_{\alpha,i} = 1 - c^\dagger_{\alpha,i} c_{\alpha,i}.\]</span></p>
+<p>The number operator <span class="math inline">\(m_{\alpha,i} = 0,1\)</span> now counts holes rather than electrons <span class="math display">\[ m_{\alpha,i} = c_{\alpha,i} c^\dagger_{\alpha,i} = 1 - c^\dagger_{\alpha,i} c_{\alpha,i}.\]</span></p>
-<p>With the last equality following from the fermionic commutation relations. In the case of nearest neighbour hopping on a bipartite lattice this transformation also leaves the hopping term unchanged because <span class="math inline">\(\epsilon_i \epsilon_j = -1\)</span> when <span class="math inline">\(i\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(j\)</span> are on different sublattices: <span class="math display">\[ d^\dagger_{\alpha,i} d_{\alpha,j} = \epsilon_i \epsilon_j c_{\alpha,i} c^\dagger_{\alpha,j} = c^\dagger_{\alpha,i} c_{\alpha,j} \]</span></p>
+<p>In the case of nearest neighbour hopping on a bipartite lattice this transformation also leaves the hopping term unchanged because <span class="math inline">\(\epsilon_i \epsilon_j = -1\)</span> when <span class="math inline">\(i\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(j\)</span> are on different sublattices: <span class="math display">\[ d^\dagger_{\alpha,i} d_{\alpha,j} = \epsilon_i \epsilon_j c_{\alpha,i} c^\dagger_{\alpha,j} = c^\dagger_{\alpha,i} c_{\alpha,j} \]</span></p>
 <p>Defining the particle density <span class="math inline">\(\rho\)</span> as the number of fermions per site: <span class="math display">\[
     \rho = \frac{1}{N} \sum_i \left( n_{i \uparrow} + n_{i \downarrow} \right)
 \]</span></p>
@@ -81,8 +81,8 @@ image:
 <section id="bibliography" class="level1 unnumbered">
 <h1 class="unnumbered">Bibliography</h1>
 <div id="refs" class="references csl-bib-body" role="doc-bibliography">
-<div id="ref-gruberFalicovKimballModel2005" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
+<div id="ref-gruberFalicovKimballModel2006" class="csl-entry" role="doc-biblioentry">
-<div class="csl-left-margin">[1] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Gruber and D. Ueltschi, <em><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0502041">The Falicov-Kimball Model</a></em>, arXiv:math-Ph/0502041 (2005).</div>
+<div class="csl-left-margin">[1] </div><div class="csl-right-inline">C. Gruber and D. Ueltschi, <em><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0502041">The Falicov-Kimball model</a></em>, in <em>Encyclopedia of mathematical physics. 1, 1,</em> (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006).</div>
 </div>
 </div>
 </section>

_thesis/6_Appendices/A.2_Markov_Chain_Monte_Carlo.html

@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ image:
 <li><a href="#the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm" id="toc-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm">The Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm</a></li>
 <li><a href="#app-mcmc-two-step-trick" id="toc-app-mcmc-two-step-trick">Two Step Trick</a>
 <ul>
-<li><a href="#app-mcmc-autocorrelation" id="toc-app-mcmc-autocorrelation">Auto-correlation Time</a></li>
+<li><a href="#app-mcmc-autocorrelation" id="toc-app-mcmc-autocorrelation">Autocorrelation Time</a></li>
 <li><a href="#tuning-the-proposal-distribution" id="toc-tuning-the-proposal-distribution">Tuning the proposal distribution</a></li>
 </ul></li>
 </ul></li>
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ image:
 <li><a href="#the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm" id="toc-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm">The Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm</a></li>
 <li><a href="#app-mcmc-two-step-trick" id="toc-app-mcmc-two-step-trick">Two Step Trick</a>
 <ul>
-<li><a href="#app-mcmc-autocorrelation" id="toc-app-mcmc-autocorrelation">Auto-correlation Time</a></li>
+<li><a href="#app-mcmc-autocorrelation" id="toc-app-mcmc-autocorrelation">Autocorrelation Time</a></li>
 <li><a href="#tuning-the-proposal-distribution" id="toc-tuning-the-proposal-distribution">Tuning the proposal distribution</a></li>
 </ul></li>
 </ul></li>
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ p(S)  &amp;= \frac{1}{\mathcal{Z}} e^{-\beta H(S)} \\
 <p>In a physics context this lets us evaluate any observable with a mean over the states visited by the walk. <span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
 \langle O \rangle &amp; = \sum_{S} p(S) \langle O \rangle_{S} = \sum_{i = 0}^{M} \langle O\rangle_{S_i} + \mathcal{O}(\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{M}})\\
 \end{aligned}\]</span></p>
-<p>The the samples in the random walk are correlated so the samples effectively contain less information than <span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> independent samples would. As a consequence the variance is larger than the <span class="math inline">\(\langle O^2 \rangle - \langle O\rangle^2\)</span> form it would have if the estimates were uncorrelated. Methods of estimating the true variance of <span class="math inline">\(\langle O \rangle\)</span> and decided how many steps are needed will be considered later.</p>
+<p>The samples in the random walk are correlated so the samples effectively contain less information than <span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> independent samples would. As a consequence the variance is larger than the <span class="math inline">\(\langle O^2 \rangle - \langle O\rangle^2\)</span> form it would have if the estimates were uncorrelated. Methods of estimating the true variance of <span class="math inline">\(\langle O \rangle\)</span> and decided how many steps are needed will be considered later.</p>
 </section>
 <section id="implementation-of-mcmc" class="level2">
 <h2>Implementation of MCMC</h2>
@@ -118,14 +118,14 @@ p(S)  &amp;= \frac{1}{\mathcal{Z}} e^{-\beta H(S)} \\
 <span id="cb1-2"><a href="#cb1-2" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"></a>current_state <span class="op">=</span> initial_state</span>
 <span id="cb1-3"><a href="#cb1-3" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"></a></span>
 <span id="cb1-4"><a href="#cb1-4" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"></a><span class="cf">for</span> i <span class="kw">in</span> <span class="bu">range</span>(N_steps):</span>
-<span id="cb1-5"><a href="#cb1-5" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"></a>    new_state <span class="op">=</span> sample_T(current_state) </span>
+<span id="cb1-5"><a href="#cb1-5" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"></a>    new_state <span class="op">=</span> sampleT(current_state) </span>
 <span id="cb1-6"><a href="#cb1-6" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"></a>    states[i] <span class="op">=</span> current_state</span></code></pre></div>
-<p>Where the <code>sample_T</code> function samples directly from the transition function <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{T}\)</span>.</p>
+<p>Where the <code>sampleT</code> function samples directly from the transition function <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{T}\)</span>.</p>
-<p>If we run many such walkers in parallel we can then approximate the distribution <span class="math inline">\(p_t(S; S)\)</span> which tells us where the walkers are likely to be after they’ve evolved for <span class="math inline">\(t\)</span> steps from an initial state <span class="math inline">\(S_0\)</span>. We need to carefully choose <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{T}\)</span> such that the the probability <span class="math inline">\(p_t(S; S_0)\)</span> approaches the distribution of interest. In this case the thermal distribution <span class="math inline">\(P(S; \beta) = \mathcal{Z}^{-1} e^{-\beta F(S)}\)</span>.</p>
+<p>If we run many such walkers in parallel we can then approximate the distribution <span class="math inline">\(p_t(S; S)\)</span> which tells us where the walkers are likely to be after they’ve evolved for <span class="math inline">\(t\)</span> steps from an initial state <span class="math inline">\(S_0\)</span>. We need to carefully choose <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{T}\)</span> such that the probability <span class="math inline">\(p_t(S; S_0)\)</span> approaches the distribution of interest. In this case the thermal distribution <span class="math inline">\(P(S; \beta) = \mathcal{Z}^{-1} e^{-\beta F(S)}\)</span>.</p>
 </section>
 <section id="global-and-detailed-balance-equations" class="level2">
 <h2>Global and Detailed balance equations</h2>
-<p>We cam quite easily write down the properties that <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{T}\)</span> must have in order to yield the correct target distribution. Since we must transition somewhere at each step, we first have the normalisation condition that <span class="math display">\[\sum\limits_S \mathcal{T}(S&#39; \rightarrow S) = 1.\]</span></p>
+<p>We can quite easily write down the properties that <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{T}\)</span> must have in order to yield the correct target distribution. Since we must transition somewhere at each step, we first have the normalisation condition that <span class="math display">\[\sum\limits_S \mathcal{T}(S&#39; \rightarrow S) = 1.\]</span></p>
 <p>Second, let us move to an ensemble view, where rather than individual walkers and states, we think about the probability distribution of many walkers at each step. If we start all the walkers in the same place the initial distribution will be a delta function and as we step the walkers will wander around, giving us a sequence of probability distributions <span class="math inline">\(\{p_0(S), p_1(S), p_2(S)\ldots\}\)</span>. For discrete spaces we can write the action of the transition function on <span class="math inline">\(p_i\)</span> as a matrix equation</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[\begin{aligned}
 p_{i+1}(S) &amp;= \sum_{S&#39; \in \{S\}} p_i(S&#39;) \mathcal{T}(S&#39; \rightarrow S)
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ P(S) \mathcal{T}(S \rightarrow S&#39;) = P(S&#39;) \mathcal{T}(S&#39; \rightarro
 <p>The Metropolis-Hastings algorithm breaks the transition function into a proposal distribution <span class="math inline">\(q(S \to S&#39;)\)</span> and an acceptance function <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{A}(S \to S&#39;)\)</span>. <span class="math inline">\(q\)</span> must be a function we can directly sample from, and in many cases takes the form of flipping some number of spins in <span class="math inline">\(S\)</span>, i.e if we’re flipping a single random spin in the spin chain, <span class="math inline">\(q(S \to S&#39;)\)</span> is the uniform distribution on states reachable by one spin flip from <span class="math inline">\(S\)</span>. This also gives the symmetry property that <span class="math inline">\(q(S \to S&#39;) = q(S&#39; \to S)\)</span>.</p>
 <p>The proposal <span class="math inline">\(S&#39;\)</span> is then accepted or rejected with an acceptance probability <span class="math inline">\(\mathcal{A}(S \to S&#39;)\)</span>, if the proposal is rejected then <span class="math inline">\(S_{i+1} = S_{i}\)</span>. Hence:</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[\mathcal{T}(S\to S&#39;) = q(S\to S&#39;)\mathcal{A}(S \to S&#39;)\]</span></p>
-<p>The Metropolis-Hasting algorithm is a slight extension of the original Metropolis algorithm which allows for non-symmetric proposal distributions $q(SS’) q(S’S) $. It can be derived starting from detailed balance <span class="citation" data-cites="krauthIntroductionMonteCarlo1998"> [<a href="#ref-krauthIntroductionMonteCarlo1998" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>:</p>
+<p>The Metropolis-Hasting algorithm is a slight extension of the original Metropolis algorithm which allows for non-symmetric proposal distributions <span class="math inline">\(q(S\to S&#39;) \neq q(S&#39;\to S)\)</span>. It can be derived starting from detailed balance <span class="citation" data-cites="krauthIntroductionMonteCarlo1998"> [<a href="#ref-krauthIntroductionMonteCarlo1998" role="doc-biblioref">6</a>]</span>:</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[
 P(S)\mathcal{T}(S \to S&#39;) = P(S&#39;)\mathcal{T}(S&#39; \to S)
 \]</span></p>
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ P(S)q(S \to S&#39;)\mathcal{A}(S \to S&#39;) = P(S&#39;)q(S&#39; \to S)\mathcal{
 </section>
 <section id="app-mcmc-two-step-trick" class="level2">
 <h2>Two Step Trick</h2>
-<p>Our method already relies heavily on the split between the classical and quantum sector to derive a sign problem free MCMC algorithm but it turns out that there is a further trick we can play with it. The free energy term is the sum of an easy to compute classical energy and a more expensive quantum free energy, we can split the acceptance function into two in such as way as to avoid having to compute the full exact diagonalisation some of the time:</p>
+<p>Our method already relies heavily on the split between the classical and quantum sector to derive a sign problem free MCMC algorithm but it turns out that there is a further trick we can play with it. The free energy term is the sum of an easy to compute classical energy and a more expensive quantum free energy, we can split the acceptance function into two in such a way as to avoid having to compute the full exact diagonalisation some of the time:</p>
 <div class="sourceCode" id="cb3"><pre class="sourceCode python"><code class="sourceCode python"><span id="cb3-1"><a href="#cb3-1" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"></a><span class="co"># Our two step MH implementation for models with classical and quantum energy terms</span></span>
 <span id="cb3-2"><a href="#cb3-2" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"></a>current_state <span class="op">=</span> initial_state</span>
 <span id="cb3-3"><a href="#cb3-3" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"></a></span>
@@ -214,16 +214,16 @@ P(S)q(S \to S&#39;)\mathcal{A}(S \to S&#39;) = P(S&#39;)q(S&#39; \to S)\mathcal{
 \mathcal{T}(a \to b)/\mathcal{T}(b \to a) = \frac{\min\left(1, r_c\right) \min\left(1, r_q\right)}{ \min\left(1, 1/r_c\right) \min\left(1, 1/r_q\right)}\end{aligned}\]</span></p>
 <p>which simplifies to <span class="math inline">\(r_c r_q\)</span> as <span class="math inline">\(\min(1,r)/\min(1,1/r) = r\)</span> for <span class="math inline">\(r &gt; 0\)</span>.</p>
 <section id="app-mcmc-autocorrelation" class="level3">
-<h3>Auto-correlation Time</h3>
+<h3>Autocorrelation Time</h3>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/fk_chapter/lsr/figs/m_autocorr.png" id="fig-m_autocorr" data-short-caption="Autocorrelation in MCMC" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 1: (Upper) 10 MCMC chains starting from the same initial state for a system with N = 150 sites and 3000 MCMC steps. At each MCMC step, n spins are flipped where n is drawn from Uniform(1,N) and this is repeated N^2/100 times. The simulations therefore have the potential to necessitate 10*N^2 matrix diagonalisations for each 100 MCMC steps. (Lower) The normalised auto-correlation (\langle m_i m_{i-j}\rangle - \langle m_i\rangle \langle m_i \rangle) / Var(m_i)) averaged over i. It can be seen that even with each MCMC step already being composed of many individual flip attempts, the auto-correlation is still non negligible and must be taken into account in the statistics. t = 1, \alpha = 1.25, T = 2.2, J = U = 5" />
+<img src="/assets/thesis/fk_chapter/lsr/figs/m_autocorr.png" id="fig-m_autocorr" data-short-caption="Autocorrelation in MCMC" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 1: (Upper) 10 MCMC chains starting from the same initial state for a system with N = 150 sites and 3000 MCMC steps. At each MCMC step, n spins are flipped where n is drawn from Uniform(1,N) and this is repeated N^2/100 times. The simulations therefore have the potential to necessitate 10*N^2 matrix diagonalisations for each 100 MCMC steps. (Lower) The normalised autocorrelation (\langle m_i m_{i-j}\rangle - \langle m_i\rangle \langle m_i \rangle) / Var(m_i)) averaged over i. It can be seen that even with each MCMC step already being composed of many individual flip attempts, the autocorrelation is still non negligible and must be taken into account in the statistics. t = 1, \alpha = 1.25, T = 2.2, J = U = 5" />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1: (Upper) 10 MCMC chains starting from the same initial state for a system with <span class="math inline">\(N = 150\)</span> sites and 3000 MCMC steps. At each MCMC step, n spins are flipped where n is drawn from Uniform(1,N) and this is repeated <span class="math inline">\(N^2/100\)</span> times. The simulations therefore have the potential to necessitate <span class="math inline">\(10*N^2\)</span> matrix diagonalisations for each 100 MCMC steps. (Lower) The normalised auto-correlation <span class="math inline">\((\langle m_i m_{i-j}\rangle - \langle m_i\rangle \langle m_i \rangle) / Var(m_i))\)</span> averaged over <span class="math inline">\(i\)</span>. It can be seen that even with each MCMC step already being composed of many individual flip attempts, the auto-correlation is still non negligible and must be taken into account in the statistics. <span class="math inline">\(t = 1, \alpha = 1.25, T = 2.2, J = U = 5\)</span></figcaption>
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1: (Upper) 10 MCMC chains starting from the same initial state for a system with <span class="math inline">\(N = 150\)</span> sites and 3000 MCMC steps. At each MCMC step, n spins are flipped where n is drawn from Uniform(1,N) and this is repeated <span class="math inline">\(N^2/100\)</span> times. The simulations therefore have the potential to necessitate <span class="math inline">\(10*N^2\)</span> matrix diagonalisations for each 100 MCMC steps. (Lower) The normalised autocorrelation <span class="math inline">\((\langle m_i m_{i-j}\rangle - \langle m_i\rangle \langle m_i \rangle) / Var(m_i))\)</span> averaged over <span class="math inline">\(i\)</span>. It can be seen that even with each MCMC step already being composed of many individual flip attempts, the autocorrelation is still non negligible and must be taken into account in the statistics. <span class="math inline">\(t = 1, \alpha = 1.25, T = 2.2, J = U = 5\)</span></figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>At this stage one might think we’re done. We can indeed draw independent samples from our target Boltzmann distribution by starting from some arbitrary initial state and doing <span class="math inline">\(k\)</span> steps to arrive at a sample. These are not, however, independent samples. In fig. <a href="#fig:m_autocorr">1</a> it is already clear that the samples of the order parameter <span class="math inline">\(m\)</span> have some auto-correlation because only a few spins are flipped each step. Even when the number of spins flipped per step is increased that it can be an important effect near the phase transition. Let’s define the auto-correlation time <span class="math inline">\(\tau(O)\)</span> informally as the number of MCMC samples of some observable O that are statistically equal to one independent sample or equivalently as the number of MCMC steps after which the samples are correlated below some cut-off, see <span class="citation" data-cites="krauthIntroductionMonteCarlo1996"> [<a href="#ref-krauthIntroductionMonteCarlo1996" role="doc-biblioref">9</a>]</span>. The auto-correlation time is generally shorter than the convergence time so it therefore makes sense from an efficiency standpoint to run a single walker for many MCMC steps rather than to run a huge ensemble for <span class="math inline">\(k\)</span> steps each.</p>
+<p>At this stage one might think we’re done. We can indeed draw independent samples from our target Boltzmann distribution by starting from some arbitrary initial state and doing <span class="math inline">\(k\)</span> steps to arrive at a sample. These are not, however, independent samples. In fig. <a href="#fig:m_autocorr">1</a> it is already clear that the samples of the order parameter <span class="math inline">\(m\)</span> have some autocorrelation because only a few spins are flipped each step. Even when the number of spins flipped per step is increased that it can be an important effect near the phase transition. Let’s define the autocorrelation time <span class="math inline">\(\tau(O)\)</span> informally as the number of MCMC samples of some observable O that are statistically equal to one independent sample or equivalently as the number of MCMC steps after which the samples are correlated below some cut-off, see <span class="citation" data-cites="krauthIntroductionMonteCarlo1996"> [<a href="#ref-krauthIntroductionMonteCarlo1996" role="doc-biblioref">9</a>]</span>. The autocorrelation time is generally shorter than the convergence time so it therefore makes sense from an efficiency standpoint to run a single walker for many MCMC steps rather than to run a huge ensemble for <span class="math inline">\(k\)</span> steps each.</p>
 <p>Once the random walk has been carried out for many steps, the expectation values of <span class="math inline">\(O\)</span> can be estimated from the MCMC samples <span class="math inline">\(S_i\)</span>: <span class="math display">\[
     \langle O \rangle = \sum_{i = 0}^{N} O(S_i) + \mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}})
 \]</span></p>
-<p>The the samples are correlated so the N of them effectively contains less information than <span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> independent samples would, in fact roughly <span class="math inline">\(N/\tau\)</span> effective samples. As a consequence the variance is larger than the <span class="math inline">\(\langle O^2 \rangle - \langle O \rangle ^2\)</span> form it would have if the estimates were uncorrelated. There are many methods in the literature for estimating the true variance of <span class="math inline">\(\langle O \rangle\)</span> and deciding how many steps are needed but my approach has been to run a small number of parallel chains, which are independent, in order to estimate the statistical error produced. This is a slightly less computationally efficient because it requires throwing away those <span class="math inline">\(k\)</span> steps generated before convergence multiple times but it is conceptually simple.</p>
+<p>The samples are correlated so the N of them effectively contains less information than <span class="math inline">\(N\)</span> independent samples would, in fact roughly <span class="math inline">\(N/\tau\)</span> effective samples. As a consequence the variance is larger than the <span class="math inline">\(\langle O^2 \rangle - \langle O \rangle ^2\)</span> form it would have if the estimates were uncorrelated. There are many methods in the literature for estimating the true variance of <span class="math inline">\(\langle O \rangle\)</span> and deciding how many steps are needed but my approach has been to run a small number of parallel chains, which are independent, in order to estimate the statistical error produced. This is a slightly less computationally efficient because it requires throwing away those <span class="math inline">\(k\)</span> steps generated before convergence multiple times but it is conceptually simple.</p>
 </section>
 <section id="tuning-the-proposal-distribution" class="level3">
 <h3>Tuning the proposal distribution</h3>
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ P(S)q(S \to S&#39;)\mathcal{A}(S \to S&#39;) = P(S&#39;)q(S&#39; \to S)\mathcal{
 <img src="/assets/thesis/fk_chapter/lsr/figs/autocorr_multiple_proposals.png" id="fig-autocorr_multiple_proposals" data-short-caption="Comparison of different proposal distributions" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 2: Simulations showing how the autocorrelation of the order parameter depends on the proposal distribution used at different temperatures, we see that at T = 1.5 &lt; T_c a single spin flip is likely the best choice, while at the high temperature T = 2.5 &gt; T_c flipping two sites or a mixture of flipping two and 1 sites is likely a better choice. $t = 1, = 1.25, J = U = 5 $" />
 <figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 2: Simulations showing how the autocorrelation of the order parameter depends on the proposal distribution used at different temperatures, we see that at <span class="math inline">\(T = 1.5 &lt; T_c\)</span> a single spin flip is likely the best choice, while at the high temperature <span class="math inline">\(T = 2.5 &gt; T_c\)</span> flipping two sites or a mixture of flipping two and 1 sites is likely a better choice. $t = 1, = 1.25, J = U = 5 $</figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>Now we can discuss how to minimise the auto-correlations. The general principle is that one must balance the proposal distribution between two extremes. Choose overlay small steps, like flipping only a single spin and the acceptance rate will be high because <span class="math inline">\(\Delta F\)</span> will usually be small, but each state will be very similar to the previous and the auto-correlations will be high too, making sampling inefficient. On the other hand, overlay large steps, like randomising a large portion of the spins each step, will result in very frequent rejections, especially at low temperatures.</p>
+<p>Now we can discuss how to minimise the autocorrelations. The general principle is that one must balance the proposal distribution between two extremes. Choose overly small steps, like flipping only a single spin and the acceptance rate will be high because <span class="math inline">\(\Delta F\)</span> will usually be small, but each state will be very similar to the previous and the autocorrelations will be high too, making sampling inefficient. On the other hand, overlay large steps, like randomising a large portion of the spins each step, will result in very frequent rejections, especially at low temperatures.</p>
 <p>I evaluated a few different proposal distributions for use with the FK model.</p>
 <ol type="1">
 <li>Flipping a single random site</li>

_thesis/6_Appendices/A.3_Lattice_Generation.html

@@ -75,14 +75,13 @@ image:
 <h1>Lattice Generation</h1>
 <section id="graph-representation" class="level2">
 <h2>Graph Representation</h2>
-<p>Three keys pieces of information allow us to represent amorphous lattices.</p>
+<p>Three key pieces of information allow us to represent amorphous lattices. The majority of the graph connectivity is encoded by an ordered list of edges <span class="math inline">\((i,j)\)</span>. These are ordered to represent both directed and undirected graphs. This is useful for defining the sign of bond operators <span class="math inline">\(u_{ij} = - u_{ji}\)</span>.</p>
-<p>Most of the graph connectivity is encoded by an ordered list of edges <span class="math inline">\((i,j)\)</span>. These are ordered to represent both directed and undirected graphs. This is useful for defining the sign of bond operators <span class="math inline">\(u_{ij} = - u_{ji}\)</span>.</p>
 <p>Information about the embedding of the lattice onto the torus is encoded into a point on the unit square associated with each vertex. The torus is unwrapped onto the square by defining an arbitrary pair of cuts along the major and minor axes. For simplicity, we take these axes to be the lines <span class="math inline">\(x = 0\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(y = 0\)</span>. We can wrap the unit square back up into a torus by identifying the lines <span class="math inline">\(x = 0\)</span> with <span class="math inline">\(x = 1\)</span> and <span class="math inline">\(y = 0\)</span> with <span class="math inline">\(y = 1\)</span>.</p>
 <p>Finally, we need to encode the topology of the graph. This is necessary because, if we are simply given an edge <span class="math inline">\((i, j)\)</span> we do not know how the edge gets from vertex i to vertex j. One method would be taking the shortest path, but it could also ‘go the long way around’ by crossing one of the cuts. To encode this information, we store an additional vector <span class="math inline">\(\vec{r}\)</span> associated with each edge. <span class="math inline">\(r_i^x = 0\)</span> means that edge i does not cross the x. <span class="math inline">\(r_i^x = +1\)</span> (<span class="math inline">\(-1\)</span>) means it crossed the cut in a positive (negative) sense.</p>
 <p>This description of the lattice has a very nice relationship to Bloch’s theorem. Applying Bloch’s theorem to a periodic lattice essentially means wrappping the unit cell onto a torus. Variations that happen at longer length scales than the size of the unit cell are captured by the crystal momentum. The crystal momentum inserts a phase factor <span class="math inline">\(e^{i \vec{q}\cdot\vec{r}}\)</span> onto bonds that cross to adjacent unit cells. The vector <span class="math inline">\(\vec{r}\)</span> is exactly what we use to encode the topology of our lattices.</p>
 <figure>
-<img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/methods/bloch.png" id="fig-bloch" data-short-caption="Bloch&#39;s Theorem and the Torus" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 1: Bloch’s theorem can be thought of as transforming from a periodic Hamiltonian on the place to the unit cell defined an torus. In addition we get some phase factors e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{r}} associated with bonds that cross unit cells that depend on the sense in which they do so \vec{r} = (\pm1, \pm1). Representing graphs on the torus turns out to require a similar idea, we unwrap the torus to one unit cell and keep track of which bonds cross the cell boundaries." />
+<img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/methods/bloch.png" id="fig-bloch" data-short-caption="Bloch&#39;s Theorem and the Torus" style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 1: Bloch’s theorem can be thought of as transforming from a periodic Hamiltonian on the plane to the unit cell defined on a torus. In addition we get some phase factors e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{r}} associated with bonds that cross unit cells that depend on the sense in which they do so \vec{r} = (\pm1, \pm1). Representing graphs on the torus turns out to require a similar idea, we unwrap the torus to one unit cell and keep track of which bonds cross the cell boundaries." />
-<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1: Bloch’s theorem can be thought of as transforming from a periodic Hamiltonian on the place to the unit cell defined an torus. In addition we get some phase factors <span class="math inline">\(e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{r}}\)</span> associated with bonds that cross unit cells that depend on the sense in which they do so <span class="math inline">\(\vec{r} = (\pm1, \pm1)\)</span>. Representing graphs on the torus turns out to require a similar idea, we unwrap the torus to one unit cell and keep track of which bonds cross the cell boundaries.</figcaption>
+<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1: Bloch’s theorem can be thought of as transforming from a periodic Hamiltonian on the plane to the unit cell defined on a torus. In addition we get some phase factors <span class="math inline">\(e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{r}}\)</span> associated with bonds that cross unit cells that depend on the sense in which they do so <span class="math inline">\(\vec{r} = (\pm1, \pm1)\)</span>. Representing graphs on the torus turns out to require a similar idea, we unwrap the torus to one unit cell and keep track of which bonds cross the cell boundaries.</figcaption>
 </figure>
 </section>
 <section id="encoding-edge-colouring-problems-as-sat-instances" class="level2">
@@ -91,21 +90,16 @@ image:
 <img src="/assets/thesis/amk_chapter/methods/times/times.svg" id="fig-times" data-short-caption="Computation Time Spent on Different Procedures." style="width:100.0%" alt="Figure 2: The proportion of computation time taken up by the four longest running steps when generating a lattice. For larger systems, the time taken to perform the diagonalisation dominates." />
 <figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 2: The proportion of computation time taken up by the four longest running steps when generating a lattice. For larger systems, the time taken to perform the diagonalisation dominates.</figcaption>
 </figure>
-<p>In the main text we discuss the problem of three-edge-colouring, assigning one of three labels to each edge of a graph such that no edges of the same label meet at a vertex.</p>
+<p>In the main text we discuss the problem of three-edge-colouring, assigning one of three labels to each edge of a graph such that no edges of the same label meet at a vertex. To solve this in practice I use a solver called <code>MiniSAT</code> <span class="citation" data-cites="imms-sat18"> [<a href="#ref-imms-sat18" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>. Like most modern SAT solvers, <code>MiniSAT</code> requires the input problem to be specified in Conjunctive Normal Form (CNF). CNF requires that the constraints be encoded as a set of <em>clauses</em> of the form</p>
-<p>To solve this in practice I use a solver called <code>MiniSAT</code> <span class="citation" data-cites="imms-sat18"> [<a href="#ref-imms-sat18" role="doc-biblioref">1</a>]</span>. Like most modern SAT solvers, <code>MiniSAT</code> requires the input problem to be specified in Conjunctive Normal Form (CNF). CNF requires that the constraints be encoded as a set of <em>clauses</em> of the form</p>
 <p><span class="math display">\[x_1 \;\textrm{or}\; -x_3 \;\textrm{or}\; x_5\]</span></p>
-<p>that contain logical ORs of some subset of the variables where any of the variables may also be logically NOT’d, which we represent by negation here.</p>
+<p>that contain logical ORs of some subset of the variables where any of the variables may also be logically NOT’d, which we represent by negation here. A solution of the problem is one that makes all the clauses simultaneously true.</p>
-<p>A solution of the problem is one that makes all the clauses simultaneously true.</p>
+<p>I encode the edge colouring problem by assigning <span class="math inline">\(3B\)</span> boolean variables to each of the <span class="math inline">\(B\)</span> edges of the graph, <span class="math inline">\(x_{i\alpha}\)</span> where <span class="math inline">\(x_{i\alpha} = 1\)</span> indicates that edge <span class="math inline">\(i\)</span> has colour <span class="math inline">\(\alpha\)</span>. For edge colouring graphs we need two types of constraints: 1. Each edge is exactly one colour. 2. No neighbouring edges are the same colour.</p>
-<p>I encode the edge colouring problem by assigning <span class="math inline">\(3B\)</span> boolean variables to each of the <span class="math inline">\(B\)</span> edges of the graph, <span class="math inline">\(x_{i\alpha}\)</span> where <span class="math inline">\(x_{i\alpha} = 1\)</span> indicates that edge <span class="math inline">\(i\)</span> has colour <span class="math inline">\(\alpha\)</span>.</p>
+<p>The first constraint is a product of doing this mapping to boolean variables. The solver does not know anything about the structure of the problem unless it is encoded into the variables. Let’s say we have three variables that correspond to particular edge being red <span class="math inline">\(r\)</span>, green <span class="math inline">\(g\)</span> or blue <span class="math inline">\(b\)</span>. To require that exactly one of the variables be true, we can enforce that no pair of variables be true: <code>-(r and b) -(r and g) -(b and g)</code></p>
-<p>For edge colouring graphs we need two types of constraints: 1. Each edge is exactly one colour. 2. No neighbouring edges are the same colour.</p>
-<p>The first constraint is a product of doing this mapping to boolean variables. The solver does not know anything about the structure of the problem unless it is encoded into the variables.</p>
-<p>Let’s say we have three variables that correspond to particular edge being red <span class="math inline">\(r\)</span>, green <span class="math inline">\(g\)</span> or blue <span class="math inline">\(b\)</span>.</p>
-<p>To require that exactly one of the variables be true, we can enforce that no pair of variables be true: <code>-(r and b) -(r and g) -(b and g)</code></p>
 <p>However, these clauses are not in CNF form. Therefore, we also have to use the fact that <code>-(a and b) = (-a OR -b)</code>. To enforce that at least one of these is true we simply OR them all together <code>(r or b or g)</code></p>
 <p>To encode the fact that no adjacent edges can have the same colour, we emit a clause that, for each pair of adjacent edges, they cannot be both red, both green or both blue.</p>
 <p>We get a solution or set of solutions from the solver, which we can map back to a labelling of the edges.</p>
 <p>The solution presented here works well enough for our purposes. It does not take up a substantial fraction of the overall computation time, see +fig:times but other approaches could likely work.</p>
-<p>When translating problems to CNF form, there is often some flexibility. For instance, we used three boolean variables to encode the colour of each edge and, then, additional constraints to require that only one of these variables be true. An alternative method which we did not try would be to encode the label of each edge using two variables, yielding four states per edge, and then add a constraint that one of the states, say (true, true) is disallowed. This would, however, have added some complexity to the encoding of the constraint that no adjacent edges can have the same colour.</p>
+<p>When translating problems to CNF form, there is often some flexibility. For instance, we used three boolean variables to encode the colour of each edge and then additional constraints to require that only one of these variables be true. An alternative method which we did not try would be to encode the label of each edge using two variables, yielding four states per edge, and then add a constraint that one of the states, say (true, true) is disallowed. This would, however, have added some complexity to the encoding of the constraint that no adjacent edges can have the same colour.</p>
 <p>The popular <em>Networkx</em> Python library uses a greedy graph colouring algorithm. It simply iterates over the vertices/edges/faces of a graph and assigns them a colour that is not already disallowed. This does not work for our purposes because it is not designed to look for a particular n-colouring. However, it does include the option of using a heuristic function that determine the order in which vertices will be coloured <span class="citation" data-cites="kosowski2004classical matulaSmallestlastOrderingClustering1983"> [<a href="#ref-kosowski2004classical" role="doc-biblioref">2</a>,<a href="#ref-matulaSmallestlastOrderingClustering1983" role="doc-biblioref">3</a>]</span>. Perhaps</p>
 <p>Next Section: <a href="../6_Appendices/A.4_Lattice_Colouring.html">Lattice Colouring</a></p>
 </section>

assets/thesis/amk_chapter/intro/majorana_bound_states_animated/animation/iteration_060.svg

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
+<!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1//EN"
+  "http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11.dtd">
+<svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="486pt" height="242.64pt" viewBox="0 0 486 242.64" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1">
+ <metadata>
+  <rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
+   <cc:Work>
+    <dc:type rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage"/>
+    <dc:date>2022-10-13T12:20:55.663367</dc:date>
+    <dc:format>image/svg+xml</dc:format>
+    <dc:creator>
+     <cc:Agent>
+      <dc:title>Matplotlib v3.5.1, https://matplotlib.org/</dc:title>
+     </cc:Agent>
+    </dc:creator>
+   </cc:Work>
+  </rdf:RDF>
+ </metadata>
+ <defs>
+  <style type="text/css">*{stroke-linejoin: round; stroke-linecap: butt}</style>
+ </defs>
+ <g id="figure_1">
+  <g id="patch_1">
+   <path d="M 0 242.64 
+L 486 242.64 
+L 486 0 
+L 0 0 
+z
+" style="fill: #ffffff"/>
+  </g>
+  <g id="axes_1"

assets/thesis/amk_chapter/intro/plaquette_addition/plaquette_addition.svg

@@ -0,0 +1,365 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
+<!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1//EN"
+  "http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11.dtd">
+<svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="486pt" height="242.64pt" viewBox="0 0 486 242.64" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1">
+ <metadata>
+  <rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
+   <cc:Work>
+    <dc:type rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage"/>
+    <dc:date>2022-07-21T10:34:05.236531</dc:date>
+    <dc:format>image/svg+xml</dc:format>
+    <dc:creator>
+     <cc:Agent>
+      <dc:title>Matplotlib v3.5.1, https://matplotlib.org/</dc:title>
+     </cc:Agent>
+    </dc:creator>
+   </cc:Work>
+  </rdf:RDF>
+ </metadata>
+ <defs>
+  <style type="text/css">*{stroke-linejoin: round; stroke-linecap: butt}</style>
+ </defs>
+ <g id="figure_1">
+  <g id="patch_1">
+   <path d="M 0 242.64 
+L 486 242.64 
+L 486 0 
+L 0 0 
+z
+" style="fill: #ffffff"/>
+  </g>
+  <g id="axes_1">
+   <g id="LineCollection_1">
+    <path d="M 69.525 78.408 
+L 31.083864 99.864 
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+    <path d="M 31.083864 99.864 
+L 31.083864 142.776 
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+    <path d="M 31.083864 142.776 
+L 69.525 164.232 
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+    <path d="M 69.525 164.232 
+L 107.966136 142.776 
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+    <path d="M 107.966136 99.864 
+L 69.525 78.408 
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+    <g id="LineCollection_2">
+     <path d="M 107.966136 142.776 
+L 107.966136 99.864 
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-opacity: 0.4; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+     <g id="LineCollection_3">
+      <path d="M 144.9846 78.408 
+L 106.543464 99.864 
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+      <path d="M 106.543464 142.776 
+L 144.9846 164.232 
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+      <path d="M 144.9846 164.232 
+L 183.425736 142.776 
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+      <path d="M 183.425736 142.776 
+L 183.425736 99.864 
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+      <path d="M 183.425736 99.864 
+L 144.9846 78.408 
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+      <g id="patch_2">
+       <path d="M 46.460319 91.2816 
+L 51.929146 83.274112 
+L 54.148546 86.9904 
+L 54.148546 86.9904 
+L 54.148546 86.9904 
+L 54.148546 86.9904 
+L 56.367946 90.706688 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+      </g>
+      <g id="patch_3">
+       <path d="M 31.083864 125.6112 
+L 26.645064 117.0288 
+L 31.083864 117.0288 
+L 31.083864 117.0288 
+L 31.083864 117.0288 
+L 31.083864 117.0288 
+L 35.522664 117.0288 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+      </g>
+      <g id="patch_4">
+       <path d="M 54.148546 155.6496 
+L 44.240919 155.074688 
+L 46.460319 151.3584 
+L 46.460319 151.3584 
+L 46.460319 151.3584 
+L 46.460319 151.3584 
+L 48.679719 147.642112 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+      </g>
+      <g id="patch_5">
+       <path d="M 92.589681 151.3584 
+L 87.120854 159.365888 
+L 84.901454 155.6496 
+L 84.901454 155.6496 
+L 84.901454 155.6496 
+L 84.901454 155.6496 
+L 82.682054 151.933312 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+      </g>
+      <g id="patch_6">
+       <path d="M 84.901454 86.9904 
+L 94.809081 87.565312 
+L 92.589681 91.2816 
+L 92.589681 91.2816 
+L 92.589681 91.2816 
+L 92.589681 91.2816 
+L 90.370281 94.997888 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+      </g>
+      <g id="patch_7">
+       <path d="M 121.919919 91.2816 
+L 127.388746 83.274112 
+L 129.608146 86.9904 
+L 129.608146 86.9904 
+L 129.608146 86.9904 
+L 129.608146 86.9904 
+L 131.827546 90.706688 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+      </g>
+      <g id="patch_8">
+       <path d="M 129.608146 155.6496 
+L 119.700519 155.074688 
+L 121.919919 151.3584 
+L 121.919919 151.3584 
+L 121.919919 151.3584 
+L 121.919919 151.3584 
+L 124.139319 147.642112 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+      </g>
+      <g id="patch_9">
+       <path d="M 168.049281 151.3584 
+L 162.580454 159.365888 
+L 160.361054 155.6496 
+L 160.361054 155.6496 
+L 160.361054 155.6496 
+L 160.361054 155.6496 
+L 158.141654 151.933312 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+      </g>
+      <g id="patch_10">
+       <path d="M 183.425736 117.0288 
+L 187.864536 125.6112 
+L 183.425736 125.6112 
+L 183.425736 125.6112 
+L 183.425736 125.6112 
+L 183.425736 125.6112 
+L 178.986936 125.6112 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+      </g>
+      <g id="patch_11">
+       <path d="M 160.361054 86.9904 
+L 170.268681 87.565312 
+L 168.049281 91.2816 
+L 168.049281 91.2816 
+L 168.049281 91.2816 
+L 168.049281 91.2816 
+L 165.829881 94.997888 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#p8248013377)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+      </g>
+     </g>
+     <g id="axes_2">
+      <g id="LineCollection_4">
+       <path d="M 305.505 78.408 
+L 267.063864 99.864 
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+       <path d="M 267.063864 99.864 
+L 267.063864 142.776 
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+       <path d="M 267.063864 142.776 
+L 305.505 164.232 
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+       <path d="M 305.505 164.232 
+L 343.946136 142.776 
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+       <path d="M 343.946136 142.776 
+L 343.946136 99.864 
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+       <path d="M 343.946136 99.864 
+L 305.505 78.408 
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+       <g id="LineCollection_5">
+        <path d="M 416.475 78.408 
+L 378.033864 99.864 
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+        <path d="M 378.033864 99.864 
+L 378.033864 142.776 
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+        <path d="M 378.033864 142.776 
+L 416.475 164.232 
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+        <path d="M 416.475 164.232 
+L 454.916136 142.776 
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+        <path d="M 454.916136 142.776 
+L 454.916136 99.864 
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+        <path d="M 454.916136 99.864 
+L 416.475 78.408 
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="fill: none; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linecap: round"/>
+        <g id="patch_12">
+         <path d="M 282.440319 91.2816 
+L 287.909146 83.274112 
+L 290.128546 86.9904 
+L 290.128546 86.9904 
+L 290.128546 86.9904 
+L 290.128546 86.9904 
+L 292.347946 90.706688 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+        </g>
+        <g id="patch_13">
+         <path d="M 267.063864 125.6112 
+L 262.625064 117.0288 
+L 267.063864 117.0288 
+L 267.063864 117.0288 
+L 267.063864 117.0288 
+L 267.063864 117.0288 
+L 271.502664 117.0288 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+        </g>
+        <g id="patch_14">
+         <path d="M 290.128546 155.6496 
+L 280.220919 155.074688 
+L 282.440319 151.3584 
+L 282.440319 151.3584 
+L 282.440319 151.3584 
+L 282.440319 151.3584 
+L 284.659719 147.642112 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+        </g>
+        <g id="patch_15">
+         <path d="M 328.569681 151.3584 
+L 323.100854 159.365888 
+L 320.881454 155.6496 
+L 320.881454 155.6496 
+L 320.881454 155.6496 
+L 320.881454 155.6496 
+L 318.662054 151.933312 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+        </g>
+        <g id="patch_16">
+         <path d="M 343.946136 117.0288 
+L 348.384936 125.6112 
+L 343.946136 125.6112 
+L 343.946136 125.6112 
+L 343.946136 125.6112 
+L 343.946136 125.6112 
+L 339.507336 125.6112 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+        </g>
+        <g id="patch_17">
+         <path d="M 320.881454 86.9904 
+L 330.789081 87.565312 
+L 328.569681 91.2816 
+L 328.569681 91.2816 
+L 328.569681 91.2816 
+L 328.569681 91.2816 
+L 326.350281 94.997888 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+        </g>
+        <g id="patch_18">
+         <path d="M 393.410319 91.2816 
+L 398.879146 83.274112 
+L 401.098546 86.9904 
+L 401.098546 86.9904 
+L 401.098546 86.9904 
+L 401.098546 86.9904 
+L 403.317946 90.706688 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+        </g>
+        <g id="patch_19">
+         <path d="M 378.033864 125.6112 
+L 373.595064 117.0288 
+L 378.033864 117.0288 
+L 378.033864 117.0288 
+L 378.033864 117.0288 
+L 378.033864 117.0288 
+L 382.472664 117.0288 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+        </g>
+        <g id="patch_20">
+         <path d="M 401.098546 155.6496 
+L 391.190919 155.074688 
+L 393.410319 151.3584 
+L 393.410319 151.3584 
+L 393.410319 151.3584 
+L 393.410319 151.3584 
+L 395.629719 147.642112 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+        </g>
+        <g id="patch_21">
+         <path d="M 439.539681 151.3584 
+L 434.070854 159.365888 
+L 431.851454 155.6496 
+L 431.851454 155.6496 
+L 431.851454 155.6496 
+L 431.851454 155.6496 
+L 429.632054 151.933312 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+        </g>
+        <g id="patch_22">
+         <path d="M 454.916136 117.0288 
+L 459.354936 125.6112 
+L 454.916136 125.6112 
+L 454.916136 125.6112 
+L 454.916136 125.6112 
+L 454.916136 125.6112 
+L 450.477336 125.6112 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+        </g>
+        <g id="patch_23">
+         <path d="M 431.851454 86.9904 
+L 441.759081 87.565312 
+L 439.539681 91.2816 
+L 439.539681 91.2816 
+L 439.539681 91.2816 
+L 439.539681 91.2816 
+L 437.320281 94.997888 
+z
+" clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)" style="stroke: #000000; stroke-linejoin: miter"/>
+        </g>
+       </g>
+      </g>
+      <defs>
+       <clipPath id="p8248013377">
+        <rect x="14.04" y="14.04" width="221.94" height="214.56"/>
+       </clipPath>
+       <clipPath id="pd00f1d4fa4">
+        <rect x="250.02" y="14.04" width="221.94" height="214.56"/>
+       </clipPath>
+      </defs>
+     </g>
+    </g>
+   </g>
+  </g>
+ </g>
+</svg>

assets/thesis/amk_chapter/intro/plaquette_addition/plaquette_addition_by_hand.svg

@@ -0,0 +1,565 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
+<svg
+   inkscape:version="1.2.1 (9c6d41e4, 2022-07-14)"
+   sodipodi:docname="plaquette_addition_by_hand.svg"
+   id="svg14238"
+   version="1.1"
+   viewBox="0 0 486 242.64"
+   height="242.64pt"
+   width="486pt"
+   inkscape:export-filename="plaquette_addition_by_hand.pdf"
+   inkscape:export-xdpi="96"
+   inkscape:export-ydpi="96"
+   xmlns:inkscape="http://www.inkscape.org/namespaces/inkscape"
+   xmlns:sodipodi="http://sodipodi.sourceforge.net/DTD/sodipodi-0.dtd"
+   xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
+   xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
+   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
+   xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#"
+   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
+   xmlns:ns1="http://www.iki.fi/pav/software/textext/">
+  <sodipodi:namedview
+     id="namedview14240"
+     pagecolor="#ffffff"
+     bordercolor="#000000"
+     borderopacity="0.25"
+     inkscape:showpageshadow="2"
+     inkscape:pageopacity="0.0"
+     inkscape:pagecheckerboard="0"
+     inkscape:deskcolor="#d1d1d1"
+     inkscape:document-units="pt"
+     showgrid="false"
+     inkscape:zoom="1.2175926"
+     inkscape:cx="288.27376"
+     inkscape:cy="151.11787"
+     inkscape:window-width="1440"
+     inkscape:window-height="820"
+     inkscape:window-x="-52"
+     inkscape:window-y="60"
+     inkscape:window-maximized="0"
+     inkscape:current-layer="figure_1" />
+  <metadata
+     id="metadata14101">
+    <rdf:RDF>
+      <cc:Work>
+        <dc:type
+           rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage" />
+        <dc:date />
+        <dc:format />
+        <dc:creator>
+          <cc:Agent>
+            <dc:title />
+          </cc:Agent>
+        </dc:creator>
+      </cc:Work>
+    </rdf:RDF>
+  </metadata>
+  <defs
+     id="defs14105">
+    <style
+       type="text/css"
+       id="style14103">*{stroke-linejoin: round; stroke-linecap: butt}</style>
+    <defs
+       id="defs14231">
+      <clipPath
+         id="p8248013377">
+        <rect
+           x="14.04"
+           y="14.04"
+           width="221.94"
+           height="214.56"
+           id="rect14225" />
+      </clipPath>
+      <clipPath
+         id="pd00f1d4fa4">
+        <rect
+           x="250.02"
+           y="14.04"
+           width="221.94"
+           height="214.56"
+           id="rect14228" />
+      </clipPath>
+    </defs>
+  </defs>
+  <g
+     id="figure_1"
+     transform="translate(4.3117871,-3.0798479)">
+    <g
+       id="g14864"
+       transform="translate(274.72244,-28.950568)">
+      <path
+         d="M 69.525,78.408 31.083864,99.864"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14110" />
+      <path
+         d="m 31.083864,99.864 v 42.912"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14112" />
+      <path
+         d="M 31.083864,142.776 69.525,164.232"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14114" />
+      <path
+         d="m 69.525,164.232 38.44114,-21.456"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14116" />
+      <path
+         d="M 107.96614,99.864 69.525,78.408"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14118" />
+      <path
+         d="M 107.96614,142.776 V 99.864"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-opacity:0.4"
+         id="path14120" />
+      <path
+         d="M 144.9846,78.408 106.54346,99.864"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14122"
+         transform="translate(1.5)" />
+      <path
+         d="m 106.54346,142.776 38.44114,21.456"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14124"
+         transform="translate(1.5)" />
+      <path
+         d="m 144.9846,164.232 38.44114,-21.456"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14126"
+         transform="translate(1.5)" />
+      <path
+         d="M 183.42574,142.776 V 99.864"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14128"
+         transform="translate(1.5)" />
+      <path
+         d="M 183.42574,99.864 144.9846,78.408"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14130"
+         transform="translate(1.5)" />
+      <path
+         d="m 46.460319,91.2816 5.468827,-8.007488 2.2194,3.716288 v 0 0 0 l 2.2194,3.716288 z"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14132" />
+      <path
+         d="m 31.083864,125.6112 -4.4388,-8.5824 h 4.4388 v 0 0 0 h 4.4388 z"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14135" />
+      <path
+         d="m 54.148546,155.6496 -9.907627,-0.57491 2.2194,-3.71629 v 0 0 0 l 2.2194,-3.71629 z"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14138" />
+      <path
+         d="m 92.589681,151.3584 -5.468827,8.00749 -2.2194,-3.71629 v 0 0 0 l -2.2194,-3.71629 z"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14141" />
+      <path
+         d="m 84.901454,86.9904 9.907627,0.574912 -2.2194,3.716288 v 0 0 0 l -2.2194,3.716288 z"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14144" />
+      <path
+         d="m 121.91992,91.2816 5.46883,-8.007488 2.2194,3.716288 v 0 0 0 l 2.2194,3.716288 z"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14147"
+         transform="translate(1.5)" />
+      <path
+         d="m 129.60815,155.6496 -9.90763,-0.57491 2.2194,-3.71629 v 0 0 0 l 2.2194,-3.71629 z"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14150"
+         transform="translate(1.5)" />
+      <path
+         d="m 168.04928,151.3584 -5.46883,8.00749 -2.2194,-3.71629 v 0 0 0 l -2.2194,-3.71629 z"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14153"
+         transform="translate(1.5)" />
+      <path
+         d="m 183.42574,117.0288 4.4388,8.5824 h -4.4388 v 0 0 0 h -4.4388 z"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14156"
+         transform="translate(1.5)" />
+      <path
+         d="m 160.36105,86.9904 9.90763,0.574912 -2.2194,3.716288 v 0 0 0 l -2.2194,3.716288 z"
+         clip-path="url(#p8248013377)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14159"
+         transform="translate(1.5)" />
+    </g>
+    <g
+       id="g14890"
+       transform="translate(-238.38022,-28.950568)">
+      <path
+         d="M 305.505,78.408 267.06386,99.864"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14163" />
+      <path
+         d="m 267.06386,99.864 v 42.912"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14165" />
+      <path
+         d="M 267.06386,142.776 305.505,164.232"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14167" />
+      <path
+         d="m 305.505,164.232 38.44114,-21.456"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14169" />
+      <path
+         d="M 343.94614,142.776 V 99.864"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14171" />
+      <path
+         d="M 343.94614,99.864 305.505,78.408"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14173" />
+      <path
+         d="M 416.475,78.408 378.03386,99.864"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14175" />
+      <path
+         d="m 378.03386,99.864 v 42.912"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14177" />
+      <path
+         d="M 378.03386,142.776 416.475,164.232"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14179" />
+      <path
+         d="m 416.475,164.232 38.44114,-21.456"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14181" />
+      <path
+         d="M 454.91614,142.776 V 99.864"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14183" />
+      <path
+         d="M 454.91614,99.864 416.475,78.408"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
+         id="path14185" />
+      <path
+         d="m 282.44032,91.2816 5.46883,-8.007488 2.2194,3.716288 v 0 0 0 l 2.2194,3.716288 z"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14187" />
+      <path
+         d="m 267.06386,125.6112 -4.4388,-8.5824 h 4.4388 v 0 0 0 h 4.4388 z"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14190" />
+      <path
+         d="m 290.12855,155.6496 -9.90763,-0.57491 2.2194,-3.71629 v 0 0 0 l 2.2194,-3.71629 z"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14193" />
+      <path
+         d="m 328.56968,151.3584 -5.46883,8.00749 -2.2194,-3.71629 v 0 0 0 l -2.2194,-3.71629 z"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14196" />
+      <path
+         d="m 343.94614,117.0288 4.4388,8.5824 h -4.4388 v 0 0 0 h -4.4388 z"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14199" />
+      <path
+         d="m 320.88145,86.9904 9.90763,0.574912 -2.2194,3.716288 v 0 0 0 l -2.2194,3.716288 z"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14202" />
+      <path
+         d="m 393.41032,91.2816 5.46883,-8.007488 2.2194,3.716288 v 0 0 0 l 2.2194,3.716288 z"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14205" />
+      <path
+         d="m 378.03386,125.6112 -4.4388,-8.5824 h 4.4388 v 0 0 0 h 4.4388 z"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14208" />
+      <path
+         d="m 401.09855,155.6496 -9.90763,-0.57491 2.2194,-3.71629 v 0 0 0 l 2.2194,-3.71629 z"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14211" />
+      <path
+         d="m 439.53968,151.3584 -5.46883,8.00749 -2.2194,-3.71629 v 0 0 0 l -2.2194,-3.71629 z"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14214" />
+      <path
+         d="m 454.91614,117.0288 4.4388,8.5824 h -4.4388 v 0 0 0 h -4.4388 z"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14217" />
+      <path
+         d="m 431.85145,86.9904 9.90763,0.574912 -2.2194,3.716288 v 0 0 0 l -2.2194,3.716288 z"
+         clip-path="url(#pd00f1d4fa4)"
+         style="opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter"
+         id="path14220" />
+    </g>
+    <g
+       ns1:version="1.8.1"
+       ns1:texconverter="pdflatex"
+       ns1:pdfconverter="inkscape"
+       ns1:text="$$=$$"
+       ns1:preamble="/Users/tom/Library/Application Support/org.inkscape.Inkscape/config/inkscape/extensions/textext/default_packages.tex"
+       ns1:scale="1.0"
+       ns1:alignment="middle center"
+       ns1:stroke-to-path="0"
+       ns1:inkscapeversion="1.2.1"
+       transform="matrix(4.54402,0,0,4.54402,245.18691,87.081045)"
+       ns1:jacobian_sqrt="4.54402"
+       id="g15015">
+      <defs
+         id="id-2d65df3e-bd8e-4b5f-bbaa-cd5bbd4db25c">
+        <g
+           id="id-c9508652-d977-4146-a722-be4efb3b6fd8">
+          <g
+             id="id-2611ea61-6cf8-4416-9aa1-6ee126d872eb" />
+          <g
+             id="id-658ac5d6-16b1-4da5-946e-58bb1d1005d1">
+            <path
+               d="m 6.84375,-3.265625 c 0.15625,0 0.34375,0 0.34375,-0.1875 C 7.1875,-3.65625 7,-3.65625 6.859375,-3.65625 h -5.96875 c -0.140625,0 -0.328125,0 -0.328125,0.203125 0,0.1875 0.1875,0.1875 0.328125,0.1875 z m 0.015625,1.9375 c 0.140625,0 0.328125,0 0.328125,-0.203125 0,-0.1875 -0.1875,-0.1875 -0.34375,-0.1875 H 0.890625 c -0.140625,0 -0.328125,0 -0.328125,0.1875 0,0.203125 0.1875,0.203125 0.328125,0.203125 z m 0,0"
+               id="id-52672403-5167-48e3-9e93-2ec4476962e8" />
+          </g>
+        </g>
+      </defs>
+      <g
+         fill="#000000"
+         fill-opacity="1"
+         id="id-b4565506-e2db-4803-825a-94da7cc18565"
+         transform="translate(-302.312,-143.064)">
+        <g
+           transform="translate(301.75,146.72)"
+           id="g15157">
+          <path
+             d="m 6.84375,-3.265625 c 0.15625,0 0.34375,0 0.34375,-0.1875 C 7.1875,-3.65625 7,-3.65625 6.859375,-3.65625 h -5.96875 c -0.140625,0 -0.328125,0 -0.328125,0.203125 0,0.1875 0.1875,0.1875 0.328125,0.1875 z m 0.015625,1.9375 c 0.140625,0 0.328125,0 0.328125,-0.203125 0,-0.1875 -0.1875,-0.1875 -0.34375,-0.1875 H 0.890625 c -0.140625,0 -0.328125,0 -0.328125,0.1875 0,0.203125 0.1875,0.203125 0.328125,0.203125 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-2aa67608-0c6d-4fd3-a394-55b530e65b05" />
+        </g>
+      </g>
+    </g>
+    <g
+       ns1:version="1.8.1"
+       ns1:texconverter="pdflatex"
+       ns1:pdfconverter="inkscape"
+       ns1:text="$$W_3$$"
+       ns1:preamble="/Users/tom/Library/Application Support/org.inkscape.Inkscape/config/inkscape/extensions/textext/default_packages.tex"
+       ns1:scale="1.0"
+       ns1:alignment="middle center"
+       ns1:stroke-to-path="0"
+       ns1:inkscapeversion="1.2.1"
+       transform="matrix(3.9708547,0,0,3.9708547,363.36179,154.07929)"
+       ns1:jacobian_sqrt="1.0"
+       id="g15576">
+      <defs
+         id="id-2a4442c1-c351-421c-82b1-26734120233b">
+        <g
+           id="id-33a3c2db-97c5-43c9-bff3-9f95d1f93590">
+          <g
+             id="id-3da5d159-1811-4f78-a156-49ccc1d0c4e5" />
+          <g
+             id="id-b8c340b1-765b-48ea-8733-f05bf1b882c8">
+            <path
+               d="m 9.140625,-5.65625 c 0.25,-0.4375 0.484375,-0.796875 1.125,-0.84375 0.07813,-0.015625 0.1875,-0.015625 0.1875,-0.203125 0,-0.03125 -0.04687,-0.109375 -0.125,-0.109375 -0.234375,0 -0.515625,0.03125 -0.765625,0.03125 -0.34375,0 -0.703125,-0.03125 -1.046875,-0.03125 -0.046875,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.1875 0,0.109375 0.09375,0.125 0.15625,0.125 0.234375,0.015625 0.59375,0.09375 0.59375,0.390625 0,0.109375 -0.0625,0.1875 -0.140625,0.328125 L 6.25,-1.09375 5.875,-6.03125 c 0,-0.203125 -0.015625,-0.453125 0.703125,-0.46875 0.171875,0 0.265625,0 0.265625,-0.203125 0,-0.09375 -0.109375,-0.109375 -0.140625,-0.109375 -0.40625,0 -0.828125,0.03125 -1.21875,0.03125 -0.234375,0 -0.8125,-0.03125 -1.046875,-0.03125 -0.0625,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.203125 C 4.25,-6.5 4.34375,-6.5 4.484375,-6.5 4.921875,-6.5 5,-6.4375 5.015625,-6.25 l 0.0625,0.765625 -2.53125,4.390625 -0.375,-5.046875 c 0,-0.125 0,-0.34375 0.765625,-0.359375 0.09375,0 0.203125,0 0.203125,-0.203125 C 3.140625,-6.8125 3.015625,-6.8125 3,-6.8125 c -0.390625,0 -0.8125,0.03125 -1.21875,0.03125 -0.359375,0 -0.71875,-0.03125 -1.046875,-0.03125 -0.0625,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.1875 0,0.125 0.09375,0.125 0.25,0.125 0.5,0 0.515625,0.09375 0.53125,0.375 l 0.453125,6.078125 c 0,0.1875 0.015625,0.265625 0.15625,0.265625 0.109375,0 0.140625,-0.0625 0.234375,-0.203125 l 2.9375,-5.09375 0.359375,5.03125 C 5.5,0.171875 5.515625,0.21875 5.625,0.21875 c 0.140625,0 0.203125,-0.09375 0.25,-0.1875 z m 0,0"
+               id="id-cabedf90-c5b0-4fdf-badc-750aff24a25b" />
+          </g>
+          <g
+             id="id-6df51856-d628-434f-b311-d4a06fa0d3b6" />
+          <g
+             id="id-07cf66ab-daa6-494f-869a-6c8716e90be2">
+            <path
+               d="m 1.90625,-2.328125 c 0.546875,0 0.9375,0.375 0.9375,1.125 0,0.859375 -0.515625,1.125 -0.90625,1.125 -0.28125,0 -0.90625,-0.078125 -1.1875,-0.5 0.328125,0 0.40625,-0.234375 0.40625,-0.390625 0,-0.21875 -0.171875,-0.375 -0.390625,-0.375 -0.1875,0 -0.390625,0.125 -0.390625,0.40625 0,0.65625 0.71875,1.078125 1.5625,1.078125 0.96875,0 1.640625,-0.65625 1.640625,-1.34375 0,-0.546875 -0.4375,-1.09375 -1.203125,-1.25 0.71875,-0.265625 0.984375,-0.78125 0.984375,-1.21875 0,-0.546875 -0.625,-0.953125 -1.40625,-0.953125 -0.765625,0 -1.359375,0.375 -1.359375,0.9375 0,0.234375 0.15625,0.359375 0.359375,0.359375 0.21875,0 0.359375,-0.15625 0.359375,-0.34375 0,-0.203125 -0.140625,-0.359375 -0.359375,-0.375 0.25,-0.296875 0.71875,-0.375 0.984375,-0.375 0.3125,0 0.75,0.15625 0.75,0.75 0,0.296875 -0.09375,0.625 -0.28125,0.828125 -0.21875,0.265625 -0.421875,0.28125 -0.765625,0.3125 -0.171875,0.015625 -0.1875,0.015625 -0.21875,0.015625 -0.015625,0 -0.078125,0.015625 -0.078125,0.09375 0,0.09375 0.0625,0.09375 0.1875,0.09375 z m 0,0"
+               id="id-ccb28513-1fbe-4ca2-94a1-84154f444afd" />
+          </g>
+        </g>
+      </defs>
+      <g
+         fill="#000000"
+         fill-opacity="1"
+         id="id-2cb85f9d-f371-4db5-9d18-e8fd3ba3abc9"
+         transform="translate(-299.232,-139.907)">
+        <g
+           transform="translate(298.685,146.72)"
+           id="g15569">
+          <path
+             d="m 9.140625,-5.65625 c 0.25,-0.4375 0.484375,-0.796875 1.125,-0.84375 0.07813,-0.015625 0.1875,-0.015625 0.1875,-0.203125 0,-0.03125 -0.04687,-0.109375 -0.125,-0.109375 -0.234375,0 -0.515625,0.03125 -0.765625,0.03125 -0.34375,0 -0.703125,-0.03125 -1.046875,-0.03125 -0.046875,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.1875 0,0.109375 0.09375,0.125 0.15625,0.125 0.234375,0.015625 0.59375,0.09375 0.59375,0.390625 0,0.109375 -0.0625,0.1875 -0.140625,0.328125 L 6.25,-1.09375 5.875,-6.03125 c 0,-0.203125 -0.015625,-0.453125 0.703125,-0.46875 0.171875,0 0.265625,0 0.265625,-0.203125 0,-0.09375 -0.109375,-0.109375 -0.140625,-0.109375 -0.40625,0 -0.828125,0.03125 -1.21875,0.03125 -0.234375,0 -0.8125,-0.03125 -1.046875,-0.03125 -0.0625,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.203125 C 4.25,-6.5 4.34375,-6.5 4.484375,-6.5 4.921875,-6.5 5,-6.4375 5.015625,-6.25 l 0.0625,0.765625 -2.53125,4.390625 -0.375,-5.046875 c 0,-0.125 0,-0.34375 0.765625,-0.359375 0.09375,0 0.203125,0 0.203125,-0.203125 C 3.140625,-6.8125 3.015625,-6.8125 3,-6.8125 c -0.390625,0 -0.8125,0.03125 -1.21875,0.03125 -0.359375,0 -0.71875,-0.03125 -1.046875,-0.03125 -0.0625,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.1875 0,0.125 0.09375,0.125 0.25,0.125 0.5,0 0.515625,0.09375 0.53125,0.375 l 0.453125,6.078125 c 0,0.1875 0.015625,0.265625 0.15625,0.265625 0.109375,0 0.140625,-0.0625 0.234375,-0.203125 l 2.9375,-5.09375 0.359375,5.03125 C 5.5,0.171875 5.515625,0.21875 5.625,0.21875 c 0.140625,0 0.203125,-0.09375 0.25,-0.1875 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-60c4b884-a00c-4b5f-8584-4502baca289c" />
+        </g>
+      </g>
+      <g
+         fill="#000000"
+         fill-opacity="1"
+         id="id-bc3f3fd2-84ff-4c79-985c-f1345a017fd0"
+         transform="translate(-299.232,-139.907)">
+        <g
+           transform="translate(308.094,148.214)"
+           id="g15573">
+          <path
+             d="m 1.90625,-2.328125 c 0.546875,0 0.9375,0.375 0.9375,1.125 0,0.859375 -0.515625,1.125 -0.90625,1.125 -0.28125,0 -0.90625,-0.078125 -1.1875,-0.5 0.328125,0 0.40625,-0.234375 0.40625,-0.390625 0,-0.21875 -0.171875,-0.375 -0.390625,-0.375 -0.1875,0 -0.390625,0.125 -0.390625,0.40625 0,0.65625 0.71875,1.078125 1.5625,1.078125 0.96875,0 1.640625,-0.65625 1.640625,-1.34375 0,-0.546875 -0.4375,-1.09375 -1.203125,-1.25 0.71875,-0.265625 0.984375,-0.78125 0.984375,-1.21875 0,-0.546875 -0.625,-0.953125 -1.40625,-0.953125 -0.765625,0 -1.359375,0.375 -1.359375,0.9375 0,0.234375 0.15625,0.359375 0.359375,0.359375 0.21875,0 0.359375,-0.15625 0.359375,-0.34375 0,-0.203125 -0.140625,-0.359375 -0.359375,-0.375 0.25,-0.296875 0.71875,-0.375 0.984375,-0.375 0.3125,0 0.75,0.15625 0.75,0.75 0,0.296875 -0.09375,0.625 -0.28125,0.828125 -0.21875,0.265625 -0.421875,0.28125 -0.765625,0.3125 -0.171875,0.015625 -0.1875,0.015625 -0.21875,0.015625 -0.015625,0 -0.078125,0.015625 -0.078125,0.09375 0,0.09375 0.0625,0.09375 0.1875,0.09375 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-fe905ebf-afc2-49ef-90e4-eebe78539c7b" />
+        </g>
+      </g>
+    </g>
+    <g
+       ns1:version="1.8.1"
+       ns1:texconverter="pdflatex"
+       ns1:pdfconverter="inkscape"
+       ns1:text="$$W_1 \\cdot W_2$$"
+       ns1:preamble="/Users/tom/Library/Application Support/org.inkscape.Inkscape/config/inkscape/extensions/textext/default_packages.tex"
+       ns1:scale="1.0"
+       ns1:alignment="middle center"
+       ns1:stroke-to-path="0"
+       ns1:inkscapeversion="1.2.1"
+       transform="matrix(3.67654,0,0,3.67654,72.48,157.173)"
+       ns1:jacobian_sqrt="3.67654"
+       id="g15337">
+      <defs
+         id="id-b37fd6cd-9682-4114-98f3-5545c3fdc36d">
+        <g
+           id="id-335ee90c-b069-4d66-83da-40e6fe27c83f">
+          <g
+             id="id-750c6499-2cde-40d8-8b22-87dbdf000d40" />
+          <g
+             id="id-257c2e0c-f0b0-45e3-9137-6ec6c72a3412">
+            <path
+               d="m 9.140625,-5.65625 c 0.25,-0.4375 0.484375,-0.796875 1.125,-0.84375 0.07813,-0.015625 0.1875,-0.015625 0.1875,-0.203125 0,-0.03125 -0.04687,-0.109375 -0.125,-0.109375 -0.234375,0 -0.515625,0.03125 -0.765625,0.03125 -0.34375,0 -0.703125,-0.03125 -1.046875,-0.03125 -0.046875,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.1875 0,0.109375 0.09375,0.125 0.15625,0.125 0.234375,0.015625 0.59375,0.09375 0.59375,0.390625 0,0.109375 -0.0625,0.1875 -0.140625,0.328125 L 6.25,-1.09375 5.875,-6.03125 c 0,-0.203125 -0.015625,-0.453125 0.703125,-0.46875 0.171875,0 0.265625,0 0.265625,-0.203125 0,-0.09375 -0.109375,-0.109375 -0.140625,-0.109375 -0.40625,0 -0.828125,0.03125 -1.21875,0.03125 -0.234375,0 -0.8125,-0.03125 -1.046875,-0.03125 -0.0625,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.203125 C 4.25,-6.5 4.34375,-6.5 4.484375,-6.5 4.921875,-6.5 5,-6.4375 5.015625,-6.25 l 0.0625,0.765625 -2.53125,4.390625 -0.375,-5.046875 c 0,-0.125 0,-0.34375 0.765625,-0.359375 0.09375,0 0.203125,0 0.203125,-0.203125 C 3.140625,-6.8125 3.015625,-6.8125 3,-6.8125 c -0.390625,0 -0.8125,0.03125 -1.21875,0.03125 -0.359375,0 -0.71875,-0.03125 -1.046875,-0.03125 -0.0625,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.1875 0,0.125 0.09375,0.125 0.25,0.125 0.5,0 0.515625,0.09375 0.53125,0.375 l 0.453125,6.078125 c 0,0.1875 0.015625,0.265625 0.15625,0.265625 0.109375,0 0.140625,-0.0625 0.234375,-0.203125 l 2.9375,-5.09375 0.359375,5.03125 C 5.5,0.171875 5.515625,0.21875 5.625,0.21875 c 0.140625,0 0.203125,-0.09375 0.25,-0.1875 z m 0,0"
+               id="id-1e178c47-aa72-4571-9053-841371edc2d2" />
+          </g>
+          <g
+             id="id-a61ad00e-68f8-4bf9-836d-546d27931b36" />
+          <g
+             id="id-51603a65-1d3a-4026-b260-1cdb916ddb8e">
+            <path
+               d="m 2.328125,-4.4375 c 0,-0.1875 0,-0.1875 -0.203125,-0.1875 -0.453125,0.4375 -1.078125,0.4375 -1.359375,0.4375 v 0.25 c 0.15625,0 0.625,0 1,-0.1875 v 3.546875 c 0,0.234375 0,0.328125 -0.6875,0.328125 H 0.8125 V 0 c 0.125,0 0.984375,-0.03125 1.234375,-0.03125 0.21875,0 1.09375,0.03125 1.25,0.03125 V -0.25 H 3.03125 c -0.703125,0 -0.703125,-0.09375 -0.703125,-0.328125 z m 0,0"
+               id="id-bc81c896-6add-4858-a71a-19a2b48b9f4a" />
+          </g>
+          <g
+             id="id-b67f7f61-20c1-4b3c-af33-3324532ae480">
+            <path
+               d="M 3.515625,-1.265625 H 3.28125 c -0.015625,0.15625 -0.09375,0.5625 -0.1875,0.625 C 3.046875,-0.59375 2.515625,-0.59375 2.40625,-0.59375 H 1.125 c 0.734375,-0.640625 0.984375,-0.84375 1.390625,-1.171875 0.515625,-0.40625 1,-0.84375 1,-1.5 0,-0.84375 -0.734375,-1.359375 -1.625,-1.359375 -0.859375,0 -1.453125,0.609375 -1.453125,1.25 0,0.34375 0.296875,0.390625 0.375,0.390625 0.15625,0 0.359375,-0.125 0.359375,-0.375 0,-0.125 -0.046875,-0.375 -0.40625,-0.375 C 0.984375,-4.21875 1.453125,-4.375 1.78125,-4.375 c 0.703125,0 1.0625,0.546875 1.0625,1.109375 0,0.609375 -0.4375,1.078125 -0.65625,1.328125 L 0.515625,-0.265625 C 0.4375,-0.203125 0.4375,-0.1875 0.4375,0 h 2.875 z m 0,0"
+               id="id-b0dbb139-a5c9-4b2b-a9a1-1264766f1c16" />
+          </g>
+          <g
+             id="id-d40a6534-ab74-451e-a87f-1516369e9089" />
+          <g
+             id="id-67084ee2-9a0e-4fd5-99fe-553bfeaae0c7">
+            <path
+               d="m 1.90625,-2.5 c 0,-0.28125 -0.234375,-0.515625 -0.515625,-0.515625 -0.296875,0 -0.53125,0.234375 -0.53125,0.515625 0,0.296875 0.234375,0.53125 0.53125,0.53125 0.28125,0 0.515625,-0.234375 0.515625,-0.53125 z m 0,0"
+               id="id-c401a72d-e9de-4868-ac62-ef2c97120b98" />
+          </g>
+        </g>
+      </defs>
+      <g
+         fill="#000000"
+         fill-opacity="1"
+         id="id-f07d9b4e-169b-45ea-a358-7691ead86b4f"
+         transform="translate(-288.695,-139.907)">
+        <g
+           transform="translate(288.148,146.72)"
+           id="g15800">
+          <path
+             d="m 9.140625,-5.65625 c 0.25,-0.4375 0.484375,-0.796875 1.125,-0.84375 0.07813,-0.015625 0.1875,-0.015625 0.1875,-0.203125 0,-0.03125 -0.04687,-0.109375 -0.125,-0.109375 -0.234375,0 -0.515625,0.03125 -0.765625,0.03125 -0.34375,0 -0.703125,-0.03125 -1.046875,-0.03125 -0.046875,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.1875 0,0.109375 0.09375,0.125 0.15625,0.125 0.234375,0.015625 0.59375,0.09375 0.59375,0.390625 0,0.109375 -0.0625,0.1875 -0.140625,0.328125 L 6.25,-1.09375 5.875,-6.03125 c 0,-0.203125 -0.015625,-0.453125 0.703125,-0.46875 0.171875,0 0.265625,0 0.265625,-0.203125 0,-0.09375 -0.109375,-0.109375 -0.140625,-0.109375 -0.40625,0 -0.828125,0.03125 -1.21875,0.03125 -0.234375,0 -0.8125,-0.03125 -1.046875,-0.03125 -0.0625,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.203125 C 4.25,-6.5 4.34375,-6.5 4.484375,-6.5 4.921875,-6.5 5,-6.4375 5.015625,-6.25 l 0.0625,0.765625 -2.53125,4.390625 -0.375,-5.046875 c 0,-0.125 0,-0.34375 0.765625,-0.359375 0.09375,0 0.203125,0 0.203125,-0.203125 C 3.140625,-6.8125 3.015625,-6.8125 3,-6.8125 c -0.390625,0 -0.8125,0.03125 -1.21875,0.03125 -0.359375,0 -0.71875,-0.03125 -1.046875,-0.03125 -0.0625,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.1875 0,0.125 0.09375,0.125 0.25,0.125 0.5,0 0.515625,0.09375 0.53125,0.375 l 0.453125,6.078125 c 0,0.1875 0.015625,0.265625 0.15625,0.265625 0.109375,0 0.140625,-0.0625 0.234375,-0.203125 l 2.9375,-5.09375 0.359375,5.03125 C 5.5,0.171875 5.515625,0.21875 5.625,0.21875 c 0.140625,0 0.203125,-0.09375 0.25,-0.1875 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-f8ef5ec9-d5aa-47c5-af3e-7ae11334c0c0" />
+        </g>
+      </g>
+      <g
+         fill="#000000"
+         fill-opacity="1"
+         id="id-144d1189-b9a8-409b-bcd1-bb9b02859eaf"
+         transform="translate(-288.695,-139.907)">
+        <g
+           transform="translate(297.557,148.214)"
+           id="g15804">
+          <path
+             d="m 2.328125,-4.4375 c 0,-0.1875 0,-0.1875 -0.203125,-0.1875 -0.453125,0.4375 -1.078125,0.4375 -1.359375,0.4375 v 0.25 c 0.15625,0 0.625,0 1,-0.1875 v 3.546875 c 0,0.234375 0,0.328125 -0.6875,0.328125 H 0.8125 V 0 c 0.125,0 0.984375,-0.03125 1.234375,-0.03125 0.21875,0 1.09375,0.03125 1.25,0.03125 V -0.25 H 3.03125 c -0.703125,0 -0.703125,-0.09375 -0.703125,-0.328125 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-f7cb4199-d865-4372-b544-8e064c0898b6" />
+        </g>
+      </g>
+      <g
+         fill="#000000"
+         fill-opacity="1"
+         id="id-077bfe4d-3dec-4fcb-a4c1-a90de09b92fe"
+         transform="translate(-288.695,-139.907)">
+        <g
+           transform="translate(304.24,146.72)"
+           id="g15808">
+          <path
+             d="m 1.90625,-2.5 c 0,-0.28125 -0.234375,-0.515625 -0.515625,-0.515625 -0.296875,0 -0.53125,0.234375 -0.53125,0.515625 0,0.296875 0.234375,0.53125 0.53125,0.53125 0.28125,0 0.515625,-0.234375 0.515625,-0.53125 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-9623bb5c-a1ee-4597-a716-39f21984d151" />
+        </g>
+      </g>
+      <g
+         fill="#000000"
+         fill-opacity="1"
+         id="id-68e504a0-49a0-4122-a7a9-24c99bccef37"
+         transform="translate(-288.695,-139.907)">
+        <g
+           transform="translate(309.221,146.72)"
+           id="g15812">
+          <path
+             d="m 9.140625,-5.65625 c 0.25,-0.4375 0.484375,-0.796875 1.125,-0.84375 0.07813,-0.015625 0.1875,-0.015625 0.1875,-0.203125 0,-0.03125 -0.04687,-0.109375 -0.125,-0.109375 -0.234375,0 -0.515625,0.03125 -0.765625,0.03125 -0.34375,0 -0.703125,-0.03125 -1.046875,-0.03125 -0.046875,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.1875 0,0.109375 0.09375,0.125 0.15625,0.125 0.234375,0.015625 0.59375,0.09375 0.59375,0.390625 0,0.109375 -0.0625,0.1875 -0.140625,0.328125 L 6.25,-1.09375 5.875,-6.03125 c 0,-0.203125 -0.015625,-0.453125 0.703125,-0.46875 0.171875,0 0.265625,0 0.265625,-0.203125 0,-0.09375 -0.109375,-0.109375 -0.140625,-0.109375 -0.40625,0 -0.828125,0.03125 -1.21875,0.03125 -0.234375,0 -0.8125,-0.03125 -1.046875,-0.03125 -0.0625,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.203125 C 4.25,-6.5 4.34375,-6.5 4.484375,-6.5 4.921875,-6.5 5,-6.4375 5.015625,-6.25 l 0.0625,0.765625 -2.53125,4.390625 -0.375,-5.046875 c 0,-0.125 0,-0.34375 0.765625,-0.359375 0.09375,0 0.203125,0 0.203125,-0.203125 C 3.140625,-6.8125 3.015625,-6.8125 3,-6.8125 c -0.390625,0 -0.8125,0.03125 -1.21875,0.03125 -0.359375,0 -0.71875,-0.03125 -1.046875,-0.03125 -0.0625,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.1875 0,0.125 0.09375,0.125 0.25,0.125 0.5,0 0.515625,0.09375 0.53125,0.375 l 0.453125,6.078125 c 0,0.1875 0.015625,0.265625 0.15625,0.265625 0.109375,0 0.140625,-0.0625 0.234375,-0.203125 l 2.9375,-5.09375 0.359375,5.03125 C 5.5,0.171875 5.515625,0.21875 5.625,0.21875 c 0.140625,0 0.203125,-0.09375 0.25,-0.1875 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-f429d505-caea-49fe-9eb4-2b2d6b51e05b" />
+        </g>
+      </g>
+      <g
+         fill="#000000"
+         fill-opacity="1"
+         id="id-106f0a66-b135-40e1-835a-2c0adbd9bb1f"
+         transform="translate(-288.695,-139.907)">
+        <g
+           transform="translate(318.631,148.214)"
+           id="g15816">
+          <path
+             d="M 3.515625,-1.265625 H 3.28125 c -0.015625,0.15625 -0.09375,0.5625 -0.1875,0.625 C 3.046875,-0.59375 2.515625,-0.59375 2.40625,-0.59375 H 1.125 c 0.734375,-0.640625 0.984375,-0.84375 1.390625,-1.171875 0.515625,-0.40625 1,-0.84375 1,-1.5 0,-0.84375 -0.734375,-1.359375 -1.625,-1.359375 -0.859375,0 -1.453125,0.609375 -1.453125,1.25 0,0.34375 0.296875,0.390625 0.375,0.390625 0.15625,0 0.359375,-0.125 0.359375,-0.375 0,-0.125 -0.046875,-0.375 -0.40625,-0.375 C 0.984375,-4.21875 1.453125,-4.375 1.78125,-4.375 c 0.703125,0 1.0625,0.546875 1.0625,1.109375 0,0.609375 -0.4375,1.078125 -0.65625,1.328125 L 0.515625,-0.265625 C 0.4375,-0.203125 0.4375,-0.1875 0.4375,0 h 2.875 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-89a46572-facb-412e-bb36-a5a661861109" />
+        </g>
+      </g>
+    </g>
+    <g
+       fill="#000000"
+       fill-opacity="1"
+       id="id-077bfe4d-3dec-4fcb-a4c1-a90de09b92fe-2"
+       transform="matrix(3.67654,0,0,3.67654,-1001.6725,-438.47985)"
+       style="stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:round">
+      <g
+         transform="translate(304.24,146.72)"
+         id="g15808-2"
+         style="stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:round">
+        <path
+           d="m 1.90625,-2.5 c 0,-0.28125 -0.234375,-0.515625 -0.515625,-0.515625 -0.296875,0 -0.53125,0.234375 -0.53125,0.515625 0,0.296875 0.234375,0.53125 0.53125,0.53125 0.28125,0 0.515625,-0.234375 0.515625,-0.53125 z m 0,0"
+           id="id-9623bb5c-a1ee-4597-a716-39f21984d151-6"
+           style="stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:round" />
+      </g>
+    </g>
+  </g>
+</svg>

assets/thesis/amk_chapter/visual_kitaev_1.svg

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
    version="1.1"
    id="svg5942"
    sodipodi:docname="visual_kitaev_1.svg"
-   inkscape:version="1.3-dev (77bc73e, 2022-05-18)"
+   inkscape:version="1.2.1 (9c6d41e4, 2022-07-14)"
    inkscape:export-filename="visual_kitaev_1.pdf"
    inkscape:export-xdpi="96"
    inkscape:export-ydpi="96"
@@ -30,14 +30,14 @@
      inkscape:document-units="pt"
      showgrid="false"
      inkscape:zoom="1.2049729"
-     inkscape:cx="230.29564"
+     inkscape:cx="230.71058"
      inkscape:cy="143.15675"
      inkscape:window-width="1422"
      inkscape:window-height="819"
-     inkscape:window-x="18"
+     inkscape:window-x="582"
-     inkscape:window-y="25"
+     inkscape:window-y="201"
      inkscape:window-maximized="0"
-     inkscape:current-layer="layer2" />
+     inkscape:current-layer="layer3" />
   <metadata
      id="metadata5878">
     <rdf:RDF>
@@ -3376,259 +3376,6 @@
            transform="rotate(180,237.07294,107.04387)" />
       </g>
     </g>
-    <g
-       ns1:version="1.8.1"
-       ns1:texconverter="pdflatex"
-       ns1:pdfconverter="inkscape"
-       ns1:text="$$H = \\sum_{\\mathrm{bonds}} J^\\alpha K_{ij}$$"
-       ns1:preamble="/Users/tom/Library/Application Support/org.inkscape.Inkscape/config/inkscape/extensions/textext/default_packages.tex"
-       ns1:scale="1.0"
-       ns1:alignment="middle center"
-       ns1:stroke-to-path="0"
-       ns1:inkscapeversion="1.2"
-       transform="translate(268.52445,37.285393)"
-       ns1:jacobian_sqrt="1.0"
-       id="g13013">
-      <defs
-         id="id-8bc1471f-0c7b-410d-b31c-01fc09cb5f36">
-        <g
-           id="id-357dcf0f-5b47-493f-8c56-70e4266f90e8">
-          <g
-             id="id-720ef573-6900-46fb-a442-44061e173f8e" />
-          <g
-             id="id-280a29ca-9e4b-445c-b87d-f87402548b2f">
-            <path
-               d="M 7.609375,-6.046875 C 7.703125,-6.40625 7.71875,-6.5 8.4375,-6.5 c 0.265625,0 0.34375,0 0.34375,-0.203125 0,-0.109375 -0.109375,-0.109375 -0.140625,-0.109375 -0.28125,0 -1,0.03125 -1.28125,0.03125 -0.28125,0 -0.984375,-0.03125 -1.28125,-0.03125 -0.078125,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.203125 0,0.109375 0.09375,0.109375 0.28125,0.109375 0.015625,0 0.203125,0 0.375,0.015625 0.1875,0.03125 0.265625,0.03125 0.265625,0.171875 0,0.03125 0,0.046875 -0.03125,0.1875 L 6.1875,-3.703125 H 3.140625 l 0.59375,-2.34375 C 3.8125,-6.40625 3.84375,-6.5 4.5625,-6.5 c 0.265625,0 0.34375,0 0.34375,-0.203125 0,-0.109375 -0.109375,-0.109375 -0.140625,-0.109375 -0.28125,0 -1,0.03125 -1.28125,0.03125 -0.28125,0 -0.984375,-0.03125 -1.28125,-0.03125 -0.078125,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.203125 0,0.109375 0.09375,0.109375 0.28125,0.109375 0.015625,0 0.203125,0 0.375,0.015625 0.171875,0.03125 0.265625,0.03125 0.265625,0.171875 0,0.03125 0,0.0625 -0.03125,0.1875 L 1.5625,-0.78125 c -0.09375,0.390625 -0.109375,0.46875 -0.90625,0.46875 -0.171875,0 -0.265625,0 -0.265625,0.203125 C 0.390625,0 0.515625,0 0.53125,0 0.8125,0 1.515625,-0.03125 1.796875,-0.03125 2,-0.03125 2.21875,-0.015625 2.4375,-0.015625 2.65625,-0.015625 2.875,0 3.078125,0 3.15625,0 3.28125,0 3.28125,-0.203125 3.28125,-0.3125 3.1875,-0.3125 3,-0.3125 c -0.375,0 -0.640625,0 -0.640625,-0.171875 0,-0.0625 0.015625,-0.109375 0.015625,-0.171875 l 0.6875,-2.734375 h 3.03125 c -0.40625,1.65625 -0.640625,2.609375 -0.6875,2.75 C 5.3125,-0.3125 5.125,-0.3125 4.5,-0.3125 c -0.140625,0 -0.234375,0 -0.234375,0.203125 C 4.265625,0 4.390625,0 4.40625,0 4.6875,0 5.390625,-0.03125 5.671875,-0.03125 5.875,-0.03125 6.09375,-0.015625 6.3125,-0.015625 6.53125,-0.015625 6.75,0 6.953125,0 7.03125,0 7.15625,0 7.15625,-0.203125 7.15625,-0.3125 7.0625,-0.3125 6.875,-0.3125 c -0.359375,0 -0.640625,0 -0.640625,-0.171875 0,-0.0625 0.015625,-0.109375 0.03125,-0.171875 z m 0,0"
-               id="id-3cf4b0c1-ff16-4926-8369-96cdf9e8d5aa" />
-          </g>
-          <g
-             id="id-17aa7cd0-8b09-483a-b735-8d298a999ce4">
-            <path
-               d="M 5.390625,-6.078125 C 5.46875,-6.40625 5.5,-6.5 6.046875,-6.5 c 0.15625,0 0.265625,0 0.265625,-0.1875 0,-0.09375 -0.0625,-0.125 -0.140625,-0.125 -0.25,0 -0.859375,0.03125 -1.109375,0.03125 -0.328125,0 -1.140625,-0.03125 -1.46875,-0.03125 -0.078125,0 -0.203125,0 -0.203125,0.203125 C 3.390625,-6.5 3.46875,-6.5 3.734375,-6.5 c 0.21875,0 0.328125,0 0.578125,0.015625 0.234375,0.03125 0.296875,0.0625 0.296875,0.203125 0,0.0625 -0.015625,0.125 -0.03125,0.203125 L 3.421875,-1.5 C 3.1875,-0.53125 2.515625,0 2,0 1.734375,0 1.203125,-0.09375 1.046875,-0.625 c 0.03125,0.015625 0.09375,0.015625 0.125,0.015625 0.390625,0 0.640625,-0.34375 0.640625,-0.640625 0,-0.3125 -0.265625,-0.421875 -0.4375,-0.421875 -0.171875,0 -0.671875,0.125 -0.671875,0.796875 0,0.625 0.53125,1.09375 1.328125,1.09375 0.90625,0 1.953125,-0.65625 2.203125,-1.640625 z m 0,0"
-               id="id-e6ffdb43-3ffd-4f4b-bda4-c8bf7e2965e1" />
-          </g>
-          <g
-             id="id-09f196d5-a59d-4921-9f72-41308ba3ecac">
-            <path
-               d="M 5.078125,-4.03125 C 5.0625,-4.0625 5.03125,-4.140625 5.03125,-4.171875 c 0,0 0.171875,-0.140625 0.28125,-0.21875 l 1.75,-1.34375 C 8,-6.4375 8.390625,-6.46875 8.6875,-6.5 8.765625,-6.515625 8.859375,-6.515625 8.859375,-6.703125 8.859375,-6.734375 8.828125,-6.8125 8.75,-6.8125 c -0.21875,0 -0.46875,0.03125 -0.703125,0.03125 -0.359375,0 -0.75,-0.03125 -1.109375,-0.03125 -0.0625,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.203125 0,0.0625 0.046875,0.09375 0.125,0.109375 0.21875,0.015625 0.296875,0.0625 0.296875,0.203125 0,0.1875 -0.296875,0.421875 -0.359375,0.46875 L 2.9375,-2.84375 3.734375,-6.046875 C 3.8125,-6.40625 3.84375,-6.5 4.5625,-6.5 c 0.25,0 0.34375,0 0.34375,-0.203125 0,-0.078125 -0.078125,-0.109375 -0.140625,-0.109375 -0.28125,0 -1,0.03125 -1.28125,0.03125 C 3.203125,-6.78125 2.5,-6.8125 2.203125,-6.8125 2.140625,-6.8125 2,-6.8125 2,-6.625 2,-6.5 2.09375,-6.5 2.296875,-6.5 c 0.125,0 0.3125,0.015625 0.421875,0.015625 0.15625,0.03125 0.21875,0.046875 0.21875,0.171875 0,0.03125 0,0.0625 -0.03125,0.1875 L 1.5625,-0.78125 c -0.09375,0.390625 -0.109375,0.46875 -0.90625,0.46875 -0.171875,0 -0.28125,0 -0.28125,0.1875 C 0.375,0 0.5,0 0.53125,0 0.8125,0 1.515625,-0.03125 1.796875,-0.03125 2,-0.03125 2.21875,-0.015625 2.4375,-0.015625 2.65625,-0.015625 2.875,0 3.078125,0 3.15625,0 3.28125,0 3.28125,-0.203125 3.28125,-0.3125 3.1875,-0.3125 3,-0.3125 c -0.375,0 -0.640625,0 -0.640625,-0.171875 0,-0.078125 0.046875,-0.296875 0.078125,-0.4375 C 2.578125,-1.453125 2.71875,-1.96875 2.84375,-2.5 l 1.484375,-1.15625 1.15625,2.6875 c 0.125,0.265625 0.125,0.296875 0.125,0.34375 0,0.3125 -0.4375,0.3125 -0.53125,0.3125 -0.109375,0 -0.21875,0 -0.21875,0.203125 C 4.859375,0 4.984375,0 5,0 5.40625,0 5.828125,-0.03125 6.21875,-0.03125 6.4375,-0.03125 6.984375,0 7.203125,0 7.25,0 7.375,0 7.375,-0.203125 7.375,-0.3125 7.265625,-0.3125 7.171875,-0.3125 c -0.40625,0 -0.53125,-0.09375 -0.6875,-0.4375 z m 0,0"
-               id="id-38b61d58-3842-478a-a128-71576671086e" />
-          </g>
-          <g
-             id="id-e16891bb-aaaf-4cb9-809c-415bd695d749" />
-          <g
-             id="id-d88eaf2d-debb-40a8-8131-1330c20a8733">
-            <path
-               d="m 6.84375,-3.265625 c 0.15625,0 0.34375,0 0.34375,-0.1875 C 7.1875,-3.65625 7,-3.65625 6.859375,-3.65625 h -5.96875 c -0.140625,0 -0.328125,0 -0.328125,0.203125 0,0.1875 0.1875,0.1875 0.328125,0.1875 z m 0.015625,1.9375 c 0.140625,0 0.328125,0 0.328125,-0.203125 0,-0.1875 -0.1875,-0.1875 -0.34375,-0.1875 H 0.890625 c -0.140625,0 -0.328125,0 -0.328125,0.1875 0,0.203125 0.1875,0.203125 0.328125,0.203125 z m 0,0"
-               id="id-5392b5ad-6d74-4181-aa23-a267b562a905" />
-          </g>
-          <g
-             id="id-b95f7ebb-c530-46e4-b499-ebb9b3afbeb4" />
-          <g
-             id="id-5f074f44-992f-417c-be2a-d8140f2db918">
-            <path
-               d="m 12.625,13.953125 1.203125,-3.1875 h -0.25 c -0.390625,1.03125 -1.453125,1.71875 -2.59375,2.015625 -0.203125,0.04687 -1.1875,0.3125 -3.09375,0.3125 H 1.875 L 6.953125,7.140625 C 7.015625,7.0625 7.03125,7.03125 7.03125,6.984375 c 0,-0.03125 0,-0.0625 -0.0625,-0.15625 L 2.328125,0.484375 H 7.78125 c 1.34375,0 2.25,0.140625 2.34375,0.15625 0.53125,0.078125 1.40625,0.25 2.1875,0.75 0.25,0.15625 0.921875,0.609375 1.265625,1.40625 h 0.25 L 12.625,0 H 0.84375 c -0.234375,0 -0.25,0.015625 -0.28125,0.0625 0,0.03125 0,0.234375 0,0.34375 l 5.265625,7.203125 -5.15625,6.0625 C 0.5625,13.78125 0.5625,13.84375 0.5625,13.84375 c 0,0.109375 0.09375,0.109375 0.28125,0.109375 z m 0,0"
-               id="id-f2e38925-a778-498e-981a-a309c53c963c" />
-          </g>
-          <g
-             id="id-27e21c36-f02a-42b7-bf00-d21c20edf8f9" />
-          <g
-             id="id-cc8fc5e3-2965-487d-8791-c0bc6432ad41">
-            <path
-               d="M 1.390625,-4.84375 0.34375,-4.765625 v 0.25 c 0.46875,0 0.515625,0.0625 0.515625,0.40625 V 0 H 1.09375 l 0.25,-0.421875 C 1.609375,-0.078125 2,0.0625 2.359375,0.0625 3.28125,0.0625 4.0625,-0.625 4.0625,-1.5 c 0,-0.859375 -0.703125,-1.578125 -1.625,-1.578125 -0.421875,0 -0.796875,0.171875 -1.046875,0.421875 z m 0.03125,2.515625 C 1.609375,-2.65625 1.984375,-2.875 2.40625,-2.875 c 0.390625,0 0.671875,0.21875 0.8125,0.421875 0.140625,0.203125 0.21875,0.484375 0.21875,0.9375 0,0.15625 0,0.6875 -0.28125,1.015625 -0.28125,0.3125 -0.625,0.375 -0.828125,0.375 -0.5625,0 -0.84375,-0.4375 -0.90625,-0.578125 z m 0,0"
-               id="id-c1181d72-336c-4aea-bdb5-97ca3db4b9f5" />
-          </g>
-          <g
-             id="id-87ef3223-4fa3-4988-8504-01359d11a94a">
-            <path
-               d="m 3.6875,-1.484375 c 0,-0.875 -0.75,-1.625 -1.703125,-1.625 -0.96875,0 -1.71875,0.75 -1.71875,1.625 0,0.859375 0.765625,1.546875 1.71875,1.546875 0.9375,0 1.703125,-0.6875 1.703125,-1.546875 z M 1.984375,-0.15625 c -0.265625,0 -0.640625,-0.078125 -0.875,-0.421875 -0.1875,-0.28125 -0.203125,-0.640625 -0.203125,-0.96875 0,-0.296875 0,-0.71875 0.25,-1.015625 0.171875,-0.203125 0.46875,-0.34375 0.828125,-0.34375 0.40625,0 0.703125,0.1875 0.859375,0.40625 0.1875,0.265625 0.203125,0.625 0.203125,0.953125 0,0.328125 -0.015625,0.703125 -0.21875,0.984375 -0.1875,0.265625 -0.5,0.40625 -0.84375,0.40625 z m 0,0"
-               id="id-a32a5a62-42c1-495b-bf17-237daed1145b" />
-          </g>
-          <g
-             id="id-7f7e8bd1-ef58-4641-b77a-33217c293c40">
-            <path
-               d="m 3.59375,-2.109375 c 0,-0.609375 -0.296875,-0.96875 -1.046875,-0.96875 -0.578125,0 -0.9375,0.3125 -1.140625,0.6875 v -0.6875 L 0.375,-3 v 0.25 c 0.46875,0 0.53125,0.046875 0.53125,0.390625 v 1.8125 C 0.90625,-0.25 0.828125,-0.25 0.375,-0.25 V 0 C 0.390625,0 0.875,-0.03125 1.171875,-0.03125 1.421875,-0.03125 1.90625,0 1.96875,0 v -0.25 c -0.453125,0 -0.515625,0 -0.515625,-0.296875 V -1.8125 c 0,-0.71875 0.578125,-1.0625 1.03125,-1.0625 0.484375,0 0.546875,0.375 0.546875,0.734375 v 1.59375 C 3.03125,-0.25 2.96875,-0.25 2.515625,-0.25 V 0 C 2.53125,0 3.015625,-0.03125 3.3125,-0.03125 3.5625,-0.03125 4.046875,0 4.109375,0 v -0.25 c -0.453125,0 -0.515625,0 -0.515625,-0.296875 z m 0,0"
-               id="id-12a02788-1ec8-4630-bb5e-5e49c6aa6029" />
-          </g>
-          <g
-             id="id-a837e16a-21cd-48fa-8ea9-4a52453e7df5">
-            <path
-               d="m 2.484375,-4.765625 v 0.25 C 2.953125,-4.515625 3,-4.453125 3,-4.125 v 1.453125 c -0.25,-0.25 -0.59375,-0.40625 -0.96875,-0.40625 -0.9375,0 -1.703125,0.703125 -1.703125,1.578125 0,0.875 0.734375,1.5625 1.609375,1.5625 0.578125,0 0.921875,-0.296875 1.03125,-0.421875 V 0.0625 L 4.046875,0 V -0.25 C 3.578125,-0.25 3.53125,-0.296875 3.53125,-0.640625 V -4.84375 Z m 0.484375,4.03125 C 2.796875,-0.40625 2.4375,-0.125 1.984375,-0.125 1.59375,-0.125 1.3125,-0.359375 1.171875,-0.5625 1.03125,-0.765625 0.953125,-1.046875 0.953125,-1.484375 c 0,-0.171875 0,-0.6875 0.28125,-1.015625 0.28125,-0.3125 0.625,-0.375 0.828125,-0.375 0.328125,0 0.640625,0.15625 0.828125,0.40625 0.078125,0.109375 0.078125,0.109375 0.078125,0.25 z m 0,0"
-               id="id-02036dd4-5d02-4d1c-af93-5ac1d60d66db" />
-          </g>
-          <g
-             id="id-d226036d-b5a5-474a-bfee-a8cc0f98791a">
-            <path
-               d="m 2.640625,-2.921875 c 0,-0.125 0,-0.1875 -0.09375,-0.1875 -0.03125,0 -0.046875,0 -0.140625,0.078125 -0.015625,0.015625 -0.078125,0.078125 -0.125,0.109375 -0.21875,-0.140625 -0.46875,-0.1875 -0.734375,-0.1875 -1,0 -1.234375,0.53125 -1.234375,0.875 0,0.21875 0.09375,0.40625 0.265625,0.546875 0.265625,0.21875 0.53125,0.265625 0.96875,0.34375 0.34375,0.0625 0.90625,0.15625 0.90625,0.625 0,0.265625 -0.1875,0.59375 -0.859375,0.59375 -0.671875,0 -0.90625,-0.4375 -1.03125,-0.90625 -0.03125,-0.09375 -0.03125,-0.125 -0.125,-0.125 -0.125,0 -0.125,0.046875 -0.125,0.1875 v 0.859375 C 0.3125,0 0.3125,0.0625 0.40625,0.0625 0.46875,0.0625 0.609375,-0.078125 0.75,-0.234375 1.046875,0.0625 1.421875,0.0625 1.59375,0.0625 c 0.90625,0 1.25,-0.484375 1.25,-0.96875 0,-0.265625 -0.125,-0.484375 -0.3125,-0.640625 -0.265625,-0.25 -0.578125,-0.3125 -0.828125,-0.34375 -0.546875,-0.109375 -1,-0.1875 -1,-0.5625 0,-0.21875 0.1875,-0.484375 0.84375,-0.484375 0.8125,0 0.84375,0.5625 0.859375,0.765625 0,0.078125 0.09375,0.078125 0.109375,0.078125 0.125,0 0.125,-0.046875 0.125,-0.1875 z m 0,0"
-               id="id-bf910182-ba9a-4d5c-9047-1d2402e488af" />
-          </g>
-          <g
-             id="id-dd9614ca-0f93-4fbb-9ba1-6b9bc3b0f680" />
-          <g
-             id="id-b83cf96a-9252-47e8-a1e0-74353c6dccac">
-            <path
-               d="m 3.8125,-0.984375 c 0.640625,-0.65625 0.890625,-1.59375 0.890625,-1.65625 0,-0.09375 -0.078125,-0.09375 -0.109375,-0.09375 C 4.5,-2.734375 4.5,-2.71875 4.453125,-2.5625 4.328125,-2.109375 4.09375,-1.671875 3.796875,-1.296875 3.796875,-1.40625 3.78125,-1.875 3.765625,-1.9375 3.65625,-2.625 3.140625,-3.078125 2.4375,-3.078125 c -1.015625,0 -2,0.953125 -2,1.9375 0,0.640625 0.46875,1.203125 1.265625,1.203125 0.640625,0 1.21875,-0.28125 1.609375,-0.578125 0.171875,0.5 0.515625,0.578125 0.734375,0.578125 0.40625,0 0.65625,-0.328125 0.65625,-0.484375 C 4.703125,-0.5 4.609375,-0.5 4.578125,-0.5 c -0.09375,0 -0.109375,0.03125 -0.125,0.0625 -0.09375,0.265625 -0.3125,0.3125 -0.390625,0.3125 -0.09375,0 -0.21875,0 -0.25,-0.859375 z M 3.265625,-0.75 C 2.578125,-0.1875 2,-0.125 1.734375,-0.125 c -0.46875,0 -0.71875,-0.3125 -0.71875,-0.78125 0,-0.1875 0.09375,-0.953125 0.453125,-1.4375 C 1.796875,-2.765625 2.1875,-2.875 2.4375,-2.875 c 0.546875,0 0.71875,0.53125 0.765625,0.96875 0.046875,0.296875 0.03125,0.796875 0.0625,1.15625 z m 0,0"
-               id="id-c9699cbe-88c9-48f7-888c-022f8bde0021" />
-          </g>
-          <g
-             id="id-45f2303a-300e-47ca-96ec-fcada78d6c4d">
-            <path
-               d="m 2.265625,-4.359375 c 0,-0.109375 -0.09375,-0.265625 -0.28125,-0.265625 -0.1875,0 -0.390625,0.1875 -0.390625,0.390625 0,0.109375 0.078125,0.265625 0.28125,0.265625 0.1875,0 0.390625,-0.203125 0.390625,-0.390625 z M 0.84375,-0.8125 c -0.03125,0.09375 -0.0625,0.171875 -0.0625,0.296875 0,0.328125 0.265625,0.578125 0.65625,0.578125 0.6875,0 1,-0.953125 1,-1.0625 0,-0.09375 -0.09375,-0.09375 -0.109375,-0.09375 -0.09375,0 -0.109375,0.046875 -0.140625,0.125 -0.15625,0.5625 -0.453125,0.84375 -0.734375,0.84375 -0.140625,0 -0.171875,-0.09375 -0.171875,-0.25 0,-0.15625 0.046875,-0.28125 0.109375,-0.4375 C 1.46875,-1 1.546875,-1.1875 1.609375,-1.375 1.671875,-1.546875 1.9375,-2.171875 1.953125,-2.265625 1.984375,-2.328125 2,-2.40625 2,-2.484375 2,-2.8125 1.71875,-3.078125 1.34375,-3.078125 0.640625,-3.078125 0.328125,-2.125 0.328125,-2 c 0,0.078125 0.09375,0.078125 0.125,0.078125 0.09375,0 0.09375,-0.03125 0.125,-0.109375 C 0.75,-2.625 1.0625,-2.875 1.3125,-2.875 c 0.109375,0 0.171875,0.046875 0.171875,0.234375 0,0.171875 -0.03125,0.265625 -0.203125,0.703125 z m 0,0"
-               id="id-0b64b2da-cef3-434f-9f02-2715a01af296" />
-          </g>
-          <g
-             id="id-9f373c17-59b7-463d-ab05-fc55b5e09132">
-            <path
-               d="M 3.0625,-4.359375 C 3.0625,-4.46875 2.96875,-4.625 2.78125,-4.625 c -0.203125,0 -0.390625,0.203125 -0.390625,0.390625 0,0.109375 0.078125,0.265625 0.28125,0.265625 0.1875,0 0.390625,-0.1875 0.390625,-0.390625 z M 1.578125,0.34375 C 1.46875,0.828125 1.09375,1.21875 0.6875,1.21875 c -0.09375,0 -0.171875,0 -0.25,-0.03125 0.171875,-0.09375 0.234375,-0.25 0.234375,-0.359375 0,-0.171875 -0.140625,-0.25 -0.28125,-0.25 C 0.1875,0.578125 0,0.765625 0,0.984375 c 0,0.265625 0.265625,0.4375 0.6875,0.4375 0.421875,0 1.234375,-0.25 1.453125,-1.09375 l 0.625,-2.5 c 0.015625,-0.078125 0.03125,-0.140625 0.03125,-0.25 0,-0.375 -0.328125,-0.65625 -0.734375,-0.65625 -0.78125,0 -1.21875,0.96875 -1.21875,1.078125 0,0.078125 0.09375,0.078125 0.109375,0.078125 0.078125,0 0.09375,-0.015625 0.140625,-0.125 C 1.265625,-2.453125 1.625,-2.875 2.03125,-2.875 c 0.171875,0 0.234375,0.109375 0.234375,0.34375 0,0.078125 0,0.171875 -0.015625,0.203125 z m 0,0"
-               id="id-943c0a96-d3d7-4629-b160-6bd33f34e4d4" />
-          </g>
-        </g>
-      </defs>
-      <g
-         fill="#000000"
-         fill-opacity="1"
-         id="id-062caac7-0601-4ee0-ae77-bb3ede790200"
-         transform="translate(-269.907,-137.255)">
-        <g
-           transform="translate(269.516,146.72)"
-           id="g12966">
-          <path
-             d="M 7.609375,-6.046875 C 7.703125,-6.40625 7.71875,-6.5 8.4375,-6.5 c 0.265625,0 0.34375,0 0.34375,-0.203125 0,-0.109375 -0.109375,-0.109375 -0.140625,-0.109375 -0.28125,0 -1,0.03125 -1.28125,0.03125 -0.28125,0 -0.984375,-0.03125 -1.28125,-0.03125 -0.078125,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.203125 0,0.109375 0.09375,0.109375 0.28125,0.109375 0.015625,0 0.203125,0 0.375,0.015625 0.1875,0.03125 0.265625,0.03125 0.265625,0.171875 0,0.03125 0,0.046875 -0.03125,0.1875 L 6.1875,-3.703125 H 3.140625 l 0.59375,-2.34375 C 3.8125,-6.40625 3.84375,-6.5 4.5625,-6.5 c 0.265625,0 0.34375,0 0.34375,-0.203125 0,-0.109375 -0.109375,-0.109375 -0.140625,-0.109375 -0.28125,0 -1,0.03125 -1.28125,0.03125 -0.28125,0 -0.984375,-0.03125 -1.28125,-0.03125 -0.078125,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.203125 0,0.109375 0.09375,0.109375 0.28125,0.109375 0.015625,0 0.203125,0 0.375,0.015625 0.171875,0.03125 0.265625,0.03125 0.265625,0.171875 0,0.03125 0,0.0625 -0.03125,0.1875 L 1.5625,-0.78125 c -0.09375,0.390625 -0.109375,0.46875 -0.90625,0.46875 -0.171875,0 -0.265625,0 -0.265625,0.203125 C 0.390625,0 0.515625,0 0.53125,0 0.8125,0 1.515625,-0.03125 1.796875,-0.03125 2,-0.03125 2.21875,-0.015625 2.4375,-0.015625 2.65625,-0.015625 2.875,0 3.078125,0 3.15625,0 3.28125,0 3.28125,-0.203125 3.28125,-0.3125 3.1875,-0.3125 3,-0.3125 c -0.375,0 -0.640625,0 -0.640625,-0.171875 0,-0.0625 0.015625,-0.109375 0.015625,-0.171875 l 0.6875,-2.734375 h 3.03125 c -0.40625,1.65625 -0.640625,2.609375 -0.6875,2.75 C 5.3125,-0.3125 5.125,-0.3125 4.5,-0.3125 c -0.140625,0 -0.234375,0 -0.234375,0.203125 C 4.265625,0 4.390625,0 4.40625,0 4.6875,0 5.390625,-0.03125 5.671875,-0.03125 5.875,-0.03125 6.09375,-0.015625 6.3125,-0.015625 6.53125,-0.015625 6.75,0 6.953125,0 7.03125,0 7.15625,0 7.15625,-0.203125 7.15625,-0.3125 7.0625,-0.3125 6.875,-0.3125 c -0.359375,0 -0.640625,0 -0.640625,-0.171875 0,-0.0625 0.015625,-0.109375 0.03125,-0.171875 z m 0,0"
-             id="id-83fb041f-c051-4de9-978c-72dafadbb851" />
-        </g>
-      </g>
-      <g
-         fill="#000000"
-         fill-opacity="1"
-         id="id-ed3b51a1-cecf-4f92-8c49-a52f68d2f7a8"
-         transform="translate(-269.907,-137.255)">
-        <g
-           transform="translate(281.375,146.72)"
-           id="g12970">
-          <path
-             d="m 6.84375,-3.265625 c 0.15625,0 0.34375,0 0.34375,-0.1875 C 7.1875,-3.65625 7,-3.65625 6.859375,-3.65625 h -5.96875 c -0.140625,0 -0.328125,0 -0.328125,0.203125 0,0.1875 0.1875,0.1875 0.328125,0.1875 z m 0.015625,1.9375 c 0.140625,0 0.328125,0 0.328125,-0.203125 0,-0.1875 -0.1875,-0.1875 -0.34375,-0.1875 H 0.890625 c -0.140625,0 -0.328125,0 -0.328125,0.1875 0,0.203125 0.1875,0.203125 0.328125,0.203125 z m 0,0"
-             id="id-293e05d7-b3e9-4df5-8592-80583bdfe9fd" />
-        </g>
-      </g>
-      <g
-         fill="#000000"
-         fill-opacity="1"
-         id="id-9ace6117-2c39-420a-8dc0-3bd247c76392"
-         transform="translate(-269.907,-137.255)">
-        <g
-           transform="translate(294.967,137.255)"
-           id="g12974">
-          <path
-             d="m 12.625,13.953125 1.203125,-3.1875 h -0.25 c -0.390625,1.03125 -1.453125,1.71875 -2.59375,2.015625 -0.203125,0.04687 -1.1875,0.3125 -3.09375,0.3125 H 1.875 L 6.953125,7.140625 C 7.015625,7.0625 7.03125,7.03125 7.03125,6.984375 c 0,-0.03125 0,-0.0625 -0.0625,-0.15625 L 2.328125,0.484375 H 7.78125 c 1.34375,0 2.25,0.140625 2.34375,0.15625 0.53125,0.078125 1.40625,0.25 2.1875,0.75 0.25,0.15625 0.921875,0.609375 1.265625,1.40625 h 0.25 L 12.625,0 H 0.84375 c -0.234375,0 -0.25,0.015625 -0.28125,0.0625 0,0.03125 0,0.234375 0,0.34375 l 5.265625,7.203125 -5.15625,6.0625 C 0.5625,13.78125 0.5625,13.84375 0.5625,13.84375 c 0,0.109375 0.09375,0.109375 0.28125,0.109375 z m 0,0"
-             id="id-c74c7831-1855-4e9e-acdc-0aaafcb6d169" />
-        </g>
-      </g>
-      <g
-         fill="#000000"
-         fill-opacity="1"
-         id="id-108f9dba-2bcb-48c2-a738-6f1bdce83011"
-         transform="translate(-269.907,-137.255)">
-        <g
-           transform="translate(291.891,158.703)"
-           id="g12978">
-          <path
-             d="M 1.390625,-4.84375 0.34375,-4.765625 v 0.25 c 0.46875,0 0.515625,0.0625 0.515625,0.40625 V 0 H 1.09375 l 0.25,-0.421875 C 1.609375,-0.078125 2,0.0625 2.359375,0.0625 3.28125,0.0625 4.0625,-0.625 4.0625,-1.5 c 0,-0.859375 -0.703125,-1.578125 -1.625,-1.578125 -0.421875,0 -0.796875,0.171875 -1.046875,0.421875 z m 0.03125,2.515625 C 1.609375,-2.65625 1.984375,-2.875 2.40625,-2.875 c 0.390625,0 0.671875,0.21875 0.8125,0.421875 0.140625,0.203125 0.21875,0.484375 0.21875,0.9375 0,0.15625 0,0.6875 -0.28125,1.015625 -0.28125,0.3125 -0.625,0.375 -0.828125,0.375 -0.5625,0 -0.84375,-0.4375 -0.90625,-0.578125 z m 0,0"
-             id="id-00df5928-9283-4177-b052-124941f86316" />
-        </g>
-      </g>
-      <g
-         fill="#000000"
-         fill-opacity="1"
-         id="id-517d8e66-d7d6-4a57-a004-f8d89940597c"
-         transform="translate(-269.907,-137.255)">
-        <g
-           transform="translate(296.508,158.703)"
-           id="g12982">
-          <path
-             d="m 3.6875,-1.484375 c 0,-0.875 -0.75,-1.625 -1.703125,-1.625 -0.96875,0 -1.71875,0.75 -1.71875,1.625 0,0.859375 0.765625,1.546875 1.71875,1.546875 0.9375,0 1.703125,-0.6875 1.703125,-1.546875 z M 1.984375,-0.15625 c -0.265625,0 -0.640625,-0.078125 -0.875,-0.421875 -0.1875,-0.28125 -0.203125,-0.640625 -0.203125,-0.96875 0,-0.296875 0,-0.71875 0.25,-1.015625 0.171875,-0.203125 0.46875,-0.34375 0.828125,-0.34375 0.40625,0 0.703125,0.1875 0.859375,0.40625 0.1875,0.265625 0.203125,0.625 0.203125,0.953125 0,0.328125 -0.015625,0.703125 -0.21875,0.984375 -0.1875,0.265625 -0.5,0.40625 -0.84375,0.40625 z m 0,0"
-             id="id-91432c74-5570-4d8f-b6e7-8bb11142c819" />
-        </g>
-        <g
-           transform="translate(300.479,158.703)"
-           id="g12985">
-          <path
-             d="m 3.59375,-2.109375 c 0,-0.609375 -0.296875,-0.96875 -1.046875,-0.96875 -0.578125,0 -0.9375,0.3125 -1.140625,0.6875 v -0.6875 L 0.375,-3 v 0.25 c 0.46875,0 0.53125,0.046875 0.53125,0.390625 v 1.8125 C 0.90625,-0.25 0.828125,-0.25 0.375,-0.25 V 0 C 0.390625,0 0.875,-0.03125 1.171875,-0.03125 1.421875,-0.03125 1.90625,0 1.96875,0 v -0.25 c -0.453125,0 -0.515625,0 -0.515625,-0.296875 V -1.8125 c 0,-0.71875 0.578125,-1.0625 1.03125,-1.0625 0.484375,0 0.546875,0.375 0.546875,0.734375 v 1.59375 C 3.03125,-0.25 2.96875,-0.25 2.515625,-0.25 V 0 C 2.53125,0 3.015625,-0.03125 3.3125,-0.03125 3.5625,-0.03125 4.046875,0 4.109375,0 v -0.25 c -0.453125,0 -0.515625,0 -0.515625,-0.296875 z m 0,0"
-             id="id-829c18e9-c4d7-4d24-a3a3-02e17dfb5c84" />
-        </g>
-        <g
-           transform="translate(304.88,158.703)"
-           id="g12988">
-          <path
-             d="m 2.484375,-4.765625 v 0.25 C 2.953125,-4.515625 3,-4.453125 3,-4.125 v 1.453125 c -0.25,-0.25 -0.59375,-0.40625 -0.96875,-0.40625 -0.9375,0 -1.703125,0.703125 -1.703125,1.578125 0,0.875 0.734375,1.5625 1.609375,1.5625 0.578125,0 0.921875,-0.296875 1.03125,-0.421875 V 0.0625 L 4.046875,0 V -0.25 C 3.578125,-0.25 3.53125,-0.296875 3.53125,-0.640625 V -4.84375 Z m 0.484375,4.03125 C 2.796875,-0.40625 2.4375,-0.125 1.984375,-0.125 1.59375,-0.125 1.3125,-0.359375 1.171875,-0.5625 1.03125,-0.765625 0.953125,-1.046875 0.953125,-1.484375 c 0,-0.171875 0,-0.6875 0.28125,-1.015625 0.28125,-0.3125 0.625,-0.375 0.828125,-0.375 0.328125,0 0.640625,0.15625 0.828125,0.40625 0.078125,0.109375 0.078125,0.109375 0.078125,0.25 z m 0,0"
-             id="id-b31c2437-7a87-45dc-b77c-dff6e01549d3" />
-        </g>
-        <g
-           transform="translate(309.28,158.703)"
-           id="g12991">
-          <path
-             d="m 2.640625,-2.921875 c 0,-0.125 0,-0.1875 -0.09375,-0.1875 -0.03125,0 -0.046875,0 -0.140625,0.078125 -0.015625,0.015625 -0.078125,0.078125 -0.125,0.109375 -0.21875,-0.140625 -0.46875,-0.1875 -0.734375,-0.1875 -1,0 -1.234375,0.53125 -1.234375,0.875 0,0.21875 0.09375,0.40625 0.265625,0.546875 0.265625,0.21875 0.53125,0.265625 0.96875,0.34375 0.34375,0.0625 0.90625,0.15625 0.90625,0.625 0,0.265625 -0.1875,0.59375 -0.859375,0.59375 -0.671875,0 -0.90625,-0.4375 -1.03125,-0.90625 -0.03125,-0.09375 -0.03125,-0.125 -0.125,-0.125 -0.125,0 -0.125,0.046875 -0.125,0.1875 v 0.859375 C 0.3125,0 0.3125,0.0625 0.40625,0.0625 0.46875,0.0625 0.609375,-0.078125 0.75,-0.234375 1.046875,0.0625 1.421875,0.0625 1.59375,0.0625 c 0.90625,0 1.25,-0.484375 1.25,-0.96875 0,-0.265625 -0.125,-0.484375 -0.3125,-0.640625 -0.265625,-0.25 -0.578125,-0.3125 -0.828125,-0.34375 -0.546875,-0.109375 -1,-0.1875 -1,-0.5625 0,-0.21875 0.1875,-0.484375 0.84375,-0.484375 0.8125,0 0.84375,0.5625 0.859375,0.765625 0,0.078125 0.09375,0.078125 0.109375,0.078125 0.125,0 0.125,-0.046875 0.125,-0.1875 z m 0,0"
-             id="id-271dbd07-eee4-47b7-8fac-282c1fb9891e" />
-        </g>
-      </g>
-      <g
-         fill="#000000"
-         fill-opacity="1"
-         id="id-f0962b18-73af-4115-ab94-e1340aa78a8d"
-         transform="translate(-269.907,-137.255)">
-        <g
-           transform="translate(314.094,146.72)"
-           id="g12995">
-          <path
-             d="M 5.390625,-6.078125 C 5.46875,-6.40625 5.5,-6.5 6.046875,-6.5 c 0.15625,0 0.265625,0 0.265625,-0.1875 0,-0.09375 -0.0625,-0.125 -0.140625,-0.125 -0.25,0 -0.859375,0.03125 -1.109375,0.03125 -0.328125,0 -1.140625,-0.03125 -1.46875,-0.03125 -0.078125,0 -0.203125,0 -0.203125,0.203125 C 3.390625,-6.5 3.46875,-6.5 3.734375,-6.5 c 0.21875,0 0.328125,0 0.578125,0.015625 0.234375,0.03125 0.296875,0.0625 0.296875,0.203125 0,0.0625 -0.015625,0.125 -0.03125,0.203125 L 3.421875,-1.5 C 3.1875,-0.53125 2.515625,0 2,0 1.734375,0 1.203125,-0.09375 1.046875,-0.625 c 0.03125,0.015625 0.09375,0.015625 0.125,0.015625 0.390625,0 0.640625,-0.34375 0.640625,-0.640625 0,-0.3125 -0.265625,-0.421875 -0.4375,-0.421875 -0.171875,0 -0.671875,0.125 -0.671875,0.796875 0,0.625 0.53125,1.09375 1.328125,1.09375 0.90625,0 1.953125,-0.65625 2.203125,-1.640625 z m 0,0"
-             id="id-eaa6ecca-c909-46c8-9e28-4807ce441935" />
-        </g>
-      </g>
-      <g
-         fill="#000000"
-         fill-opacity="1"
-         id="id-426f7b98-ab63-4329-97f7-2aa5567a28e0"
-         transform="translate(-269.907,-137.255)">
-        <g
-           transform="translate(320.576,142.606)"
-           id="g12999">
-          <path
-             d="m 3.8125,-0.984375 c 0.640625,-0.65625 0.890625,-1.59375 0.890625,-1.65625 0,-0.09375 -0.078125,-0.09375 -0.109375,-0.09375 C 4.5,-2.734375 4.5,-2.71875 4.453125,-2.5625 4.328125,-2.109375 4.09375,-1.671875 3.796875,-1.296875 3.796875,-1.40625 3.78125,-1.875 3.765625,-1.9375 3.65625,-2.625 3.140625,-3.078125 2.4375,-3.078125 c -1.015625,0 -2,0.953125 -2,1.9375 0,0.640625 0.46875,1.203125 1.265625,1.203125 0.640625,0 1.21875,-0.28125 1.609375,-0.578125 0.171875,0.5 0.515625,0.578125 0.734375,0.578125 0.40625,0 0.65625,-0.328125 0.65625,-0.484375 C 4.703125,-0.5 4.609375,-0.5 4.578125,-0.5 c -0.09375,0 -0.109375,0.03125 -0.125,0.0625 -0.09375,0.265625 -0.3125,0.3125 -0.390625,0.3125 -0.09375,0 -0.21875,0 -0.25,-0.859375 z M 3.265625,-0.75 C 2.578125,-0.1875 2,-0.125 1.734375,-0.125 c -0.46875,0 -0.71875,-0.3125 -0.71875,-0.78125 0,-0.1875 0.09375,-0.953125 0.453125,-1.4375 C 1.796875,-2.765625 2.1875,-2.875 2.4375,-2.875 c 0.546875,0 0.71875,0.53125 0.765625,0.96875 0.046875,0.296875 0.03125,0.796875 0.0625,1.15625 z m 0,0"
-             id="id-fa27fa8b-2c65-4a79-baa9-71d3f860df76" />
-        </g>
-      </g>
-      <g
-         fill="#000000"
-         fill-opacity="1"
-         id="id-bb7ba5fc-5c6c-4ee9-b03f-f670d219b421"
-         transform="translate(-269.907,-137.255)">
-        <g
-           transform="translate(326.254,146.72)"
-           id="g13003">
-          <path
-             d="M 5.078125,-4.03125 C 5.0625,-4.0625 5.03125,-4.140625 5.03125,-4.171875 c 0,0 0.171875,-0.140625 0.28125,-0.21875 l 1.75,-1.34375 C 8,-6.4375 8.390625,-6.46875 8.6875,-6.5 8.765625,-6.515625 8.859375,-6.515625 8.859375,-6.703125 8.859375,-6.734375 8.828125,-6.8125 8.75,-6.8125 c -0.21875,0 -0.46875,0.03125 -0.703125,0.03125 -0.359375,0 -0.75,-0.03125 -1.109375,-0.03125 -0.0625,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.203125 0,0.0625 0.046875,0.09375 0.125,0.109375 0.21875,0.015625 0.296875,0.0625 0.296875,0.203125 0,0.1875 -0.296875,0.421875 -0.359375,0.46875 L 2.9375,-2.84375 3.734375,-6.046875 C 3.8125,-6.40625 3.84375,-6.5 4.5625,-6.5 c 0.25,0 0.34375,0 0.34375,-0.203125 0,-0.078125 -0.078125,-0.109375 -0.140625,-0.109375 -0.28125,0 -1,0.03125 -1.28125,0.03125 C 3.203125,-6.78125 2.5,-6.8125 2.203125,-6.8125 2.140625,-6.8125 2,-6.8125 2,-6.625 2,-6.5 2.09375,-6.5 2.296875,-6.5 c 0.125,0 0.3125,0.015625 0.421875,0.015625 0.15625,0.03125 0.21875,0.046875 0.21875,0.171875 0,0.03125 0,0.0625 -0.03125,0.1875 L 1.5625,-0.78125 c -0.09375,0.390625 -0.109375,0.46875 -0.90625,0.46875 -0.171875,0 -0.28125,0 -0.28125,0.1875 C 0.375,0 0.5,0 0.53125,0 0.8125,0 1.515625,-0.03125 1.796875,-0.03125 2,-0.03125 2.21875,-0.015625 2.4375,-0.015625 2.65625,-0.015625 2.875,0 3.078125,0 3.15625,0 3.28125,0 3.28125,-0.203125 3.28125,-0.3125 3.1875,-0.3125 3,-0.3125 c -0.375,0 -0.640625,0 -0.640625,-0.171875 0,-0.078125 0.046875,-0.296875 0.078125,-0.4375 C 2.578125,-1.453125 2.71875,-1.96875 2.84375,-2.5 l 1.484375,-1.15625 1.15625,2.6875 c 0.125,0.265625 0.125,0.296875 0.125,0.34375 0,0.3125 -0.4375,0.3125 -0.53125,0.3125 -0.109375,0 -0.21875,0 -0.21875,0.203125 C 4.859375,0 4.984375,0 5,0 5.40625,0 5.828125,-0.03125 6.21875,-0.03125 6.4375,-0.03125 6.984375,0 7.203125,0 7.25,0 7.375,0 7.375,-0.203125 7.375,-0.3125 7.265625,-0.3125 7.171875,-0.3125 c -0.40625,0 -0.53125,-0.09375 -0.6875,-0.4375 z m 0,0"
-             id="id-fb3da704-1bda-4993-be29-6f309eac750d" />
-        </g>
-      </g>
-      <g
-         fill="#000000"
-         fill-opacity="1"
-         id="id-ef55dc86-e4b4-48cb-866b-d5a3f28c5941"
-         transform="translate(-269.907,-137.255)">
-        <g
-           transform="translate(334.715,148.214)"
-           id="g13007">
-          <path
-             d="m 2.265625,-4.359375 c 0,-0.109375 -0.09375,-0.265625 -0.28125,-0.265625 -0.1875,0 -0.390625,0.1875 -0.390625,0.390625 0,0.109375 0.078125,0.265625 0.28125,0.265625 0.1875,0 0.390625,-0.203125 0.390625,-0.390625 z M 0.84375,-0.8125 c -0.03125,0.09375 -0.0625,0.171875 -0.0625,0.296875 0,0.328125 0.265625,0.578125 0.65625,0.578125 0.6875,0 1,-0.953125 1,-1.0625 0,-0.09375 -0.09375,-0.09375 -0.109375,-0.09375 -0.09375,0 -0.109375,0.046875 -0.140625,0.125 -0.15625,0.5625 -0.453125,0.84375 -0.734375,0.84375 -0.140625,0 -0.171875,-0.09375 -0.171875,-0.25 0,-0.15625 0.046875,-0.28125 0.109375,-0.4375 C 1.46875,-1 1.546875,-1.1875 1.609375,-1.375 1.671875,-1.546875 1.9375,-2.171875 1.953125,-2.265625 1.984375,-2.328125 2,-2.40625 2,-2.484375 2,-2.8125 1.71875,-3.078125 1.34375,-3.078125 0.640625,-3.078125 0.328125,-2.125 0.328125,-2 c 0,0.078125 0.09375,0.078125 0.125,0.078125 0.09375,0 0.09375,-0.03125 0.125,-0.109375 C 0.75,-2.625 1.0625,-2.875 1.3125,-2.875 c 0.109375,0 0.171875,0.046875 0.171875,0.234375 0,0.171875 -0.03125,0.265625 -0.203125,0.703125 z m 0,0"
-             id="id-ac463526-d5e6-4e2f-8576-1f9891c9f9f1" />
-        </g>
-        <g
-           transform="translate(337.534,148.214)"
-           id="g13010">
-          <path
-             d="M 3.0625,-4.359375 C 3.0625,-4.46875 2.96875,-4.625 2.78125,-4.625 c -0.203125,0 -0.390625,0.203125 -0.390625,0.390625 0,0.109375 0.078125,0.265625 0.28125,0.265625 0.1875,0 0.390625,-0.1875 0.390625,-0.390625 z M 1.578125,0.34375 C 1.46875,0.828125 1.09375,1.21875 0.6875,1.21875 c -0.09375,0 -0.171875,0 -0.25,-0.03125 0.171875,-0.09375 0.234375,-0.25 0.234375,-0.359375 0,-0.171875 -0.140625,-0.25 -0.28125,-0.25 C 0.1875,0.578125 0,0.765625 0,0.984375 c 0,0.265625 0.265625,0.4375 0.6875,0.4375 0.421875,0 1.234375,-0.25 1.453125,-1.09375 l 0.625,-2.5 c 0.015625,-0.078125 0.03125,-0.140625 0.03125,-0.25 0,-0.375 -0.328125,-0.65625 -0.734375,-0.65625 -0.78125,0 -1.21875,0.96875 -1.21875,1.078125 0,0.078125 0.09375,0.078125 0.109375,0.078125 0.078125,0 0.09375,-0.015625 0.140625,-0.125 C 1.265625,-2.453125 1.625,-2.875 2.03125,-2.875 c 0.171875,0 0.234375,0.109375 0.234375,0.34375 0,0.078125 0,0.171875 -0.015625,0.203125 z m 0,0"
-             id="id-f797581b-3080-4bf4-b708-78f3c4917c85" />
-        </g>
-      </g>
-    </g>
     <g
        id="g23871">
       <g
@@ -3679,6 +3426,259 @@
            transform="matrix(-0.43487384,0.25107453,-0.25107453,-0.43487384,248.82675,190.52816)" />
       </g>
     </g>
+    <g
+       ns1:version="1.8.2"
+       ns1:texconverter="pdflatex"
+       ns1:pdfconverter="inkscape"
+       ns1:text="$$H = \\sum_{\\mathrm{bonds}} J^\\alpha k_{ij}$$"
+       ns1:preamble="/Users/tom/Library/Application Support/org.inkscape.Inkscape/config/inkscape/extensions/textext/default_packages.tex"
+       ns1:scale="1.0"
+       ns1:alignment="middle center"
+       ns1:stroke-to-path="0"
+       ns1:inkscapeversion="1.3-dev"
+       transform="translate(270.162, 37.2854)"
+       ns1:jacobian_sqrt="1.0"
+       id="g13013">
+      <defs
+         id="id-af70e49d-c703-4dfd-a58f-132d80041891">
+        <g
+           id="id-6124e075-2be0-4219-9727-03ef65fd8638">
+          <g
+             id="id-321a23f9-23c9-43fb-91fc-c0a21dd9a5b9" />
+          <g
+             id="id-063b5e5b-da96-42a8-98c9-22b3b1f332f0">
+            <path
+               d="M 7.609375,-6.046875 C 7.703125,-6.40625 7.71875,-6.5 8.4375,-6.5 c 0.265625,0 0.34375,0 0.34375,-0.203125 0,-0.109375 -0.109375,-0.109375 -0.140625,-0.109375 -0.28125,0 -1,0.03125 -1.28125,0.03125 -0.28125,0 -0.984375,-0.03125 -1.28125,-0.03125 -0.078125,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.203125 0,0.109375 0.09375,0.109375 0.28125,0.109375 0.015625,0 0.203125,0 0.375,0.015625 0.1875,0.03125 0.265625,0.03125 0.265625,0.171875 0,0.03125 0,0.046875 -0.03125,0.1875 L 6.1875,-3.703125 H 3.140625 l 0.59375,-2.34375 C 3.8125,-6.40625 3.84375,-6.5 4.5625,-6.5 c 0.265625,0 0.34375,0 0.34375,-0.203125 0,-0.109375 -0.109375,-0.109375 -0.140625,-0.109375 -0.28125,0 -1,0.03125 -1.28125,0.03125 -0.28125,0 -0.984375,-0.03125 -1.28125,-0.03125 -0.078125,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.203125 0,0.109375 0.09375,0.109375 0.28125,0.109375 0.015625,0 0.203125,0 0.375,0.015625 0.171875,0.03125 0.265625,0.03125 0.265625,0.171875 0,0.03125 0,0.0625 -0.03125,0.1875 L 1.5625,-0.78125 c -0.09375,0.390625 -0.109375,0.46875 -0.90625,0.46875 -0.171875,0 -0.265625,0 -0.265625,0.203125 C 0.390625,0 0.515625,0 0.53125,0 0.8125,0 1.515625,-0.03125 1.796875,-0.03125 2,-0.03125 2.21875,-0.015625 2.4375,-0.015625 2.65625,-0.015625 2.875,0 3.078125,0 3.15625,0 3.28125,0 3.28125,-0.203125 3.28125,-0.3125 3.1875,-0.3125 3,-0.3125 c -0.375,0 -0.640625,0 -0.640625,-0.171875 0,-0.0625 0.015625,-0.109375 0.015625,-0.171875 l 0.6875,-2.734375 h 3.03125 c -0.40625,1.65625 -0.640625,2.609375 -0.6875,2.75 C 5.3125,-0.3125 5.125,-0.3125 4.5,-0.3125 c -0.140625,0 -0.234375,0 -0.234375,0.203125 C 4.265625,0 4.390625,0 4.40625,0 4.6875,0 5.390625,-0.03125 5.671875,-0.03125 5.875,-0.03125 6.09375,-0.015625 6.3125,-0.015625 6.53125,-0.015625 6.75,0 6.953125,0 7.03125,0 7.15625,0 7.15625,-0.203125 7.15625,-0.3125 7.0625,-0.3125 6.875,-0.3125 c -0.359375,0 -0.640625,0 -0.640625,-0.171875 0,-0.0625 0.015625,-0.109375 0.03125,-0.171875 z m 0,0"
+               id="id-3064ac5c-c66a-4a20-9cf5-5288c5db93f5" />
+          </g>
+          <g
+             id="id-a508000a-5318-48df-9ba0-dd4a58cb2b83">
+            <path
+               d="M 5.390625,-6.078125 C 5.46875,-6.40625 5.5,-6.5 6.046875,-6.5 c 0.15625,0 0.265625,0 0.265625,-0.1875 0,-0.09375 -0.0625,-0.125 -0.140625,-0.125 -0.25,0 -0.859375,0.03125 -1.109375,0.03125 -0.328125,0 -1.140625,-0.03125 -1.46875,-0.03125 -0.078125,0 -0.203125,0 -0.203125,0.203125 C 3.390625,-6.5 3.46875,-6.5 3.734375,-6.5 c 0.21875,0 0.328125,0 0.578125,0.015625 0.234375,0.03125 0.296875,0.0625 0.296875,0.203125 0,0.0625 -0.015625,0.125 -0.03125,0.203125 L 3.421875,-1.5 C 3.1875,-0.53125 2.515625,0 2,0 1.734375,0 1.203125,-0.09375 1.046875,-0.625 c 0.03125,0.015625 0.09375,0.015625 0.125,0.015625 0.390625,0 0.640625,-0.34375 0.640625,-0.640625 0,-0.3125 -0.265625,-0.421875 -0.4375,-0.421875 -0.171875,0 -0.671875,0.125 -0.671875,0.796875 0,0.625 0.53125,1.09375 1.328125,1.09375 0.90625,0 1.953125,-0.65625 2.203125,-1.640625 z m 0,0"
+               id="id-24e9390f-a7d0-42e3-aadd-79549650db07" />
+          </g>
+          <g
+             id="id-cac28d6b-fad8-466c-90d8-23e5846030da">
+            <path
+               d="m 2.859375,-6.8125 c 0,0 0,-0.109375 -0.125,-0.109375 -0.234375,0 -0.953125,0.078125 -1.21875,0.109375 -0.078125,0 -0.1875,0.015625 -0.1875,0.1875 0,0.125 0.09375,0.125 0.234375,0.125 0.484375,0 0.5,0.0625 0.5,0.171875 L 2.03125,-6.125 0.59375,-0.390625 c -0.046875,0.140625 -0.046875,0.15625 -0.046875,0.21875 0,0.234375 0.203125,0.28125 0.296875,0.28125 0.125,0 0.265625,-0.09375 0.328125,-0.203125 0.046875,-0.09375 0.5,-1.9375 0.5625,-2.1875 0.34375,0.03125 1.15625,0.1875 1.15625,0.84375 0,0.078125 0,0.109375 -0.03125,0.21875 -0.015625,0.109375 -0.03125,0.234375 -0.03125,0.34375 0,0.578125 0.390625,0.984375 0.90625,0.984375 0.296875,0 0.578125,-0.15625 0.796875,-0.53125 0.25,-0.4375 0.359375,-0.984375 0.359375,-1 0,-0.109375 -0.09375,-0.109375 -0.125,-0.109375 -0.09375,0 -0.109375,0.046875 -0.140625,0.1875 -0.203125,0.71875 -0.421875,1.234375 -0.859375,1.234375 -0.203125,0 -0.328125,-0.109375 -0.328125,-0.46875 0,-0.171875 0.046875,-0.40625 0.078125,-0.5625 C 3.5625,-1.3125 3.5625,-1.34375 3.5625,-1.453125 3.5625,-2.09375 2.9375,-2.375 2.078125,-2.5 2.390625,-2.671875 2.71875,-2.984375 2.9375,-3.234375 3.421875,-3.765625 3.875,-4.1875 4.359375,-4.1875 c 0.0625,0 0.078125,0 0.09375,0.015625 0.125,0.015625 0.125,0.015625 0.21875,0.078125 0.015625,0 0.015625,0.015625 0.03125,0.03125 -0.46875,0.03125 -0.5625,0.421875 -0.5625,0.546875 0,0.15625 0.109375,0.34375 0.375,0.34375 0.265625,0 0.546875,-0.21875 0.546875,-0.609375 0,-0.296875 -0.234375,-0.625 -0.671875,-0.625 -0.28125,0 -0.734375,0.078125 -1.453125,0.875 -0.34375,0.375 -0.734375,0.78125 -1.109375,0.921875 z m 0,0"
+               id="id-43d7c6cc-8f6d-431f-985f-e57eeea02b57" />
+          </g>
+          <g
+             id="id-4bc61700-5aa6-4221-b285-f5ee9e4482cb" />
+          <g
+             id="id-cd6ff477-73cc-42c4-84d4-99125a0ab496">
+            <path
+               d="m 6.84375,-3.265625 c 0.15625,0 0.34375,0 0.34375,-0.1875 C 7.1875,-3.65625 7,-3.65625 6.859375,-3.65625 h -5.96875 c -0.140625,0 -0.328125,0 -0.328125,0.203125 0,0.1875 0.1875,0.1875 0.328125,0.1875 z m 0.015625,1.9375 c 0.140625,0 0.328125,0 0.328125,-0.203125 0,-0.1875 -0.1875,-0.1875 -0.34375,-0.1875 H 0.890625 c -0.140625,0 -0.328125,0 -0.328125,0.1875 0,0.203125 0.1875,0.203125 0.328125,0.203125 z m 0,0"
+               id="id-9001a15c-543b-4fcc-adb1-0c11ce9184ce" />
+          </g>
+          <g
+             id="id-87a3b6e2-c789-4247-b046-757c87448bc0" />
+          <g
+             id="id-91742e78-8bc6-4090-a37b-317045fcdd8c">
+            <path
+               d="m 12.625,13.953125 1.203125,-3.1875 h -0.25 c -0.390625,1.03125 -1.453125,1.71875 -2.59375,2.015625 -0.203125,0.04687 -1.1875,0.3125 -3.09375,0.3125 H 1.875 L 6.953125,7.140625 C 7.015625,7.0625 7.03125,7.03125 7.03125,6.984375 c 0,-0.03125 0,-0.0625 -0.0625,-0.15625 L 2.328125,0.484375 H 7.78125 c 1.34375,0 2.25,0.140625 2.34375,0.15625 0.53125,0.078125 1.40625,0.25 2.1875,0.75 0.25,0.15625 0.921875,0.609375 1.265625,1.40625 h 0.25 L 12.625,0 H 0.84375 c -0.234375,0 -0.25,0.015625 -0.28125,0.0625 0,0.03125 0,0.234375 0,0.34375 l 5.265625,7.203125 -5.15625,6.0625 C 0.5625,13.78125 0.5625,13.84375 0.5625,13.84375 c 0,0.109375 0.09375,0.109375 0.28125,0.109375 z m 0,0"
+               id="id-950df668-158f-4710-84a9-87fdc535a9c1" />
+          </g>
+          <g
+             id="id-4548e13e-86d9-4267-b398-f2c7a1d113de" />
+          <g
+             id="id-cc4cb98f-c78e-44ec-91a0-20a4f95037c0">
+            <path
+               d="M 1.390625,-4.84375 0.34375,-4.765625 v 0.25 c 0.46875,0 0.515625,0.0625 0.515625,0.40625 V 0 H 1.09375 l 0.25,-0.421875 C 1.609375,-0.078125 2,0.0625 2.359375,0.0625 3.28125,0.0625 4.0625,-0.625 4.0625,-1.5 c 0,-0.859375 -0.703125,-1.578125 -1.625,-1.578125 -0.421875,0 -0.796875,0.171875 -1.046875,0.421875 z m 0.03125,2.515625 C 1.609375,-2.65625 1.984375,-2.875 2.40625,-2.875 c 0.390625,0 0.671875,0.21875 0.8125,0.421875 0.140625,0.203125 0.21875,0.484375 0.21875,0.9375 0,0.15625 0,0.6875 -0.28125,1.015625 -0.28125,0.3125 -0.625,0.375 -0.828125,0.375 -0.5625,0 -0.84375,-0.4375 -0.90625,-0.578125 z m 0,0"
+               id="id-4af5c0da-21a6-4e0f-9d23-fa195b2e87bd" />
+          </g>
+          <g
+             id="id-fce30794-b88c-48ff-93df-6fe5ed83278e">
+            <path
+               d="m 3.6875,-1.484375 c 0,-0.875 -0.75,-1.625 -1.703125,-1.625 -0.96875,0 -1.71875,0.75 -1.71875,1.625 0,0.859375 0.765625,1.546875 1.71875,1.546875 0.9375,0 1.703125,-0.6875 1.703125,-1.546875 z M 1.984375,-0.15625 c -0.265625,0 -0.640625,-0.078125 -0.875,-0.421875 -0.1875,-0.28125 -0.203125,-0.640625 -0.203125,-0.96875 0,-0.296875 0,-0.71875 0.25,-1.015625 0.171875,-0.203125 0.46875,-0.34375 0.828125,-0.34375 0.40625,0 0.703125,0.1875 0.859375,0.40625 0.1875,0.265625 0.203125,0.625 0.203125,0.953125 0,0.328125 -0.015625,0.703125 -0.21875,0.984375 -0.1875,0.265625 -0.5,0.40625 -0.84375,0.40625 z m 0,0"
+               id="id-554a3ca1-02eb-4757-9697-5db47f34222c" />
+          </g>
+          <g
+             id="id-5d9e2713-18ea-4cc9-9d14-0f443424a8fd">
+            <path
+               d="m 3.59375,-2.109375 c 0,-0.609375 -0.296875,-0.96875 -1.046875,-0.96875 -0.578125,0 -0.9375,0.3125 -1.140625,0.6875 v -0.6875 L 0.375,-3 v 0.25 c 0.46875,0 0.53125,0.046875 0.53125,0.390625 v 1.8125 C 0.90625,-0.25 0.828125,-0.25 0.375,-0.25 V 0 C 0.390625,0 0.875,-0.03125 1.171875,-0.03125 1.421875,-0.03125 1.90625,0 1.96875,0 v -0.25 c -0.453125,0 -0.515625,0 -0.515625,-0.296875 V -1.8125 c 0,-0.71875 0.578125,-1.0625 1.03125,-1.0625 0.484375,0 0.546875,0.375 0.546875,0.734375 v 1.59375 C 3.03125,-0.25 2.96875,-0.25 2.515625,-0.25 V 0 C 2.53125,0 3.015625,-0.03125 3.3125,-0.03125 3.5625,-0.03125 4.046875,0 4.109375,0 v -0.25 c -0.453125,0 -0.515625,0 -0.515625,-0.296875 z m 0,0"
+               id="id-d85b63ce-2f0b-4e8e-bcca-49a9c6631abf" />
+          </g>
+          <g
+             id="id-0731261e-da3c-4ab2-bafc-386097c75074">
+            <path
+               d="m 2.484375,-4.765625 v 0.25 C 2.953125,-4.515625 3,-4.453125 3,-4.125 v 1.453125 c -0.25,-0.25 -0.59375,-0.40625 -0.96875,-0.40625 -0.9375,0 -1.703125,0.703125 -1.703125,1.578125 0,0.875 0.734375,1.5625 1.609375,1.5625 0.578125,0 0.921875,-0.296875 1.03125,-0.421875 V 0.0625 L 4.046875,0 V -0.25 C 3.578125,-0.25 3.53125,-0.296875 3.53125,-0.640625 V -4.84375 Z m 0.484375,4.03125 C 2.796875,-0.40625 2.4375,-0.125 1.984375,-0.125 1.59375,-0.125 1.3125,-0.359375 1.171875,-0.5625 1.03125,-0.765625 0.953125,-1.046875 0.953125,-1.484375 c 0,-0.171875 0,-0.6875 0.28125,-1.015625 0.28125,-0.3125 0.625,-0.375 0.828125,-0.375 0.328125,0 0.640625,0.15625 0.828125,0.40625 0.078125,0.109375 0.078125,0.109375 0.078125,0.25 z m 0,0"
+               id="id-bbfaa1dc-f073-42e9-bf38-70fae209d971" />
+          </g>
+          <g
+             id="id-7a378a81-2bd4-4242-86f5-cd831191fe9c">
+            <path
+               d="m 2.640625,-2.921875 c 0,-0.125 0,-0.1875 -0.09375,-0.1875 -0.03125,0 -0.046875,0 -0.140625,0.078125 -0.015625,0.015625 -0.078125,0.078125 -0.125,0.109375 -0.21875,-0.140625 -0.46875,-0.1875 -0.734375,-0.1875 -1,0 -1.234375,0.53125 -1.234375,0.875 0,0.21875 0.09375,0.40625 0.265625,0.546875 0.265625,0.21875 0.53125,0.265625 0.96875,0.34375 0.34375,0.0625 0.90625,0.15625 0.90625,0.625 0,0.265625 -0.1875,0.59375 -0.859375,0.59375 -0.671875,0 -0.90625,-0.4375 -1.03125,-0.90625 -0.03125,-0.09375 -0.03125,-0.125 -0.125,-0.125 -0.125,0 -0.125,0.046875 -0.125,0.1875 v 0.859375 C 0.3125,0 0.3125,0.0625 0.40625,0.0625 0.46875,0.0625 0.609375,-0.078125 0.75,-0.234375 1.046875,0.0625 1.421875,0.0625 1.59375,0.0625 c 0.90625,0 1.25,-0.484375 1.25,-0.96875 0,-0.265625 -0.125,-0.484375 -0.3125,-0.640625 -0.265625,-0.25 -0.578125,-0.3125 -0.828125,-0.34375 -0.546875,-0.109375 -1,-0.1875 -1,-0.5625 0,-0.21875 0.1875,-0.484375 0.84375,-0.484375 0.8125,0 0.84375,0.5625 0.859375,0.765625 0,0.078125 0.09375,0.078125 0.109375,0.078125 0.125,0 0.125,-0.046875 0.125,-0.1875 z m 0,0"
+               id="id-b701ad33-8d4e-4863-8e86-e84c36d8ece6" />
+          </g>
+          <g
+             id="id-f0a22931-731b-4b10-8558-cd2cd499893c" />
+          <g
+             id="id-475a237f-b97f-4e51-b21b-e21ed69ff00a">
+            <path
+               d="m 3.8125,-0.984375 c 0.640625,-0.65625 0.890625,-1.59375 0.890625,-1.65625 0,-0.09375 -0.078125,-0.09375 -0.109375,-0.09375 C 4.5,-2.734375 4.5,-2.71875 4.453125,-2.5625 4.328125,-2.109375 4.09375,-1.671875 3.796875,-1.296875 3.796875,-1.40625 3.78125,-1.875 3.765625,-1.9375 3.65625,-2.625 3.140625,-3.078125 2.4375,-3.078125 c -1.015625,0 -2,0.953125 -2,1.9375 0,0.640625 0.46875,1.203125 1.265625,1.203125 0.640625,0 1.21875,-0.28125 1.609375,-0.578125 0.171875,0.5 0.515625,0.578125 0.734375,0.578125 0.40625,0 0.65625,-0.328125 0.65625,-0.484375 C 4.703125,-0.5 4.609375,-0.5 4.578125,-0.5 c -0.09375,0 -0.109375,0.03125 -0.125,0.0625 -0.09375,0.265625 -0.3125,0.3125 -0.390625,0.3125 -0.09375,0 -0.21875,0 -0.25,-0.859375 z M 3.265625,-0.75 C 2.578125,-0.1875 2,-0.125 1.734375,-0.125 c -0.46875,0 -0.71875,-0.3125 -0.71875,-0.78125 0,-0.1875 0.09375,-0.953125 0.453125,-1.4375 C 1.796875,-2.765625 2.1875,-2.875 2.4375,-2.875 c 0.546875,0 0.71875,0.53125 0.765625,0.96875 0.046875,0.296875 0.03125,0.796875 0.0625,1.15625 z m 0,0"
+               id="id-24d5b206-0bb7-41d2-8c9b-2a0919af29f8" />
+          </g>
+          <g
+             id="id-ac5eeb4b-42cc-4ced-add7-6b7059350fa6">
+            <path
+               d="m 2.265625,-4.359375 c 0,-0.109375 -0.09375,-0.265625 -0.28125,-0.265625 -0.1875,0 -0.390625,0.1875 -0.390625,0.390625 0,0.109375 0.078125,0.265625 0.28125,0.265625 0.1875,0 0.390625,-0.203125 0.390625,-0.390625 z M 0.84375,-0.8125 c -0.03125,0.09375 -0.0625,0.171875 -0.0625,0.296875 0,0.328125 0.265625,0.578125 0.65625,0.578125 0.6875,0 1,-0.953125 1,-1.0625 0,-0.09375 -0.09375,-0.09375 -0.109375,-0.09375 -0.09375,0 -0.109375,0.046875 -0.140625,0.125 -0.15625,0.5625 -0.453125,0.84375 -0.734375,0.84375 -0.140625,0 -0.171875,-0.09375 -0.171875,-0.25 0,-0.15625 0.046875,-0.28125 0.109375,-0.4375 C 1.46875,-1 1.546875,-1.1875 1.609375,-1.375 1.671875,-1.546875 1.9375,-2.171875 1.953125,-2.265625 1.984375,-2.328125 2,-2.40625 2,-2.484375 2,-2.8125 1.71875,-3.078125 1.34375,-3.078125 0.640625,-3.078125 0.328125,-2.125 0.328125,-2 c 0,0.078125 0.09375,0.078125 0.125,0.078125 0.09375,0 0.09375,-0.03125 0.125,-0.109375 C 0.75,-2.625 1.0625,-2.875 1.3125,-2.875 c 0.109375,0 0.171875,0.046875 0.171875,0.234375 0,0.171875 -0.03125,0.265625 -0.203125,0.703125 z m 0,0"
+               id="id-3b035a0a-be9d-4cb0-8b3d-09d72c076571" />
+          </g>
+          <g
+             id="id-b91a2cba-8c45-47dd-a961-be09d7c6b260">
+            <path
+               d="M 3.0625,-4.359375 C 3.0625,-4.46875 2.96875,-4.625 2.78125,-4.625 c -0.203125,0 -0.390625,0.203125 -0.390625,0.390625 0,0.109375 0.078125,0.265625 0.28125,0.265625 0.1875,0 0.390625,-0.1875 0.390625,-0.390625 z M 1.578125,0.34375 C 1.46875,0.828125 1.09375,1.21875 0.6875,1.21875 c -0.09375,0 -0.171875,0 -0.25,-0.03125 0.171875,-0.09375 0.234375,-0.25 0.234375,-0.359375 0,-0.171875 -0.140625,-0.25 -0.28125,-0.25 C 0.1875,0.578125 0,0.765625 0,0.984375 c 0,0.265625 0.265625,0.4375 0.6875,0.4375 0.421875,0 1.234375,-0.25 1.453125,-1.09375 l 0.625,-2.5 c 0.015625,-0.078125 0.03125,-0.140625 0.03125,-0.25 0,-0.375 -0.328125,-0.65625 -0.734375,-0.65625 -0.78125,0 -1.21875,0.96875 -1.21875,1.078125 0,0.078125 0.09375,0.078125 0.109375,0.078125 0.078125,0 0.09375,-0.015625 0.140625,-0.125 C 1.265625,-2.453125 1.625,-2.875 2.03125,-2.875 c 0.171875,0 0.234375,0.109375 0.234375,0.34375 0,0.078125 0,0.171875 -0.015625,0.203125 z m 0,0"
+               id="id-cbffe1d3-6742-40c3-a02e-aa301d1dc154" />
+          </g>
+        </g>
+      </defs>
+      <g
+         fill="#000000"
+         fill-opacity="1"
+         id="id-2b7d5409-999f-49e7-a5a4-aba3d8608d25"
+         transform="translate(-271.545, -137.255)">
+        <g
+           transform="translate(271.154, 146.72)"
+           id="g4252">
+          <path
+             d="M 7.609375,-6.046875 C 7.703125,-6.40625 7.71875,-6.5 8.4375,-6.5 c 0.265625,0 0.34375,0 0.34375,-0.203125 0,-0.109375 -0.109375,-0.109375 -0.140625,-0.109375 -0.28125,0 -1,0.03125 -1.28125,0.03125 -0.28125,0 -0.984375,-0.03125 -1.28125,-0.03125 -0.078125,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.203125 0,0.109375 0.09375,0.109375 0.28125,0.109375 0.015625,0 0.203125,0 0.375,0.015625 0.1875,0.03125 0.265625,0.03125 0.265625,0.171875 0,0.03125 0,0.046875 -0.03125,0.1875 L 6.1875,-3.703125 H 3.140625 l 0.59375,-2.34375 C 3.8125,-6.40625 3.84375,-6.5 4.5625,-6.5 c 0.265625,0 0.34375,0 0.34375,-0.203125 0,-0.109375 -0.109375,-0.109375 -0.140625,-0.109375 -0.28125,0 -1,0.03125 -1.28125,0.03125 -0.28125,0 -0.984375,-0.03125 -1.28125,-0.03125 -0.078125,0 -0.1875,0 -0.1875,0.203125 0,0.109375 0.09375,0.109375 0.28125,0.109375 0.015625,0 0.203125,0 0.375,0.015625 0.171875,0.03125 0.265625,0.03125 0.265625,0.171875 0,0.03125 0,0.0625 -0.03125,0.1875 L 1.5625,-0.78125 c -0.09375,0.390625 -0.109375,0.46875 -0.90625,0.46875 -0.171875,0 -0.265625,0 -0.265625,0.203125 C 0.390625,0 0.515625,0 0.53125,0 0.8125,0 1.515625,-0.03125 1.796875,-0.03125 2,-0.03125 2.21875,-0.015625 2.4375,-0.015625 2.65625,-0.015625 2.875,0 3.078125,0 3.15625,0 3.28125,0 3.28125,-0.203125 3.28125,-0.3125 3.1875,-0.3125 3,-0.3125 c -0.375,0 -0.640625,0 -0.640625,-0.171875 0,-0.0625 0.015625,-0.109375 0.015625,-0.171875 l 0.6875,-2.734375 h 3.03125 c -0.40625,1.65625 -0.640625,2.609375 -0.6875,2.75 C 5.3125,-0.3125 5.125,-0.3125 4.5,-0.3125 c -0.140625,0 -0.234375,0 -0.234375,0.203125 C 4.265625,0 4.390625,0 4.40625,0 4.6875,0 5.390625,-0.03125 5.671875,-0.03125 5.875,-0.03125 6.09375,-0.015625 6.3125,-0.015625 6.53125,-0.015625 6.75,0 6.953125,0 7.03125,0 7.15625,0 7.15625,-0.203125 7.15625,-0.3125 7.0625,-0.3125 6.875,-0.3125 c -0.359375,0 -0.640625,0 -0.640625,-0.171875 0,-0.0625 0.015625,-0.109375 0.03125,-0.171875 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-b1e0ecbb-5255-4f7e-b75c-a2e0f30c2857" />
+        </g>
+      </g>
+      <g
+         fill="#000000"
+         fill-opacity="1"
+         id="id-21852d84-b132-4a7f-bc38-c1359fc424fb"
+         transform="translate(-271.545, -137.255)">
+        <g
+           transform="translate(283.012, 146.72)"
+           id="g4256">
+          <path
+             d="m 6.84375,-3.265625 c 0.15625,0 0.34375,0 0.34375,-0.1875 C 7.1875,-3.65625 7,-3.65625 6.859375,-3.65625 h -5.96875 c -0.140625,0 -0.328125,0 -0.328125,0.203125 0,0.1875 0.1875,0.1875 0.328125,0.1875 z m 0.015625,1.9375 c 0.140625,0 0.328125,0 0.328125,-0.203125 0,-0.1875 -0.1875,-0.1875 -0.34375,-0.1875 H 0.890625 c -0.140625,0 -0.328125,0 -0.328125,0.1875 0,0.203125 0.1875,0.203125 0.328125,0.203125 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-84f794b2-f20b-48d0-afe0-781692e7cb64" />
+        </g>
+      </g>
+      <g
+         fill="#000000"
+         fill-opacity="1"
+         id="id-40f93a39-9b58-45d8-9d0e-5cf25d152957"
+         transform="translate(-271.545, -137.255)">
+        <g
+           transform="translate(296.604, 137.255)"
+           id="g4260">
+          <path
+             d="m 12.625,13.953125 1.203125,-3.1875 h -0.25 c -0.390625,1.03125 -1.453125,1.71875 -2.59375,2.015625 -0.203125,0.04687 -1.1875,0.3125 -3.09375,0.3125 H 1.875 L 6.953125,7.140625 C 7.015625,7.0625 7.03125,7.03125 7.03125,6.984375 c 0,-0.03125 0,-0.0625 -0.0625,-0.15625 L 2.328125,0.484375 H 7.78125 c 1.34375,0 2.25,0.140625 2.34375,0.15625 0.53125,0.078125 1.40625,0.25 2.1875,0.75 0.25,0.15625 0.921875,0.609375 1.265625,1.40625 h 0.25 L 12.625,0 H 0.84375 c -0.234375,0 -0.25,0.015625 -0.28125,0.0625 0,0.03125 0,0.234375 0,0.34375 l 5.265625,7.203125 -5.15625,6.0625 C 0.5625,13.78125 0.5625,13.84375 0.5625,13.84375 c 0,0.109375 0.09375,0.109375 0.28125,0.109375 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-d04fb40e-92cc-4199-b877-dce78cb3eed4" />
+        </g>
+      </g>
+      <g
+         fill="#000000"
+         fill-opacity="1"
+         id="id-33f4c594-fdfa-4b4e-b685-4337ec83c29f"
+         transform="translate(-271.545, -137.255)">
+        <g
+           transform="translate(293.528, 158.703)"
+           id="g4264">
+          <path
+             d="M 1.390625,-4.84375 0.34375,-4.765625 v 0.25 c 0.46875,0 0.515625,0.0625 0.515625,0.40625 V 0 H 1.09375 l 0.25,-0.421875 C 1.609375,-0.078125 2,0.0625 2.359375,0.0625 3.28125,0.0625 4.0625,-0.625 4.0625,-1.5 c 0,-0.859375 -0.703125,-1.578125 -1.625,-1.578125 -0.421875,0 -0.796875,0.171875 -1.046875,0.421875 z m 0.03125,2.515625 C 1.609375,-2.65625 1.984375,-2.875 2.40625,-2.875 c 0.390625,0 0.671875,0.21875 0.8125,0.421875 0.140625,0.203125 0.21875,0.484375 0.21875,0.9375 0,0.15625 0,0.6875 -0.28125,1.015625 -0.28125,0.3125 -0.625,0.375 -0.828125,0.375 -0.5625,0 -0.84375,-0.4375 -0.90625,-0.578125 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-4988c89a-5483-4686-899d-d0f1802509dc" />
+        </g>
+      </g>
+      <g
+         fill="#000000"
+         fill-opacity="1"
+         id="id-85c24b01-3187-45fa-9e7e-62675b2f813a"
+         transform="translate(-271.545, -137.255)">
+        <g
+           transform="translate(298.145, 158.703)"
+           id="g4268">
+          <path
+             d="m 3.6875,-1.484375 c 0,-0.875 -0.75,-1.625 -1.703125,-1.625 -0.96875,0 -1.71875,0.75 -1.71875,1.625 0,0.859375 0.765625,1.546875 1.71875,1.546875 0.9375,0 1.703125,-0.6875 1.703125,-1.546875 z M 1.984375,-0.15625 c -0.265625,0 -0.640625,-0.078125 -0.875,-0.421875 -0.1875,-0.28125 -0.203125,-0.640625 -0.203125,-0.96875 0,-0.296875 0,-0.71875 0.25,-1.015625 0.171875,-0.203125 0.46875,-0.34375 0.828125,-0.34375 0.40625,0 0.703125,0.1875 0.859375,0.40625 0.1875,0.265625 0.203125,0.625 0.203125,0.953125 0,0.328125 -0.015625,0.703125 -0.21875,0.984375 -0.1875,0.265625 -0.5,0.40625 -0.84375,0.40625 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-fe49798b-5923-466a-9986-04b6f803bac3" />
+        </g>
+        <g
+           transform="translate(302.116, 158.703)"
+           id="g4271">
+          <path
+             d="m 3.59375,-2.109375 c 0,-0.609375 -0.296875,-0.96875 -1.046875,-0.96875 -0.578125,0 -0.9375,0.3125 -1.140625,0.6875 v -0.6875 L 0.375,-3 v 0.25 c 0.46875,0 0.53125,0.046875 0.53125,0.390625 v 1.8125 C 0.90625,-0.25 0.828125,-0.25 0.375,-0.25 V 0 C 0.390625,0 0.875,-0.03125 1.171875,-0.03125 1.421875,-0.03125 1.90625,0 1.96875,0 v -0.25 c -0.453125,0 -0.515625,0 -0.515625,-0.296875 V -1.8125 c 0,-0.71875 0.578125,-1.0625 1.03125,-1.0625 0.484375,0 0.546875,0.375 0.546875,0.734375 v 1.59375 C 3.03125,-0.25 2.96875,-0.25 2.515625,-0.25 V 0 C 2.53125,0 3.015625,-0.03125 3.3125,-0.03125 3.5625,-0.03125 4.046875,0 4.109375,0 v -0.25 c -0.453125,0 -0.515625,0 -0.515625,-0.296875 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-9450d655-ffb8-442a-bf01-1cde625f5944" />
+        </g>
+        <g
+           transform="translate(306.517, 158.703)"
+           id="g4274">
+          <path
+             d="m 2.484375,-4.765625 v 0.25 C 2.953125,-4.515625 3,-4.453125 3,-4.125 v 1.453125 c -0.25,-0.25 -0.59375,-0.40625 -0.96875,-0.40625 -0.9375,0 -1.703125,0.703125 -1.703125,1.578125 0,0.875 0.734375,1.5625 1.609375,1.5625 0.578125,0 0.921875,-0.296875 1.03125,-0.421875 V 0.0625 L 4.046875,0 V -0.25 C 3.578125,-0.25 3.53125,-0.296875 3.53125,-0.640625 V -4.84375 Z m 0.484375,4.03125 C 2.796875,-0.40625 2.4375,-0.125 1.984375,-0.125 1.59375,-0.125 1.3125,-0.359375 1.171875,-0.5625 1.03125,-0.765625 0.953125,-1.046875 0.953125,-1.484375 c 0,-0.171875 0,-0.6875 0.28125,-1.015625 0.28125,-0.3125 0.625,-0.375 0.828125,-0.375 0.328125,0 0.640625,0.15625 0.828125,0.40625 0.078125,0.109375 0.078125,0.109375 0.078125,0.25 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-d15e35d5-31e7-4b35-bff5-76fbb4390eeb" />
+        </g>
+        <g
+           transform="translate(310.917, 158.703)"
+           id="g4277">
+          <path
+             d="m 2.640625,-2.921875 c 0,-0.125 0,-0.1875 -0.09375,-0.1875 -0.03125,0 -0.046875,0 -0.140625,0.078125 -0.015625,0.015625 -0.078125,0.078125 -0.125,0.109375 -0.21875,-0.140625 -0.46875,-0.1875 -0.734375,-0.1875 -1,0 -1.234375,0.53125 -1.234375,0.875 0,0.21875 0.09375,0.40625 0.265625,0.546875 0.265625,0.21875 0.53125,0.265625 0.96875,0.34375 0.34375,0.0625 0.90625,0.15625 0.90625,0.625 0,0.265625 -0.1875,0.59375 -0.859375,0.59375 -0.671875,0 -0.90625,-0.4375 -1.03125,-0.90625 -0.03125,-0.09375 -0.03125,-0.125 -0.125,-0.125 -0.125,0 -0.125,0.046875 -0.125,0.1875 v 0.859375 C 0.3125,0 0.3125,0.0625 0.40625,0.0625 0.46875,0.0625 0.609375,-0.078125 0.75,-0.234375 1.046875,0.0625 1.421875,0.0625 1.59375,0.0625 c 0.90625,0 1.25,-0.484375 1.25,-0.96875 0,-0.265625 -0.125,-0.484375 -0.3125,-0.640625 -0.265625,-0.25 -0.578125,-0.3125 -0.828125,-0.34375 -0.546875,-0.109375 -1,-0.1875 -1,-0.5625 0,-0.21875 0.1875,-0.484375 0.84375,-0.484375 0.8125,0 0.84375,0.5625 0.859375,0.765625 0,0.078125 0.09375,0.078125 0.109375,0.078125 0.125,0 0.125,-0.046875 0.125,-0.1875 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-11b19a5e-7932-4ed3-a23e-c944dcdb9bf1" />
+        </g>
+      </g>
+      <g
+         fill="#000000"
+         fill-opacity="1"
+         id="id-cb0ca3d1-00cb-477e-96f1-4dccf81f0d01"
+         transform="translate(-271.545, -137.255)">
+        <g
+           transform="translate(315.731, 146.72)"
+           id="g4281">
+          <path
+             d="M 5.390625,-6.078125 C 5.46875,-6.40625 5.5,-6.5 6.046875,-6.5 c 0.15625,0 0.265625,0 0.265625,-0.1875 0,-0.09375 -0.0625,-0.125 -0.140625,-0.125 -0.25,0 -0.859375,0.03125 -1.109375,0.03125 -0.328125,0 -1.140625,-0.03125 -1.46875,-0.03125 -0.078125,0 -0.203125,0 -0.203125,0.203125 C 3.390625,-6.5 3.46875,-6.5 3.734375,-6.5 c 0.21875,0 0.328125,0 0.578125,0.015625 0.234375,0.03125 0.296875,0.0625 0.296875,0.203125 0,0.0625 -0.015625,0.125 -0.03125,0.203125 L 3.421875,-1.5 C 3.1875,-0.53125 2.515625,0 2,0 1.734375,0 1.203125,-0.09375 1.046875,-0.625 c 0.03125,0.015625 0.09375,0.015625 0.125,0.015625 0.390625,0 0.640625,-0.34375 0.640625,-0.640625 0,-0.3125 -0.265625,-0.421875 -0.4375,-0.421875 -0.171875,0 -0.671875,0.125 -0.671875,0.796875 0,0.625 0.53125,1.09375 1.328125,1.09375 0.90625,0 1.953125,-0.65625 2.203125,-1.640625 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-bde5d580-e4c4-49f8-982c-5315c48eced7" />
+        </g>
+      </g>
+      <g
+         fill="#000000"
+         fill-opacity="1"
+         id="id-03ea3db0-7713-4bd0-800f-fdd45d676374"
+         transform="translate(-271.545, -137.255)">
+        <g
+           transform="translate(322.214, 142.606)"
+           id="g4285">
+          <path
+             d="m 3.8125,-0.984375 c 0.640625,-0.65625 0.890625,-1.59375 0.890625,-1.65625 0,-0.09375 -0.078125,-0.09375 -0.109375,-0.09375 C 4.5,-2.734375 4.5,-2.71875 4.453125,-2.5625 4.328125,-2.109375 4.09375,-1.671875 3.796875,-1.296875 3.796875,-1.40625 3.78125,-1.875 3.765625,-1.9375 3.65625,-2.625 3.140625,-3.078125 2.4375,-3.078125 c -1.015625,0 -2,0.953125 -2,1.9375 0,0.640625 0.46875,1.203125 1.265625,1.203125 0.640625,0 1.21875,-0.28125 1.609375,-0.578125 0.171875,0.5 0.515625,0.578125 0.734375,0.578125 0.40625,0 0.65625,-0.328125 0.65625,-0.484375 C 4.703125,-0.5 4.609375,-0.5 4.578125,-0.5 c -0.09375,0 -0.109375,0.03125 -0.125,0.0625 -0.09375,0.265625 -0.3125,0.3125 -0.390625,0.3125 -0.09375,0 -0.21875,0 -0.25,-0.859375 z M 3.265625,-0.75 C 2.578125,-0.1875 2,-0.125 1.734375,-0.125 c -0.46875,0 -0.71875,-0.3125 -0.71875,-0.78125 0,-0.1875 0.09375,-0.953125 0.453125,-1.4375 C 1.796875,-2.765625 2.1875,-2.875 2.4375,-2.875 c 0.546875,0 0.71875,0.53125 0.765625,0.96875 0.046875,0.296875 0.03125,0.796875 0.0625,1.15625 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-58c26191-597c-462b-827b-be42f38baa3e" />
+        </g>
+      </g>
+      <g
+         fill="#000000"
+         fill-opacity="1"
+         id="id-77e77f3d-45b8-41a3-b916-4e6dd5105206"
+         transform="translate(-271.545, -137.255)">
+        <g
+           transform="translate(327.891, 146.72)"
+           id="g4289">
+          <path
+             d="m 2.859375,-6.8125 c 0,0 0,-0.109375 -0.125,-0.109375 -0.234375,0 -0.953125,0.078125 -1.21875,0.109375 -0.078125,0 -0.1875,0.015625 -0.1875,0.1875 0,0.125 0.09375,0.125 0.234375,0.125 0.484375,0 0.5,0.0625 0.5,0.171875 L 2.03125,-6.125 0.59375,-0.390625 c -0.046875,0.140625 -0.046875,0.15625 -0.046875,0.21875 0,0.234375 0.203125,0.28125 0.296875,0.28125 0.125,0 0.265625,-0.09375 0.328125,-0.203125 0.046875,-0.09375 0.5,-1.9375 0.5625,-2.1875 0.34375,0.03125 1.15625,0.1875 1.15625,0.84375 0,0.078125 0,0.109375 -0.03125,0.21875 -0.015625,0.109375 -0.03125,0.234375 -0.03125,0.34375 0,0.578125 0.390625,0.984375 0.90625,0.984375 0.296875,0 0.578125,-0.15625 0.796875,-0.53125 0.25,-0.4375 0.359375,-0.984375 0.359375,-1 0,-0.109375 -0.09375,-0.109375 -0.125,-0.109375 -0.09375,0 -0.109375,0.046875 -0.140625,0.1875 -0.203125,0.71875 -0.421875,1.234375 -0.859375,1.234375 -0.203125,0 -0.328125,-0.109375 -0.328125,-0.46875 0,-0.171875 0.046875,-0.40625 0.078125,-0.5625 C 3.5625,-1.3125 3.5625,-1.34375 3.5625,-1.453125 3.5625,-2.09375 2.9375,-2.375 2.078125,-2.5 2.390625,-2.671875 2.71875,-2.984375 2.9375,-3.234375 3.421875,-3.765625 3.875,-4.1875 4.359375,-4.1875 c 0.0625,0 0.078125,0 0.09375,0.015625 0.125,0.015625 0.125,0.015625 0.21875,0.078125 0.015625,0 0.015625,0.015625 0.03125,0.03125 -0.46875,0.03125 -0.5625,0.421875 -0.5625,0.546875 0,0.15625 0.109375,0.34375 0.375,0.34375 0.265625,0 0.546875,-0.21875 0.546875,-0.609375 0,-0.296875 -0.234375,-0.625 -0.671875,-0.625 -0.28125,0 -0.734375,0.078125 -1.453125,0.875 -0.34375,0.375 -0.734375,0.78125 -1.109375,0.921875 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-90ca069f-5a26-4ac2-a12c-8fd9088a48da" />
+        </g>
+      </g>
+      <g
+         fill="#000000"
+         fill-opacity="1"
+         id="id-21191bf8-fcd9-48a4-9d36-d30403f6c9dc"
+         transform="translate(-271.545, -137.255)">
+        <g
+           transform="translate(333.078, 148.214)"
+           id="g4293">
+          <path
+             d="m 2.265625,-4.359375 c 0,-0.109375 -0.09375,-0.265625 -0.28125,-0.265625 -0.1875,0 -0.390625,0.1875 -0.390625,0.390625 0,0.109375 0.078125,0.265625 0.28125,0.265625 0.1875,0 0.390625,-0.203125 0.390625,-0.390625 z M 0.84375,-0.8125 c -0.03125,0.09375 -0.0625,0.171875 -0.0625,0.296875 0,0.328125 0.265625,0.578125 0.65625,0.578125 0.6875,0 1,-0.953125 1,-1.0625 0,-0.09375 -0.09375,-0.09375 -0.109375,-0.09375 -0.09375,0 -0.109375,0.046875 -0.140625,0.125 -0.15625,0.5625 -0.453125,0.84375 -0.734375,0.84375 -0.140625,0 -0.171875,-0.09375 -0.171875,-0.25 0,-0.15625 0.046875,-0.28125 0.109375,-0.4375 C 1.46875,-1 1.546875,-1.1875 1.609375,-1.375 1.671875,-1.546875 1.9375,-2.171875 1.953125,-2.265625 1.984375,-2.328125 2,-2.40625 2,-2.484375 2,-2.8125 1.71875,-3.078125 1.34375,-3.078125 0.640625,-3.078125 0.328125,-2.125 0.328125,-2 c 0,0.078125 0.09375,0.078125 0.125,0.078125 0.09375,0 0.09375,-0.03125 0.125,-0.109375 C 0.75,-2.625 1.0625,-2.875 1.3125,-2.875 c 0.109375,0 0.171875,0.046875 0.171875,0.234375 0,0.171875 -0.03125,0.265625 -0.203125,0.703125 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-b2ae4509-c49d-4190-a0bd-c0c97146b6b4" />
+        </g>
+        <g
+           transform="translate(335.897, 148.214)"
+           id="g4296">
+          <path
+             d="M 3.0625,-4.359375 C 3.0625,-4.46875 2.96875,-4.625 2.78125,-4.625 c -0.203125,0 -0.390625,0.203125 -0.390625,0.390625 0,0.109375 0.078125,0.265625 0.28125,0.265625 0.1875,0 0.390625,-0.1875 0.390625,-0.390625 z M 1.578125,0.34375 C 1.46875,0.828125 1.09375,1.21875 0.6875,1.21875 c -0.09375,0 -0.171875,0 -0.25,-0.03125 0.171875,-0.09375 0.234375,-0.25 0.234375,-0.359375 0,-0.171875 -0.140625,-0.25 -0.28125,-0.25 C 0.1875,0.578125 0,0.765625 0,0.984375 c 0,0.265625 0.265625,0.4375 0.6875,0.4375 0.421875,0 1.234375,-0.25 1.453125,-1.09375 l 0.625,-2.5 c 0.015625,-0.078125 0.03125,-0.140625 0.03125,-0.25 0,-0.375 -0.328125,-0.65625 -0.734375,-0.65625 -0.78125,0 -1.21875,0.96875 -1.21875,1.078125 0,0.078125 0.09375,0.078125 0.109375,0.078125 0.078125,0 0.09375,-0.015625 0.140625,-0.125 C 1.265625,-2.453125 1.625,-2.875 2.03125,-2.875 c 0.171875,0 0.234375,0.109375 0.234375,0.34375 0,0.078125 0,0.171875 -0.015625,0.203125 z m 0,0"
+             id="id-c4ae31ba-932a-4ddf-846e-3aa4740aee20" />
+        </g>
+      </g>
+    </g>
   </g>
   <g
      inkscape:groupmode="layer"