--- title: Background - The Kitaev Honeycomb Model excerpt: layout: none image: --- Background - The Kitaev Honeycomb Model {% capture tableOfContents %}
{% endcapture %} {% include header.html extra=tableOfContents %}

The Kitaev Honeycomb Model

papers Jos on dynamics https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.115127

intro - strong spin orbit coupling leads to anisotropic spin exchange (as opposed to isotropic exchange like the Heisenberg model) - geometrical frustration leads to QSL ground state with long range entanglement (not simple paramagnet)

The Model

Figure 1: (a) The standard Kitaev model is defined on a honeycomb lattice. The special feature of the honeycomb lattice that makes the model solvable is that each vertex is joined by exactly three bonds, i.e. the lattice is trivalent. One of three labels is assigned to each (b). We represent the antisymmetric gauge degree of freedom u_{jk} = \pm 1 with arrows that point in the direction u_{jk} = +1 (c). The Majorana transformation can be visualised as breaking each spin into four Majoranas which then pair along the bonds. The pairs of x,y and z Majoranas become part of the classical \mathbb{Z}_2 gauge field u_{ij}. This leavies a single Majorana c_i per site.
  • strong spin orbit coupling yields spatial anisotropic spin exchange leading to compass models  [1]
  • spin model of the Kitaev model is one
  • has extensively many conserved fluxes

A mapping to Majorana Fermions

Gauge Fields

Anyons, Topology and the Chern number

Phase Diagram

Bibliography

[1]
K. I. Kugel’ and D. I. Khomskiĭ, The Jahn-Teller Effect and Magnetism: Transition Metal Compounds, Sov. Phys. Usp. 25, 231 (1982).